Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/16422
標題: On the effect of seismic evaluation for vertical stiffness irregularity of school buildings
立面勁度不規則對校舍耐震能力評估值的影響
作者: 梁博舜
Liang, Bo-Shun
關鍵字: 立面勁度不規則性
the structure of the demo files provided highlight the irregularity of the facade strength
主控模態側推法
側推力迭代法
the master mode
lateral force iteration
出版社: 土木工程學系所
引用: 1. Freeman, S.A., Nicoletti, J.P., and Tyrell, J.V., “Evaluations of Existiong Buildings for Seismic Risk – A Case Study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington”, National Earthquake Conference, Berkeley, pp.113-122, 1975. 2. Applied Technology Council(ATC), Seismic Evalution and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Vol. 1, ATC-40, Redwood City, CA, 1996. 3. FEMA-273, NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehailitation fo Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1997. 4. Sezen, H. and Moehle, J.P., “Shear strength model for lightly reinforced concrete columns”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 130, NO. 11, 1692~1703, 2004. 5. 國家地震中心,「雲林縣口湖國小校舍現地試驗之材料取樣檢測與結構配筋圖重建」,國立雲林科技大學營建材料檢測中心,報告編號:EM05-00362,2005年。 6. 葉勇凱、蕭輔沛、林金祿,「耐震詳評之ETABS推垮分析」,校舍之耐震評估與補強講習會,臺北,2005年。 7. ]葉勇凱、蕭輔沛,「建築結構耐震能力詳細評估法—以消防廳舍為例」,鋼筋混凝土建築耐震能力評估研討會論文集,臺北,2006年。 8. 蕭輔沛、葉勇凱、林金祿,「校舍建築之耐震能力詳細評估與試驗驗證」,中華民國第八屆結構工程研討會論文集,南投,2006年。 9. 蕭輔沛、葉勇凱、曾至堅,「建築物耐震詳細評估方法之研究(一)」,國家地震工程研究中心報告,編號NCREE-07-049,臺北,2007年。 10. 施俊揚,垂直勁度不規則性對建築物基本振動週期與樓層剪力之影響,國立台灣科技大學,碩士論文,2002年。 11. FEMA-440, Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 2004. 12. Elwood, K.J., and Moehle, J.P., “Axial capacity model for shear damaged columns”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 102, No. 4, 578-587, 2005. 13. Elwood, K.J., and Moehle, J.P., “Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 21, No. 1, 71-89, 2005. 14. ACI Committee318(2005). Building code requirements for structural concrete(ACI 318-05) and commentary(ACI 318R-05). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI. 15. ASCE 41-06, Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings by American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 2006. 16. 日本建築學會,「鐵筋コソクリ一ト造建物の耐震性能評価指針(案)‧同解說(Guidelines for Performance Evaluation of Earthquake Resistant Reinforced Concrete Buildings(Draft))」,日本建築學會,2004 年。 17. 涂耀賢,「低矮型RC 牆暨構架之側向載重位移曲線預測研究」,國立台灣科技大學營建工程研究所博士論文,黃世建教授指導,2005 年。 18. 內政部,「建築物磚構造設計及施工規範」,台北,2008 年。 19. 內政部,「建築物耐震設計規範及解說」,台北,2006年。 20. Chopra, A.K., “Dynamics of Structures—Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering”, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1999. 21. 內政部建築研究所,「鋼筋混凝土建築物耐震能力評估法及推廣」,台北,1999年。 22. 內政部營建署,「結構混凝土設計規範」, 1992年。 23. 台灣邁達斯股份有限公司,「校舍耐震能力詳細評估之NCREE for MIDAS Gen操作應用範例」,台北,2009年 24. 國家地震中心,「MIDAS Gen 耐震詳細評估輔助分析程式使用說明」,台北,2009年 25. Mayhaney, J.A., Freeman, S.A., Paret, T.F., and Kehoe, B.E., “The Capacity Spectrum Method of Evaluating Structural Response During the Loma Prieta Earthquake”, National Earthquake Conference, Memphis, pp.501~510, 1993. 26. CSI, “ETABS: Extended 3D analysis of building systems, Nonlinear Version 8.5.4”, User’s Manual, Computer and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California, 1999. 27. 陳奕信,「含磚牆RC建築結構之耐震診斷」,國立成功大學建築研究所博士論文,許茂雄教授指導,2003年。
摘要: During the process of constructing school building, it usually employs the patchwork approach to expand the magnitude of the school which originally resulted from incomplete overall planning. And this causes the irregularity found in the building's façade quality as well as the strength and eventually renders its model shape not presented in a linear distribution format. As well all know the professional engineering staff, while in the process of conducting seismic analysis and capacity evaluation, tends to use assistant programs provided by NCREE. And in doing so, the program that computes the performance curve would treat the modal of the building as linear distribution close to the first modal as input; therefore, it could have misjudged the seismic assessment value for that building. The aim of this thesis, by going through case studies, has the structure of the demo files provided by NCREE altered so as to highlight the irregularity of the facade strength. At the same token, by targeting to the activity center of a certain elementary school, this thesis conducts analysis as result. From the findings of the analysis one can learn that, by using the NCREE flow process, one can acquire the maximum assessment value in the seismic capability. Suppose the way to apply the lateral force would adopt the lateral push for the master mode or lateral force iteration, and the seismic ability values acquired from these two approaches would be relatively close to each other. Moreover, these two values would be more conservative and rational than those acquired from NCREE flow process. Meanwhile, regarding to the choices for displacement monitoring points, since the mass on the top floor of activity center would be lighter as opposed to the heavier mass at the ground floor, therefore, in order to avoid the scenario that the partition for that of lighter mass is not adequate to represent the mass for the whole building, it should set the displacement monitoring points at floors with heavier mass.
在校舍興建過程中因整體規劃不完整,常常以拼湊的方式擴充學校規模。而導致建築物在立面質量、勁度的不規則性,使其模態並非以線性分佈呈現。而專業工程人員在進行建築物耐震能力分析評估中使用NCREE所提供之輔助程式,其中計算性能曲線程式是將建築物之模態以線性分佈近似第一模態來輸入,如此便會錯估建築物之耐震能力評估值。 本文旨在透過案例分析,將NCREE所提供之示範例檔案改變其結構,以凸顯立面勁度不規則性,同時針對某一小學之活動中心進行分析。從分析結果得知,使用NCREE流程所得出之耐震能力評估值為最大,若側力施加方式採用主控模態側推法或側推力迭代法此兩者所得之耐震能力評估值較為接近,且此兩者之耐震能力評估值皆比NCREE流程所得出之耐震能力評估值評估值較來的保守且合理。同時關於位移監控點的選擇,由於活動中心之頂層質量較小而底層樓板有較大的質量,為避免質量較小之隔板不足以代表該樓層之質量,應將位移監控點設於有較大質量之樓層。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/16422
其他識別: U0005-1208201112342200
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-1208201112342200
Appears in Collections:土木工程學系所

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.