Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/16430
標題: On the Effect of Seismic Evaluation for In-plane deformation of school building's floor
樓版變形特性對校舍耐震能力評估值的影響
作者: Huang, Shu-Tse
黃書澤
關鍵字: 剛性樓版
rigid diaphragm
柔性樓版
耐震評估
側推分析
flexible diaphragm
seismic evaluation
pushover
出版社: 土木工程學系所
引用: 1.J.A.Blume,R.L.Sharpe and E.Elsesser,”A Structural Dynamic Investigation of Fifteen School Buildings Suject to Simulated Earthquake Motion”,Division of Arch.,California State Printing Division Sacramento,1961 2.J.E.Goldberg,E.D.Herness,”Vibration of Multistory Buildings Considering Floor and Wall Deformations”,Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,Vol.55,No.1,Feb.,1965,pp.181-200 3.J.S.Maybee,J.E.Goldber and E.D.Herness,”Dynamics of Separable Multistory Buildings”,Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division,ASCE,Vol.92,No.EM2,Apr.1966 4.K.Muto,”A seismic Design Analysis of Buildings”,Maruzen,LTD.,Tokyo,1974,pp.241-269 5.A.L.Unemori,J.M.Roesset,J.M.Becker,”Effect of In-plane Floor Slab Flexibility on the Response of Cross-wall Building System”,Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Wind and Earthquake Force,ACI Publication sp-63,1980,pp.113-134 6.M.Nakashima,T.Huang,L.w.Lu,”Experimential Study of Beam-Suppoted Slabs under In-plane Loading”,ACI Joural Vol.79,No.1,Jan/Feb.,1982,pp.59-65 7.M.Nakashima,T.Huang,L.w.Lu,”Effect of Diaphragm Flexibility on Seismic Response of Building Structure”,Proceeding of the 8-th World Conference on Earthquake(San Francisco),1984,pp735-742 8.S.K.Jain,”Seismic Response of Builiding with Flexible Floors”,Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division,ASEC,Vol.110,No.1,Jan.,1984,pp.125-129 9.S.K.Jain,”Continuum Models for Dynamics of Buildings”,Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division,ASEC,Vol.110,No.12,Dec.,1984,pp.1713-1730 10.S.K.Jain,P.C.Jennings,”Continuum Models for Frame and Shear-Wall Buildings with Flexible Floors”,Proceeding of the 8-th World Conference on Earthquake(San Francisco),1984,pp.743-750 11.S.K.Jain,P.C.Jennings,”Analytical Models for Low-rise Buildings with Flexible Floor Diaphragms”,Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,Vol.13,1985,pp.225-241 12.S.K.Jain,R.Sharma,”Dynamic Response of a Setback Building with a Flexible Floor Diaphragm”,Proceeding of the 9-th World Conference on Earthquake(Tokyo-Kyoto),1988,pp.479-484 13.S.K.Jain,”Dynamic Analysis of Buildings with Flexible Floor Diaphragm”,International Jal. Of Structure(India),1988,pp.71-93 14.S.C.Roper,R.H.Iding,”Approximation of the Rigid Floor Assumption for Buildings with Irregular Features”,Proceeding of the 8-th World Conference on Earthquake(San Francisco),1984,pp.751-758 15.龐海鯤,”考慮樓版非剛性體對結構型為的影響”,國立成功大學土木研究所碩士論文,民國74年 16.鄭恆立,”考慮樓版柔性對高樓結構水平地震力之影響”,國立成功大學土木研究所碩士論文,民國78年 17.S.J.Chen,Ti Huang,and Le-wu Lu,”Diaphragm Behavior of R/C floor Slab”,Proceeding of 9-th ECEE,1988,pp.565-569 18.王隆,”考慮樓版平面外勁度對高樓結構地震反應之影響”,國立成功大學土木研究所碩士論文,民國79年 19.蔡坤晉,”樓版柔性對不同結構平面高樓地震反應之影響”,國立成功大學土木研究所碩士論文,民國81年 20.Saffarinirini,H.S.,and M,M.Qudaimat,”In-plane floor deformations in RC structures,”ASCE,J. of structural Engineering,1993,Vol.118,No.11,pp.3089-3e4 21.Freeman,S.A. , Nicoletti ,J.P. ,and Tyrell, J.V.,”Evaluations of Existiong Buildings for Seismic Risk -A Case Study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington”,National Earthquake Conference,pp.113-122,1975 22.內政部營建署,「結構混凝土設計規範」,1992年 23.Applied Technology Council (ATC),Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings,Vol.1,ATC-40,Redwood City,CA,1996 24.Mayhaney,J.A.,Freeman,S.A.,Paret,T.F.,and Kehoe,B.E.,”The Capacity Spectrum Method of Evaluating Structural Response During the Loma Prieta Earthquake”,National Earthquake Conference,Memphis,pp.501-510,1993 25.FEMA-273,NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic Rehailitation for Buildings,Federal Emergency Management Agency,Washington,D.C.,1997 26.曾凱瀚,「磚礅與磚牆基本力學性質試驗研究」,國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文,許茂雄、蔡萬傳教授指導,1994年 27.CSI,”ETABS;Extended 3D analysis of building systems, Nonlinear Version 8.5.4”,User’s Manual,Computer and Structures,Inc.,Berkeley,California,1999 28.陳奕信,「含磚牆RC建築結構之耐震診斷」,國立成功大學建築研究所博士論文,許茂雄教授指導,2003年 29.Sezen,H. and Moehle,J.P.,”Shear strength model for lightly reinforced concrete columns”,Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,Vol.130,No.11,1692-1703,2004 30.國家地震中心,「雲林縣口湖國小校舍現地試驗之材料取樣檢測與結構配筋圖重建」,國立雲林科技大學營建材料檢測中心,報告編號:E05-00362,2005年 31.葉勇凱、蕭輔沛、林金祿,「耐震詳評之ETABS推垮分析」,校舍之耐震評估與補強講習會,台北,2005年。 32.葉勇凱、蕭輔沛,「建築結構耐震能力詳細評估法-以消防廳舍為例」,鋼筋混凝土建築耐震能力評估研討會論文集,台北,2006年 33.蕭輔沛、葉勇凱、林金祿,「校舍建築之耐震能力詳細評估與試驗驗證」,中華民國第八屆結構工程研討會論文集,南投,2006年 34.蕭輔沛、葉勇凱、曾至堅,「建築物耐震詳細評估發法之研究(一)」,國家地震工程研究中心報告,編號NCREE-07-049,台北,2007年 35.FEMA-440,Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures,Federal Emergency Management Agency,Washington,D.C.,2004 36.內政部,「建築物耐震設計規範及解說」,台北,2006 年。 37.Elwood, K. J., and Moehle, J. P., “Axial capacity model for shear damaged columns,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 102, No. 4, 578-587, 2005. 38.Elwood, K. J., and Moehle, J. P., “Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 21,No. 1, 71-89, 2005. 39.ACI Committee 318, Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI318-05) and commentary (ACI 318R-05). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005. 40.ASCE 41-06, Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings by American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 2006. 41.日本建築學會,「鐵筋コソクリ一ト造建物の耐震性能評価指針(案)‧同解說(Guidelines for Performance Evaluation of Earthquake Resistant Reinforced Concrete Buildings(Draft))」,日本建築學會,2004 年。 42.涂耀賢,「低矮型RC 牆暨構架之側向載重位移曲線預測研究」,國立台灣科技大學營建工程研究所博士論文,黃世建教授指導,2005 年。 43.內政部,「建築物磚構造設計及施工規範」,台北,2008 年。 44.台灣邁達斯股份有限公司,「校舍耐震能力詳細評估之NCREE for MIDAS Gen操作應用範例」,台北,2009年 45.國家地震中心,「MIDAS Gen 耐震詳細評估輔助分析程式使用說明」,台北,2009年
摘要: This article is about the research of rigid diaphragm and flexible diaphragm. The main idea is to discuss the effect in seismic evaluation for school building. The shear deformation of floor and mass of school building when sustaining earthquake are frequently overlooked when performing school building seismic evaluation in Taiwan. This results in the misestimate when assessing aseismatic reinforced school buildings. Therefore, school buildings with obvious flexible diaphragm deformation such as: school building of linear shape, school building of L-shape and school building of linear shape and L-shape with shear wall reinforcement were chosen in this article to compare the different assumption between rigid diaphragm and flexible diaphragm. Also, considering whether or not taking 1/2 live load into consideration to see if it make any differences toward seismic evaluation. The result of this research shows that the difference value of seismic evaluation in shear deformation of floor with different length of linear shape do not have obvious difference. On the other hand, the value of seismic evaluation appear to be lower when taking floor mass with 1/2 live load into consideration. As a result, the article suggests that it is proper to consider the buildings with obvious shear deformation as a flexible diaphragm when performing seismic evaluation.
在校舍耐震評估中,往往忽略樓版剪力變形特性以及低估校舍受震時的質量,使得補強校舍之耐震能力評估值可能會被錯估。因此,本文採用柔性樓版變形特性顯著之校舍模式:較長一字型校舍、L型校舍、以剪力牆補強之一字型校舍及L型校舍,來討論剛性樓版與柔性樓版的假設條件及是否採計1/2設計活載於校舍質量中,對於耐震能力評估值的差異。 結果顯示,在不同長度之一字型校舍,考慮及不考慮樓版的剪力變形其耐震能力差異不大。但是,L型校舍、以剪力牆補強之一字型校舍及L型校舍當以柔性樓版為假設條件時,其耐震能力評估值較剛性樓版假設者為低。另外,在耐震能力分析中若考慮採計1/2設計活載重於校舍質量時,其耐震能力評估值比不考慮者為低。 因此本文建議在樓版剪力變形特性顯著之校舍,應以柔性樓版假設分析其耐震能力評估值較保守。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/16430
其他識別: U0005-1408201112281000
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-1408201112281000
Appears in Collections:土木工程學系所

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.