Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/18798
標題: 中國上市公司財務報表品質之探討:以中國股權分置改革論析
The Association between Nontradable Share Reform and Financial Reporting Quality in China
作者: 呂碧玉
Lu, Pi-Yu
關鍵字: 關鍵詞:股權分置改革
Key words: Full Circulation Reforms(FCR)
股權結構
組織環境
會計資訊品質
Ownership Structure
Institutional Features
Quality of Accounting Information
出版社: 會計學研究所
引用: 中文部分 丁美方、王鵬和朱權森,2006,股權分置改革公司經營業績對其對價支付水平影響的實證分析,交通財會,第229期,第53-55頁。 呂長江和王克敏,2002,上市公司股利政策的實證分析,經濟研究,第12期,第31-39頁。 林俊颉和羅靖霖,2007,中國股改效應之初步觀察,中國股市專題, 4-22。 俞喬和程瀅,2001,我國公司紅利政策與股市波動,經濟研究,第4期,第32-40頁。 徐志文,2010,不同公司型態下和股權分置改革前後所有權結構和資本結構關係之研究-以中國上市公司為例,國立中央大學企管管理研究學系碩士論文。 陳浪南和姚正春,2000,我國股利政策信號傳遞作用的實證研究,金融研究,第10期,第69-77頁。 張簡麗萍,2005,內部人持股比例變動與經營績效關連性之研究,國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。 惲碧琰,2010,股權分置改革對上市公司治理的影響,統計與決策,第12期,第186-188頁。 靳慶魯和原紅旗,2006,公司治理與股權分置改革對價的確定,上海財經大學會計與財務研究院未出版論文。 蔡佩雯,2006,中國股權分置改革及股東權益之研究,國立臺灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文。 譚利與陳琪華,2009,股權分置改革下對股權結構與公司績效的實證研究,中國管理信息化,第12期,第37-40頁。 二、西文部份 Aharony, J., C. W. J. Lee and T. J. Wong. 2000. Financial packaging of IPO firms in China. Journal of Accounting Research 38, 103-126. Aggarwal, R., R. Leal., and L. Hernadez. 2002.The aftermarket performance of initial public offerings in Latin America. Financial Management 22, 42-53. Alford, A., J. Jones, and R. Leftwish, and M. Zmijewski. 1993. The relative informativeness of accounting disclosures in different countries. Journal of Accounting Research 31, 183-223. Amir, E., T. Harris, and E. Venuti. 1993. A comparison of the value-relevance of U.S. versus non-U.S. GAAP accounting measures using form 20-F reconciliations. Journal of Accounting Research 31, 230-264. Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6, 159-178. Barber, B. and J. Lyon. 1997. Detecting Long-Horizon Abnormal Stock Returns: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics. Journal of Financial Economics 43, 341-372. Barth, M., J. Elliott, and M. Finn, 1999. Market rewards associated with patterns of increasing earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 37, 387-413. Barton, J. 2001. Does the use of financial derivatives affect earnings management decisions? The Accounting Review 76, 1-26. Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71, 443-465. Beaver, W., P. Kettler, and M. Scholes. 1970. The Association between market-determined and accounting-determined risk measures. The Accounting Review 45, 654-682. Beltratti, A., and B. Bortolotti. The nontradable share reform in the Chinese stock market. Working paper, Bocconi University. Bowen, R. M., S. Rajgopal, and M. Venkatachalam. 2008. Accounting choice, corporate governance and firm performance. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 ,351-405 Brandt, L., and Li, H., 2003. Bank discrimination in transition economies: ideology, information or incentives? Journal of Comparative Economics 31, 387-413. Brown, L. P. Griffin, R. Hagerman, and M. Zmijewski, 1987. An evaluation of alternative measures for the market’s assessment of unexpected earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 9, 159-193. Brown, L.D., K. Sivakumar, 2001. Comparing the quality of three earnings measures. working paper, Georgia State University. Brown, P.R., 1999. Earnings management: a subtle and troublesome twist to earnings quality. The Journal of Financial Statement Analysis 4, 61-63. Cai, J., and L. Xia. What will privatization bring: the non-tradable share issue reform in China. Working paper, Shenzhen Stock Exchange. Chakravarty, S., Sarkar, A., and L.Wu. 1998. Information asymmetry, market segmentation and the pricing of cross-listed shares: Theory and evidence from Chinese A and B shares. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 8, 325–356. Chan, K., J. Wang, and K.C. J. Wei. 2004. Underpricing and long-term performance of IPOs in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 10, 409-430. Che, J., and Y. Qian. 1998. Institutional environment, community government, and corporate governance: understanding China’s township-village enterprises. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 14, 1-23. Chen, G. M., Firth, M. and J. Kim. 2004. IPO underpricing in China’s New Stock Markets’. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 14, 283-302. Chen, G., M. Firth., and J. B. Kim. 2000. The post issue market performance of initial public offerings in China’s new stock markets. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 14, 319-339. Chen, J. P. C., S. Chen, and X. Su. 2001. Is accounting information value-relevant in the emerging Chinese stock market? Journal of International Accounting Auditing & Taxation 10, 1-22. Wang, S. S., and J. Li. 2004. Location of trade, ownership restrictions, and market illiquidity: examining Chinese A- and H- shares. Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 1273-1297. Cao, Y., Qian, Y., and B.R. Weingast. 1999. From federalism, Chinese style, to privatization, Chinese style. Economics of Transition 7, 103– 131. Chen, K. C. W. and H. Yuan. 2006. Government involvement, market forces, and the pricing of earnings: A comparison of China’s tradable and nontradable Shares, working paper. Chen, K. C. W., and H. Yuan. 2004. Earnings management and capital resource allocation: evidence from China’s accounting-based regulation of rights issues. The Accounting Review 79, 645-665. Chen, Z., and P. Xiong. 2001. Discounts on illiquid stocks: evidence from China. Working Papers, Yale School of Management`s. Financial Research Network, 1-44. Chen, G., M. Firth, and O. Rui. 2006. Have China’s enterprise reforms led to improved efficiency and profitability? Emerging Markets Review 7, 82-109. Clarke, D. 1996. The creation of a legal structure for market institutions in China. In: John McMillan and Barry Naughton (Eds.). Reforming Asian Socialism: the Growth of Market Institutions. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 39-59. Coughlan A. T. and R, M. Schmidt. 1985. Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics .Volume 7, Issues 1-3, Pages 43-66. Collins, D. W., and P. Hribar. 2000. Earnings-based and accrual-based market anomalies: One effect or two? Journal of Accounting and Economics 29, 101-123. Conrad, J., and G. Kaul. 1993. Long-Term Market Overreaction or Biases in Computed Returns. Journal of Finance 48, 39-63. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 17, 193-225. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings management: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13, 1-36. DeFond, M., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals: Accounting choice in troubled companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17, 145-176. DeFond, M., T.J., Wong, and S. Li. 1999. The impact of improved auditor independence on auditor market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30, 269-305. Demsetz, H. 1983. The structure of ownership and theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics 26, 375-390. Fama, E. F. 1998. Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics 49, 283-306. Fama, E., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301-325. Fan, G., and T. J. Wong. 2003. The report on the relative process of marketization of each region in China. The Economic Science Press( in Chinses). Fan, J. P. H., and T.J. Wong. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33, 401-425. Feng, L. and W. Xu. 2007. Has the reform of nontradable shares raised prices? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 43, 33-62. Frankel, R., M. McNichols, and G. P. Wilson. 1995. Discretionary disclosure and external financing. The Accounting Review 70, 135-150. Gaver, J. J., K. M. Gaver, and J. R. Austin. 1995. Additional evidence on bonus plans and income management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19, 3-28. Graham, R., and R. King. 1998. The relation of firm market values with book values and residual accounting earnings in six Asian countries. Working paper, Oregon State University. Green, S. 2003. China’s stock market: eight myths and some reasons to be optimistic. Working paper, The Royal Institute of International Affairs. Hansen, G. A., and C. F. Noe. 1998. Do managers’ accrual decision speak louder than words? Working Paper. Pennsylvania State University. Harris, T., M. Lang, and H. Moller. 1994. The value relevance of German accounting measures: an empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research 32, 187-209. Haw, I. M., D. Qi, and W. Wu. 1998. Value-relevance of financial reporting disclosures in an emerging capital market: the case of B-shares and H-shares in China. Working paper, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7, 85-107. Healy, P.M., J.M. Wahlen, 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons 13, 365-383. Holthausen, R. W., D. F. Larcker, and R. G. Sloan. 1995. Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19, 29-74. IASC. 1994. International Accounting Standards. Basingstoke, Hants: Burgess Science Press. Jensen, M. C. and J. B. Warner. 1988. The distribution of power among corporate managers, shareholders and directors. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 3-24 Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 1,105-160. Jin, H., and Y. Qian. 1998. Public ownership of firms: evidence from rural china. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 773-808. Jiang, B. B., J. Laurenceson, K. K. Tang. 2008. Share reform and the performance of China''s listed companies. China Economic Review 19, 489-501. Jiang, Y., W. Li. and G. Hu. 2010. An Empirical Study on Share Splitting Governance Structure and Firm Performance. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Hainan University 28,62-68. Jiang H. and A. Habib.2010. Value relevance of accounting information : Evidence from split share structure reform in china. Johnson, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2000. Tunnelling. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 90, 22-27. Johnson, S., J. McMillan, and C. Woodruff. 2002. Property Rights and Finance. NBER Working Paper No. 8852. Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research 29, 193-228. Jones, S.L., W.L. Megginson, R.C. Nash, and J. M. Netter. 1999. Share issue privatizations as financial means to political and economic ends. Journal of Financial Economics 53, 217-253. Kimbro, M. B. 2005. Managing underpricing?the case of pre-IPO discretionary accruals in China. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 16, 229-262. Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33, 375-400. Kothari, S.P., 2001. Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31, 105-231. Kwan, C. H. (2005/12/17) Reforms of non-tradable shares opening the way for the privatization of major state-owed enterprises. China in Transition. (web site: http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/china/05120701.html) La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1998. Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113-1155. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1997. Legal Determinants of External Finance. The Journal of finance 52, 1131-1150. Lee, C. W. J., and X. Xiao. 2003. Cash dividends in China: liquidating, expropriation and earnings management. EFMA Annual Meeting Paper. Leuz, C., D. Nanda, and P. Wysocki. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69, 505-527. Levitt, A. 1998. The numbers game. Remarks delivered at the NYU Center for Law and Business, New York, NY, September 28. Li, H., L. Meng, and J. Zhang. 2004. Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Working Paper, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Li, K., T. Wang, Y. L. Cheung, and P. Jiang. 2007. Removing market friction and sharing the gain: evidence from the split share structure reform in China. Working paper University of British Columbia. Lin, Y.M., and T. Zhu. 2001. Ownership restructuring in Chinese state industry: an analysis of evidence on initial organizational changes. China Quarterly 166, 305–341. Liu, G. S., and P. Sun. 2005. The class of shareholdings and its impacts on corporate performance: a case of state shareholding composition in Chinese public corporations. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13, 46-59. Loomis, C. J. 1999. Lies, dammed lies, and managed earnings: The crackdown is here. Fortune 140, 75-92. Lu F., M. Balatbat and R. Czernkowski. 2008. The reform of split share structure in China and its effects on the capital market: An empirical study. Minton, B., and C. Schrand. 1999. The impact of cash flow volatility on discretionary investment and the costs of debt and equity financing. Journal of Financial Economics 54, 423-460. Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny, 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. Journal of Fanancial Economics 20, 293-315. Ohlson, J. 1995. Earnings, book values and dividends in security valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 661-687. Peterson, M. A., and S. R. Thiagarajan. 2000. Risk measurement and hedging: With and without derivatives. Financial Management 29, 5-30. Pincus, M., and S. Rajgopal. 2002. The interaction of accrual management and hedging: Evidence from oil and gas firms. The Accounting Review 71,: 127-160. Qi D., W. Wu, and H. Zhang. 2000. Shareholding structure and corporate performance of partially privatized firms: Evidence from listed Chinese companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 8, 587-610. Qian, Y. 1995. Reforming corporate governance and finance in China. In Masahiko Aoki and Hyung-Ki Kim, eds., Corporate Governance in Transition Economies: Insider Control and the Role of Banks. The World Bank, 215-252. Quan, Q., and N. Huyghebaert. 2004. Privatization: issues at stake in the case of China. Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management 49, 647-687. Ritter, Jay, 1991. The-long run performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance 46, 3-28. Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1994. Politicians and firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 995-1025. Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52, 737-783. Skinner, D. J., and R. G. Sloan. 1999. Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns: Don''t let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Working Paper. University of Michigan Business School. Wang, Q., Wong, T.J., and L. Xia. 2005. State ownership, institutional environment and auditor choice: evidence form china. Chinese University of Hong Kong, working paper. Wang, Q., Wong, T.J., and L. Xia. 2008. State ownership, institutional environment and auditor choice: evidence form china. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 112-134. Wang, X., L. C. Xu, and T. Zhu. 2001. State-owned enterprises going public: the case of China. Working paper of City University of Hong Kong. Watts, L. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1990. Positive accounting theory: A ten Year perspective. The Accounting Review 65, 131-156. Wayne H.M. , M.M. Partch and K. Shah. 1998. Ownership and operating performance of companies that go public. Journal of Financial Economics. Volume 44, Issue 3, June 1997, Pages 281-307 Wei, Z., F. Xie, and S. Zhang. 2005. Ownership structure and firm value in China’s privatized firms: 1991-2001. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 40, 87-108. Xiang, B. 1998. Institution al factors influencing China’s accounting reforms and standards. Accounting Horizons 12, 105-119. Xu, X., and Y. Wang. 1999. Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese listed firms. China Economic Review 10, 75-98. Zhang, A., Y. Zhang. and R. Zhao. 2002. Profitability and productivity of Chinese industrial firms: Measurement and ownership implications. China Economic Review 13, 65-88.
摘要: 本研究主要目的想瞭解中國股權分置改革是否會影響上市公司的會計資訊品質。中國近20年來中國經濟發展快速,為了募集市場資金與改善國有企業的體質,在1990年起中國開始建立證券市場,同時進行國有企業私有化改革,將部分中大型國有企業透過證券市場方式上市,因中國政府是統治化集權國家,採用的是計畫額度管理,把上市公司的股票區分為為不可流通股(non-tradable shares)與流通股(tradable shares),此即為「股權分置」措施。這種對公司「股權分置」的獨特安排,一般經濟學人稱為「社會主義的市場經濟」。 然而,「股權分置」扭曲了資本市場的定價機制與流動性,同時大部份上市公司的控制權仍然掌握在國家,故缺乏好的公司治理結構導致私有化後的公司績效普遍不佳。這樣的措施制度下,也產生了中國獨特現象。例如股票初次公開發行(IPOs)價格折價幅度過高或非流通股價格無法正確反映公司績效或非流通股比例較高的上市公司傾向發放較高現金股利以補償控制股東的報酬或管理階層侵佔公司資產等。中國政府為解決股權分置造成市場缺陷的問題,拾回投資人的信心,中國證監會(CSRC)於2005年9月4號發布了「上市公司股權分置改革管理辦法」,將非流通股票透過法定的程序,給予流通的權利。中國政府期盼透過這樣的改革,恢復資本市場的固有功能,以解決上述的市場缺陷。據中國證監會指出,截至目前完成股權分置改革公司佔全部上市公司的比例已達99%。 然而,中國與先進的歐美國家相比其體制尚未成熟亦不夠完善,且中國的占地廣大,各地區域發展不一致性,地方政府往往能夠控制地方經濟、資本市場和法律環境。此外,國有政府的股份在股權改革後,在市場上的流通仍受阻,亦即國有企業並未完全的私有化而持續控制在政府(中央或地方政府)或委任的官僚體系手中,而過去國有企業與地方政府官僚互相勾結、官官相護情形嚴重,無法藉由股權分置改革達到改善公司治理的情況。因此,本研究探討中國股權分置改革(Reforms of Nontradable Shares,簡稱RNS)對於公司會計資訊的品質(價值攸關性、盈餘品質)是否有顯著的影響? 同時深入探討,上市公司的內部治理結構與各省份所處組織環境,在改革前後,是否也會對公司的會計資訊品質有不同程度的影響?並能進一步建議中國政府當局在進行股權分置改革後,也能推定完善的法律組織及推動國有企業私有化。 實證結果,分成二部份作為探討。就價值攸關性而言,在股權分置改革後,價值攸關性普遍提升,不同的控制股東均有不同的影響,大體而言法人公司優於國有企業,中央政府控制的公司優於地方政府控制的公司,而地方法律環境越完善,價值攸關性亦越高。股權分置改革後,盈餘管理的幅度有提高的現象。 就盈餘品質而言,股權分置改革後,法人公司與國有企業之盈餘品質均有下滑的趨勢;但中央政府控制公司盈餘品質優於地方政府控制公司;所屬省份之法律組織環境較好者,其盈餘品質卻較差。
China's stock market has seen rapid progress in recent years. In the start 1990 when the securities market was just established in China, conditions for public trade of all equity shares of listed companies on stock exchanges were immature, due to issues relating to equity shares owned by state-owned enterprises. The pre-2005 Chinese capital market is characterized with a unique feature of having two classes of shares with the same voting and dividend rights coexisting with one class being tradable and nontradable. The split share structure evolved during China's transition from a regulatory economy to a market economy where the government raised capital to finance expansion through the privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOE) but retained control of the SOE by introducing non-tradable shares. The “socialist-market economy”, is a mixture of free enterprise and state planning and control. However, the presence of the split share structure created valuation and liquidity problems for the semi-government owned publicly listed companies undermining the development of the Chinese capital market. The split share structure also distorts the valuation mechanisms with non-tradable shares based on net asset value (NAV) while tradable shares are based on market determined share price. Therefore, the split-share structure of listed companies has caused many adverse consequences to China's securities market, i.e., the lower price of non-tradable shares, the conflicts between non-tradable and tradable shareholder, and anomalies of IPOs underpricing and cash dividend paying behavior.To address these concerns, Chinese government launched full circulation reforms of non-tradable shares (RNS) of listed companies on 29 April 2005.Until new, about 99% listed companies have reformed to their non-negotiable shares. However, the institutional features of China, for instance, a state-dominant shareholding structure, dominant government power over external monitoring and market, and inadequate legal system, also give rise to distorted corporate behavior. Furthermore, after the FCR reforms, the authorities do not float state-owned shares on the market and still control the trading of the equity shares of state-owned enterprises. If government is still interfering with capital market, it is doubtful whether the FCR reform can be effective in improving Quality of Accounting Information. We will investigate if the FCR reform has significant impacts on accounting Information value-relevant and earnings quality. In addition, we will also examine if a firm's internal governance structure and external environment has differential influence on quality of accounting information in the pre- and post-FCR periods. The empirical result is divided into two parts.For the value relevance ,the value relevance usually increase after the split share structure reform, but the different shareholders have different effects on the control.Generally speaking, the value relevance of Corporations is better than the state-owned enterprises,the central government-controlled companies is superior to the local Government-controlled companies.When institutional features is better, the higher of the value of relevance. After the split share structure reform, the magnitude of earnings management has increased. For the earnings quality, earnings quality of the Corporations and state-owned enterprises both declined after the split share structure reform; the central government-controlled company earnings quality is better than the local government-controlled company; The earnings quality is poor when institutional features is better.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/18798
其他識別: U0005-0306201118104200
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-0306201118104200
Appears in Collections:會計學系所

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.