Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
標題: 在不同生命週期下董事會組成特性對公司經營績效之影響
The Relationship between Characteristics of Board Directors and Firm's Performance : A Test of the Life Cycle Hypothesis
作者: 劉力維
Liu, Li-Wei
關鍵字: Life cycle
Characteristics of board directors
Agency theory
Stewardship theory
Resource dependence theory
出版社: 會計學研究所
引用: 一、中文部分 李馨蘋、詹凱玲,2007,「股權結構、董事會組成與公司績效之關係-以家族與非 家族企業之角度」,當前會計理論與實務研討會。 侍台誠,1994,「董事會特性中家族因素與經營績效之實證研究-兼論法人董事的 影響」,國立台灣大學,會計系研究所未出版碩士論文。 金成隆、林修葳、邱煒恒,2005,「研究發展支出與資本支出的價值攸關性:以 企業生命週期論析」,中山管理評論,第13卷,第2期,頁617-643。 金成隆、林修葳、紀信義,2004,「專利權的價值攸關性:從企業生命週期論析」, 管理學報,第21卷,第2期,頁175-197。 洪永昌,2004,「企業生命週期與融資策略」,國立台灣科技大學,財務金融所碩 士論文。 陳冠仲,2005,「董事會特性及組成與現金增資公司長期績效關連性研究」,國立 成功大學,財務金融研究所碩士論文。 陳貴端,2005,「公司治理經濟法律制度之探討:以公司內部治理結構與組織運 作為中心」,律師雜誌,第310期,頁 18-37。 高蘭芬,2001,「董監事股權質押之代理問題對會計資訊與公司績效之影響」,國 立成功大學,會計學研究所博士論文。 黃旭輝、王育偉,2006,「績效不佳的經理人會被撤換嗎?」,證券市場發展季刊, 第18卷,第4期。 張瑞當、方俊儒、曾玉琦,2007,「核心代理問題與盈餘管理:董事會結構與外 部監督機制之探討」,第24卷,第1期,頁17-39。 曹壽民、紀信義、陳光政,2006,「企業生命週期對商標權價值攸關性之影響」, 企業管理學報,第69卷,第6期,頁39-72。 楊朝旭、黃潔,「企業生命週期、資產組合與企業未來績效關連性之研究」,商管 科技季刊,第5卷,第1期,頁49-71。 楊嘉斌,2005,「軟體產業策略性人力資源雇用構築之初探:以企業生命週期觀 點」,崑山科技大學,資訊管理系碩士論文。 廖秀梅,2004,「董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-探討台灣家族控制企業 因素的影響」,國立台北大學,會計學系研究所博士論文。 二、西文部分 Anthony, J. H. and K. Ramesh, 1992, “Association Between Accounting Performance Measures and Stock Prices”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.15, pp. 203-277. Bacon, J., 1973, “Corporate Directorship Practices: Membership and Committees of The Board”, New York: The Conference Board. Baliga, B. R., N. C. Moyer and R. S. Rao, 1996,“CEO Duality and Firm Performance: What’s the Fuss”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, No.1, pp.41-53. Baysinger, B. and H. Butler, 1985, “Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol.1, pp.101-134. Beasley, M. S. 1996, “An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Froud”, The Accounting Review, Vol.71, No.4, pp.443-465. Beatty, R. E. and E. J. Zajac, 1994, “Managerial Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk Bearing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.39, pp.313-335. Black, E. L., 1998, “Which Is More Value Relevant: Earnings or Cash Flows ? A Life Cycle Examination”, Journal of Financial Statement Analysts, Vol.4, pp.40-56. Boyd, B., 1990, “Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the Resource Dependence Model”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.11, pp.419-430. Boyd, B. K, 1995, “CEO Duality and Firm Performance: A Contingency Model”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, No.4, pp.301-312. Chandler, A. D., 1962, “Strategy and Structure”, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chava, S., M. Dierker and D. Livdan, 2004, “Do Shareholder Rights Affect the Cost of Bank Loans”, The University of Houston Working Paper. Dahya, J., A. A. Lonie and D.M. Power, 1996, “The Case for Separating the Roles of Chairman and CEO:An Anaylsis of Stockmarket and Accounting Data”, Corporate Governance :An International Review, No.4, pp.71-77. Daft, R. L., 2004, “Organization Theory and Design”, South-Western ,8th Ed. Daily, C. and D. Dalton, 1993, “Board of Directors Leadership and Structure: Control and Performance Implications”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, No.17, pp.65-81. Daily, C. and D. Dalton, 1994, “Bankruptcy and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Board Composition and Structure”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37,No.6, pp.1603-1617. Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, A. E. Ellstrand, and J. L. Johnson, 1998, “Mate-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure and Financial Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.19, pp.269-290. Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman and L. Donaldson, 1997,“Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol.22, No.1, pp.20-47. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan and A. P. Hutton, 1996, “Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firm Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol.13, No.2, pp.1-36. Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn. 1985, “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93, pp.1155-1177. Dodge, H. J. and J. E. Robbins, 1992, “An empirical Investigation of the Organizational Life Cycle Model for Small Business Development and Survival”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol.30(1), pp.27-37. Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis, 1991, “Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns”, Australian Journal of Management, Vol.16, pp.49-64. Fama, E., 1980, “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm”, Journal of Political Economy , Vol.88, pp.288-307. Fama, E. and M. Jensen, 1983, “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.26, pp.301-325. Francis, J. R., I. K. Khurana and R. Pereira, 2005, “Disclosure Incentives and Effects on Cost of Capital Around the World”, The Accounting Review, Vol.80, pp.1125-1162. Greiner, L. E., 1972, “Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.50(4), pp.37-56. Gupta, A. 1987, “SBU Strategies, Corporate-SBU Relations, and SBU Effectiveness in Strategy Implementation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.30, pp.477-500. Haire, M., 1959, “Biological Models and Empirical History of the Growth of Organizations.” , In M. Haire (Ed.) Modern Organizational Theory, pp.272-306. Heracleous, L., 2001, “What is the Impact of Corporate Governance on Organizational Performance?”, Conference Papers, Vol.9, No.3, pp.165-173. Hillman, A. J., A. A. Cannella and R. L. Paetzold, 2000, “The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol.37, pp.235-254. Jawahar, I. M. and L. McLaughlin, 2001, “Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory: An Organizational Life Cycle Approach”, Academy of Management Preview, Vol.26, No.3, pp.397-414. Jensen, M. C., 1993, “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control System”, Journal of Finance, Vol.48, pp.831-880. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3, pp.305-360. John, K. and L. W. Senbet, 1998, “Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.22, pp.371-403. Johnson, J., C. Daily and A. Ellstrand, 1996, “Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda”, Journal of Management, Vol.22, pp.409-438. Katz, D. and R. L. Kahn, 1978, “The Social Psychology of Organizations”, New York: Wiley. Kesner, I. F., 1987, “Directors Stock Ownership and Organization Performance: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies”, Journal of Business Research, Vol.16, pp.235-249. Lynall, M.D., B. R. Golden and A. J. Hillman, 2003, “Board Composition From Adolescence To Maturity: A Multitheoretic View”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol.28, No.3, pp.416-431. McConnell, J. J. and H. Servaes, 1990, “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.27, No.2, pp.595-612. Miller, D. and P. H. Friesen, 1984, “A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle”, Management Science, Vol.30(10), pp.1161-1183. Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny, 1988, “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp. 293-315. Ocasio, W., 1994, “Political Dynamics and the Circulation of Power: CEO Succession in U.S. Industrial Corporations, 1960–1990”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.39, pp.285-312. Patton, A. and J. C. Baker, “Why Won’t Directors Rock the Boat”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.65, NO.6, pp.10-18. Pfeffer, J.,1972, “Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.21, pp.218-228. Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik, 1978,“The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective”, New York: Harper and Row. Pi, L. and S. G. Timme, 1993, “Corporate control and bank efficiency”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.17, pp. 515-530. Quinn, R. E. and K. Cameron, 1983, “Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence”, Management Science, Vol.29, No.1, pp. 33-51. Rechner, P. L. and D. R. Dalton, 1991,“CEO Duality and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12, No.2, pp.155-160. Shalit, S. S. and U. Sankar, 1977, “The Measurement of Firm Size”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.59, No.3, pp.290-298. Smith, K. G., T.R. Mitchell, and C. E. Summer, 1985, “Top Level Management Priorities Lndifferent Stages of the Organizational Life Cycle”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.28, pp.799-820. Weisbach, M., 1988, “Outside Directors and CEO Turnover”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.431-460. Williamson, O., 1984, “Corporate governance”, Yale Law Journal Q2, pp.1197-1229. Yermack, D., 1996, “Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.40, pp.185-211. Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce, 1989, “Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model”, Journal of Management, Vol.15, pp. 291-344.
摘要: 本研究探討在不同的生命週期下,董事會組成特性對公司經營績效是否有不同程度上的影響,以1996年到2007年間台灣上市櫃公司資料進行實證觀察。本文參考Anthony and Ramesh ( 1992 ) 的方法,將銷貨成長率、資本支出率、公司成立年度以及綜合指標做為生命週期判斷因子。 實證結果顯示,企業處於成長階段,董事長兼總經理對公司績效有正向影響,但在成熟與衰退階段,則會不利於公司績效。外部董事比率對於處在成長期之公司績效影響為負向,但並不明顯,而對處於成熟期與衰退期的公司績效則有明顯提升效果。董事規模在各生命週期階段對公司績效均產生不利的效果,尤其在成長期時,負向影響公司績效的情況更為明顯。董事持股比率與公司績效具正向關聯性,在成熟期與衰退期階段,提升公司績效之效果較為明顯。
This study is to investigate the relationship between characteristics of board directors and firm's performance for a differential stage in a firm's life cycle, and the data was collected from various industries listed in the Taiwan stock exchange during 1996-2007. According to the firm's life cycle of Anthony and Ramesh (1992), we use sales growth rate (SG), capital expenditures rate (CEV), establishment years (AGE), and composite score as life cycle descriptors. The empirical results show that the firm's performance is better when the chairman of the board is the CEO in the stage of growth, but in the stage of mature and decline, the chairman of the board is the CEO will harm firm's performance. The external director rate is negatively related to the firm's performance in the stage of growth, but in the stage of mature and decline, which can promote firm's performance significantly. In any stage, the board size is negatively related to the firm's performance, and it has much influence in the stage of growth than in the stage of mature and decline. Finally, the share ownership of directors is positively associated with firm's performance, and in the stage of mature and decline, the effect of promoting firm's performance is more conspicuous.
其他識別: U0005-2406200922475100
Appears in Collections:會計學系所



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.