Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/18892
標題: 信用評等對審計公費之影響
The Impact of Credit Rating on Audit Fees
作者: 廖瑞蔓
Liao, Ruei-Mam
關鍵字: Credit rating
信用評等
Audit fees
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
審計公費
沙賓法案
出版社: 會計學研究所
引用: 壹、 中文部分 朱應舞,2002. 任重道遠的美國企業革新法案.會計研究月刊,202:18-29 朱應舞,2003. 追縱「沙氏法案」最新脈動!會計研究月刊,209: 92-101 林宛瑩,許崇源,戚務君,陳宜伶,2009. 公司治理與信用風險評量,台大管理論叢 官月緞,簡松源,徐永檳,2008. 會計弊案與財務報導保守性-安隆/博達觀察.當代會計,9(1):69-104 邱垂昌,莊峻銘,2004. 獨立董監事、公司資訊透明度與公司價值之關連性,2004會計理論與實務研討會論文集,國立政治大學會計系 鄭桂蕙,林宛瑩,許崇源,2006. 董監事持股高低對庫藏股買回誘因之影響.東吳經計商學學報,54:1-26 薛富井,林千惠,2003. 美國2002年沙氏法案(Sarbanes-Oxely Act)對會計師事務所與發行公司影響之探討,會計研究月刊,209:102-130 貳、西文部分 Amir,E., Y.Guan, and G. Livne, 2005. The Effects of Auditor Independence on the Cost of Public Debt. Working Paper, London Business School. Anderson,R.C., S.A.Mansi, and D.M.Reeb, 2004. Board characteristics,accounting reporting integrity,and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3):315-342. Ashbaugh,H., R.LaFond, and B.W.Mayhew, 2003. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. Accounting Review, 78(3),:611–640. Ashbaugh-Skaife,H., D.W.Collins, and R.LaFond, 2006. The effects of corporate governance on firms’credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42 (1-2) :203–243. Asthana,S., S.Balsam, and S.Kim, 2004. The Effect of Enron, Andersen, and Sarbanes–Oxley on the Market for Audit Services. Working Paper,Temple University and Rutgers University. Bazerman, M. H., G.Loewenstein, and D. A.Moore, 2002. Why good accountants do bad audits. Harvard Business Review,80(11): 87–102 Beaulieu, P. R., 2001. The effects of judgments of new clients’ integrity upon risk judgments, audit evidence, and fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20(2): 85-99. Bell,T.b., J.C.Bedard, and K.M.Johnstone, E.F.Smith, 2002. KRiskSM:A Computerized Decision Aid for Client Acceptance and Continuance Risk Assessments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice&Theory,21(2) :97-113. Bhojraj,S., P.Sengupta, 2003. Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: the role of institutional investors and the outside directors. The Journal of Business ,76(3): 455–475. Blazenko,G.W., W.R.Scott, 1986. A model of Standard setting in auditing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 3(1):68-92. Brandon, D. M., A. D. Crabtree, and J. J. Maher, 2004. Non-Audit Fees, Auditor Independence, and Bond Ratings. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2): 89-103. Carcello,J.V., D.R.Hermanson, and T.L.Neal, R.A.Riley Jr., 2002. Board Characteristics and Audit Fees.Contemporary Accounting Research ,19 (3): 365–384. Charles,S.L., S.M.Glover, and N.Y.Sharp, 2009. The Association between Financial Reporting Risk and Audit Fees Before and After the Historic Events Surrounding SOX. Working paper: Texas A&M University. Choi,J.H., J.B. Kim, X. Liu, and D.A. Simunic, 2008. Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and big4 premiums: theory and cross-country evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25 (1):55–99. Ciesielski,J.T., T.R.Weirich, 2006. Ups and Downs of Audit Fees since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The CPA Journal ,76 (10): 28 – 35. Craswell, A., I. Francis, and S. Taylor, 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3):297-322. Crouhy,M., D.Galai, and R.Mark, 2000. A comparative analysis of current credit risk Models. Journal of Banking & Finance ,24(1-2): 59-117. Copley,P.A., J.J.Gaver, and K.M.Gaver. 1995, Simultaneous estimation of the supply and demand of differentiated audits:Evidence from the municipal audit market, Journal of Accounting Research ,33(1):137-55. Dalton, D. R., J. W. Hill., and R. J. Ramsey, 1994. The big chill. Journal of Accountancy , 178(5): 53-56. Dalton, D. R., J. W. Hill., and R. J. Ramsey, 1997. The threat of litigation and voluntary partner/manager turnover in Big Six firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy ,16 (4): 379-413. Datar, S.M., G. A. Feltham, and J. S. Hughes, 1991. The role of audits and audit quality in valuing new issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(1):3-49. DeAngelo, L.E., 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 3(3):183–199. Dechow, P.M., I.D. Dichev, 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review, 77(4):35–59. DeFond, M. L., J. R. Francis, and T. J. Wong, 2000. Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19 (1): 49-66. Farrell, K.A., D.A.Whidbee, 2003. Impact of firm performance expectations on CEO turnover and replacement decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics,36(1-3):165-96. FEI. 2004. FEI Special Survey on Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 Implementation. Financial Executives International (FEI): www.fei.org. Francis, J.R., 1984. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(2): 133-151. Francis, J.R., 2004. What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36 (4): 345-368. Francis, J.R., R.LaFond, and P.Olsson, K. Schipper, 2005. The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2): 295-327. Frankel, R.M., M,F, Johnson, and K.K.Nelson, 2002. The relation between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. Accounting Review, 77(4):71–105. Gordon, L.A., J.Pound, 1993. Information,ownership structure, and shareholder voting: Evidence from shareholder-sponsored corporate governance proposals. Journal of Finance, 48(2):697-718 Griffin, P.A., D.H. Lont, 2007. An Analysis of Audit Fees Following the Passage of Sarbanes-Oxley, Working paper. Griffin, P.A., A.Z.Sanvicente, 1982. Common Stock Returns and Rating Changes:A Methodological Comparison. The Journal of Finance ,37(1) 103-19 Hackenbrack, K., W. R. Knechel, 1997. Resource allocation decisions in audit engagetnents. Contemporary Accounting Research ,14 (3): 481-499. Hausman,J.A., 1978. Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6):1251-1274. Hay, D. , W.R. Knechel, 2002. Evidence on the association among elements of internal control and external assurance, Working paper, University of Auckland. Houston, R. W., 1999. The effects of fee pressure and client risk on audit seniors’ time budget decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory,18(2):70-86. Huss, H.F., F.A. Jacobs, 1991. Risk containment: Exploring auditor decisions in the engagement process. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory ,10(2):16-32 Iliev, P., 2007. The Effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 404) on Audit Fees, Accruals and Stock Returns. Working paper: Brown University. Imhoff, E.A., 2003. Accounting quality, auditing, and corporate governance. Accounting Horizons ,17(suppeiment):117–128. Jensen, M.C., 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3): 831–880. Johnson, V. E., I. K. Khurana, and J. K. Reynolds, 2002. Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports.Contemporary Accounting Research,19 (4):637-660. Knechel, W.R., M.Willekens, 2004. The role of risk management and governance in determining audit fee. Working paper,University of Florida. Kliger, D., O.Sarig, 2000. The Information value of Bond Ratings. The Journal of Finance ,25(6): 2879–902. Krishanan, J., J. Krishnan, 1996. The role of economic trade-offs in the audit opinion decision: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, & Finance ,11 (4):565-586. Krishnan, G. V., 2004. Auditors’ risk management and reputation building in the post-Enron environment: An examination of earnings conservatism of former Andersen clients. Working paper: George Mason University. Laux,V., D.P. Newman, 2010. Auditor Liability and Client Acceptance Decisions. The Accounting Review,85(1):261-285. Lee, Y. S., S. Rosenstein, and J. G. Wyatt, 1999. The value of financial outside directors on corporate boards. International Review of Economics and Finance ,8(4):421-431. Mansi, S.A., F.M.William, and M.Dariusp , 2004. Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market .Journal of Accounting Research,42(4):755-793. Menon, K., D.D. Williams, 2004. Former Audit Partners and Abnormal Accruals. The Accounting Review,79(4)1095-1118. Messier, W. Jr., S. Glover, and D. Prawitt, 2008. Auditing and Assurance Services: A Systematic Approach. McGraw-Hill Irwin,6th Edition, New York, NY. Myers J.N., L. A. Myers, and T. C. Omer, 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation. The Accounting Review, 78 (3): 779-799. Palmrose, Z.V., 1986. Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1):97-110. Palmrose,Z.V., 1997. Audit litigation research: Do the merits matter? An assessment and directions for future research. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,16(4): 355-378. Phillips, F., 1999. Auditor attention to and judgments of aggressive financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research,37(1):167-189. Pratt,J., J.D.Stice, 1994. The Effects of Client Characteristics on Auditor Litigation Risk Judgments, Required Audit Evidence, and Recommended Audit Fees. The Accounting Review, 69(4):639-656. Rappeport, A., 2008. Fixing the Financial-Reporting Supply Chain.CFO.com:March 6. Rashkover, B.W., C.B.Winter, 2005. The Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley on SEC Enforcement in Public Company Disclosure Cases. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2(4): 312-324. Seetharaman, A., F.A. Gul, and S.G. Lynn, 2002. Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from UK firms cross listed on US markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(1): 91–115. Sengupta, P., 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review ,73(4)459–474. Shleifer, A., D. Wolfenzon, 2002. Investor protection and equity markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 66(1):3–27. Shleifer, A., R.W. Vishny, 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. Simunic, D.A., 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research,18(1):161–190. Simunic, D.A., M.T. Stein, 1996. The Impact of Litigation Risk on Audit Pricing: A Review of the Economics and the Evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory ,15 (2): 119 – 134. Stice, J.D., 1991. Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. The Accounting Review ,66(3): 516-553. Titman, S., B.Trueman, 1986. Information quality and the valuation of new issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(2):159-172. Venkataraman, R., J.P. Weber, and M. Willenborg, 2008. Litigation risk, audit quality, and audit fees: Evidence from initial public offerings. The Accounting Review, 83 (5): 1315–1345. Walo, J.C., 1995. The Effects of Client Characteristics on Audit Scope. Auditing:A Journal of Practice & Theory, 14(1):114-124. Warnera,J.B., R.L.Watts, and K.H.Wruck, 1988. Stock prices and top management changes .Journal of Financial Economics, 20:461-492. Weisbach, M.S., 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics,20:431-460. Whisenant, S., S. Sankaraguruswamy, and K. Raghunandan, 2003. Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research,41(4):581-744. Wilcox, K., 2007. Dealing With Sarbox. Wall Street Journal: 1 June, Eastern edition: A13. Zhang,J., 2008.The Contracting Benefits of Accounting Conservatism to Lenders and Borrowers. Journal of Accounting and Economics,45:27-54.
摘要: 審計人員會評估客戶的風險來決定審計公費、並規畫審計程序,本研究則是評估客戶的信用評等對審計公費的影響;客戶的信用評等越差,違約破產風險較高,審計人員會藉由提高審計公費來降低違約風險所帶來的訴訟成本。研究範圍主要以沙賓法案後強制揭露審計公費之美國上市公司公司為樣本,沙賓法案後使得審計人員面臨法律責任上升;於是會計師在評估客戶破產風險時會更加謹慎。本研究以聯立方程式探討信用評等與審計公費間的關係,實證結果發現,整體而言信用評等對於審計公費顯著正相關,也代表信用評等越差的公司,其審計公費會越高。
Auditors will assess the client''s risk to determine audit fees , and planning the audit process , this study investigates whether the association between customer''s credit rating and audit fee. The worse the client''s credit rating, the higher the client''s default risk, auditors will raise audit fees in order to reduce the risk of litigation costs. We examine the audit fees paid to auditors around the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Audit fees are expected to increase after SOX due to potentially increased auditors' legal liability, SOX made auditor assess the client's risk more cautiously. In this study, we use simultaneous equations to examine the relationship between credit ratings and audit fees. Our results indicate that overall credit rating is significantly positive correlation for the audit fees, that also represented the worse the credit rating companies, whose audit fee will be higher.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/18892
其他識別: U0005-0806201018062900
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-0806201018062900
Appears in Collections:會計學系所

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.