請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/20627
標題: AHP是否能有效應用在供應商評選決策?
Is Analytic Hierarchy Process an Effective Tool for Supplier Selection Decision Making?
作者: Jong, Chien-Yee
楊嵌聿
關鍵字: supplier selection
供應商評選
AHP(analytic hierarchy process)
purchasing satisfaction
層級分析法
採購滿意度
出版社: 企業管理學系所
引用: 一、中文文獻 (一)圖書 張保隆、周瑛琪、翁振益,2007,決策分析:方法與應用,華泰。 莊允中、薛乃綺、黃得晉、陳仲宜、葉哲政、林偉凱、劉文海、陸蓉菁,2005,2005金屬製品年鑑,ITIS專案辦公室。 (二)期刊論文 畢威寧,2005,結合AHP與TOPSIS法於供應商績效評估之研究,科學與工程技術期刊,第一卷(1):75-83。 鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,層級分析法的內涵特性與應用(下),中國統計學報,第27卷(7):1-20。 鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,層級分析法的內涵特性與應用(上),中國統計學報,第27卷(6): 5-22。 (三)網路資源 經濟部中小企業處,2006年中小企業白皮書,http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/Data_Service/95white/white95.asp,2007年6月14日。 二、英文文獻 (一)Books Corbett, M. F., (2004) The Outsourcing Revolution: Why it makes sense and how to do it right, Dearborn Trade Publishing, a Kaplan Professional Company. Coyle, J. J., Bardi, E. J., and Langley, J. (2003) The Management of Business Logistics: A Supply Chain Perspective, 7E, South Western. Kline. R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edition, Guilford Press, p.73. Kotler, P. (1999) Marketing Management, 10th edition, Prentice Hall. Leenders, M. R., Fearon, H. E., Flynn, A. E., and Johnson, P. F. (2002) Purchasing and Supply Management, 12th ed, McGraw-Hill Companies. Russell, R. S. & Taylor, B. W. (2000). Operations Management, 3rd ed, Prentice Hall. Saaty, T. L. (1990). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. Pittsburgh, Pa, RWS. Stevenson, W. J. (2002) Operations management, 7th ed, McGraw-Hill Companies. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Free Press, New York, NY. (二)Journal articles Andreassen, T. W. (2000). Antecedents to satisfaction with service recovery. European Journal of Marketing, 34(1/2), 156-175. Barbarosoglu, G., & Yazgac, T. (1997). An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 38(1), 14-21. Barney, J. B. (1995). Looking inside competitive advantage. Academy of management Executive, 9(4), 49-61. Carr, A. S., & Smeltzer, L. R. (1999). The relationship of strategic purchasing to supply chain management. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 5, 43-51. Choi, T. Y., & Hartley, J. L. (1996). An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 14(4), 333-343. De Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7(2), 75-89. Dubois, A., & Pedersen, A. C. (2002). Why relationships do not fit into purchasing portfolio models: A comparison between the portfolio and industrial network approaches. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(1), 35-42. Eggert, A., & Ulaga, W. (2002). Customer perceived value: A substitute for satisfaction in business market? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(2/3), 107-118. Ellegaard, C. (2006). Small company purchasing: A research agenda. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, ,1-12. Ellram, L. M. (1990). The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26(4), 8-14. Ellram, L. M., Carr, A. (1994). Strategic purchasing: A history and review of the literature. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials, 30(2), 10-18. Ghodsypour, S. H., & O’Brien, C. (1998). A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 56, 199-212. Gottfredson M, Puryear R, & Phillips S. 2005. Strategic sourcing: from periphery to the core. Harvard Business Review, 83(2), 132–139. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Califomia Management Review, 33(3), 114-135. Hirakubo, N. & Kublin, M. (1998). The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: The case of electronic components procurement in Japan. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(2), 19-24. Hsu, C. C., Kannan, V. R., Leong, G. K., & Tan, K. C. (2006). Supplier selection construct: Instrument development and validation. International Journal of Logistics Management, 17(2), 213-239. Humphreys, P. K., Lo, V. H. Y. & McIvor, R. T. (2000). A decision support framework for strategic purchasing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 107, 353-362. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382-394. Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C., (2002). Supplier selection and assessment: Their impact on business performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(4), 11. Kanter, R. M. (1994). Collaborative advantage. Harvard Business Review, July/August, 72(6), 96-108. Kleindorfer, P. R. & Partovi, F. Y. (1990). Integrating manufacturing strategy and technology choice. European Journal of Operational Research, 47, 214-224. Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 109-117. Lehmann, D. & O’Shaughnessy, J. (1974). Difference in attribute importance for different industrial products. Journal of Marketing, 38(4), 36-42. Lehmann, D. & O’Shaughnessy, J. (1982). Decision criteria used in buying different categories of products. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 18(1), 9-14. Masella, C., Rangone, A. (2000). A contingent approach to the design of vendor selection systems for different types of co-operative customer/supplier relationships. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(1), 70-84. Matthyssens, P., & Van de Bulte, C. (1994). Getting closer and nicer : Partnerships in the supply chain. Long Range Planning, 27(1), 72-83. Narasimhan, R., & Das, A. (1999). An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing on manufacturing flexibility and performance. Decision Sciences, 30(3), 683–713. Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Gregory, M., & Richards, H. (1994). Realizing strategy through measurement. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(3), 140–152. Olsen, R. F., & Ellram, L. M. (1997). A portfolio approach to supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(2), 101-113. Petroni, A., & Braglia, M. (2000). Vendor selection using principal component analysis. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(2), 63-69. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G.. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3) 79-91. Quinn, J. B. (1999). Strategic outsourcing: Leveraging knowledge capabilities. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 9-21. Quinn, J. B., & Hilmer, F. G. (1994). Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 35(4), 43-55. Ruekert, R. W. & Churchile, G. A.(1984). Reliability and validity of alternative measures of channel member satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 226-233. Sarkis, J., & Talluri, S. (2002). A model for strategic supplier selection. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 18-28. Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (1999). Revisiting marketing’s lawlike generalizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 17(1), 71-87. Simpson, J. T., & Mayo, D. T. (1997). Relationship management: a call for fewer influence attempts? Journal of Business Research, 39(3), 209-218. Spekman, R. E., Kamauff Jr, J. W., & Myhr, N. (1998) An empirical investigation into supply chain management: A perspective on partnerships. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 28(8), 630-650. Tracey, M., & Tan, C. L. (2001). Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(4), 174-188. Vokurka, R. J., Choobineh, & J., Vadi, L. (1996). A prototype expert system for the evaluation and selection of potential supplier. International Journal of operations and Production Management, 16(12), 106-127. Vonderembse, M. A., Tracey, M. (1999). The impact of supplier selection criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(3), 33-39. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vender selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2-18. Wilson, E. J. (1994). The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: a review and update. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(3), 35-41. Yoon, K., & Hwang, C. L. (1985). Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: Part I – Single-plant strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 23(2), 345-359.
摘要: For the product or service of suppliers, whether the quality, delivery date, price or flexibly would affect the additional value which were created by manufacturing and delivering form the companies. Thus, the enterprises must be cautious about selecting the suppliers. According to the related literature which gave us supplier selecting tools, they only showed us how to use the tools and defined the function of them. However, they didn't tell the decision makers how to evaluate if the selected suppliers satisfied the needs of their companies. If the suppliers couldn't meet the needs of the companies, it would have increased the trading cost and decreased the competitive advantage of the company. For these reason, this research come up with if the decision made by experienced professor had the best purchasing satisfaction. Also, we used analytic hierarchy process to build up AHP model and value its efficiency. As the result of the case of G Company, the correlation between the weighted result of the importance of the APH and purchasing satisfaction were both positive and negative. Under the low important condition, the weighted result of the importance of the APH and purchasing satisfaction was insignificant positive correlation. It meant that AHP wasn't a good tool for G Company to select a good supplier. Hence, we don't recommend the company using AHP to make decision in this case. On the other hand, under the high important condition, the weighted result of the importance of the APH and purchasing satisfaction was significant negative correlation. It meant the same as above. Finally, this research tells us two things. One is what the management meaning of efficiency is for the company. The other is what the theoretical meaning of efficiency is for the suppliers selecting.
供應商所提供的產品與服務,無論在品質、交期、價格或彈性,皆會影響企業藉由製造與流通配送所創造的附加價值。因此,企業在評選供應商時必須非常謹慎。供應商評選工具的相關文獻主要在探討工具使用及功能,卻無法告訴決策者,所評選到的供應商是否真能為滿足企業的採購需求。然而,無法滿足企業的採購要求,將會增加企業額外的交易成本及影響到企業的競爭優勢。有鑑於此,本研究想要了解以專家經驗判斷所決定的供應商是否能帶來最佳的採購滿意度,並以層級分析法(analytic hierarchy process, AHP)為例,建構一個AHP模式及探討模式的有效性。由G公司的個案結果得知,AHP準則重要性的加權總分與採購滿意度的相關係數有正有負。在低重要性情境下,AHP準則重要性的加權總分與採購滿意度呈現不顯著的正相關,表示G公司透過AHP法評選出來的供應商對滿足G公司的採購要求是處於不明確的情況,故不建議使用AHP法於此情境的供應商評選。然而,在高重要情境下,AHP準則重要性的加權總分與採購滿意度呈現顯著的負相關,表示AHP法所評選出來的供應商無法滿足企業的要求,故不建議使用AHP法。最後,本研究將說明有效性對企業的管理意涵,以及有效性對供應商評選文獻的理論意涵。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/20627
其他識別: U0005-0407200716140500
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-0407200716140500
顯示於類別:企業管理學系所

文件中的檔案:
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。


在 DSpace 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。