Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/20676
標題: 創造力工作環境對員工自我效能、創造力績效之影響-以領導者激勵語言為干擾變數
The Effect of Creative Work Environment on Self-Efficacy and Creative Performance-Investigating the Moderating effects of Leader Motivational Language
作者: 陳宜君
Chen, Yi-Chun
關鍵字: leadership motivating language
領導者激勵語言
creative work environment
self-efficacy
creative performance
創造力工作環境
自我效能
創造力績效
出版社: 企業管理學系所
引用: 一、中文部份 (一)圖書 林震岩(民95)。多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用。台北市:智勝文化。 張紹勳著(民92)。研究方法(修訂版)。台北市:滄海書局。 (二)期刊論文 王精文、范凱棠(民95)。工作不滿足與持續承諾對員工創造力表現之影響。人力資源管理學報,6(4),81-98。 吳明隆、涂金堂(民94)。SPSS與統計應用分析(二版)。台北市:五南。 李建道(民91)。創造力人格、工作環境認知與研發績效關聯性研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中興大學企業管理研究所,台中市。 周明鴻(民94)。主管的領導型態對於部屬的創造力及工作滿足之影響研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中興大學企業管理學系研究所,台中市。 林佳慧(民89)。組織內部創新氣氛與知識管理機制關係之探討。未出版之碩士論文,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所,桃園縣。 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(民95)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。 黃荷婷(民91)。研發團隊成員目標導向與創新行為、創新績效-自我效能與集體效能的中介效果。未出版之碩士論文,東吳大學企業管理學研究所,台北市。 黃雯蓉(民90)。組織特性與工作特性對員工創造力的影響-以行銷相關工作為例。未出版之碩士論文,成功大學企業管理學系,台南市。 萬金生(民88)。自我效能影響個人參與與資訊委外績效之研究:以台灣公營機構為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所,高雄市。 劉士吟(民95)。高科技公司人力資源管理活動、研發人員創造力對組織創新能力影響之研究:以知識慣性為干擾變項。未出版之碩士論文,彰化師範大學人力資源管理研究所,彰化市。 劉崇義(民89)。顧客滿意之研究-以壽險業為例。未出版之碩士論文,中原大學企業管理研究所,桃園縣。 劉曉雯(民 87)。創造力工作環境特質對組織創租行為影響關係之研究-兼論內外在動機與資訊科技基磐的作用。未出版之碩士論文,中央大學企業管理學研究所,桃園縣。 劉崇義(民90)。顧客滿意之研究-以壽險業為例。未出版之碩士論文,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文,桃園縣。 蔣美惠(民 93)。探討保全人員生涯管理、人格特質及組織氣候對工作滿足、自我效能與工作績效之關聯性研究-以台北市保全公司為例。未出版之碩士論文,南華大學管理科學研究所,嘉義縣。 蔡立旭(民89)。組織氣候、組織學習與自我效能之關係。未出版之碩士論文,大葉大學事業經營研究所,彰化縣。 蔡啟通(民 86)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。未出版之博士論文,台灣大學商學研究所,台北市。 蔡啟通、高泉豐(民93)。動機取向、組織創新氣候與員工創新行為之關係:Amabile動機綜效模型之驗證。管理學報,21(5),571-592。 賴文魁(民94)。組織氣候、工作特性、內外控人格、自我效能與工作績效之關係研究-以陸軍某基地進訓基層單位為例。未出版之碩士論文,大葉大學國際企業管理學系研究所,彰化縣。 簡文娟(民88)。組織創新氣候評鑑量表之建立-以高科技產業為實證研究對象。未出版之碩士論文,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所,桃園縣。 饒瑞霖(民89)。創造力競爭環境、個人內在動機與創造力工作環境關係之探討--學童與廠商跨領域之比較。未出版之碩士論文,中央大學企業管理學研究所,桃園縣。 二、英文部分 (一)Books Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Amabile, T. M., Taylor, S., & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1995). Technical manual for KEYS: assessing the climate for creativity. Centre for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC. Amabile, T.M. (1996) Creativity in context. Boulder, CO:Westview. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. Bandura, A.(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A Social- Cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Daft, R. L. (1988). Management. Chicago: Dryden Press. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodeness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1999). Positive turbulence: developing climates fir creativity, innovation, and renewal. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Fancisco. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Insel, P. M., & Moos, R. H. (1975). Work Environment Scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press. Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster. Kerlinger, F. N.(1973) .Foundations of Behavior Research (2nd ed.). NY: Rinehart and Winston. Marsh, H. W., Ballam, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: a clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrece Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Noe, R. A. (2005). Employee Training and Development (3rd ed.). New York: McGRAW.Hill. Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organization. New York: Wiley. Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. (二)Journal Articals Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123. Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualization of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3) , 185-201. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivational creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-57. Amabile, T. M., & Conti, R. (1999). Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 630-640. Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The creative Environment Scale: the work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231-254. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M., (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1159-1162. Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. (2002). Creativity under the Gun. Harvard Business Review, 52-61. Amabile, T. M., Schatzl, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32. Anderson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(5), 449-469. Anyster, W., & Goodman, S., & Wallis, T. (2006). The formation of self-efficacy beliefs of skilled professional employees in a South African fruit export organization. S.Afr.J.Bus.Manage, 37(4), 19-28. Axtell, C., Holman, D., Unsworth, K., Wall, T., Waterson, P., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psycholohy, 73(3), 265-285. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human Agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D.H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598. Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit Indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 41-75. Birdi, K. S. (2005). No idea? Evaluating the effectiveness of creativity training. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(2), 102-111. Ching-Wen Wang, Kai-Tang Fan & Yi-Ting Chang. (2007, Feb). How to motivate team members’creativity in virtual teams: the motivating language theory perspectives. 14th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences, USA, Las Vegas. Chio, J. N. (2004). Person-environment fit and creative behavior: differential impacts of supplies-values and demands-abilities versions of fit. Human Realtions, 57(5), 531-552. Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584-594. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995b). Computer self-efficacy Development of a measure and initial test. Mis Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. Conger, J. A. (1991). Inspiring others: the language of leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 5(1), 31-45. Deborah, R. C., & Christopher, A. H. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. Dennard, R. H. (2000). Creativity in the 2000s and beyond. Research Technology Management, 43(6), 23-25. Devanna, M. A., & Tichy, N. (1990). Creating the competitive organization of the 21st century: the boundaryless corporation. Human Resource Management, 29(4), 445-471. Devanna, M. A., & Tichy, N. Creating the competitive organization of the 21st century: The boundaryless corporation. Human resource management, 29(4), 455-471. Ekval, G., Arvonen, J., & Waldenstrom-Lindblad, I. (1983). Creative organizational climate: Construction and validation of a measuring instrument. Report 2, Swedish Council for Management and Organization Behavior, Stockholm. Fairhurst, G. T., & Chandler, T. A. (1989). Social structure in leader-memberinteraction. Communication Monographs, 56, 215-239. Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-McIntyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618-630. Fobes, R. (1996). Creative problem solving. Futurist, 30(1), 19. Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142. Ford, C. M., & Gioia, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. Journal of Management, 26(4), 705-732. Ford, C., & Gioia, D. (2000). Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. Journal of Management, 26(4), 705-732. Francis, L. J., Kaldor, P., Shevlin, M., & Lewis, C. A. (2004). Assessing emotional exhaustion among the Australian clergy: internal reliability and construct validity of the scale of emotional exhaustion in ministry. Review of Religious Research, 45(3), 267-277. Gilson, L. L., Mathieu, J. E., Shalley, C. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (2005). Creativity and standardization: complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 521-531. Gist, M. E. (1989). The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers. Personnel Psychology, 42(4), 787-805. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-.211. Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C. S., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 884-891. Gist, M. E., Stevens, C. K., & Bavetta, A. G. (1991). Effects of self-efficacy and post-training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills. Personnel Psychology, 44, 837-862. Graen, G., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic originating. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208. Graen, G., Scandura, T.A., & Graen, M. R. (1986). A field experimental test of the moderating effects of growth need strength on productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 484-491. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. Helson, H. (1952). Vision. Annual Review of Psychology, 3, 55-84. Howkins, J. (2003). Rights for life. Director, 56(11), 27. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Isaksen, S. G., & Lauer, K. J. (2001). Convergent validity of the situational outlook questionnaire: Discriminating levels of perceived support for creativity. North American Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 31. Isaksen, S. G., & Lauer, K. J. (2002). The climate for creativity and change in teams. Creativity & Innovation Management, 11(1), 74. Kanfer, R.(1987). Task-specific motivation: an integrative approach to issues of measurement, mechanisms, processes, and determinants. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 237-264. Kanter, R. M. (1983). Change masters and the intricate architecture of corporate culture change. Management review, 72(10), 18. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169. Kirkman, B.L. & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment, Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74. Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629. Kwaśniewska, J., & Nęcka, E. (2004). Perception of the climate for creativity in the workplace the role of the level in the organization and gender. Climate for Creativity, 13(3), 187-196. Lent, R. W., & Maddux, J. E. (1997). Self-efficacy: building a sociocognitive bridge between social and counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(2), 240-255. Lievens, A., Moenert, R., & S’Jegers, R. (1999). Linking Communication to Innovation Success in the Financial Industry: A Case Study Analysis. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(1), 23-47. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science. 1(4), 240-246. Mayfield, J. R., Mayfield, M. R., & Kopf, J. (1995). Motivating language: exploring theory with scale development. The Journal of Business Communication, 32(4), 329-344. Mayfield, J. R., Mayfield, M. R., & Kopf, J. (1998). The effects of leader motivating language on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 235-246. Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2002). Leader communication strategies critical paths to improving employee commitment. American Business Review, 20(2), 89-94. Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2004). The Effects of Leader Communication on Worker Innovation. American Business Review, 22(2), 46-51. Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705-750. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634. Orang, D. W., & Greence, C. N. (1981). The effects of formalization on professional involvement: a compensatory process approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 237-252. Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1964). Detecting causal priorities in panel study data. American Sociological Review, 29(6), 836-848. Podsakfoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y.,& Podsakoff,N.P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature andRecommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects, Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. Purvanova, R. K., Bono, J. E., & Dzieweczynski, J. (2006). Transformational leadership, job characteristics, and organizational citizenship performance. Human Performance, 19(1), 1-22. Schepers, P., & Berg, P. T. (2007). Social Factors of Work-Environment Creativity. Journal of Business & Psychology, 21(3), 407-428. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607. Selby, E. C., Shaw, E. J., & Houtz, J. C. (2005). The creative personality. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 300-314. Sethi, V., & Carraher, S. (1993).Developing measures for assessing the organizational impact of information technology: a comment on mathmood and soon’s paper. Decision Science, 24(4), 867-877. Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483-503. Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham,G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here?. Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. Sharbough, W. C., Simmons, S. A., & Cantrill, D. A. (2006). Motivating language in industry: its impact on job satisfaction and perceived supervisor effectiveness. Journal of Business Communication, 43(4), 322-343. Sherer, M., & Maddox, J. E. (1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671. Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703-714. Smith, G. (1962). Creativity: YOURS FOR THE EFFORT. Vital speeches of the day, 28(14), 439. Stein, J. (2004). Feldstein: Challenges demand creativity. Automotive News, 79(6121), 40-40. Sullivan, J. J. (1988). Three roles of language in motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 104-114. Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resource: a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330. Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: the relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591-620. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E. & Griffin, R.W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: a review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251-289. Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 261-276. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696. Zorn, T. E. Jr., & Ruccio, S. E. (1998). The use of communication to motivate college sales teams. The Journal of Business Communication, 35(4), 468-500.
摘要: The main purpose of this study is to examine the moderating effect of leadership motivating language use on the relationship between employees' perceived creative work environment, self-efficacy, and creative performance. First, we investigate the impact of the creative work environment on employees' self-efficacy and creative performance. Then, we explore the moderating effect of leadership motivating language use on the above relationship. Through this study can help us to clarify how leaders modify or change organizational creative work environment, and in turn, influence employees' self-efficacy and creative performance. This study used paired-sampling with names recorded approach and surveyed two small businesses located in Tai-Chung. 295 respondents were surveyed, and 240 copies of questionnaires were returned, the respondent rates were 84.21%. The result shows that the perceived stimulates to creativity in organizational work environment have significantly positive influence on employees' self-efficacy and creative performance. On the contrary, the perceived obstacles to creativity in organizational work environment have significantly negative influence on employees' self-efficacy and creative performance. Furthermore, the leadership motivating language use is positively moderate the impact of perceived stimulates to creativity in organizational work environment on self-efficacy and creative performance. For the obstacles to creativity in organizational work environment, leadership motivating language use has slightly negative moderating effects on self-efficacy. However, leadership motivating language use does not significant moderate the influence of obstacles to creativity in organizational work environment on creative performance. To sum up, business should not only emphasis on shaping creative work environment, but use leadership motivating language to enhance employees' self-efficacy and creative performance, or to cease the negative effect on employees' self-efficacy, as well. Thus, managers should pay more attention to frame a creative work environment. Besides, in order to increase employees' self-efficacy and enhance their creative performance, leaders have to learn to use motivating language to communicate with their subordinates strategically.
本研究旨在探討領導者激勵語言對創造力工作環境、員工自我效能與創造力績效間之干擾效果,先檢驗創造力工作環境對員工自我效能、創造力績效之影響,再深入探討領導者激勵語言對兩者之干擾作用,試圖了解領導者如何透過本身所使用之激勵語言來塑造或改變組織內原有的創造力工作環境,影響其對於員工自我效能與創造力績效之作用。 本研究以台中地區兩家中小企業為分析對象,分兩階段發放計名問卷,共計發放295份,扣除無效問卷,並經過配對後,共回收240份有效問卷,有效樣本回收率為84.21%。研究結果發現,創造力工作環境中的促進因素對員工自我效能與創造力績效皆產生正向顯著影響,而抑制因素對自我效能與創造力績效則是呈現負向顯著影響;再者,領導者使用的激勵語言形態對創造力工作環境中「促進因素」與自我效能創造力績效間皆呈現正向顯著的干擾效果;而對「抑制因素」與自我效能間則呈現出部份負向干擾效果,對「抑制因素」與創造力績效間則沒有顯著干擾效果。 可知企業除應重視創造力工作環境之培養與建立外,尚可透過領導者激勵語言之運用,方能加乘環境中促進因素對自我效能與創造力績效的提升,或減緩抑制因素對自我效能之削減;因此,企業應正視創造力工作環境塑造之重要性,可藉由創造力工作環境之塑造提升員工自我效能與創造力績效,而領導者必須要學習以策略地採用他們的溝通風格來達成以及維持競爭優勢,透過日常工作中與部屬間溝通的激勵語言增強員工自我效能,提升創造力績效。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/20676
其他識別: U0005-2806200722251500
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-2806200722251500
Appears in Collections:企業管理學系所

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.