Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/20703
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor周世玉zh_TW
dc.contributor蕭子誼zh_TW
dc.contributor彭朱如zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor林金賢zh_TW
dc.contributor.author羅元邦zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLo, Yuan-Bangen_US
dc.contributor.other中興大學zh_TW
dc.date2009zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-06T07:14:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-06T07:14:19Z-
dc.identifierU0005-0607200823472000zh_TW
dc.identifier.citationㄧ、中文部份 吳思華 (1996),策略九說,台北:麥田出版。 吳思華 (2000),智慧資本衡量因素之研究─ 以我國軟體業為例,國立政治大學科技管理研究所。 劉常勇 (2001),老企業成長所面臨之挑戰,中山大學企管系。 劉常勇 (2002),創業管理的12堂課,台北:天下文化出版社。 王文英與張清福 (2004),智慧資本影響績效模式之探討-我國半導體業之實證研究,會計評論,第 39 期,89-117。 朱博湧,鄧美貞與黃基鴻 (2005),垂直整合與虛擬整合商業模式之績效比較: 台灣積體電路産業實證,交大管理學報,第二十五卷,第ㄧ期,1-27。 朱博湧,熊杏華,林裕淩與劉子衙 (2005),非營利研發機械之智慧資 本與績效評估-工研院之實證研究,管理學報,第二十二卷,第三期,277-293。 朱博湧,熊杏華與楊川毅 (2007),跨國無形資產價值驅動因子之研究-以台灣、美國 IC 設計業為例,管理與系統,第十四卷,第二期,239-264。 二、英文部份 Aaker, D. A., & Jacobson, R. (1987). The role of risk in explaining differences in profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 30(2), 277-296. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46. Anand, G., & Ward, P. T. (2004). Fit, Flexibility and Performance in Manufacturing: Coping with Dynamic Environments. Production and Operations Management, 13(4), 369-385. Anderson, C., & Zeithmal, C. (1984). Stages of the product business cycle, business strategy, and business performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 5-24. Andrews. KR. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin: New York. Bain, J. (1956). Barriers to New Competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2003). A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models. Economics Letters, 80(3), 391-397. Barney J, Griffin, R. (1992). The Management of Organizations: Strategy, Structure, and Behavior. Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41-57. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (2001). Fit in strategic information technology management research: an empirical comparison of perspectives. Omega, 29(2), 125-142. Berman SL, Wicks AC, Kotha S, Jones, TM. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(7), 488-506. Bontis, N., Keow, W. C. C., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85-100. Bourantas D, Papadakis V. (1997). Greek management: diagnosis and prognosis. International Journal of Management and Organization, 26(3), 13–32. Bourgeois III, L. J. (1985). Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 548-573. Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 419-30. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253. Brush, C. G., & Chaganti, R. (1999). Businesses without glamour? an analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3), 233-257. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock. Buzzell RD, Gale BT, Sultan, RGM. (1975). Market share, a key to profitability. Harvard Business Review, 53(1), 97–107. Cave, R. (1977). American industry: Structure, conduct, performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Chan, R. Y., and Wong, Y. H. (1999). Bank generic strategies: Does Porter’s. theory apply in an international banking centre. International Business Review, 8, 561-590 Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of American enterprise. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press. Chandler, G. N., & Hanks, S. H. (1994). Founder Competence, the Environment, and Venture Performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18(3). Child, J. (1972). Organization structure and strategies of control: A replication of the Aston study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 163-177. Conner, K. (1991). An historical comparison of resource based theory and five school of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17, 121-154. Dess, G. & Beard, D. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52-73. Dess, G. G., and Davis, P. S. 1984. Porter’s (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 467-488. Dierickx, I. & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511. Doty, D. H., Glick, W. H., and Huber, G. P. 1993. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1196–1250. Drazin, R., and Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 514–539. Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313-327. Dzinkowski, R. (2000). The measurement and management of intellectual capital: An introduction. Management Accounting, 78(2), 32-36. Edelman, L. F., Brush, C. G., & Manolova, T. (2005). Co-alignment in the resource–performance relationship: strategy as mediator. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 359-383. Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital Harper. Business New York. Fiss, P. C. (2007). A Set-theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180-1198. Foss, N. (1997). Resources and strategy: a brief overview of themes and contributions. Oxford University Press: New York, 3-18. Foss, N. 1996. Research in strategy, economics, and Michael Porter. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 1-24. Furrer, O., Alexandre, M.T. and Sudharshan, D. (2007). The impact of resource-strategy correspondence on marketing performance-financial performance tradeoffs. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 15(2), 161-183. Furutani, M. T. lida, T. Yoshida, and T. Maruyama (1998). Group II chaperonin in a thermophilic methanogen, Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus. Chaperone activity and filament-forming ability. Biol.Chem, 273, 28399-28407. Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Galbraith, S.; Schendel, D. (1983). An empirical analysis of strategy types. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 153-173. Govindarajan, V. (1988). A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: Integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 828-853. Grant, R. M. (2002). Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications. Blackwell Publishers. Grant, R. M. 1991. The Resource-Based Theory of competitive advantage: Implication for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135. Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. A. (1984). Errors in Variables in Panel Data. NBER Working Paper. Habib, M. M., & Victor, B. (1991). Strategy, structure, and performance of US manufacturing and service MNCs: a comparative analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(8), 589-606. Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hall, D., & Saias, M. A.(1980). Strategy follows structure. Strategic Management Journal, 1, 149-163. Hall, M., and Weiss, L. (1967). Firm size and profitability. The Review of Econoimcs of Statistics, 3 , 319-331 Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 135-144. Hambrick, D. C. (1983). An empirical typology of mature industrial-product environments. Academy of Management Journal, 26 , 213-230. Hofer, C. W. (1975). Toward a contingency theory of business strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 18 , 784-810. Hoskisson, R. E., M. A. Hill, W. P. Wan, and Yiu, D. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management , 25(3), 417-456. Jacobsen, R., (1988). The persistence of abnormal returns. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 415-430. Jauch, L. R., Osborn, R. N., & Glueck, W. F. (1980). Short term financial success in large business organizations: the environment-strategy connection. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 49-63. Jemison, D. B. (1981). The contributions of administrative behavior to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 633-642. Kabadayi, S., Eyuboglu, N., & Thomas, G. P. (2007). The Performance Implications of Designing Multiple Channels to Fit with Strategy and Environment. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 195-211. Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 570-598. Kerr, J., & Snow, C. (1982). A Conceptual Model of the Reward System Design Process. Academy of Management Meeting, New York. Kerr, M., & Snow, D. (1982). Alterations in haematocrit, plasma proteins and electrolytes in horses following the feeding of hay. Veterinary Record, 110, 538-540. Ketchen, D. J., Combs, J. G., Russel, C. J., Shook, C., Dean, M. A., Runge, J., Lohrke, F., Naumann, S., Haptonstahl, D. E., Baker, R., Beckstein, B. A., Handlers, C., Honig, H., and Lamoureux, S. (1997). Organizational configurations and performance: Ameta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 223–240. Ketchen, D. J., Thomas, J. B., and Snow, C. C. (1993). Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1278–1313. Lawless, M. W. (1987). The Structure of Strategy: A taxonon study of competitive strategy and technology in ttrategy. Unpublished technical report, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. Lawless, M. W., & Finch, L. K. (1989). Choice and determinism: a test of Hrebiniak and Joyce''s framework on strategy-environment fit. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4), 351-365. Lawrence, P.R., and Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Organization and Environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Luo, Y., & Park, S. H. (2001). Strategic alignment and performance of market-seeking MNCs in China. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 141-155. Marlin, D., Lamont, B. T., & Hoffman, J. J. (1994). Choice situation, strategy, and performance: A reexamination. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 229-240. Mason, E. (1939). Price and Production Policies of Large-scale Enterprises. American Economic Review, 29, 61-74. Mauri, A. and Michaels, M. (1998). Firm and industry effects within strategic management: an empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 211-219. Miller, D. & Shamsie, J. (1996). The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 519-543. Miller, D. (1981). Toward a new contingency perspective: the search for organizational gestalts. Journal of Management Studies, 18 , 1-26. Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3), 233–249. Miller, D. (1987). The genesis of configuration. Academy of Management Review, 12, 686-701. Miller, D. (1988). Relating Porter’s business strategies toenvironment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal, 31 , 280-308. Miller, D. (1992). Environmental fit versus internal fit. Organization Science, 3(2), 159-178. Miller, D. (1996). Configurations revisited. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 505-512. Miller, D. and Friesen, P. H. (1978). Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 31, 544-569. Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30(10), 1161-1183. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1986). Porter''s (1980) Generic Strategies and Performance: An Empirical Examination with American Data: Part I: Testing Porter. Organization Studies, 7(1), 37. Murray, A. (1988). A contingency view of Porter’s genericstrategies. Academy of Management Review, 13, 390-400. Porter, M. E. (1980). The Competitive Advantages, New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1981). The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 609-620. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press: New York. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Macmillan: New York. Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal,Winter Special Issue 12, 95–117. Prescott JE, Kohli AK, Venkatraman N. (1986). The market share–profitability relationship: an empirical assessment of major assertions and contradictions. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 377–394. Rumelt R. (1984). Toward a strategic theory of the firm. In Competitive Strategic Management, Lamb R (ed.). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 556-570. Rumelt, R. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167-185. Scherer FM, Ross D. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (3rd edn). Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA. 213. Scherer, F. (1990). Ross, 1990, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Aufl., Chicago, Schoonhoven, C. B. (1981). Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 349-377. Schwartz, H., & Davis, S. M. (1981). Matching corporate culture and business strategy. Organizational Dynamics, 10(1), 30-48. Segev, E. (1989). A systematic comparative analysis and synthesis of two business-level strategic types. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 487-505. Spanos Y. E, Lioukas S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter’competitive strategy framework and the resource based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 907-934. Spanos, Y. E., Zaralis, G., & Lioukas, S. (2004). Strategy and industry effect on profitability: Evidence from Greece. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 139-165. Standifer, R. L. (2004). Business-to-business electronic commerce relationships: The impact of B2B structure and other relational antecedents upon conflict and perceived success. (Ph.D., University of Missouri - Columbia). Sullivan, P. J. (2000). Value-Driven Intellectual Capital: How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets into Market Value. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. Berrett-Koehler Publisher. Tan, J. J., & Litschert, R. J. (1994). Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications: an empirical study of the Chinese electronics industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1), 1-20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. Venkatraman, N. (1989). The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423-444. Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 3(14), 423-444. Venkatraman, N. and Camillus, J. C. (1985). Exploring the concept of fit in strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 513-525. Venkatraman, N. and Camillus, J. C. 1984. Exploring the concept of “Fit”in strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 513-525. Venkatraman, N. and Prescott, J. (1990). Environment-strategy coalignment: an empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 1-23. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180. Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J., & Phillips, J. R. (1980). Structure is not organization. Business Horizons, 23(3), 14-26. Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (1994). Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 301-326. Ward, Peter T., Deborah J. Bickford, and G. Keong Leong (1996). Configurations of Manufacturing Strategy, Business Strategy, Environment, and Structure. Journal of Management, 22(4), 597–626. Yu-Ching Chiao, Kuo-Pin Yang, Chwo-Ming JosephYu. (2006). Performance, Internationalization,and Firm-specific Advantages of SMEs in a Newly-Industrialized Economy. Small Business Economics 26, 5, 475-492zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11455/20703-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to investigate how to choose an appropriate strategy for Taiwan's electronic firms? Should they pursuit the external fit between environment and strategy which based on Porter's competitive strategy framework; or should they pursuit the internal fit between resource and strategy which based on resource-based view? In order to achieve this purpose, we use the panel data for all the Taiwan's electronic firms since peroid 2000 to 2004. By Hausman test, we choose the regression model of fixed effect to confirm the research hypothesis. The results show that no matter external fit or internal fit is positively related to the performance. Also the interaction term between external fit and internal fit is positively related to the performance, which confirms that an appropriate strategy should consider the external fit and internal fit simultaneously. Among external fit, the environment of munificence, dynamism and complexity would fit with part of strategic groupings; and among internal fit, the structurue resource, customer resource and human resource would fit with part of strategic groupings. Following this result, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings, along with limitations and directions for future research.en_US
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討廠商在選擇策略時,應以Porter競爭策略觀點為基礎,追求環境與策略間的外部配適;或是以資源基礎觀點為基礎,追求資源與策略間的內部配適,才有助於企業獲利。為達上述研究目的,本研究利用台灣電子業內所有上市廠商2000至2004年共5年份的經緯資料 (panel data) 進行分析,經Hausman 檢定,本研究採固定效果估計模式來驗證研究假說。 實證結果顯示,外部配適與內部配適程度皆會正向地影響績效,且兩者間的交乘項亦正向地影響績效,證實了執行策略應同時尋求與環境、資源間配適的互補性觀點。而外部配適中,環境豐厚性、環境動態性與部分的執行策略間具良好的配適關係,內部配適中,結構資源、人力資源與部分的執行策略間亦具良好的配適關係。最後,針對上述結果,本研究提出ㄧ些建議供後續研究與實務界參考。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 3 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 產業組織學派與Porter競爭策略 6 第二節 資源基礎觀點 7 第三節 權變理論的配適觀點 8 第四節 配適的方法 9 第五節 環境 17 第六節 策略 18 第七節 資源 20 第三章 模型發展與假說 24 第一節 Porter競爭策略與外部配適 24 第二節 資源基礎觀點與內部配適 25 第三節 外部配適、內部配適的互補性關係 25 第四節 外部配適中各項環境特性和執行策略間的配適關係 26 第五節 內部配適中各項資源構面和執行策略間的配適關係 27 第四章 研究方法與研究設計 29 第一節 研究架構 29 第二節 樣本選取 31 第三節 變數的定義與衡量方式 31 第四節 資料分析方法 36 第五章 資料分析 42 第一節 敘述性統計分析 42 第二節 研究構面之相關分析 43 第三節 假說檢定 45 第六章 結論與建議 58 第一節 研究結論 58 第二節 理論與實務意涵 64 第三節 研究限制與建議 67 參考文獻 68 表目錄 表2-1 六種配適模型之分析比較 15 表2-2 策略歸類方式 19 表2-3 智慧資本定義匯整表 21 表4-1 探索型因素分析結果 34 表5-1 變數敘述性統計 43 表5-2 Pearson 相關係數表 44 表5-3 外部配適度、內部配適度對績效的迴歸分析結果 46 表5-4 各項環境與策略因子間配適對績效的迴歸分析結果 49 表5-5 各項資源與策略因子間配適對績效的迴歸分析結果 54 表6-1 研究假說與實證結果彙整 59 表6-2 第二階段研究假說與實證結果彙整 60 圖目錄 圖1-1 研究流程圖 5 圖2-1 調節配適模型架構圖 9 圖2-2 中介配適模型架構圖 10 圖2-3 相稱配適模型架構圖 11 圖2-4 共變異配適模型架構圖 12 圖2-5 完型配適模型意示圖 14 圖4-1 第一階段之研究架構 29 圖4-2 各環境與策略因子間配適關係之研究架構圖 30 圖4-3 各資源與策略因子間配適關係之研究架構圖 30 圖4-4 選取適當資料分析模型的檢定程序圖 41zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_USzh_TW
dc.publisher企業管理學系所zh_TW
dc.relation.urihttp://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-0607200823472000en_US
dc.subjectcompetitive strategyen_US
dc.subject競爭策略zh_TW
dc.subjectresource-based viewen_US
dc.subjectexternal fiten_US
dc.subjectinternal fiten_US
dc.subject資源基礎觀點zh_TW
dc.subject外部配適zh_TW
dc.subject內部配適zh_TW
dc.title如何選擇適當的策略? 以配適觀點為基礎zh_TW
dc.titleHow to choose an appropriate strategy from the strategic fit point of view ?en_US
dc.typeThesis and Dissertationzh_TW
Appears in Collections:企業管理學系所
文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.