Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
標題: How do firms cooperate with their competitors? The antecedents and consequences of firms' cooperative aggressiveness
如何與競爭者合作? 焦點廠商合作積極性的前置因子及結果
作者: 曾善美
Chung, San-Mei
關鍵字: AMC perspective
cooperative network
resource density
resource incompatibility
出版社: 企業管理學系所
引用: 參考文獻 Abell, D. F. (1980). Defining the Business: The Starting Point of Strategic Planning. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Ahuja, G. (2000), The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages.” Strategic Management Journal, March Special Issue 21, pp. 317-343. Aiken, M. and Hage, J. (1968), Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. American Sociological Review, 33, pp. 912–930. Ansoff, H. Igor (1984). Implanting Strategic Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs. Arino, A. and Torre, J. (1998), Learning from failure: towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. Organization Science, 9 (3), pp. 306-325. Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (1990), Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of large firms in biotechnology,’’ Journal of Industrial Economics, 38 (4), pp. 361-379. Atuahene-Gima, K. and Li, H. (2002), When does trust matter? An empirical analysis of the antecedent and contingent effects of supervisee trust on sales performance in selling new products in China and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 66 (3), pp. 61-81. Aulakh, P. S., Kotabe, M. and Sahay, A. (1996), Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Marketing Partnerships: a Behavioral Approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (5), pp. 1005-1053. Barnes, J. A. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations, 7 (1), pp. 39-58. Barney, J. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), pp. 99-120. Barney, J. (2001), Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), pp. 41-56. Baum, J. A. C. and Singh, J. V. (1996), Dynamics of organizational responses to competition. Social Forces, 74, pp. 1261-1297 Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., and Silverman, B. S. (2000), Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 267–294. Baum, J. A. C. and Korn, H. J. (1996), Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry. Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp. 255-291. Bengtsson, M., Eriksson, J., and Wincent, J. (2010), Co-opetition dynamics – an outline for further inquiry. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal. 20 (2), pp.194-214. Boeker, W., Goodstein, J., Stephan, J., and Murmann, J. P. (1997), Competition in a multimarket environment: The case of market exit. Organization Science, 8 (2), pp. 126-142. Brandenburger, A. and H. Stuart (1996), Value-based Business Strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 5 (1), pp. 5-24. Brandenburger, A. M. and Nalebuff, B. J. (1996), Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday. Caves, R. E. and Porter, M. E. (1977), From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. Journal of Economics, 9 (1), pp. 241-262. Chen, M. J. (1996), Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Towards a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), pp. 100-134. Chen, M. J. and MacMillan, I. C. (1992), Nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves: The roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (3), pp. 539-570. Chen, M. J. and Miller, D. (1994), Competitive attack, retaliation, and performance: An expectancy-valence framework. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (2), pp. 85-102. Chen, M. J. and Hambrick, D. C. (1995), Speed stealth and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2), pp. 453-482. Chen, M. J. and MacMillan, I. C. (1992), Nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves: The roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (3), pp.539-570. Chen, M. J. and Miller, D. (1994), Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy valence framework. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (2), pp. 85-102. Chen, M. J., Smith, K. G., and Grimm, C. M. (1992), Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses. Management Science, 38 (3), pp. 439-455. Chen, M. J., Su, K., and Tsai, W. (2007), Competitive tension: The awareness, motivation, capability perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1), pp. 101-118. Chen, M. J., Yu, T., Michel, J. G., and Cannella Jr., A. A. (2007), Crossborder competitive aggressiveness among MNCs: Market and resource considerations. Working paper, University of Virginia. Chen, M. (2008), Multicountry Competitive Interaction and Firm Performance with a Multilevel Approach- The Moderating Role of Competitive Rhythm. (Unpublished Master''s thesis). Chung Hsing University, Tai Chung. Cook, K. S. and Emmerson, R. M. (1978), Power, Equity, and Commitment in Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, pp. 721-739. Cool, K. O. and Schendel, D. (1987), Strategic group formation and performance: The case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, 1963-1982. Management Science, 33 (9), pp. 1102-1124. Cui, A. S., Roger, J. C., and David, G. (2011), Strategic Change and Termination of Interfirm Partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (4), pp. 402-423. Dobrev, S. D. and Kim, T. (2006), Positioning among organizations in a population: Moves between market segments and the evolution of industry structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, pp. 230-261. Dussauge, P., Garrette, B., and Mitchell, W. (2000), Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2), pp. 99-126. Dutton, J. E. and Jackson, S. B. (1987), Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review, 12 (1), pp. 76-90. Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998), The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4), pp. 660-679. Echols, A. and Tsai, W. (2005), Niche and performance: The moderating role of network embeddedness. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (3), pp. 219-238. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996), Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7 (2), pp. 136-150. Ferrier, W. J., Smith, K. G., and Grimm, C. M. (1999), The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4), pp. 372-388. Galbraith, J. R. and Kazanjian, R. K. (1986). Strategy implementation: Structure, systems and process. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing. Gimeno, Javier (1999), Reciprocal threats in multimarket rivalry: Staking out ‘spheres of influence’ in the U.S. airlines industry, ” Strategic Management Journal, 20 (2), pp. 101-128. Gimeno, Javier (2004), Competition within and between networks: The contingent effect of competitive embeddedness on alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6), pp. 820-842. Gimeno, J. and Woo, C. Y. (1996), Hypercompetition in a multimarket environment: The role of strategic similarity and multimarket contact in competitive de-escalation. Organization Science, 7 (3), pp. 322-341. Glaister, K. W. (1996), UK-Western European strategic alliances: Motives and selection criteria. Journal of Euromarketing, 5 (4), pp. 5-35. Gomes-Casseres, B. (1996), The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape of Business Rivalry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Granovetter, M. S. (1985), Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), pp. 481-510. Greve, H. R., (1998), Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (1), pp. 58-86. Greve, H. R., Baum, J. A. C., Mitsuhashi, H. and Rowley, T. J. (2010), Built to last but falling apart: cohesion, friction, and withdrawal from interfirm alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (2), pp. 302-322. Gulati, R. (1995), Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 619-652. Gulati, R. (1998), Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293-317. Gulati, R. and Garguilo, M. (1999), Where do interorganizational networks come from. American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5), pp. 1439-1493. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., and Zaheer, A. (2000), Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9 (4), pp. 361-374. Gnyawali, D. R. and Madhavan, R. (2001), Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (3), pp. 431-445. Gnyawali, D. R., He, J., and Madhavan, R. (2006), Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: An empirical examination. Journal of Management, 32 (4), pp. 507-530. Gnyawali, D. R., He, J., and Madhavan, R. (2007), Co-opetition: promises and challenges. in Wankel, C. (Ed.), The 21st Century Management: A Reference Handbook, 38 (1), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 386-98. Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. A., Tatham, R. L., and Black, E. C. (1998).Multivariate Data Analysis, (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, Thersea S., and Chen, M. J. (1996), The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on firms’ Competitive Moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (4), pp. 659-684. Harbison, J. R. and Pekar, P. (1998).Smart alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Hoang, H., and Rothermael, F. T. (2005),The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, pp. 332–345. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., and Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications. Jauch, L. R., Osborn, R. N., and Martin, T. N. (1980), Structured content analysis of cases: A complementary method for organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 5 (4), pp. 517-526. Johanson, J. and Lars-Gunnar M. (1984), Interorganization Relations in Industrial System: A Network Approach Compared with the Transactional Cost Approach. International Studies of Management, 17 (1), pp. 37-38. Kale, P., Singh, H., and Perlmutter, H. (2000), Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 217-237. Kilduff, M. and Tsai, W. (2003), Social Networks and Organizations. London: Sage. Kogut, B. (1989), The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38, pp. 183-198. Koka, B. R., Madhavan, R., and Prescott, J. E. (2006), The evolution of interfirm networks: Environmental effects on patterns of network change. Academy of Management Review, 31, pp. 721-737. Kumar, R. and Nti, K. (1998), Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: A process and outcome discrepancy model. Organization Science, 9 (3), pp. 358-367. Lado A. A., Boyd N. G., and Hanlon S. C. (1997), Competition, cooperation and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22 (1), pp. 110-141. Larson, A. (1992), Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, pp. 76-103. Levine, S. and White, P. E. (1961), Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5 (4), pp. 583-601. Livengood, R. Scott and Reger, Rhonda K. (2010), That’s our turf! Identity domains and competitive dynamics. Academy of Management Review, 35 (1), pp. 48-66. Lun, Y.H.V., Lai K.H., and Cheng, T.C.E. (2009), A descriptive framework for the development and operation of liner shipping networks. Transport Reviews, 29 (4), pp. 439-457 Lunnan, R. and Haugland, S. A. (2008), Predicting and measuring alliance performance: a multidimensional analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (5), pp. 545-556. Miller, Danny (1993), The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review, 18 (1), pp. 116-138. Miller, D. and Chen, M. J. (1994), Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (1), pp. 1-23. Mitsuhashi, H. and Greve, H. R. (2009), A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success: Complementarity and compatibility. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (5), pp. 975-995 Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. (1994), Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attribute, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp. 135-152. Morgan, R. and Hunt, S. D. (1994), The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), pp. 20-38. Moorman, C., G. Zaltman, and R. Deshpande (1992), Relationships between Providers and Users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (3), pp. 314-28. Neter, J. and Wasserman, W. (1974), Applied Linear Statistical Models. Richard D.Irwin Inc., Homewood, pp. 547. Oxley, JE. (1997), Appropriability Hazards and Governance in Strategic Alliances: A Transaction Cost Approach. Journal of law, Economic, and Organization, 13(2), pp. 387-409 Parkhe, A. (1993), Messy’ Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures. Academy of Management Review, 18 (2), pp. 227-268. Park, S. H., and Russo, M. V. (1996), When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure. ” Management Science, 42 (6), pp. 875-890. Peteraf, M. A. (1993), The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), pp. 179-191. Podolny, J. M. (1994), Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, pp.458-483. Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E. and Fuller, M. B., (1986), Coalitions and Global Strategy, in M.E. Porter(ed.), Competitive in Global Industries, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. pp. 315-343. Powell, W. (1998), Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40 (3), pp. 228-240. Powell, W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., and Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in Life Sciences, ” American Journal of Sociology, 110 (4), pp. 1132-1205. Priem, R. L. and Butler, J. E. (2001), Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), pp. 22-40. Renato, M. and Alessandro, P. (2000), A critical evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping. Maritime Policy and Management, 27 (1), pp. 31-40. Richardson, G. B. (1972), The organization of industry. Economic Journal, 82, pp. 883-896. Ritala, P., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., and Blomqvist, K. (2009), Tug of war in innovation-co-opetitive service development. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12 (3), pp. 255-272. Rowley, T. J., Behrens, D., and Krackhardt, D. (2000), Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 369-386. Simmel, G. (1950), Superordination and subordination and degrees of domination and freedom. In K. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of Georg, pp. 268-303. Singh, K. and Mitchell W. (1996), Precarious collaboration: business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 17, pp. 99-115. Singh, K. and Mitchell W. (2005), Growth dynamics: the bidirectional relationship between interfirm collaboration and business sales in entrant and incumbent alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (6), pp. 497-521. Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W. J., and Ndofor, H. (2001), Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. In M.Hitt, R. Freeman, and J. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management, pp. 315-361. London: Blackwell. Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., and Gannon, M. J. (1991). Dynamics of Competitive Strategy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. J., and Chen, M. J. (1991), Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (1), pp. 1-26. Thompson, J. D. (1967), Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill. Tushman, M. L. and Nadler, D. A., (1978) Information Processing As An Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. Academy of Management Review, pp. 613-624. Uzzi, B. (1997), Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), pp. 35-67. Wang, L. and Zajac, E. J. (2007), Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations. Strategic Management Journal, 28, pp. 1291-1317. Young, G., Smith, K. G., and Grimm, C. M. (1996), Austrian and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance. Organization Science, 7 (3), pp. 243-254. Yu, T. and Cannella Jr., A. A. (2007), Rivalry between multinational enterprises: An event history approach. Academy of Management Journal, 50 ( 3), pp. 665-686. Yu, T., Subramaniam, M., and Cannella Jr., A. A. (2009), Rivalry deterrence in international markets: Contingencies governing the mutual forbearance. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (1), pp. 127-147. Zaheer, A. and Zaheer, S. (1997), Catching the wave: Alertness, responsiveness, and market influence in global electronic networks. Management Science, 43 (11), pp. 1493-1509. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., and Perrone, V. (1998), Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9 (2), pp. 141-159.
摘要: Cooperative ties and resources incompatibility inside the networks affect the co-opetitive dynamic among the local firm and competitors. Firms can achieve superior performance through simultaneous co-opetition inside the network. This study also uses the AMC perspective as the basis of reasoning process to derive the hypothesis development. This study chooses the global liner shipping industry as the empirical research target and selects the top 21 container shipping companies as the research sample. Data from year 2010 are divided into 4 seasons for analysis. The news gathering of this study is retrieved from websites of the container companies and Cyber Shipping Guide. This study employs structure content analysis method to construct competitor's action database, then classifies competitor's actions of the global liner shipping company into 24 different categories. Finally, there are 84 samples, and the hierarchical regression model is used for statistical analysis. This study explores the effect of the focal firm's cooperative density and resource incompatibility by using co-opetition and structure embeddedness perspectives, then uses cooperation actions as a moderator to explores relationship between cooperation density/ resource incompatibility and cooperation aggressiveness. By examining co-opetition interaction of top 21 companies, the empirical results show: (1) cooperation density positively affects cooperation aggressiveness; (2) resource incompatibility negatively affects cooperation aggressiveness; (3) the greater number of tactical actions, the greater will be the positive relationship between cooperation density and cooperation aggressiveness; (4) the greater number of strategic actions, the less will be the negative relationship between resource incompatibility and competitor's action, and (5) cooperation aggressiveness negatively affects firm performance. In summary, this study investigates firms' co-opetiton actions based on co-opetition and network perspectives. The contribution of this study not only fulfils the gap of previous researches in competitive dynamics, but also shows the direction to the companies facing with co-opetition environment in practice.
網絡中的合作連結及資源會影響廠商之間的競合行為,且廠商與其競爭者的競合行為會影響其績效。本研究將運用動態競爭的觀點,由網絡連結關係及資源屬性來詮釋多國企業間競合互動之關係,並以察覺、動機與能力觀點 AMC 進行解釋與說明。 本研究以定期貨櫃航運產業作為研究對象,並選定全球前21大貨櫃航商作為研究樣本。研究資料來源主要取自CSG 研究機構資料,蒐集期間從2010年1月至12月,共1年4季進行資料分析。本研究使用結構內容法進行資料庫建立,並將全球定期貨櫃海運產業之競爭性行動歸類成24種行動分類,就產業內的合作與競爭進行相關探討。最後共計有84個樣本數,並以階層迴歸模型進行統計分析。 本研究由競合及網絡理論來探討焦點廠商與其競爭者的合作密度及資源不相容對其合作關係有何影響,並利用合作行動中的策略及戰術性合作行動當作干擾變數,進一步探討焦點廠商的合作密度及資源不相容對於合作積極性,是否會造成廠商合作行為產生變化。另外,本研究亦深入探討,廠商採取合作行動的積極性是否會影響績效。本研究發現:(1) 多國企業的合作密度越高,與競爭者的合作意願越高;(2) 多國企業與合作夥伴的資源不相容性愈高,則合作的意願越低;(3) 多國企業採取越多的戰術性合作行動,會強化合作密度與合作積極性之正向關係;(4) 多國企業採取越多的策略性合作行動,會弱化資源不相容與合作積極性之負向關係,以及 (5) 多國企業採取越多的合作行動,會導致績效下降。 本研究利用競合及網絡的觀點來詮釋廠商間的競合行為,除了彌補競合理論在過去動態競爭研究中之不足,讓理論內容更加完整外,並且也為實務帶來全新競合關係之意涵。
其他識別: U0005-2306201119111500
Appears in Collections:企業管理學系所



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.