Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/21980
標題: 台中縣市長治理特質之研究(2001-2009):企業家精神觀點
Leaders' Governance Style in Taichung County and City (2001-2009): Entreprenuship Perspective
作者: 賴義鍠
Lai, Yi-Huang
關鍵字: 企業精神市長
the Entrepreneurial Spirit Mayor
企業精神政府
城市經理制
台中縣市
the Entrepreneurial Spirit Government
Urban Governance
Taichung County and City
出版社: 國家政策與公共事務研究所
引用: 一、中文部分 (一) 專書 王佳煌(2005)。都市社會學。台北:三民。 王振寰(1996)。誰統治台灣?。台北:巨流。 江岷欽、劉坤億(1999)。企業型政府—理念.實務.省思。台北:智勝文化。 吳定主編(1989)。公共政策個案集。台北:政大公企中心。 吳瓊恩、李允傑、陳銘薰(2005)。公共管理。台北:智勝文化。 林水波(1999)。政府再造。台北:智勝文化。 林水波、李長晏(2005)。跨域治理。台北:五南。 柯三吉(1998)。公共政策與政治經濟論叢。台北:時英出版社。 胡幼蕙(1996)。質性研究―理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。 孫本初(1998)。公共管理。台北:智勝。 張紹勳(2004)。研究方法。台中市:滄海書局。 楊國樞主編(1993)。社會及行為科學研究法(上冊)。台北:東華書局。 葉至誠、葉立誠(2001)。研究方法與論文寫作。台北:商鼎。 詹中原等著(1999)。新公共管理:政府再造的理論與實務。台北:五南。 盧建旭 (1997)。公共行政學 WWW 導覽。台北:立威。 鍾起岱(1994)。行政革新:理論與方法。南投:台灣省訓練團。 (二) 期刊論文 朱雲漢(1990)。社會抗議與政治民主化。政治科學論叢,第1期,頁65-88。 江岷欽、劉坤億(1995)。企業型政府的省思:從美國行政革新經驗談起。人 事行政,第25卷第4期,頁34-45。 江岷欽、劉坤億(1996)。企業官僚理念的省思。空大行政學報,第6期,頁 123-136。 林水波、陳志瑋(1999)。企業精神政府的政策設計與評估。中國行政評論, 第8卷第2期,頁45-74。 詹中原(1998)。談企業精神組織。人力發展月刊,第58期,頁4-6。 賴秀真(1994)。台中市地方派系之特質。理論與政策,第8卷第4期,頁97-108。 (三) 專書論文 王仕圖、吳慧敏(2005)。深度訪談與案例演練。載於齊力、林本炫(主編), 質性研究方法與資料分析(頁95-114)。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究 所。 齊力(2005)。質性研究方法概論。載於齊力、林本炫(主編),質性研究方法 與資料分析(頁1-19)。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。 (四) 研討會論文 李長晏、莊旻達(2009)。企業型市長治理特質之研究:以企業性政府理念與 城市經理制為肇始,發表於第六屆地方治理與城鄉發展學術研討會,玄奘 大學主辦,新竹(2009年4月11日)。 詹中原(1998)。企業精神政府的設計與限制。發表於建構企業型政府研討會 論文輯,政治大學主辦,台北(1998年10月12日)。 (五) 學位論文 胡朝進(2004)。誰打造汐止-新都市政治經濟學分析。東吳大學社會學系在職 專班碩士論文,未出版,台北。 陳明照(2001)。企業精神政府之機制與設計。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩 士論文,未出版,台北。 陳華昇(1993)。威權轉型期地方派系與選擇之關係─台中縣地方派系之分析。 國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。 (六) 研究報告 李長晏(2008)。台灣都會治理問題研究。行政院研考會委託研究案,計劃編 號rdec-097-008,未出版。 省府住都局(1992)。台中都會區實質規劃報告。台中:省府住都局。 (七) 譯著 吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1999)。質的評鑑與研究(Michael Quinn Patton原著)。 台北:桂冠圖書。 李美華等(譯)(1998)。社會科學研究方法(The practice of social research, 8th Ed.) (Earl Babbie原著)。台北:時英出版社。 林世華、陳柏熹、黃寶園、傅瓊儀、趙如錦(譯)(2005)。社會科學研究方法: 量化與質化取向(Keith F. Punch 著)。台北:心理出版社 莊立民、王鼎銘(譯)(2004)。企業研究方法(質化與量化之應用(Robert Y. Cavana, Brain L. Delahaye, & Uma Sekaran原著)。台北:雙葉書廊。 黃惠雯(譯)(2003)。最新質性方法與研究(Benjamin F. Crabtree, & William L. Miller原著)。台北:韋伯。 潘明宏(譯)(1999)。社會科學研究方法(Chava Frankfort Nachmias, & David Nachmias原著)。台北:韋伯。 二、西文部分 (一) 專書 Berg, Rikke & Nirmala Rao (2005). Transforming Local Political Leadership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Childs, Richard S.(1952). Civic Victories: The Story of an Unfinished Revolution. New York: Harper & Row. Christensen, Terry (1995). Local Politics: Governing at the Grassroots. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. East, John Porter(1965). Council-Manager Government: The Political Thought of Its Founder, Richard S. Childs. Chapel Hill, CA: The University of North Carolina Press. Heywood, A. (2004). Political Theory: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Hunter, Floyd.(1953). Community Power Structure. Chapel Hill, CA: University of North Carolina Press. Jacobsen, D. I. (1997). Administrasjonens Makt- om Forholdet Mellom Politick Og Administrasjon. Bergen-Sandviken: Fagbokforlaget. King, Desmond, & Gerry Stoker(1996). Rethinking Local Democracy. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan. Leonard D. White(1927). The City Manager . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. March, J. G. & J. P. Olsen (1995). Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press. Mossberger, K. (2000). The Politics of Ideas and Spread of Enterprise Zones. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University. Press. Mouritzen, P. E. & J. H. Svara (2002). Leadership at the Apex: Politicals and Administrators in Western Local Governments. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Nalbandian, John(1991). Professionalism in local Government: Transformations in the Roles, Responsibilities, and Values of City Managers. San Francisco and Oxford: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Rao, N. (1993). Managing Change: Councilors and the New Local Government. New York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Starling, Grover(1998). Managing the Public Sector, (5th Ed.). Fort Worth, T: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. Stillman, Richard S. (1974), The Rise of the City Manager: A Public. Professional in Local Government, Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press. Stone, Harold A., Don K. Price & Kathryn H. Stone (1940). City Manager Government in the United States: A Review after Twenty-Five Years. Chicago: Public Administration Service. Svara, J. H.(1994). Facilitative Leadership in Local Government. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Svara, James H. (1990). Official Leadership in the City: Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. White, Leonard D.(1927). The City Manager. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (二) 期刊論文 Bellone, C. J. & G. F. Goerl (1992), Reconciling Public Entrepreneurship and Democracy. Public Administration Review, 52(2): 130-134. Boynton, Robert P. & Deil S Wright (1971). Mayor-Manager Relationships in Large Council-Manager Cities: A Reinterpretation. Public Administration Review, 31: 32-43. Childs, Richard S. (1912). What a Democracy Would Be Like. Everybody’s, 23: 10-18. Childs, Richard S. (1913). The Theory of the New Controlled-Executive Plan. National Municipal Review, 31: 32-41. Childs, Richard S. (1955). Civic Victories in he United States. National Municipal Review, 44: 24-33. Deleon, Linda.(1996). Ethics and Entrepreneurship. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3): 495-510. Goldsmith, Mike.(1998). Local Democracy and Local Government (book review). Public Administration. 76(3): 593-594. Hambletion, R. & D. Sweeting (2004). US-Style Leadership for English Local Government. Public Administration Review, 64: 474-488. Hood, C.(1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration 69(1): 3-19. Johnston, Von R.(1996). Optimizing Productivity through Privatization and Entrepreneurital Management. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3): 45-60. Morgan, David R. & Sheilah S. Watson (1992). Policy Leadership in Council-Manager Cities: Comparing Mayor and Manager. Public Administration Review, 52(5): 135-155. Roberts, N. C.(2002). Keeping Public Officials Accountable through Dialogue: Resolving the Accountability Paradox. Public Administration Review, 62(6): 658-669. Roberts, Nancy C.(1992). Public Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Policy Studies Review, 11(1): 351-374. Sava, James H.(1986).The Mayor in Council-Manager Cities: Recognizing Leadership Potential. National Civic Review, 75: 271-305. Wolman, H. & E. C. Page (2002). Policy Diffusion among Local Government: An Information-Theory Approach. Government, 15(4): 477-501. (三) 專書論文 Beetham, D. (1996). Theorising Democracy and Local Government . In D. King and G. Stoker(Eds.), Rethinking Local Democracy (pp.28-49). Basingstoke, England: Macmillan. John, P. & A. Cole (2000). Policy Networks and Local Political Leadership in Britain and France. In G. Stoker(Ed.), The New Politics of British Local Governance (pp.72-90). Basingstoke,England: Macmillan. Protasel, Greg J.(1995). Leadership in Council-Manager Cities: The Institutional Implications.. In Frederickson H. G. (Ed.), Ideal & Practice in Council-Manager Government (pp.33-55). Washington, D.C.: International City/Country Management Association. Stone, C.N.(1995). Political Leadership in Urban Politics. In D. Judge, G. Stoker & H. Wolman (Eds). Theories of Urban Politics (pp.96-116). London: Sage. Young, K.(2000). Opportunities, Constraints and “the Right to Represent”. In N. Rao (Ed.) Representation and Community in Western Democracies (pp.194-216). Basingstoke, England: Macmillan. (四) 網路等電子化資料 ICMA. Council-Manager Government--The Fastest Growing Form of U.S. Local Government Structure, Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http://icma.org/issueintersections/formofgovt.cfm.
摘要: 公共管理與企業管理是兩個差別極大的領域,在問題的表現和解決流程都有所不同,但政府機構與企業組織在管理層面上,還有著許多共通點。企業在市場經濟競爭中發展出的經營管理方式與原則,在塑造真正負責、效能卓越的政府方面,必然有其特殊的借鑑意義。這一點在地方政府管理的行政事務上尤其突出。換言之,企業管理的思想和原則在都市行政管理方面,現實的借鑑意義更強。本文透過文獻分析與深度訪談法之應用,探討公共管理理論下之企業精神政府意涵、美國城市經理制與市長作用之歸納,透過彼此間之文獻梳理與歸納,作為探索企業精神市長之治理特質,並作為後續研究之先行研究並透過台中市與台中縣兩個案討論。 經由研究發現,可將企業精神市長歸納為六項特質:強化溝通協調能力、專業性與參與性的授權、課責性、價值中立、重視行政效能、資源配置具效率。並且,移植的可能性是有,但要透過適度的評估以及並非全然的移植,還是需配合相關配套措施與設計才可執行。
Public Management is enormously different from business administration. Although they show the differences on the presentation of issues and the procedures of solutions, there are several common opinions between government organs and business organization from the management perspective. For the government, the industries create their own business style and principles and draw on special experiences of responsibility and efficiency, especially on administration affairs of local government. In another word, the thoughts and principles of business management means more important to administrative management of urban. This article adopts the Document Analysis and In-depth Interview to discuss the enterprising concept, governmental implication and generalizes the effects of manager and mayor of American urban. Then exploring the governed characteristics of entrepreneurial spirit mayor and making a study in advance through the cases of Taichung County and City. After the research, we can generalize six characteristics from the entrepreneurial spirit mayor: strengthened communication coordinated ability, specialization and participation authorization, accountability, value neutrality, value Administrative effectiveness and the efficiency of resource allocation. Besides, it's possible to transplant the system by estimating appropriately and cooperating with relative measures planning and design.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/21980
其他識別: U0005-2008200916464600
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-2008200916464600
Appears in Collections:國家政策與公共事務研究所

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館

Show full item record
 
 
Citations:


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.