Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
標題: 台灣科技育成中心之資源組合之研究
The Study of Resource Portfolios Among Technology Incubators in Taiwan-- a Resource Based View
作者: 陳浩源
Chin, How-Nyian
關鍵字: 科技育成中心
technology incubator
strategic alliance
Resource-based View (RBV)
case study approach
resource portfolio
tangible asset
intangible asset
出版社: 科技管理研究所
引用: Chinese References 吳泓鎰,2004,「創新育成中心對進駐生技廠商策略聯盟成效之影響」,碩士論文,中興大學科技管理研究所。 萬鍾汶/陸大榮,2004,「新興育成業務—育成中心角色的再檢視」,2003中小企業創新育成中心年鑑,經濟部中小企業處。 張雅嵐,2005,「以資源觀點及定位策略探討科技育成中心對女性企業之培育模式」,碩士論文,中興大學科技管理研究所。 林佩宜,2005,「創新育成中心知識價值鏈之研究-以台中區創新育成聯盟為例」,碩士論文,中興大學科技管理研究所。 邱啟綱,2005,「育成中心關鍵成功因素之研究-分析層級程序法(AHP)之應用」,碩士論文,實踐大學企業管理研究所。 English References Aleong, C. 2001. Models in strategy: Empirical and qualitative comparisons with applications to non-profits. Unpublished Ed.D., University of Pennsylvania, United States -- Pennsylvania. Arend, R. J., & Amit, R. 2005. Selection in Strategic Alliance Activity: Effects on Firm Performance in the Computing Industry. European Management Journal, 23(4): 361-381. Balkin, D. B., & Gianiodis, P. T. 2005. Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2): 241-263. Baranano, A. M., Bommer, M., & Jalajas, D. S. 2005. Sources of innovation for high-tech SMEs: a comparison of USA, Canada, and Portugal. International Journal of Technology Management, 30(1-2): 205-219. Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 99-120. Bonner, J. M., Kim, D., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2005. Self-perceived strategic network identity and its effects on market performance in alliance relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58(10): 1371-1380. Bruton, G. D., Lohrke, F. T., & Lu, J. W. 2004. The evolving definition of what comprises international strategic management research. Journal of International Management, 10(3): 413-429. Carayannis, E. G., Popescu, D., Sipp, C., & Stewart, M. 2006. Technological learning for entrepreneurial development (TL4ED) in the knowledge economy (KE): Case studies and lessons learned. Technovation, 26(4): 419-443. Carayannis, E. G., & von Zedtwitz, M. 2005. Architecting gloCal (global-local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices. Technovation, 25(2): 95-110. Carr, J. 2005. The implementation of technology-based SME management development programmes. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3): 206-215. Chiou, I., & White, L. J. 2005. Measuring the value of strategic alliances in the wake of a financial implosion: Evidence from Japan''s financial services sector. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(10): 2455-2473. Chou, T. C., Hsu, L. L., Yeh, Y. J., & Ho, C. T. 2005. Towards a framework of the performance evaluation of SMEs'' industry portals. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(3-4): 527-544. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. 2005. Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2): 183-216. Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. 2002. How effective are technology incubators?: Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7): 1103-1122. Cyert, R. M., & Goodman, P. S. 1997. Creating effective University-industry alliances: An organizational learning perspective. Organizational Dynamics, 25(4): 45-57. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.S. 2000. A resource based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1): 31-61. Davenport, S. 2005. Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition. Research Policy, 34(5): 683-701. Dean, E., Michael, A., & Marco, N. 2005. An overview of strategic alliances between universities and corporations. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1/2): 115-130. Etzkowitz, H. 1998. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8): 823-833. Ferneley, E., & Bell, F. Using bricolage to integrate business and information technology innovation in SMEs. Technovation, In Press, Corrected Proof. Finney, R. Z., Campbell, N. D., & Powell, C. M. 2005. Strategies and resources: Pathways to success? Journal of Business Research, 58(12): 1721-1729. Freel, M. S. 2005. Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms. Technovation, 25(2): 123-134. Foss, K., & Foss, N. J. 2005. Resources and transaction costs: How property rights economics furthers the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6): 541-553. Galbreath, J. 2005. Which resources matter the most to firm success? An exploratory study of resource-based theory. Technovation, 25(9): 979-987. Green, P. E., Carmone, F. J., & et al. 1977. On the analysis of qualitative data in marketing research.. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(1): 52-60. Haahti, A., Madupu, V., Yavas, U., & Babakus, E. 2005. Cooperative strategy, knowledge intensity and export performance of small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of World Business, 40(2): 124-138. Hoffmann, W. H., & Schlosser, R. 2001. Success Factors of Strategic Alliances in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises- An Empirical Survey. Long Range Planning, 34(3): 357-381. Iyer, K. 2002. Learning in Strategic Alliances: An Evolutionary Perspective. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2002: 1. Janell, D. T. 2003. Understanding alliances: A review of international aspects in strategic marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(3): 143. Lyons, M. P. 1991. Joint-ventures as strategic choice- A literature review. Long Range Planning, 24(4): 130-144. Lu, Ta-Jung; Wann, Jong-Wen “Entrepreneurship from Internal to External through Strategic Planning-The Typical Experiences of Public University''s Innovation Incubators in Taiwan”, International Journal of Innovation and Incubation 2004, 1, 51-62.Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Mian, S. A. 1996. Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to client firms. Research Policy, 25(3): 325-335. Muthusamy, S. K., & White, M. A. 2005. Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organization Studies, 26(3): 415-441. Nielsen, B. B. 2005. The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research, 58(9): 1194-1204. Peng, M. W. 2001. The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management, 27(6): 803-829. Phillips, R. G. 2002. Technology business incubators: how effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society, 24(3): 299-316. Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. John Wiley, New York. Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. 2005. University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3): 291-311. Rangan, U. S., & Yoshino, M. Y. 1996. Forging alliances: A guide to top management. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 31(3): 6-13. Ranjay, G. 1998. Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal (1986-1998), 19(4): 293. Rao, B. P., & Reddy, S. K. 1995. A dynamic approach to the analysis of strategic alliances. International Business Review, 4(4): 499-518. Rice, M. P. 2002. Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2): 163-187. Rivard, S., Raymond, L., & Verreault, D. Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, In Press, Corrected Proof. Robert, E. S., Theodore, M. F., III, Lynn, A. I., & Thomas, C. M. 1998. Alliance management: A view from the past and a look to the future. The Journal of Management Studies, 35(6): 747. Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. 2005. Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages. Research Policy, 34(7): 1076-1090. Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. 2005. University-incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance. Research Policy, 34(3): 305-320. Rothschild, L., & Darr, A. 2005. Technological incubators and the social construction of innovation networks: an Israeli case study. Technovation, 25(1): 59-67. Rumelt, R. P. 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. . New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs. Saarenketo, S., Puumalainen, K., Kuivalainen, O., & Kylaheiko, K. 2004. Dynamic knowledge-related learning processes in internationalizing high-tech SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 89(3): 363-378. Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. 1992. Towards a theory of business alliance formation. Scandinavian International Business Review, 1(3): 71-87. Tsai-Lung, L. 2004. Enhancement of Customer Network Relationship via Governance Mechanism of Inter-Organizational Core Resource and Core Knowledge Strategic Alliance. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 5(1/2): 220. Tsai-Lung, L. 2005. Impacts on Improvement of Organizational Synthetic Value Caused by Social Network Relationship. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 6(1): 102. Tsolmon, U., & Nord, W. R. 2005. Strategic Restructuring for Nonprofit Organizations: Mergers, Integrations, and Alliances. Academy of Management Review, 30(3): 643-645. Varadarajan, P. R., & Cunningham, M. H. 1995. Strategic alliances: A synthesis of conceptual foundations. Academy of Marketing Science. Journal, 23(4): 282. Verhees, F., & Meulenberg, M. T. G. 2004. Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation, and performance in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2): 134-154. Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. 2006. The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4): 541-567. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. Resource Based View of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 56: 1-17. Wohlstetter, P., Smith, J., & Malloy, C. L. 2005. Strategic alliances in action: Toward a theory of evolution. Policy Studies Journal, 33(3): 419-442. Wong, A., Tjosvold, D., & Zhang, P. Z. 2005. Developing relationships in strategic alliances: Commitment to quality and cooperative interdependence. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(7): 722-731. Yasuda, H. 2005. Formation of strategic alliances in high-technology industries: comparative study of the resource-based theory and the transaction-cost theory, Technovation, Vol. 25: 763-770.
摘要: 本研究主要透過對新興策略合作模式之瞭解,應用資源基礎理論(RBV)檢視影響科技育成進駐企業之關鍵資源組合及其特徵。最後針對台灣科技育成中心形成策略聯盟之可能型態提出建議。 首先經由整合資源基礎理論(RBV)對於企業(組織)必須維持所掌握的資源之異質性,以創造競爭優勢,因而推論科技育成中心作為產學合作之促成者,不但必須扮演好資源整合者之角色,並需要不斷地協助進駐企業取得所需的資源以加速產業界之研發與成長。 為檢視科技育成中心對進駐企業所提供之資源之關係,乃應用Logit模型作實證分析。實證資料得自對苗栗、台中、彰化、南投與雲林等中部地區23所育成中心經理人所作之問卷調查。實証結果顯示設施與空間等實體資源對於培育種子期進駐企業有顯著相關,商業與行銷網絡等無形資源對於發展期之進駐企業有顯著影響。其他資源如技術、管理、聲譽、取得經費等則無所差異。 本研究從組織資源基礎理論觀點,強調科技育成中心策略聯盟有助於擴大並強化進駐企業之競爭優勢。透過內外環境等檢視,建構組織的資源組合時,應視需求、市場競爭環境等因素,動態調整策略聯盟之運營與檢視。以實證研究檢視科技育成中心資源組合,科技育成中心策略聯盟之夥伴以達最佳之資源互補效率。
This research explores the operational model of a strategic alliance amongst technology incubators, and examines how incubator clients can benefit from the expanded and integrated resources offered by any one of the technology incubators through the application of a Resource-Based View (RBV). A survey was conducted by distributing a questionnaire to 23 incubator managers in central Taiwan. Through an empirical binary logic model we discovered that “facility” resources that were adequate and of good quality are significantly related to the seed clients' stage and “networking” resources for business and marketing opportunities are important to the expanding clients' stage. RBV theory was integrated with research done on technology incubators, and the feasibility of expanding the scale of the resources supporting the incubator by providing a greater resource pool for the clients through the development of strategic alliances was explored. SA technology incubator models should constantly be reviewed and adapted to the external environment as well as to the demands of the incubator clients to create and sustain the competitive advantages for the incubator clients. In addition, it is suggested that SA partners review the combination of their resource portfolios for the best interest of their clients. We encourage an empirical study on technology incubator resource portfolios and the development of a dynamic SA technology incubator model as worthwhile research to be further explored.
其他識別: U0005-3008200617401200
Appears in Collections:科技管理研究所



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.