Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/24551
標題: 產業群聚地區的群體經營績效分析研究─以台灣自行車產業為例
A Study of the Business Performance in the Industry Cluster - A Case of Bicycle Industry in Taiwan
作者: 李俊坤
Li, Chun-Kun
關鍵字: http://etds.lib.nchu.edu.tw/etdservice/view_metadata?etdun=U0005-1601200923334000
產業群聚
策略聯盟
合作關係
組織學習
競合關係
經營績效
出版社: 高階經理人碩士在職專班
引用: 參考文獻 一、中文部分 (一)圖書 1.Peter F. Drucker著,傅振焜譯,1994,「後資本主義社會」,台北:時報出版社。 2.Michael Porter著,邱如美、李明軒譯,1996,「國家競爭優勢/The Competitive Advantage of Nations」,台北:天下文化。 3.Michael Porter著,周旭華譯, 2000,「競爭策略-產業環境及競爭者分析」台北:天下文化。 4.Gary Hamel & C.K. Prahalad 著,顧淑馨譯, 1994,「競爭大未來」,台北:臉譜出版社。 5.Peter M. Senge著,郭進隆譯,1994,「第五項修練/The Fifth Discipline」,初版,台北:天下文化。 6.司徒達賢,李方仁與吳思華,1984,「企業概論」,教育部出版。 7.吳思華,1996,「策略九說」,台北:麥田出版社。 8.楊國安、大衛歐瑞奇、史蒂芬納森、瑪莉安范格林娜原著,劉復苓譯,2001,「組織學習能力」,台北:聯經出版社。 (二)期刊論文 1.司徒達賢,1979,「台灣企業之環境分析」,企銀季刊,第三卷,第一期,頁27-38。 2.李文瑞,2002,「策略聯盟類型與績效影響因素之研究」,中山管理評論。 3.佘日新、梁家隆和陳厚銘,2000,「廠商如何經由國外夥伴之技術合作提昇企業技術能力-以台灣資訊電子廠商為例」,管理學報,第十七卷第二期,頁297-319。 4.吳萬益,1994,「中美日在台公司企業文化與管理風格之關係研究」,成功大學學報,第二十卷,人文社會篇,頁63-90。 5.吳萬益、陳淑惠,1999,「集團企業組織文化、決策模式與經營策略之研究」,交大管理學報,第八期,頁1-46。 6.洪廣朋、李文瑞、翁宗志,2002,「廠商間長期合作關係模式之研究-台灣資訊電子代工廠商之實證」,管理學報,第十九卷第五期,頁781-810。 7.陳悅琴,2007,「廠商間合作關係對企業營運策略發展之影響探討」,輔仁管理評論,第十四卷第三期,頁145~180。 8.湯明哲及李吉仁,1999,「外包與專業製造廠商-雙贏的策略」,遠見雜誌,頁172-175。 9.王緝慈,2001,「創新的空間-企業集群與區域發展」。中國,北京大學。 10.江正信,2000,「高階經營團隊與企業策略決策模式、組織學習傾向、創新能力及經營績效之關係研究」,成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 11.吳榮林,2004,「組織學習、組織能力與經營型態的演進--以台灣中部某運動器材廠商為例」,東海大學管理碩士學程在職進修專班碩士論文。 12.邱鉅權,1989,「台灣大型企業的財務績效、組織創新與管理特質」,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 13.范成杰,2003,「國際市場進入模式決策與經營績效關係之研究—以台灣生物技術產業為例」,大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。 14.周立鼎,2006,「台灣自行車產業組織間學習與信任構築之探討--以A-Team為例」,東海大學工業工程與經營資訊研究所碩士論文。 15.高協聖,1996,「高科技事業組織學習類型與環境回應能耐關聯之研究」,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 16.陳倚瑄,2006,「台灣自行車A-Team產業互動策略之個案分析研究」,國立體育學院休閒產業經營學研究所碩士論文。 17.陳崇安,2003,「組織變革型態對組織學習與經營績效提升之探討」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 18.許文宗,2003,「代工範籌變化主動程度之之研究-以台灣國際代工廠商為例」,政治大學企業管理系博士論文。 19.郭為傑,2008,「產業群聚效應、價值系統與市場進入障礙對技術創新績效影響之研究─以數位電視IC設計產業為例」,大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。 20.黃延聰,2006,「代工聯盟中產品開發能力之提昇:知識管理過程觀點」,中山管理評論,第十四卷第四期,頁881-914。 21.黃銘章,2002,「影響代工供應商與顧客間夥伴關係因素之研究-以台灣電子資訊產業為例」,國立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。 22.梁善柏,2005,「競合關係、競合機制與資源整合 ─以台中港貨櫃碼頭現有業者為例」,東海大學管理碩士學程在職專班碩士論文。 23.蕭仁祥,2001,「策略聯盟績效評估分析系統設計之研究」,大葉大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 24.張陽隆,2001,「產業群聚成因、廠商行為與組織績效之關聯性研究─以高科技產業為例」,成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 25.闕曉俐,2004,「跨國聯盟關係演進與企業成長策略之個案研究」,國立台灣大學國際企業研究所未出版之碩士論文。 26.游曉芸,2003,「大陸台商策略聯盟類型決定因素之研究-以電機電子業實證」,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 27.孫嘉琪,2004,「組織學習、組織創新與企業核心競爭優勢關係之研究-以台灣發光二極體產業為例」,南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 (三)網路資源 1.林毅夫,2005,比較優勢與中國經濟發展。http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/printpage.htm 二、英文部分 1.Argyris, C., “Double Loop Learning In Organization”,1977, Harvard Business Review, 55, PP.115-125. 2.Barney, J.G., 1991, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17, pp.99-120. 3.Brandenburger A. M., & Nalebuff B. J., 1996, Co-opetition. New York:Currency Doubleday. 4.Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal D. A.,1990, “Absorptive Capacity : A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp.128-152. 5.Contractor F. J. and Lorange, P.,1988, “Why should Firm Cooperate? The Strategy and Economics Basis for Cooperative Ventures” , Cooperative Strategies in International Business, New York:Lexingion Books. 6.Czamanski, S. and L. A. Ablas.1979, “Identification of Industrial Clusters and Complexes:A Comparison of Methods and Findings. ”Urban Studies 16, no.1 : 61-80. 7.Das, T. K. & Teng B-S, 2000, A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances, Jouranl of Management, 26 (1):13-61. 8.Dyer, J., 1997, “Managing the Global Supply Chain”, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, pp.1387-1390. 9.Grant, Robert M., 1991, The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage : Implications for Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, 33(3) : 114-135. 10.Grant, R.M., 1996,”Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments : Organization Capability as Knowledge Integration”, Organization Science, 7(4), pp.375-387. 11.Grittner, P.,1996, “Four Elements of Successful Sourcing Strategies”, Management Review, 41, pp.41-45. 12.Gulati, R., 1998, “Alliances and Networks”, Strategic Management Journal, 19, pp.293.317. 13.Hamel Gary, 1991, “Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Leaning within International Strategic Alliance”, Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp83-103. 14.Hanson, G. H,1995, “Incomplete Contracts, Risk, and Ownership”, International Economic Review, 36, pp.341-357. 15.Hedberg, B.,1981, “How Organizations Learn and Unlearn in P.C. Industry”, Nystrom and W.H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook or Organizational Design, 1, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.8-27. 16.Huber, G. P.,1991, “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures”, Organization Science, 2(1), pp.88-115. 17.Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M.A. & Vaidyanath, D., 2002, Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 28(3) : 413-446. 18.Iyer, K. N. S., 2002, Learning in Strategic Alliances : An Evolutionary Perspective, Academy of Marketing Science Review, No. 10. 19.Joseph, D. Cruz. and M. Rugman Alan. 1992, ” Business Network for International Competitiveness.” Business Quarterly 56, Iss.4: 101-107. 20.Kanter, R. M.,1994, “Collaborative Advantage: The Art of Alliances”, Harvard Business Review, July-August, pp.96-108. 21.Kogut, B. and Zander, U.,1993, “Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation”, Journal of International Business Studies, 4, pp.625-643. 22.Krogh, G., 1998, “Care in Knowledge Creation”, California Management Review, 40(3), pp-133-153. 23.Lei, D. & Slocum, J. W. Jr., 1992, Global Strategy, Competence-building and Strategic Alliances, California Management Review, Fall : 81-97. 24.Lumpkin G.T. and G. G. Dess, 1996, “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Constructs and Linking it to Performance,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21(1), pp.135-172. 25.Lyles, M., 1992, ”The impact of organizational learning on joint venture formations Presented at the Academy of Management “ Meetings Las Vegas, Nevada. Marquardt, M. and Reynolds, A., 1994, “ The global learning organization “ (New York: Irwin Professional Publishing). 26.Marks, H.M, & Louiss, K.S., 1999, “Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning.” Education Administration Quarterly, 35, pp.707-750. 27.Morgan and Rramirez, 1983 ,“Action Learning: A Holographic Metaphor for Guiding Change”, Human Relations, vo1.37.No1.,pp.1-28. 28.Penrose, E.T., 1959, “The Theory of the Growth of the Firm”. New York:John Wiley andSons, Inc. 29.Quinn, B. J.,1999, “Strategic Outsourcing: Knowledge Capabilities”, Sloan Management Review, 28(7), pp.9-21. 30.Ring, P. S., and A.H. Van de Ven, 1994, “Development Process of Cooperative International Organizational Relationship”, Academy of Management Review, 19, pp.90-118. 31.Rackham, N., Lawrence, F. and Ruff, R., 1995, “Getting Partnering Right”, McGraw Hill. 32.Reed, Richard, David J. Lemak and Joseph C. Montgomery, 1996, “Beyond Process: TQM Content and Firm Performance, “ Academy of Management Review, Vol.21(1), pp.173-202. 33.Rosenfeld, S.1995, Industrial Strength Strategies Regional Business Clusters and Public Policy, Washington, D.C. 34.Teece, D. J., 1996, “Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, pp193-224. 35.Tsang, E.W.K., 1997, “Choice of International Technology Transfer Mode : A Resource-Based View, ”Management International Review, 37(2), pp.151-168. 36.Uzzi, B., 1997, “Social Structure and Competition in Inter-Firm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp.35-67. 37.Venkatraman, N. and Vasudevan Ramanujam, 1986, “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research : A Comparison of Approaches, ”Academy of Management Review, Vo1.11(4), pp.801-814. 38.Wernerfelt, B.,1984, “ A Resource-Based View of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp.171-180. 39.Wilson, D.T., 1995, “An Integrated Model of Buyer-Seller Relationships”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(Fall), pp.335-345.
摘要: 本研究旨在探討產業群聚地區中企業群體的經營績效會受何種因素影響,以台灣的自行車產業為例,並以A-Team為個案研究對象。透過個案分析和相關文獻、研究資料,再進行比較分析,最後試圖歸納出產業群聚地區中的企業群體如何提高其經營績效。 研究結果顯示:在產業群聚地區中,若能組成「策略聯盟」群體,則可更有效地促進該聯盟成員之經營績效提高,而且若聯盟成員間「合作關係」的程度愈緊密或「組織學習」的互動程度愈高或「良性競爭」的程度愈高,則經營績效愈高。
The purpose of this study was to discuss potential impacts of the business performance in the industry cluster. This research focuses on the study of the bicycle industry in Taiwan. Base on the individual case study of A-Team. This research is collection of case study, relating reference and researching data at first. After that we compare and analysis all information. Finally, we try to get the conclusions how to improve the business performance in the industry cluster. This research has reached the following conclusions: A group makes strategy alliance in the industry cluster that can improve the business performance of all members. And the following each three conditions make the positive influential to more excellent business performance also. First, the more cooperative relationship in the strategy alliance makes it happens. Second, the higher organizational learning each other make it happens. Third, the more healthy or constructive competition make it happens.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/24551
其他識別: U0005-1601200923334000
Appears in Collections:高階經理人碩士在職專班

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.