Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/24647
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor陳俊合zh_TW
dc.contributor林鳳麗zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor許永聲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author陳佩君zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChen, Pei-Chunen_US
dc.contributor.other中興大學zh_TW
dc.date2010zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-06T07:23:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-06T07:23:22Z-
dc.identifierU0005-1706200911454400zh_TW
dc.identifier.citationㄧ、中文部份 李雅蕙,民國85年,「企業研究發展支出與股價報酬關係之研究」,私立東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 沈維民,民國86年。「企業之盈餘管理:以會計方法選用和應計項目認列為例」,管理評論,第16卷第1期:頁11-38。 吳明儀,民國86年,「管理當局股權結構與盈餘管理相關性之研究」,國立中興大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 施振榮,民國85年5月,「再造宏碁」,天下文化出版。 郭蓁容,民國97年,「資訊揭露、裁決性應計項目與實質盈餘管理之關聯」,國立中興大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 陳依蘋,民國91年,「透明度與企業價值」,會計研究月刊,第200期:頁48-54。 張瑞當、方俊儒。民國95年,「資訊揭露評鑑系統對企業盈餘管理行為之影響」,會計評論,第42期:頁1-22。 鄭嘉珮、劉錦添。民國84年,「台灣廠商研究發展支出的分析」,台灣銀行季刊,第45卷第2期:頁138-152。 歐進士,民國87年,「我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯性之實證研究」,中山管理評論,第6卷第2期:頁357-386。 二、西文部份 Baber, W., P. Fairfield. and J. Haggard, 1991,“ The Effect of Concern about Reported Income on Discretionary Spending Decisions: The case of Research and development,”The Accounting Review, Vol. 66, Iss. 4, pp. 818-829. Bartov, E. 1993. “The timing of asset sales and earnings manipulation.” The Accounting Review, pp. 840-855. Berger, P., 1993, “Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R&D tax credit,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.31, Iss.2, pp. 131-171. Branch, B., 1974, “Research and development activity and profitability:a distributed lag analysis ,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, Iss. 5, pp. 999-1011. Brenner, M. S. and B. M. Rushton, 1989, “Sales growth and R&D in the chemical industry,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 32, Iss. 2, pp. 8-15. Bushee, B., 1998, “The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 73, Iss. 3, pp. 305-333. Chung Kee H., Pruitt and Stephen W. ,1994,. “A Simple Approximaion of Tobin''s Q, ” Financial Management, Autumn, Vol.23, No.3, pp. 70-74. Dechow, P. M. and R. Sloan, 1991, “Executive incentives and the horizon problem:an empirical investigation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 51-89. Dechow, R. and D. Skinner, 2000, “Earnings management:reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners and regulators,” Accounting Horizons, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, pp. 235-250. Defond, M., 2002, “Discussion of the balance sheet as an earnings management constraint,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 77, pp. 29-33. Demirag I. and Tylecote A, 1992, “ The effects of organizational culture ,structure and market expections on technological innovation:a hypothesis, ” British Journal of Management, Vol. 3 , pp.7-20. Dhaliwal, D.S. G. L. Salamon and E. D. Smith ,1982, "The Effect of Owner Versus Management Control on the Choice of Accounting Methods,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.4, No.1, pp.41-54. Drucker, P., 1986, “Drucker on management:a crisis of capitalism,” Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition, September 30, pp. 1-1. Dye, R., 1988, “Earnings Management in an Overlapping Generations Model,” Journal of Accounting Research, 26, pp.195-235. Ewert, R. and A. Wagenhofer, 2005, “Economic effects of tightening accounting standards to restrict earnings management,” The Accounting Review, Forthcoming, Vol. 80, Iss. 4, pp. 1101-1101. Glosten, L. and P. Milgrom, 1985, “Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialistmarket with heterogeneously informed traders,” Journal of FinancialEconomics, Vol.14, No.1, pp.71-100. Gosman,M. ,1973, “Characteristics of FirmMaking Accounting Changes.” The Accounting Review,Vol. 48, No.1, pp.1-11. Graham, J., C. Harvey and S. Rajgopal, 2005, “The economic implications of corporate financial reporting,” Journal of Accounting and Economic, Vol. 40, Iss. 1-3, pp. 3-73. Graves S. B. , 1988, “ Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer industry, ” Academy of Management Journal, June, Vol. 31, pp. 417-428. Green, J. P., A. W. Steaark and H. M. Thomas, 1996, “UK evidenve of market valuation of research and development ex-72 -penditures,” Journal of Business & Accounting, Vol. 23, pp.191-216. Gunny, K., 2005, “What are the consequences of real earnings management?” Working paper, University of Colorado. Healy P. M. ,1985, “ The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, April, Vol. 7 , pp.85-107. Hirst, D. and P. Hopkins, 1998, "Comprehensive income reporting and analysts'' valuation judgments," Journal of Accounting Research , Vol.36, No.3, pp.47-75. Healy, R. and J. Wahlen, 1999, “A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting,” Accounting Horizons, Vol. 13, Iss. 4, pp. 365-383. Herrmann, T., T. Inoue and W. B. Thomas, 2003, “The sale of assets to manage earnings in Japan.,” Journal of Accounting Research 41,pp. 89-108. Hunton, J., R. Libby and C. Mazza, 2004, “Financial reporting transparency and earnings management, ” Working paper. Jacobs, M., 1991, “Nonfiction short-term America:the causes and cures of our business myopia,” Stuttaford, Genevieve, Publishers Weekly, New York, Vol. 238, Iss. 37, pp. 41-41. Kim, O. and R. E. Verrecchia, 2001," The Relation among Disclosure, Returns, and Trading Volume Information," The Accounting Review,Vol.76, No. 4, pp.633-654. Lev, B. and T. Sougiannis, 1996, “The Capitalization, Amortization and Value-Relevance of R&D,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 21, Iss. 1, pp. 107-138. Myers, S. and N. Majluf, 1984, “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have investment information that investors do not have,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, pp. 187-220. Oswald, D. and Zarowin, P., 2004,"Capitalization of R&D and informativeness of stock prices” , working paper, London Business School, New York University. Perry, S. and R. Grinaker, 1994, “Earnings expectations and discretionary research and development spending,” Accounting Horizons, Vol. 8, Iss. 4, pp. 43-51. Porter, M., 1992, “Capital choice : changing the way America invests in industry,” Boston, MA, council on Competitiveness/Harvard Business School. Richardson, V., 1998, " Information Asymmetry and Earning Management:Some Evidence,” Working paper, University of Kansas. Roychowdhury, S., 2006, “Earnings management through real activities manipulation,” Working paper, June, Sloan School of Management. Schipper, K., 1989, “Commentary on earnings management,” Accounting Horizons, December, Vol. 3, Iss. 4, pp. 91-102. Hall, L. A., and B.S. Sharmistha , 2002,"A study of R&D, Innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry,”Technovation, Vol.22, pp.231-244. Sougiannis, T., 1994, “The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D,” The Accounting Review, Jan., Vol. 69, Iss. 1, pp. 44-68. Teoh, S. H., Welch, and T. J. Wong. 1998, “Earnings management and post-issue performance of seasoned equity offers,” Journal of financial Economics , Oct., Vol.50, pp. 63-99. Thomas, J. and H. Zhang, 2002, “Inventory changes and future returns,” Review of Accounting Studies, 7, 163-187. Wang, S. and J. D’ Souza, 2006, “Earnings management:the effect of accounting flexibility on R&D investment choices,” Working paper, MCU. Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman, 1986 , “Positive Accounting Theory,” Prentice-Hall, USA. Wiedman, C., 1996, “The relevance of characteristics of the information environment in the selection of a proxy for the market’s expectations for earnings: An extension of Brown, Richardson, and Schwager,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.34, Iss.2, pp.313-324zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11455/24647-
dc.description.abstract研究發展是維持企業競爭力的關鍵因素之一,然而由於研究發展支出具有未來效益不確定且存在長期及時間遞延的效果,管理當局可能為了追求短期利益而犧牲具有長期效益的研究發展計劃等創新活動。本研究主要係以裁減研發支出為例,探討企業面臨提升資訊透明度的資訊揭露評鑑系統實施時,是否會因為形式盈餘管理操作受到限制,而採用裁減研發支出的實質盈餘管理行為,並討論產業研究發展密度是否會影響此實質盈餘管理行為。 實證結果發現,資訊揭露評鑑系統實施,會增加企業利用裁減研究發展支出進行盈餘管理的機率。此外,研究發展密度較高的產業,企業利用裁減研究發展支出進行盈餘管理的可能性較低。但是研究發展密度會影響因資訊揭露評鑑系統的實施,所增加以裁減研究發展支出進行盈餘管理機率並未獲得證實。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractR&D is one of key aspects for keeping enterprise's competitive capacity, However,the uncertainly benefits, long-term and time deferred results of R&D might cause the manager to sacrifice those plans for R&D which are innovative and have long-term beneficial result for obtaining the short-term benefits. Taking R&D Cutting as an Example, this paper mainly inquires when the enterprises meet the situation that the Information Disclosure and Evaluation System would promote the information transparency, whether the accounting earnings management be limited and adopt R&D cutting of the real earnings management. And we also discuss whether R&D Intensity affects the behavior of real earnings management. The empirical results revealed the following facts. The implementation of information disclosure and evaluation system would increase the probability which the enterprisesuse cutting R&D expenditure as a tool for earnings management. Besides, The higher R&D Intensity of the industry, the less possibility by cutting R&D expenditure as a tool of earnings management. The effect of R&D intensity on the relationship between the implementation of Information Disclosure and Evaluation system and the real earnings management using R&D cutting is not confirmed.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 I 英文摘要 II 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 2 第三節 研究架構與流程 3 第二章 文獻探討與假說發展 5 第一節 裁減研發支出的實質盈餘管理 5 第二節 研究發展密度與資訊揭露評鑑系統對實質盈餘管理行為的影響 10 第三章 研究方法 17 第一節 樣本期間與選樣標準 17 第二節 實證模型建立 18 第三節 變數定義與衡量 20 第四章 實證結果 25 第一節 敘述性統計分析 25 第二節 Logistic迴歸分析結果 34 第五章 結論與建議 37 第一節 結論 37 第二節 研究限制與建議 38 參考文獻 40zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_USzh_TW
dc.publisher高階經理人碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.subjecthttp://etds.lib.nchu.edu.tw/etdservice/view_metadata?etdun=U0005-1706200911454400en_US
dc.subject研發密度zh_TW
dc.subject資訊揭露評鑑系統zh_TW
dc.subject實質盈餘管理zh_TW
dc.subject裁減研究發展支出zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effect of R&D Intensity and Information Disclosure & Transparency Rankings System on Real Earnings Management ---Taking R&D Cutting as an Exampleen_US
dc.title研究發展密度與資訊揭露評鑑系統對企業實質盈餘管理行為的影響 ---以裁減研究發展支出為例zh_TW
dc.typeThesis and Dissertationzh_TW
Appears in Collections:高階經理人碩士在職專班
文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.