Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
The effects of perch height and perch diameter on the behavior and growth traits of Taiwan Country Chicken during rearing period
Taiwan country chicken
|引用:||甘明宗，1986。公母分飼、合飼及棲木對土雞日間作息行為、鬥爭行為、性行為及經濟性狀之影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。 李淵百、甘明宗、陳振台，1986。土雞攻擊行為的發展與社會地位的決定。中畜會誌。15(3~4):25~37。 姜中鳳，1994。不同公母比例飼養法、棲架及飼桶添置與飼糧添加色氨酸，對台灣土雞日間作息、鬥爭及性行為與重要經濟性狀之影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。 陳亭蓉，1998。北京油雞、絲羽烏骨雞、台灣地區商用烏骨雞與土雞育成期生長與行為性狀之比較。碩士論文。國立中興大學。 陳明修，1998。十四種品系雞隻的血液學與血液化學數據。碩士論文。國立中興大學。 曾秋隆，2005。曾氏獸醫臨床病理學75-80頁。偉明圖書有限公司。台北市。 黃誠鑑、李淵百、黃暉煌，1985。台灣商用土雞重要性狀的遺傳率與遺傳相關：1、體重、雞冠與肉髯。中畜會誌。14(3~4):69~78。 葉力子，1990。剪爪、棲架及公母分、合飼對土雞趨近性成熟階段之日間作息、鬥爭行為、性行為及經濟性狀之影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。 Appleby, M. C. 1990. Behaviour of laying hens in cages with nest sites. Br. Poult. Sci. 31:71-80. Appleby, M. C. 1993. Should cages for laying hens be banned or modified? Anim. Welfare 2:67-80. Appleby, M. C. 1995. Perch length in cages for medium hybrid laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 36:23-31. Appleby, M. C. 1998. Modification of laying hen cages to improve behavior. Poult. Sci. 77:1828-1832. Appleby, M. C., J. H. Duncan, and H. E. McRae. 1988. Perching and floor laying by domestic hens: Experimental results and their commercial application. Br. Poult. Sci. 29:351-357. Appleby, M. C., B. O. Hughes, and G. S. Hogarth. 1989. Behaviour of laying hens in a deep litter house. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:545–553. Appleby, M. C., and B. O. Hughes. 1990. Cages modified with perches and nests for the improvement of brid welfare. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 46:38-40. Appleby, M. C., and B. O. Hughes. 1991. Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: Environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 47:109–128. Appleby, M. C., S. F. Smith, and B. O. Hughes. 1992. Individual perching behaviour of laying hens and its effect in cage. Br. Poult. Sci. 33:227-238. Appleby, M. C., S. F. Smith, and B. O. Hughes. 1993. Nesting, dust bathing and perching by laying hens in cages: effect of design on behavior and welfare. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:835-847. Appleby, M. C., B. O. Hughes, M. McDonald, and L. S. Cordiner. 1998. Factor affecting the use of perches in cages by laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 39:186-190. Appleby, M. C., J. A. Mench, and B. O. Hughes. 2004. Poultry Behaviour and Welfare, CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA. Appleby, M. C., A. W. Walker, C. J. Nicol, A. C. Lindberg, R. Freire, B. O. Hughes, and H. A. Elson. 2002. Development of furnished cages for laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci.43:489-500. Barnett, J. L., P. C. Glatz, E. A. Newman, and G. M. Cronin. 1997. Effects of modifying layer cages with perches on stress physiology, plumage, pecking and bone strength of hens. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture.37:523-529. Bell, D. D. 2002. Chapter 52: Cage management for layers. Pages 1007–1040 in Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production, 5th ed. D. D. Bell and W. D. Weaver, Jr., ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA. Bishop, S. C., and R. H. Fleming, H. A. Mccormack, D. K. Flock, and C. C. Whitehead. 2000. Inheritance of bone characteristics affecting osteoporosis in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:33-40. Bizeray, D., I. Estevez, C. Leterrier, and J. M. Faure. 2002. Influence of increase environmental complexity on leg condition, performance, and level of fearfulness in broilers. Poul. Sci. 81:767-773. Blokhuis, H. J. 1984. Rest in poultry. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 12:289-303. Bokkers, E., and P. Koene. 2003. Behaviour of fast- and slow-growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 81:59-72. Brake, J. 1987. Influence of presence of perches during rearing on incidence of floor laying in broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 66:1587-1589. Campo, J. L., M. G. Gil, S. G. Davila, and I. Munoz. 2005. Influence of perches and footpad dermatitis o tonic immobility and heterophil to lymphocyte ratio of chickens. Poult. Sci. 84:1004-1009. Craig, J. V. 1981. Domestic animal behaviour. Prentice-hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Duncan, I. J. H. 1998. Behavior and behavioral needs. Poult. Sci. 77: 1766-1722. Duncan, E. T., M. C. Appleby, and B.O. Hughes. 1992. Effect of perches in laying cages on welfare and production of hens.Br. Poult. Sci. 33:25–35. Faure, J. M., and R. B. Jones. 1982a. Effects of sex, strain and type of perch on perching behaviour in the domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8:281-293. Faure, J. M., and R. B. Jones. 1982b. Effects of age, access and time of day on perching behaviour in the domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8:357-364. Fleming, R. H., C. C. Whitehead, D. Alvey, N. G. Gregory, and L. J. Wilkins. 1994. Bone structure and breaking strength in laying hens housed in different husbandry system. Br. Poult. Sci. 35: 651-662. Gregory, N. G., and L. J. Wilkins. 1989. Broken bones in domestic fowl: handling and processing damage in end-of-lay battery hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:555-562. Gregory, N. G., and L. J. Wilkins. 1990. Broken bones in chickens: effect of stunning and processing in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 31:53-58. Gregory, N. G., L. J. Wilkins, S. D. Eleperuma, A. J. Ballantyne, and N. D. Overfiled. 1990. Broken bones in domestic fowls: effects of husbandry system and stuning method in end-of- lay hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 31:59-69. Gross, W. B., and H. S. Siegel. 1983. Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Dis. 27:972-978. Guhl, A. M. 1953. Social behavior of domestic fowl. Kans. Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull.73. Gunnarsson, S., L. J. Keeling, and J. Svedberg. 1999. Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 40:12-18. Hansen, R. S. 1976. Nervousness and hysteria of mature female chickens. Poult. Sci. 55:531-543. Heckert, R. A., I. Estevez, E. Russek-Cohen, amd R. Pettit-Riley. 2002. Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poult. Sci. 81:451-457. Hester, P.Y. 2005. Impact of science and management on the welfare of egg laying strains of hens. Poult. Sci. 84: 687-696. Hester, P. Y. 2005. Review: Impact of science and management on the welfare of egg laying strain of hens. Poult. Sci. 84:687-696. Hughes, B. O., and M. C. Appleby. 1989. Increase in bone strength of spent laying hens housed in modified cages with perches. Vet. Rec. 124: 483-484. Hughes, B. O., and H. A. Elson. 1977. The use of perches by broiler in floor pens. Br. Poult. Sci. 18:715-722. Jones, R. B. 1986. The tonic immobility reaction of the domestic fowl:a review. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 42(1):82–92. Jones, R.B. 1996. Fear and adaptability in poultry: insights, implications and imperatives. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 52:131-174. Jones, R. B, and J. M. Faure. 1981. Tonic immobility(“righting time”) in laying hens housed in cages and pens. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 7:369-372. Kjaer, J. B., and J. A. Mench. 2003. Chapter 5：Behaviour problems associated with selection for increased production. Pages 67-82 in Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology. W.M. Muir and S.E. Aggrey, New York. Knowles, T. G., and D. M. Broom. 1993. Effect of catching method on the concentration of plasma corticosterone in end-of –day hens. Vet. Rec. 133:527-528. Knowles, T. G., and L. J. Wilkins. 1998. The problem of broken bones during the handing of laying hens-a review. Poul. Sci. 77:1798-1802. Kopka, M. N.,H.W. Cheng, and P. Y. Hester. 2003. Bone mineral density of laying hens housed in enriched versus conventional cages. Poult. Sci. 82(Suppl. 1):29. (Abstr.) Mabkovish, N. J., and E. M. Bank. 1982. An analysis of social orientation and the use of space in a flock of domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 9:177-193. Martrenchar, A., D. Huonnic, J. P. Cotte, E. Boilletot, and J. P. Morisse. 2000. Influence of stocking density, artificial dusk and group size on the perching behaviour of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:125-130. Mashaly, M. M., G. L. Hendricks, M. A. Kalama, A. E. Gehad, A. O. Abbas, and P. H. Patterson. 2004. Effect of heat stress on production parameters and immune responses of commercial laying hens. Poult. Sci. 83:889-894. McFarlane, J. M., and S. E. Curtis. 1989. Multiple concurrent stressors in chicks. 3. Effect on plasma corticosterone and the heterophil:lymphocyte ratio. Poult. Sci. 68:522-527. Miner, M. L., and R. A. Smart. 1975. Causes of enlarged sternal bursas (breast blisters). Avian Dis.19:246-256. Newberry, R. C. 1995. Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44:229–243. Newberry, R. C., I. Estevez, and L. J. Keeling. 2001. Group size and perching behaviour in young domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73:117-129. Nielsen, B. L. 2004. Breast blisters in groups of slow-growing broilers in relation to strain and the availability and use of perches. Br. Poult. Sci. 45(3):306-315. Pettit-Riley, R., and I. Estevez. 2001. Effects of density on perching behavior of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 127-140. Pohle, K., and H. Cheng. 2003. Housing effect on behavior and production performance of laying hens: Furnished cages vs. conventional cages. Poult. Sci. 82(Suppl. 1):59. (Abstr.) SAS, 2003. User’s Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC. Scott, J. P. 1972. Animal behavior, second edition, revised. The university of Chicago press, Chicago & London. Tauson, R. 1998. Health and production in improved cage designs. Poult. Sci. 77:1820–1827. Vits, A. D. Weitzenbürger, H. Hammann, and O. Distl. 2005. Production, egg quality, bone strength, claw length, and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed in furnished cages with different group sizes. Poult. Sci. 84:1511-1519. Webster, A. B., and J. F. Hurnik. 1990. Behavior, production, and well-being of the laying hens. 1. Effects of movable roosts, relationship of cage mates, and genetic stock. Poult. Sci. 69:2118-2127. Wechsler, B., and B. Huber-Eicher. 1998. The effect of forage material and perch height on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 58:131-141. Week, C. A., D. T. Danbury, H. C. Davies, P. Hunt, and S. C. Kestin. 2000. The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 67:111-125. Wood-gush, D. G. M., and I. J. H. Duncan. 1976. Some behavioural observations on domestic fowl in the wild. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 2:255-260. Wood-gush, D. G. M., I. J. H. Duncan, and C. J. Savory. 1978. Observations of the social behaviour of domestic fowl in the wild. Biol. Behav. 3:193-205.|
|摘要:||本研究欲探討棲架高度及粗細對於台灣土雞育成期行為及生長性狀之影響，希冀推薦適當棲架設計給予商業土雞場。試驗使用之台灣土雞為國立中興大學育成L2品系，採公母分飼，於5至16週齡進行試驗。試驗一使用公母雞共528隻，比較三種不同高度之雙層棲架(H30、H50及H70組，低層棲架高度分別為30, 50與70 cm)；試驗二公母雞共672隻，比較三種不同粗細之雙層棲架(D1.9、D3.2及D3.8組，棲架直徑分別為1.9, 3.2與3.8 cm)。
試驗一結果發現，公雞中，日間、夜間利用棲架頻率均以H70組最少；H30組利用棲架頻率最高，使H30組公雞鬥爭行為最少，羽毛外觀較佳；且H30組公雞體重顯著較重、冠面積顯著較大，Tonic Immobility時間在H30組公雞亦有趨勢較短，顯示社會壓力較小。缺點在於H30組公雞背部羽毛有較多糞便污染情形，且16週齡H30組公雞龍骨外觀較差但不顯著。整體來說，對於育成期的台灣土雞，30 cm可能是較適合的高度，但仍有羽毛、龍骨外觀之缺點仍待克服。
The purpose of this study was to realize the effect of perch height and diameter on the behaviours and production efficiency of Taiwan Country chicken during rearing period. The information may be useful to design appropriate perches to commercial farms of Taiwan Country chicken. The Taiwan Country Chicken studied were L2 strain bred by the National Chung Hsing University. Males and females were separately reared and studied from 5 to 16 weeks of age. Experiment 1 used 528 chickens to compare two-stair perches with three different height (the heights of the lower perch in H30, H50, and H70 groups were 30, 50 and 70 cm). Experiment 2 used 672 chickens to compare three different diameters of perches (the diameters of perches in D1.9, D3.2, and D3.8 groups were 1.9, 3.2 and 3.8 cm). The following results were consistent for both experiments. Males had higher frequency of agonistic behavior, and perched more often during both daytime and night time. Females displayed more foraging and preening behaviors. Chickens perched more often in the morning and late afternoon than in the middle of the day. Perching increased with age in males but decreased in females. Results of Experiment 1 indicated that in males, H70 perched less often than the other groups during both daytime and night time; H30 utilized perches more often and had less frequency of agonistic behavior and better feather condition; in additions, H30 males had significantly heavier body weight and larger comb area, and a tendency to have shorter TI time which suggests that they were under less social stress. The problems of H30 males were feather contaminated with feces and slightly worse keel score at 16 weeks of age. In general, 30 cm may be the appropriate height for Taiwan Country chicken during the rearing period. However, the feather and keel problems need further studies. Results of Experiment 2 indicated that size of perch diameter did not significantly affect the frequency of perching during neither daytime nor night time. It did not have any significant effect on body weight, comb size, claw deformation or TI duration time. However, D1.9 males decreased the use of upper-perch and increased the use of lower-perch after 14 weeks of age. It suggested that too small the size of the perch may make the large bird unwilling to use them. It was also possible that the less upper-perch perching frequency made D1.9 males had less feces contamination on feather at 16 weeks of age. Therefore, for the design of perch for Taiwan Country chicken, the males may use a perch, with the lowest level 30 cm height from the ground, and a diameter of 3.2 cm. Females reared separately from males may not need any perches.
|Appears in Collections:||動物科學系|
Show full item record
TAIR Related Article
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.