Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/25581
標題: 利用繞道迷宮試驗探討地方雞種對陌生環境之適應能力
Using the detour maze to study the adaptation ability of local chicken in novel environments
作者: 陳信雄
Chen, Hsin-Hsiung
關鍵字: 繞道迷宮
detour maze
地方雞種
陌生環境
土雞
適應
行為
adaptation ability
local chicken
novel environments
出版社: 動物科學系所
引用: 方建仁。2010。簡單籠飼豐富化對地方雞種日間作息行為之影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 李伯年。1952。臺灣之家禽。臺灣之畜產資源,17-49頁。臺灣銀行。臺北。 李淵百。1992。台灣的土雞。國立中興大學。台中。 李福井。1999。古寧頭戰記。稻田出版社。台北。 李祖基。2001。陳第、沈有容與《東番記》。歷史月刊 162:108。 沈衛平。2008。8/23金門大炮戰︰1958年台海國共炮戰全解密。黃河出版社。高雄。 周宜靜。2012。不同地方雞種就巢與產蛋位置之選擇。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 林志興。2005。雞年談雞事:卑南族與雞。史前館電子報 53。網址:http://www.nmp.gov.tw/enews/no53/page_01.html 林柔彣。2010。台灣土雞對環境改變的初期適應情況及其害怕反應之探討。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 姜中鳳。1994。不同公母比例飼養法、棲架及飼桶添置與飼糧添加色胺酸,對臺灣土雞日間作息、鬥爭及性行為與重要經濟性狀之影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。 洪膺詮。2009。從天神到上帝:1950年代布農族望鄉部落集體改宗之研究。碩士論文。東海大學。台中。 洪兮雯。2010。長期選拔生產性狀對雄性臺灣土雞性行為之影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 胡家寧。2007。臺灣地區土雞生產性能分析。碩士論文。國立臺灣大學。台北。 張凱鍠。2002。地方雞種之生長、免疫、繁殖性狀與耐熱能力之調查研究。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 許正和、施義燦、陳保基。2000。2000年7–9月臺灣地區白肉雞生產成績簡訊。中華民國養雞協會會刊 140。 陳志峰、李淵百、范揚廣、黃三元、黃暉煌。1994。臺灣土雞種原保存。中畜會誌 23(3): 339-346。 陳冠豪、林正忠、簡茂盛。2002。肉雞之脊椎滑脫症。中華民國獸醫病理學會91年度組織病理研討會專輯,65-67頁。中華民國獸醫病理學會。臺灣。 陳韋如。2008。遺傳與社會環境對臺灣土雞棲息行為的影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 彭婉孋。2010。台灣土雞CFL行為與資訊獲得能力之探討。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 馮維綺、駱新太、吳小淦、劉畢祥、王志俊、張清、林建華、吳素琴。1994。石岐雞的選育及開發研究。第三屆優質雞的改良生產及發展研討會論文集,112-116頁。國立中興大學。台中。 鄭中基。2005。原住民族行政及法規(含原住民族發展史)。志光教育文化出版社。台北。 蕭薈。2012。不同地方雞種於成長期與產蛋期之日間作息行為與夜間棲息位置。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 薛化元。2010。戰後臺灣歷史閱讀。五南圖書出版社。台北。 吕连山、黄梅南,1985。石岐杂肉鸡“北繁南养”的应用。农业科技通讯 1985(8)。 名古屋コーチン協会。2012。名古屋コーチンの生い立ち。網址:http://nagoya-cochin.jp/02_about/02_01_growth/index.html Appleby, M. C., S. N. Maguire, and H. E. McRae. 1986. Nesting and floor laying by domestic hens in a commercial flock. Br. Poult. Sci. 27: 75-82. Baddeley, A. 2000. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(11): 417-423. Beilharz, R. G., B. G. Luxford, and J. L. Wilkinson. 1993. Quantitative genetics and evolution: Is our understanding of genetics sufficient to explain evolution? J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 110(1-6): 161-170. Belyaev, D. K. 1979. Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. J. Hered. 70(5): 301-308. Berlyne, D. E. 1960. Conflict, Arousal and curiosity. McGraw-Hill. New York. Bizeray, D., I. Estevez, C. Leterrier, and J. M. Faure. 2002. Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 79: 27-41. Black, A. J., and B. O. Hughes. 1974. Patterns of comfort behavior and activity in domestic fowls: a comparison between cages and pens. Br. Vet. J. 130: 23-33. Bracha, H. S. 2004. Freeze, flight, fight, fright, faint: adaptationist perspectives on the acute stress response spectrum. CNS Spectr. 9: 679-685. Braud, W. G., and H. J. Ginsburg. 1973. Effect of administration of adrenalin on immobility reaction in domestic fowl. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 83: 124-127. Boissy, A. 1995. Fear and fearfulness in animals. Quart. Rev. Biol. 70: 165-191. Bokkers, E. A. M., and P. Koene. 2003. Behaviour of fast- and slow growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 81: 59-72. Camp, D. M., T. E. Robinson, and J. B. Becker. 1984. Sex differences in the effects of early experience on the development of behavioral and brain asymmetries in rats. Physiol Behav. 33(3): 433-439. Campbell, N. A. 1996. Biology, 4th ed. Benjamin-Cummings Pub Co. New York. Campler, M., M. Jongren, and P. Jensen. 2009. Fearfulness in red junglefowl and domesticated White Leghorn chickens. Behav. Processes. 81: 39-43. Che, Y., H. Sun, Y. Cui, D. Zhou, and Y. Ma. 2007. Effects of exposure to 50 Hz magnetic field of 1 mT on the performance of detour learning task by chicks. Brain Res. Bull. 74(1-3): 178-182. Cheng, H. W., and L. Jefferson. 2008. Different behavioral and physiological responses in two genetic lines of laying hens after transportation. Poult. Sci. 87: 885-892. Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. John Murray. United Kingdom. Deacon, R. M., and J. N. Rawlins. 2006. T-maze alternation in the rodent. Nat. Protoc. 1(1): 7-12. Dobzhansky, T., M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere. 1968. On some fundamental concepts of evolutionary biology. Evolutionary Biology Volume 2, 1st ed. Appleton-Century-Crofts. New York. Duncan, I. J. H. 1985. How do fearful birds respond? In: R. M. Wegner, Second European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, Celle, German Branch of the WPSA, pp. 96-113. Eldredge, N. 1985. Time Frames: The Rethinking of Darwinian Evolution and the Theory of Punctuated Equilibria. Simon & Schuster. New York. Evans, C. S., L. Evans, and P. Marler. 1993. On the meaning of alarm calls: functional reference in an avian vocal system. Anim. Behav. 46: 23-38. Faure, J. M. 1975. Etude des liaisons entre comportement en open-field et emotivite chez le jeune poussin. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 7: 197-204. Faure, J. M. 1979. Effet de l’habituation sur le comportement en open-field du jeune poussin (Gallus domesticus). Biol. Behav. 4: 241-248. Faure, J. M., R. B. Jones, and W. Bessei. 1983. Fear and social motivation as factors in open-field behavior of the domestic chick: a theoretical consideration. Biol. Behav. 8: 103-116. Forkman, B., A. Boissy, M. C. Meunier-Salaun, E. Canali, and R. B. Jones. 2007. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol. Behav. 92: 340-374. Gallup, G. G. Jr. 1974. Genetic influence in tonic immobility in chickens. Anim. Learn. Behav. 2: 145-147. Gallup, G. G. Jr. 1979. Tonic immobility as a measure of fear in the domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. 27: 316-317. Gallup, G. G. Jr., and S. D. Suarez. 1980. An ethological analysis of open-field behavior in chickens. Anim. Behav. 28: 368-378. Hogan, J. A. 1965. An experimental study of conflict and fear: an analysis of behavior of young chicks towards a mealworm. 1. The behavior of chicks which do not eat the mealworm. Behav. 25: 45-97. Jones, R. B. 1977. Sex and strain differences in the open field responses of the domestic chick. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 3: 255-261. Jones, R. B., and J. M. Faure. 1981. Sex and strain comparisons of tonic immobility (''righting time'') in the domestic fowl and the effects of various methods of induction. Behav. Processes. 6: 47-55. Jones, R. B. 1986. The tonic immobility reaction of the domestic fowl: a review. World''s Poult. Sci. J. 42: 82-92. Jones, R. B. 1987. The assessment of fear in the domestic fowl. In: R. Zayan and I. J. H. Duncan, Cognitive Aspects of Social Behaviour in the Domestic Fowl. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 40-99. Jones, R. B. 1989. Avian open-field research and related effects of environmental novelty: an annotated bibliography, 1960-1988. Psychol. Rec. 39: 397-420. Jones, R. B. 1996. Fear and adaptability in poultry: insights, implications and imperatives. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 52: 131-174. King, D. L. 1966. A review and interpretation of some aspects of the infant-mother relationship in mammals and birds. Psychol. Bull. 65: 143-155. Krause, E. T., M. Naguib, F. Trillmich, and L. Schrader. 2006. The effects of short term enrichment on learning in chickens from a laying strain (Gallus gallus domesticus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101(3-4): 318-327. Lee, Y. P., C. T. Chen, Y. K. Fan, and C. C. Hwang. 1985. Daily activities of the three varieties of meat-type chickens in Taiwan and their influences on carcass traits. Proc. 3rd AAAP Anim. Sci. Cong. Vol (1):257-259. Lindberg, A. C., and C. J. Nicol. 1996. Effects of social and environmental familiarity on group preferences and spacing behaviour in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 49(2): 109-123. Lindqvist, C., P. Zimmerman, and P. Jensen. 2006. A note on contrafreeloading in broilers compared to layer chicks. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101: 161-166. Lindqvist, C., and P. Jensen. 2009. Domestication and stress effects on contrafreeloading and spatial learning performance in red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers. Behav. Processes. 81: 80-84. Marin, R. H., and R. B. Jones. 2000. T-maze behaviour in broiler chicks is not sensitive to right–left preferences, test order or time-of-day. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 68(3): 207-214. McFarland, D. 1982. The Oxford Companion to Animal Behaviour. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Mercer, J. 2006. Understanding Attachment: Parenting, Child Care, and Emotional Development. Greenwood Publishing Group. United States. Merriam-Webster. 2008. Webster Universal Dictionary, 11th ed. Merriam-Webster, Inc. United States. Miller, G. A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 63(2): 81-97. Millman, S. T., and I. J. H. Duncan. 2000. Do female broiler breeder fowl display a preference for broiler breeder or laying strain males in a Y-maze test?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 69(4): 275-290. Murphy, L. B. 1978. The practical problems of recognizing and measuring fear and exploration behaviour in the domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. 26: 422-431. Nicol, C. 2006. How animals learn from each other. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 100: 58-63. Nikolić, D., and W. Singer. 2007. Creation of visual long-term memory. Percept Psychophys. 69: 904-912. Ohman, A. 2000. Fear and anxiety: evolutionary, cognitive, and clinical perspectives. In: M. Lewis, and J. M. Haviland-Jones, Handbook of emotions, 2nd ed. Guilford Press. New York. Pavlov, I. P. 2003. Conditioned Reflexes. Dover Publications. New York. Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. Harper Perennial Modern Classics. United States. Price, E. O. 1984. Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Q. Rev. Biol. 59: 1-32. Price, E. O. 2002. Animal Domestication and Behavior. CABI Publishing. United Kingdom. Ratner, S. C. 1967. Comparative aspects of hypnosis. In: J. E. Gordon, Handbook of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. Macmillan, New York, pp.550-587. Regolin, L., G. Vallortigara, and M. Zanforlin. 1995. Object and spatial representations in detour problems by chicks. Anim. Behav. 49(1): 195-199. Regolin, L., and S. P. R. Rose. 1999. Long-term memory for a spatial task in young chicks. Anim. Behav. 57(6): 1185-1191. Reznick, D. A., B. Heather, and J. A. Endler. 1990. Experimentally induced life-history evolution in a natural population. Nature 346: 357-359. Robinson, S. R. 2010. Alarm communication in belding''s ground squirrels. Z. Tierpsychol. 56(2): 150-168. Rodenburg, T. B. 2010. Response to van Rooijen: ‘Is feather pecking in laying hens a by-product of artificial selection?’. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 122: 134-135. Siegel, P. B. 1984. The role of behavior in poultry production: a review of research. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 11: 299-316. Suarez, S. D., and G. G. Gallup Jr. 1983. Emotionality and fear in birds: a selected review and reinterpretation. Bird Behav. 5: 22-30. Sun, H., Y. Che, X. Liu, and Y. Ma. 2010. Detour behavior changes associated with prenatal morphine exposure in 11-day-old chicks. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 28(3): 239-243. Tinbergen, N. 1953. The Herring Gull''s World: A Study of the Social Behaviour of Birds. The Lyons Press. London. Vallortigara, G., and M. Zanforlin. 1988. Open-field behavior of young chicks (Gallus gallus): antipredatory responses, social reinstatement motivation, and gender effects. Anim. Learn. Behav. 16: 359-362. Van De Graaff, K. M., S. I. Fox. 1995. Concepts of Human Anatomy & Physiology. W.C. Brown. United States. Vicedo, M. 2009. The father of ethology and the foster mother of ducks: Konrad Lorenz as expert on motherhood. Isis. 100(2): 263-291. Webster, A. J. F., and C. J. Nicol. 1988. The case for welfare. In: Cages for the future, Cambridge Poultry Conference, Agricultural Advisory and Development Service, pp. 11-21. Wechsler, B. 1995. Coping and coping strategies: a behaviourral view. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 43: 123-134. Wechsler, B., and S. E. G. Lea. 2007. Adaptation by learning: its significance for farm animal husbandry. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 108: 197-214. Wilson, R. A., and F. C. Keil. 2001. The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. A Bradford Book. United States. Wilson, D. R., and C. S. Evans. 2008. Mating success increases alarm-calling effort in male fowl, Gallus gallus. Anim. Behav. 76: 2029-2035. Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1971. The Behaviour of the Domestic Fowl. Heinemann. London. Zucca, P., F. Antonelli, G. Vallortigara. 2005. Detour behaviour in three species of birds: quails (Coturnix sp.), herring gulls (Larus cachinnans) and canaries (Serinus canaria). Anim Cogn. 8(2): 122-128.
摘要: 隨著人們對動物福祉意識的抬頭,傳統動物飼養管理方法已經為人所詬病。但是將已經長期選拔生產性狀的雞隻再度回歸到豐富化的放牧環境中,卻帶來了環境適應的問題。長期的選拔特定性狀的結果卻也降低了某些行為的表現能力。像是比起保種品系,選拔生產性狀的育種品系活動較低,也比較怕人。因此選擇生長較慢但肉質較白肉雞佳,並且也能適應開闊飼養環境的地方雞種做為飼養對象,可能是改善目前雞隻飼養福祉的較佳辦法。 然而地方雞種彼此間也存在著差異,因此本試驗使用中興大學目前所保存種原的六種土雞:花東、信義、竹崎、金門、名古屋、石岐,來試驗雞種間的環境適應能力。本試驗利用繞道迷宮試驗為主,回憶試驗、進階繞道迷宮試驗為輔,檢測雞隻面對新環境時的害怕與適應,進而討論地方雞種之放牧潛力。 繞道迷宮試驗為一開放空間區域放入兩個圍籬作分隔,雞隻必須從中探索環境並找尋食物,試驗期間記錄相關行為以評估對環境之適應能力。回憶試驗則是在四週後再重複迷宮繞道試驗檢測雞隻是否有退步之情況。進階繞道迷宮試驗則是將繞道迷宮試驗之難度增加,用以檢測雞隻空間記憶能力以探討適應能力。 結果顯示,六種品系的雞種中,探索區域表現較佳的為信義。探索必須在害怕降到一定程度時才會發生,表現較佳之雞隻同時也代表對環境害怕程度較低。到達食物所在區的抵達時間為信義較快,代表信義對環境的熟悉度較其他雞隻為高。移動潛在時間為信義所花的時間較短,時間越短表示雞隻對環境較不害怕。步伐數為花東、信義較多,代表他們對環境的害怕程度較低。鳴叫潛在時間較短與鳴叫次數較多的則是信義、竹崎、石岐,配合移動潛在時間、步伐數的結果,顯示信義與竹崎會有此種表現為對環境的害怕程度較低,而石岐則是尋求社會恢復的動機較強烈所致。綜合上述結果,對環境適應能力較好的為信義、竹崎、花東,而石岐則較差,金門與名古屋則介於中間。儘管六種品系對陌生環境的適應能力有差異,但基本上都是隨著試驗回合的增加而改變。 回憶試驗方面,雞隻在四週後再進到相同試驗環境時,對環境的害怕程度差異不大,但是對環境設備位置之記憶會稍微遺忘,但只需要稍加適應即可恢復原本之水平。 在進階繞道迷宮試驗方面,若將雞隻已熟悉之環境稍加改動環境配置,則會使雞隻表現受影響,若此環境又無法讓雞隻持續的接觸,則一段時間後此環境對雞隻來說會成為一個更不熟悉的環境。
As the concept of animal welfare has been gradually rooted in people, traditional animal feeding and management methods are seen to be inappropriate and out of date. However, those chickens which are long-term selected for production traits also have adaption problems as they are again brought back to free range. Moreover, the long-term selection for the production traits also causes reductions of performance in some behaviors. For example, compared to conserved chickens, chickens selected for production may more easily feel afraid of human and not active. Therefore, local chickens, which grow more slowly, taste better, and are more adaptable to the enriched environment than the broilers, would be better candidates for raising in order to solve animal welfare problems at present. Yet, local chickens from different origins are also found to be different in some behaviors. In order to test the performance of adaption to environment among different breeds of chickens, 6 breeds of local chickens, i.e., Hua-Tun, Hsin-Yi, Ju-Chi, Quemoy, Nagoya, and Shek-Ki, were compared. Besides, by detour maze, reminiscent test and advanced detour maze, the fear that a chicken feel and its performance when it is brought to a new environment were studied to further evaluate their potential to adapt free-ranged environment. Detour maze is an open-field with two wire-net fences. Objects have to explore and find the food in the apparatus. The performance of their behavior would be recorded during the test. The reminiscent test is the same as the detour maze but is performed 4 weeks after the detour maze in order to test whether the chickens retrogress or not. The advanced detour maze is similar to the detour maze but with more difficulties. The test is designed to test the chickens’ spacial memory and the ability of adaption. The result showed that among all breeds, Hsin-Yi has the best performance in area exploring ability, which, in general speaking, appears when chickens are at lower fear level. That is, chickens that perform better in this stage are considered to have less fear of environment. In terms of testing duration, it was also Hsin-Yi that spent the shortest time reaching to the assigned location, which means the breed gets acquainted with the environment faster than others. Furthermore, Hsin-Yi has shorter latency of moving, and is considered to have a lower level of fear of environment. Likewise, Hsin-Yi and Hua-Tung are also considered to have a lower level of fear of environment for they have more numbers of steps when reaching to the foods. Hsin-Yi, Ju-Chi and Shek-Ki all have the shorter latency of vocalizing and higher frequency of vocalizations. Taking previous results, latency of moving and numbers of steps into consideration, one can conclude that Hsin-Yi and Ju-Chi have lower level of fear of the environment and Shek-Ki has more motives for searching companions. In conclusion, Hsin-Yi, Hua-Tung, and Ju-Chi performed a higher ability of adaption to new environments, while Shek-Ki performed worse in the detour maze than all the other breeds, and Quemoy and Nagoya are in the middle. In spite of the differences of adaption ability among the 6 breeds, their performance changed as the frequency of trial went up. As for the reminiscent test, when the chickens came back to the same trial again after four weeks, there were no significant differences in their fear of environments compared with the last trial. Moreover, at first the chickens lost a bit of memory for the position of the equipments they met last time, but got acquainted as their memory was recovered. In advanced detour maze, their performance would be affected after we made a little change in the environment that the chickens have known well. What’s more, if we let the chickens not to stay in the changed environment, the environment will become much more unfamiliar to the chickens in a period of time.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/25581
其他識別: U0005-0908201222100200
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-0908201222100200
Appears in Collections:動物科學系

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.