Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/28664
標題: 賽德克族風土景觀塑造之研究-以南投縣仁愛鄉春陽部落為例
Forming Vernacular Landscape of Seediq Tribe: A Case Study in Alang Snuwil Area, Ren-ai Township, Nantou County
作者: 邱奕維
Chiou, Yi-Wei
關鍵字: Seediq
賽德克族
garden
in-depth interview
focus group
prototype
庭園形
深度訪談
焦點團體
出版社: 園藝學系所
引用: 【中文部分】 1. 劉其偉,(1979),藝術人類學:原始思維與創作,台北:雄獅圖書股份有限公司。 2. 李進旗,(1987),中國、日本傳統庭園比較研究,淡江大學建築學系研究所碩士論文,台北。 3. 洪得娟,(1994),景觀建築,台北:地景企業股份有限公司。 4. 金妙貞,(1994),中國與韓國傳統庭園景觀構成要素之比較,台灣大學園藝學系研究所碩士論文,台北。 5. 小形研三、高原榮重,( 1995 ),造園意匠論,台北:田園城市文化出版社。 6. 歐聖榮,(1997),造園,台北:三民書局。 7. 裴修瑩,(1997),韓國朝鮮時代傳統庭園植物種植原則之研究,台灣大學園藝學系研究所碩士論文,台北。 8. 汪明輝,(1998),原住民之空間策略-分享與共有台灣,台灣原住民文化與教育之發展,P.205-245,台北:台灣師大人文教育中心。 9. 朱景堅,(1998),私有庭園植栽風格應用之研究—以台中市為例,東海大學景觀學系研究所碩士論文,台中。 10. 楊裕富,(1998),空間設計概論與設計方法,台北:田園城市文化出版社。 11. 沈明仁,(1998),崇信祖靈的民族:賽德克人,台北:台灣的店有限公司。 12. 豐田幸夫,(2000),造園設計資料集,台北:詹氏書局。 13. 陳文錦,(2001),中國傳統庭園形式之構成探討台灣傳統私家庭園形式之特質,台灣大學園藝學系研究所博士論文,台北。 14. 高明哲,(2002),臺灣原住民族土地所全制度與土地利用關係之研究,國立中興大學農業經濟學系研究所,台中。 15. 陳向明,(2002),社會科學質的研究,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 16. 張兆菱,(2006),遊客對原住民觀光文化產品真實性認知之研究-以泰雅族編織工藝品為例,中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文,台北。 17. 黃衛文,(2006),台灣原住民傳統圖騰藝術應用於木藝創意設計 - 以台東卑南族圖騰為例,國立屏東科技大學熱帶農業暨國際合作研究所碩士論文,屏東。 18. 許芳瑜,(2007),遊客參與原住民節慶之動機、滿意度及遊後行為關係之研究—以阿美族聯合豐年祭及賽夏族矮靈祭為例,雲林科技大學休閒運動研究所碩士班碩士論文,雲林。 19. 董世孝,(2008),台灣原住民住宅之空間構成研究—以南投縣仁愛鄉布農族與泰雅族為例—,中原大學室內設計研究所碩士論文,桃園。 20. 陳懷恩,(2008),圖像學:視覺藝術的意義與解釋,台北:如果出版社。 【西文部分】 1. Booth, N. (1983). Basic Elements of Landscape Architectural Design. New York: Elsevier. 2. Booth, N. K., & Hiss J. E. (2000) Residential Landscape Architecture: Design Process for the Private Residence. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 3. Boults, E. & Chip, S. (2010). Illustrated History of Landscape Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4. Cosgrove, D. & Daniels, S. (1988). The iconography of landscape. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 5. Crumley, C.,& Marquardt, W. (1990). Landscape: a unifying concept in regional analysis. London, New York: Taylor & Francis. 6. Cudl’ınov’a, E., Lapka, M.,& Bartos, M., (1999). Problems of agriculture and landscape management as perceived by farmers of the Sumava mountains, Czech Republic. Landscape and Urban Planning. 46, 71-82. 7. Darvill, T. (1999). The historic environment, historic landscapes, and space-time-action models in landscape archaeology. The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape, (pp. 104-118). London, New York: Routledge. 8. Di Mauro, S.E. (2003). Disaggregating local knowledge: the effects of gendered farming practices on soil fertility and soil reaction inSWHungary. Geoderma 111, 503-520. 9. Dube, R. L. (1997). Natural Pattern Forms: A Practical Sourcebook for Landscape Design. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 10. Eckbo, G.(1950). Landscape for living. New York: Architectrural Record, with Duell, Sloan & Pearce. 11. Gidden, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition, and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press. 12. Gilbert, L. M. (2008). The World''s First Book on Landscape Architecture. Gardenvisit.com. 13. Hackett, B. (1968). Landscape Planning: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Oriel Press. 14. Jackson, J. B. (1980). How to Study Landscape, The theory in Landscape Architecture, 11-18. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSLYVANIA PRESS. 15. Jessel, B. (2006). Elements, characteristics and character - Information functions of landscapes in terms of indicators. Ecological Indicators, 6, 153-167. 16. Kantor, N., & Unger, J. (2010). Bene?ts and opportunities of adopting GIS in thermal comfort studies in resting places: An urban park as an example. Landscape and Urban Planning, 98, 36-46. 17. Kassler, E. B. (1964). Modern Gardens and the Landscape. New York: Museum of Modern Art. 18. Laurie, M. (1986). An Introduction to Landscape Architecture. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 19. Lykke, A.M., (2000). Local perceptions of vegetation change and priorities for conservation of woody-savanna vegetation in Senegal. J. Environ. Manage. 59 (2), 107-120. 20. McDonnald, M. A., Hofny-Collins, A., Healey, J. R., & Goodland, T. C. R. (2003). Evaluation of trees indigenous to the mountain forest of the Blue Mountains, Jamaica for reforestation and agroforestry. Forest Ecology and Management, 175 ,379-401. 21. Mendez, V., Lok, R., & Somarriba, E. (2001). Interdisciplinary analysis of homegardens in Nicaragua: micro-zonation, plant use and socioeconomic importance. Agroforestry System, 51 (2), 85-96. 22. Motloch, J. L. (1991). Introduction to Landscape Design. New York: VAN NOSTRAND REINHOLD. 23. O''Rourke, E. (2005). Socio-natural interaction and landscape dynamics in the Burren, Ireland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70 (1-2), 69-83. 24. Padua, M. G. (2007). Designing an Identity: The Synthesis of a Post-traditional Landscape Vocabulary in Hong Kong. Landscape Research, 32, No. 2, 225-240. 25. Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in the Visual Arts. The University of Chicago Press. 26. Parsons, Talcott and Edward A. Shils. (1951). Toward a General Theory of Action: Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences. Harvard University Press. 27. Pavlikakis, G.E.,& Tsihrintzis, V.A. (2006). Perceptions and preferences of the local population in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace National Park in Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning. 77, 1-16. 28. Peroni, N., & Hanazaki, N. (2002). Current and lost diversity of cultivated varieties, especially cassava, under swidden cultivation systems in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 92 (2-3), 171-183. 29. Pregill, P., & Volkman, N, (1992). Landscape in History: Design and Planning in the Western Tradition. New York: VAN NOSTRAND REINHOLD. 30. Robertson, H. A. & McGee, T. K., (2003). Applying local knowledge: the contribution of oral history to wetland rehabilitation at Kanyapella Basin, Australia. Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 275-287. 31. Schein, R. (1997). The Place of landscape: a conceptual framework for the American scene. Annals, Association of American Geographers, 87, 660-680. 32. Simonds, J. O. (1998) Landscape Architecture a Manual of Site Planning and Design. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. 33. Soini, K. (2001). Exploring human dimensions of multifunctional landscapes through mapping and map-making. Landscape Urban Planning, 57, 225-239. 34. Spirn, A. (1998). The Language of Landscape. NewHaven and London: Yale University Press. 35. Stephenson, J. (2008). The cultural values model: an integrated approach to values in landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84 , 127-139. 36. Straten, R. (1997). Einfuhrung in die Ikonographie. 37. Terkenli, T. ( 2001). Towards a theory of the landscape: the Aegean landscape as a cultural image. Landscape Urban Planning, 57, 197-208. 38. Tom, T. (2005). Garden History Philosophy and Design 2000 BC to 2000 AD. London: Routledge. 39. Tom, T. (2008).The Principles of Garden Design. Gardenvisit.com. 40. Tom, T. (2011). European Gardens: History, philosophy and design. London: Routledge. 41. Tress, B. & Tress, G. (2001). Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landscape Urban Planning, 57, 143-157. 42. Trieb, M. (1995). Must Landscape Mean?. The theory in Landscape Architecture, 89-101. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSLYVANIA PRESS. 43. Wai, A. W. T. (2006). Place promotion and iconography in Shanghai''s Xintiandi. Habitat International, 30, 245-260. 44. Zurayk, R., El-Awar, F., Hamadeh, S., Talhouk, S., Sayegh, C., Chehab, A. G., & Al Shab, K. (2001). Using indigenous knowledge in land-use investigations: a participatory study in a semi-arid mountainous region of Lebanon. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 86, 247-262. 【網路資料】 1. 中華民國教育部,(1994), 教育部重編國語辭典修訂本。 2. Pearson, E. (2011). Longman English Dictionary Online. 3. 國立嘉義大學,(2011),台灣原住民族教育及產業發展中心。 4. 行政院原住民族委員會,(2011),台灣原住民族資訊資源網。
摘要: 近二十年來,不可避免的開發及全球化的趨勢嚴重地威脅到原住民文化的存在,如何保存及重塑原住民文化成為了重要的文化議題。而原住民部落景觀的維護以及傳統建築的保存,在近年來逐漸受到世人重視。因此,如何從景觀觀點著手,建構出原住民所認同的戶外庭園模式,以保存具特殊的原住民文化是本研究關注的重點,本研究選取正名時間最晚,在台灣原住民中屬於相對少數的賽德克族為研究標的。因其與坡地環境共生的文化特質無法被妥善保存,族人的共同記憶也逐漸隨著年邁者的離逝而消失,因此作為本研究首要的探討對象。 在研究的過程中,先以回顧文獻與歷史資源分析的方法,建構出分析與理解賽德克庭園之方法,並藉由研究場域的現地調查及深度訪談,獲得建構賽德克庭園的可能的背景因素及背後的象徵元素。其次,研究將所獲得的調查內容進行象徵元素的外觀形式、排列組合以及功能意義分析,獲得了初步的賽德克形式庭園原型之後,本研究將庭園原型以圖面化的方式呈現,以利焦點團體訪談修正與討論的進行,最後得到受訪族人所認同之賽德克庭園原型。本研究最後針對研究所歸納之原型,配合相關文獻回顧與理論所提及之景觀設計手法,建構一初步之賽德克庭園空間配置,期望能對原住民庭園之設計準則提供參考。
In the past two decades, inevitable exploitation and globalization are the main threats for the existence of aboriginal culture. Thus how to conserve and reform the aboriginal culture has become a critical issue in Taiwan society. Recently, the movement of conserving and maintaining in aboriginal tribe's and traditional architecture has gradually been noticed by public. However, few studies related to vernacular landscape of aboriginal tribe had been done. Therefore, this study tries to form a garden scheme that was considered in the standpoint of landscape and identified by aborigines.Comprehending from above, Seediq, the latest one named by official and belonged to minor in Taiwan aboriginal tribes, is the study subject in this research. For their specific cultural trait in coexisting with the terrain of slope has not been appropriately preserved, and their common tradition is vanishing with their fading elders, thereby to proceed related researches is in the great urgency. In the procedure of this research, the first step is to review related literatures and analyze some classical landscape architectural cases to construct the method for analyzing Seediq's vernacular landscape and garden. Then, for obtaining Seediq's garden symbolic elements and its background factors of formation, the research proceeds the on-site investigation and in-depth interview to collect related data. Afterward, the research analyzes the collected data in symbolic elements' appearance features, arrangement, meaning and function, for forming the preliminary prototype of Seediq's garden. After forming the preliminary prototype, the research illustrates the prototype to help the focus group in proceeding research interview and modification. Then for making sure the result is credible, the interview of focus group which is comprised by Seediqs is taking place to obtain the identifiable Seediq's garden prototype. Lastly, the research bases on the Seediq's garden prototype and some ways of landscape design which are mentioned in literature review to sum up some design concepts of Seediq's garden, and expect those can be the references in the future.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/28664
其他識別: U0005-1908201120350000
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-1908201120350000
Appears in Collections:園藝學系

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.