Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/28924
標題: ‘桃園亞蔬九號’番茄穴盤苗健化之研究
Study on the hardening treatment in Plug Seedling of Tomato (Lcopersicon esculentum Mill.cv.' TAOYUAN AVRDC NO.9')
作者: 楊世聖
Yang, Shih-Sheng
關鍵字: 番茄
Tomato
穴盤苖
健化
出版社: 園藝學系所
引用: 朱德民1977.植物缺水的生理反應。科學農業25(1.2)6.3。 朱德民1980.植物與環境逆境。國立編譯館。台灣。 朱德民1982.植物與缺水適應性。科學農業32(1.2)21.26。 朱德民1984. 植物與淹水逆境. 植物與環境逆境. 國立編譯館 朱德民1985.缺水與作物的關係。科學農業33(1.2)31.43, 朱德民.1993 植物與環境逆境87-146 國立編譯館。 司亞平、何倖明、陳殿奎1993.番茄穴盤育苗營養面積選擇試驗初報。中國蔬菜(1):29-32. 李曙軒.1987.番茄。中國蔬菜栽培學 中國農業科學院蔬菜研究所主編農業出版社出版北京 何偉真、黃泮宮 1990蔬菜自動化育苗試驗八十年度農業試驗計畫成果報告(79農建一7.1-糧一103a) 阮育奇、林俊彥譯。1997.番茄栽培與營養、生理障害。財團法人農友社會福利基金會編印 台灣pp.107。 林文華、李哖 2006 貯運方式及輕微缺水逆境處理對蔓綠絨‘綠帝王’品種貯後品質之影響 花蓮區農業改良場 花蓮區研究彙報 23:1∼13 林正宏1988,玉米、高梁及向日葵對缺水之生理反應與旱馴化作用之研究。國立中興大學植物研究所博士論文。 林瑞松1989穴盤育苗系統之介紹 第二屆設施園藝研討會專集 鳳山熱帶園藝分所編印 p.83-92 林瑞松、曹幸之 1992 穴盤育苗生產技術改進 設施園藝之研究與技術開發計晝執行成果報告(79年度)鳳山熱帶園藝試驗分所編印p.133~136 林國青。2001。番茄栽培密度與留花序數對果實產量、品質及採收期的影響。中興大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。臺灣台中。 林秋連. 1996。不同栽培季節穴盤苗齡對番茄生育之影響。國立中興大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。 林楨祐.1999 黑板樹和樟樹容器育苗生產技術之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。 林忠逸.2004.蝴蝶蘭裸根及黑暗模擬貯運對蝴蝶蘭植株生長之影響. 國立中興大學園藝研究所.碩士論文 邱輝龍.1994.苗齡對番茄生育與早期產量之影響.國立中興大學園藝研究所.碩士論文 洪進雄。1995。台灣茄果類蔬菜產業之現況及展望。台灣蔬菜產業改進研討會專集台中區農業改良場編印p.39-110。 韋水來.1993.容器構型與容積對大型苗木生長影響之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。 吳心浩。1999。不同海拔穴盤曲齡對番茄生育之影響。國立中興大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。 齊藤 隆。1983.番茄。蔬菜生物生理學基礎。北京農業大學譯 農業出版社出版 北京 高景輝。1994。植物生長與分化。國立編譯館主編。茂昌圖書有限公司發行。臺灣台北。 高景輝. 1996. 植物生長與分化. 國立編譯館主編. 茂昌圖書有限公司. 高景輝. 1998. 植物賀爾蒙生理. 華香園出版社. 許圳塗、馬溯軒 1987 種子種苗之設施栽培設施園藝研討會專集pp.67-75 中國園藝學會及鳳山熱帶園藝試驗分所編印 許啟誠。1998。苗齡與低溫處理對番茄生育與產量之影響。國立中興大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。臺灣台中。 農糧署1994 臺灣地區主要農產品產銷及進出口量值 行政院農業委員會農糧署p.41 陳正次。1998。番茄育種。蔬菜育種技術研習會專刊台灣省農業試驗所編印p.231-284. 陳正次。1995.番茄。台灣農家要覽農作篇(二) 財團法人豐年社發行p.436. 陳惠美、郭忠吉。1993 番茄之耐熱性與夏季增產之展望。蔬菜生產與發展研討會專刊.行政院農業委員會 農業試驗所編印 P.169-180 陳文雄、鄭安秀、王添成,1998.番茄。蔬菜病蟲害綜合防治專輯。台灣省政府農林廳.p.1-18. 孫文章 1989 研習美國設施穴盤育苗科技報告 台南區農業改良場。 孫文章、林學正 1990 穴盤育苗生產系統之研究 設施園藝之研究與技術開發計晝執行成果報告(78年度)鳳山熱帶園藝試驗分所編印p.368~374 孫文章、方新政、陳榮五 1992 穴盤育苗生產技術改進 設施園藝之研究與技術開發計晝執行成果報告(79年度)鳳山熱帶園藝試驗分所編印p.129~132 孫文章、方新政、陳榮五 1992 穴盤育苗生產系統之研究 設施園藝之研究與技術開發計晝執行成果報告(80年度)鳳山熱帶園藝試驗分所編印p.129~132 黃玉梅、王小華,1994溫度與苗齡對蔬菜穴盤苗生育之影響。種苗科技專訊8:7-8 黃玉梅,1998 光、溫度與蔬菜育苗之株高控制。種苗科技專訊20:20-23 黃玉梅,1998 穴格構型改善番茄%甘藍種苗盤根及其生育之研究 國立中興大學園藝學研究所 碩士論文。 黃玉梅,1999盤根現象對穴盤育苗根群發育之影響 種苗科技專訊26:12-16 。 黃亮白,2000 穴盤型式及穴格構型改善甘藍、結球白菜種苗盤根及其生育之研究國立中興大學園藝學研究所 碩士論文。 楊紹榮、餘合。1996。穴盤格子大小及栽植株數對小白菜生育及產量之影響。設施園藝之研究與技術開發計畫執行成果報告(83及84年度)鳳山熱帶園藝試驗分所編印p.286~290。 廖玉琬、徐善德編審 1999.植物生理學。啟英文化事業有限公司 pp.581 鄔家琪. 2003. 叢枝菌根對設施栽培蔬菜在環境逆境下生長之影響. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所博士論文. 戴振洋,1997蔬菜育苗之穴盤種類與特性。種苗科技專訊20:20-23 張育森。1987。番茄開花生理。中國園藝33(2):83-100。 賴森雄1993.台灣的番茄生產概況 臺灣蔬菜產業演進四十年專輯 臺灣省農業試驗所編印 p.277-292 蔡幸玲 1994.熱處理對草莓植株生長之影響.國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文 諶克終譯。1983。園藝作物之開花調節。臺灣商務印書館發行。臺灣。 Abdul, K.S. and G.P.Han.is. 1978. Conlx-ol ofnower number in the first inflorescence of tomato (Lycopersjcon esculentum Mill.) Ann. Bot. 42:1361-1367. Abemethy, R. H., D. S. Thief, N. S. Petersen,and K. helm. 1989. Themotolerance ils developmentally dependent in gemlinating wheat seed. Plant Physiol.89:569-576. Alders, S.W., and C.A. Mitchell. 1985. Seismic stress effects on reproductivestructures of tomato,potato, and marigold. HoNScience. 20(4):684-686. AI-Khatib, K., and S. C. Wiest. 1990. Crop physiology and metabolism solution effects on the thermostability of bean chloroplast thylakoids. Crop Sci. 30:90-96. Alioni, B.,J. Dale, and L.Karoi. 1991. Water relation,pbotosyotbesis and assimilate partitooiog lo leaves Of pepper (capsicum annuum)traosplaots:Effect Of Water Stress after traosplaotiog. J.Hort.Sci. 66(1):15.80. Appleton, B. L. 1993. Using copper compounds to modify roots on container-grown trees. Proc. Intern. Plant Prop. Soc. 43:376-379 Armitage, A. M. and T. Kowalski. 1983. Effect of irrigation frequency during greenhouse production on the postproduction quality of Petunia hybrida Vilm. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108:118-121 Baquedano,F.J.andF.J.Castdlo ,2006 Comparative ecophysiological effect of dsought on seedliags of the Mediteranem water-saver Pious halepensis and water-spenders Quercus coccPra red eercus ilex. Trees 20 : 689-700. Beardsell, D.V.,D.G.Nicbols,and D.L.looes.1979. Water relatioos of oursery pottiog.media, Scieotia Hort. 11:1- 8. Benaie,,A. T. 1991. Growth and mechanical impedance. P393-416. In Y.Waisel, A. Eshel, and U. Kafkafi(eds). Plant Roots :the hidden half.Marcel Dekker, New York. Beny, J. and O. Bjorkman. 1980. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in high plant. Ann. Rev. Plant. Physiol.31:491-453. Boyer, J. S. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:443-448 Boyer,J.S. 1985. Watertransport. Ann.Rew.36:473-561. Burke, J. J. 1990. High temperature stress and adaptions in crops. In: Sh.ess Responses in Plant: Adaptation and Acclimation Mechanisms. P.295-309. Wiley-Liss, Inc. Camzi, A. and J. Shalhevet. 1983. Root effects on cotton growih and yield. Crop Sci. 23:875-878. Carpenter,W.J. and Boucher.J.F. 1991. Priming improves high temperature gemiination of pansy seed. Hortscinece. 26(5): 541-544. Chen, H. H., Z Y. Chen, and P. H. Li. 1982. Adaptability of crop plants to high temperature sti.ess. Crop Science 22:719-725 Conditioning effects on Salvia splendens ‘Bonfire’ J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116:716-719. Cook, D.F. and S.D. Nelson. 1986. Effect of Polyacrylamide on seedliog emergeoce in crustformiog Soils. Soil Sci. 141:328.333 Close, D. C., C. L. Beadle and M. J. Hovenden ,2003 .Interactive effects of nitrogen and ioadiance on sustained xanthophyll cycle engagement in Eucalyptus nitens leaves ding wioter. Oecolopa 134 : 32-36. Cumbus, L.P. and P H. Nve.1985. Root zone tempeiture effects on growth and phosphate absorption in rape Brassica napurs cv. Emerals. J. Exp. Bot. 36:219-227. Dayies, Jr.F,T, aod Y,Castro.Jimeoez, 1989. Water relatioos of Lagerstroemica indica growo lo ameoded media uoder drougbt Stress. Scieotia Hort. 41:97.104. Dinar,M. and J. Rudich. 1985b. Effects of heat stress on assimilate metabolism in tomato flower buds. Ann.Bot. 56:249-257. Eakes, D. J., R. D. Wright and J. R. Seiler. 1991. Moisture stress conditioning effects on Salvia splendens ‘Bonfire’ J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116:716-719. Eidsten, I.M. and H. R. Gislerod. 1986. The effect of root temperature on growth ofcurled parsley. Plant and Soil. 92:23-28. Gagnon,S. and B.Dansereau. 1992. Temperature and duration of pretreatment effects on growth and development ofgeraniums. Hortscience. 27(3):216-217. Gartoa, R.W. and I.E. Widders. 1990.Nitrogeo and pbospborus precooditiooiog of small.plug seedliogs ioflueoce processiog tomato productirity.EortScieoce 25(6):665.657. Gebriog, J.M. and A.J. Lewis.1980. Effect of bydrogel on wilting aod moisture stress of beddion plaots. J. Ainer.Soc. Hort. Sci. 105(4):511.513. Halterlein, A.J., C.D. Clayberg and I. D. Teaere. 1980.Innuence of high temperature on pollen grain viability and pollen tube growth in the styles of Phaseolus vulgaris L.J.Ainer.Soc. Hon. Sci. 105:12-14. Hsiao, T.C. 1973, Plaot respooses to water stress. Ann.Rev. plaot physiol, 24:519.10. Ingrain, D. L.,and D. Buchanan. 1981. Measurement of direct heat injuly of roots of three woody plants. HortScience 16(6): 769-771 .Iordanov, I. 1969. Effects ofkinetin on the rate and products of photosynthesis in Nicotiana rusica leaves subjected to high temperature treatment. Soviet Plant Physiol. 16:838-842. jones, H,G., .A.N.Lakso, and J.P.Syvertsen. 1985.Pbysiological cootrol of water status lo temperate aod subtropical fruit. Hort. Rev, 7:301.344. Koraoski, D.S. 1981. Tips oo Growing.Beddion Plaots.In:Plug Symposium Elimioate Mistakes/Improve Quality. pp.13-24 Kramer, P.J. 1983. Water Relatioo of Plaots. Academic Press New York. Krizek, D. T., A. Canni, R. M. Mirecki, F. W. Snyder, and J. A. Bunce. 1985. Comparative effects ofsoil moisture stress and restricted root zone volume on morphogenetic and physiological response ofsoy bean (Glycne max L. Merr). J. Expt. Bot. 36:25-38 Kuo, C. G., H. M. Chen, and L. M. Ma. 1986. Effect of high temperature on proline content in tomato noral buds and leaves. J. Ainer. Soc. Hon. Sci. 111(5):746-750 .Lakso, A.N.1990. Ioteractioos of pbysiology with multiple eoviroomeotal stress in horticultural crops.HortScieoce 25(11):1365.1369. Lee,W.S. 1991. High temperature effects on vegetative growth and floral development Impatiens wallerana .Ph.D.Dissert.Univ.of fjorida Gainesville.Florida. Levitt, J. 1980. Responses ofplant to environmental stresses. 2nd ed., Acdemic Press. New York. Levitt, J. 1985. Relationsbip of debydratioo rate to drougbt avoidaoce, debydratioo toleraoce and debydratioo avoidaoce of cabbage leaves, and to stress. Plaot cell Environ. 8:287..296.. Levitt, J.1990. Stress ieteraction-baek to the future. HortScieoce 25(11):1363.1365. Loscb, R., 1989, Plaot water relation, Progress in Botaoy. 50:21.50. Marler, T. E. and D. Willis.1996. Chemical or air root pruning containers improve carambola, logan and mango seedlings root morphology and initial root growth after transplanting. J. Environ. Hort. 14(2):47-49. Mere.tt, R.H. and H.C. Kohl,Jr. 1985. Photoperiod and soil temperature effects on crop productivity efficiency and growth of seeding geraniums in the greenhouse.J. Ainer.Soc. Hort.Sci.llO(2):204-207. Milkes, R.R., W. C, Fouteoo, and R.A.Larsoo, 1989.Hydrology of borticultural substrates:Predicting air ao.d water cooteot of limited.rolume plug cells. J.Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114(1):51.61. Montenoso, V. A., and H. C. Wien. 1990. Flower and pod abscission due to heat so.ess in beans. J. Ainer. Soc. Hon. Scl. 115(4)631-634. Morgan,J. M. 1984. Osmoregulation and water stress lo bigb plaots. Aoo. Rev. Plant Pbysial.35:299.319. Reuther, W., E. M. Nauer and C. N. Roistacher. 1979. Some high temperature effects on cihus growth. J. Ainer. Soc.Hort.Sci. 104:353-356. Richards, D. and R. N. Rowe. 1977. Effect of root restrzction, root pnuizg and 6-benzylaminopurine on the growth ofpeach seedling. Ann. Bot. 41:729-740. Santarius, K. A. 1975. Sites of heat sensitivity in chloroplasts and differential inactivation of cyclic and non-cyclic photo-phosthlation by heating. J.Thelm.Bio. I:101-107. Spomer, L.A.1975. SinSmall soil contaioers as experimeotal tools:Soil water relatioo. Commun. SoilSci. Plant,Anal. 6:21.26. Taiz,L. And E. Leiger. 1991. Heat Stress. In: Plant physiology. Pp 360-362. The Benjamin /Cumming Pub. Redwood City, California. Tayler, A.G., J.E,Motes, and M.B.Kirkham, 1982,Gmioation and seedling growth cbaracteristics of tbree tomato species affected by water deficits.J. Amer. Soc.Hort. Sci. 107(2):282.285. Wardlaw, I. F., I. Sofield and P. M. Caltvnight. 1980. Factors limiting the rate of dly inaner accumulation in the grain Of wheat at high temperature. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 7:387-400. Weaver, M. L.,H. Timm, M.J.Silbemagel and D.W.Burke. 1985. Pollen staining and high temperature tolerance of bean. J.Ainer. Soc. Hon. Sci. 110:797-799. Weiser, C. J. 1970. Cold resistance and injury in woody plants. Science 169:1269-1278. Whealy, C. A., T. A. Neil, J. B. Ban.en and R.A.Larson. 1987.High tempellzle effects on groeth and floral development of Chtysantemum. J. Ainer. Soc. Hon. Sci. 112:464-468 Wullscbleger, S. D. and D.M.Dosterbuls.1991. Osmotic adJustmeot and tbe growtb response of seveo vegetable crops following water.deficit stress, HortScieoce 26(9):1210.1212 Zimmermaoo, U. 1978. Pbysics Of turgor and osmoregulatioo. Aoo, Rev. Plaot Pbysiol. 29:121.148.
摘要: 本研究以‘桃園亞蔬九號’番茄為試驗材料,以穴盤之ㄧ半穴格底部剪裁成為直線漏空穴格底部,寬與圓孔孔徑相同(以直孔簡稱),另ㄧ半則保留原來穴格底部之圓孔。將四週與六週直孔及圓孔穴格苗,經斷水48及24小時處理後調查植株性狀。調查株高、莖長、莖徑、本葉數、根長、葉綠素、地上部鮮重、地上部乾重、地下部鮮重、地下部乾重、根部TTC活力試驗等。 不同苗齡與穴格處理下,斷水處理48小時與24小時者的株高顯著較對照組低。斷水處理48小時與24小時的莖長顯著較低。斷水處理48小時者與24小時者的莖徑顯著較低。斷水處理48小時與24小時的節間數與比較差異不顯著。斷水處理48小時與24小時的節間長顯著較低。斷水處理48小時與24小時的根長在四週苗顯著較對照組長。斷水處理48小時與24小時的地上部鮮重顯著較對照組低。斷水處理48小時與24小時的地下部鮮重顯著較對照組低。斷水處理者48小時與24小時的葉綠素顯著普遍較對照組低。斷水處理48小時、24小時者與對照組根部活力的表現在4週齡與六週齡有不同表現。 番茄苗以直線漏空及圓孔穴格之穴盤育苗至五週苗時,經斷水48及24小時與對照組處理後,番茄苗五週苗定植於田間三週之生理性狀與始花情形。缺水健化處理後,定植於中興大學園藝系蔬菜田,行株距為60cm × 45cm,定植時與定植後三週調查株高、莖徑、本葉數等性狀,並於定植後調查始花天數、始花節位等初期生育。 不同苗齡與穴格處理下五週苗齡番茄苗,經斷水處理48小時、24小時者定植田間的始花天數。直孔或圓孔穴格處理斷水處理48小時、24小時者與對照組的表現,在始花天數上沒有顯著差異。不同苗齡與穴格處理下五週苗齡番茄苗,斷水處理者48小時、24小時與對照組的始花節位。直孔或圓孔穴格處理斷水處理48小時、24小時者與對照組始花節位的表現,在五週苗齡沒有明顯表現差異。
We used‘Lcopersicon esculentum’Mill.cv.‘TAOYUAN AVRDC NO.9’seedling in our study, a half of the plate cell, the bottom of the cell was broken and the the cell board was the same with upper, and the others was control. In our research, we measured the plant growth condition after treated with 48 and 24 hours water-deficit in 4 and 6 week old seedlings. The plant growth condition was showed with plant height, the diameter and length of shoot, the number of leaves, the root length, chlorophyll containing, the fresh and dry weight of shoot, the fresh and dry weight of root, and the TTC test. Compare with CK, the plant height was higher in different stage of seedling and cell structure after water-deficit treated. Moreover, the shorter of shoot length and shoot diameter were observably in the seedling of water-deficit treated. On the other hand, the node number was the same but the length of node was shorter than CK. When the water-deficit was treated on the 4 weeks old seedling, the root was longer than CK. In our results, the fresh weight of shoots and roots were less than CK and the content of chlorophyll still less than CK. In 4 and 6 weeks old seedling, the activities of TTC test were different after water-deficit treated. Tomato seedlings were grown in cavity cell (漏空) and round cell until 5 weeks. Before transfer to field, we treated water deficit for 24 and 48 hours, and measured the physiological characters and flowering time after 3 weeks. All of seedlings were plated in field of NCHU after hardening, and the distance of plant growth were 60cm × 45cm. After 3 weeks, we measured the plant height, the diameter and length of shoot, and the number of leaves. We also counted the days of flowering and the node of flower.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/28924
其他識別: U0005-0109200812135700
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-0708200810214400
Appears in Collections:園藝學系

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.