Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/30736
標題: 台灣沙灘蟋蟀(直翅目:地蟋蟀科)基礎生物學研究
Biological research on beach cricket, Taiwanemobius formosanus Yang et Chang (Orthoptera: Nemobiidae)
作者: Huang, Chih-Chieh
黃致玠
關鍵字: http://etds.lib.nchu.edu.tw/etdservice/view_metadata?etdun=U0005-1306200918453700
台灣沙灘蟋蟀
空間分布
生活史
生殖行為
散佈模式
出版社: 昆蟲學系所
引用: 王立豪。2008。台灣寬尾鳳蝶的習性與生態需求之研究。國立台灣師範大學生命科學系碩士論文,台北。49頁。 余清金、朱耀沂。1993。台灣長臂金龜(Cheirotonus macleayi formosanus Ohaus)之飼養。中華昆蟲13: 235-239。 沈勇強。1993。扇平地區舟蛾科昆蟲生活史之研究。台灣省林業試驗所,台北。109頁。 李惠永。1999。瀕危種蝴蝶─大紫蛺蝶之棲所、生活史及習性。國立台灣大學昆蟲學研究所碩士論文,台北。54頁。 吳尚澄、彭仁君。2007。紅紋鳳蝶取食港口馬兜鈴不同生長期葉片之生活史特性比較。動物行為暨生態研討會論文宣讀摘要。 柯心平。2002。台灣擬食蝸步行蟲之基礎生態學研究及其族群分化之探討。國立台灣大學昆蟲學研究所碩士論文,台北。69頁 黃生。2002。東亞水筆仔(Kandelia candel)族群遺傳變異的地理關係。中國生物學會。專題演講摘要。 陳素瓊、歐楊盛芝、游書萍。2006。五種蝴蝶生活史的比較。台灣昆蟲學會論文宣讀。 黃煌煇。2006。台灣海岸的美。科學發展。408: 52-57。 葉萬音、朱耀沂。1981。津田氏大頭竹節蟲(Megacrania tsudai Shiraki)之生活史。中華昆蟲學會,論文宣讀摘要(八)。 童維德。1991。樺斑蝶之生物學:產卵行為與各蟲期的發育。國立台灣大學植物病蟲學研究所碩士論文,台北。71頁。 張錦洲。1994。台灣產黃緣螢人工飼育之研究。國立中興大學昆蟲學研究所碩士論文,台中。48頁。 楊平世。1989。陽明山國家公園主要蝶類之飼養及青斑蝶類行為之研究。陽明山國家公園管理處,台北。79頁。 楊正澤。1997。地棲蟋蟀及棲所保育。台灣省政府農林廳,台灣南投。106頁。 劉恆鍵。2002。台灣地區津田氏大頭竹節蟲(Megacrania tsudai Shiraki)(竹節蟲目:竹節蟲科)之空間分布、野外生活史及取食行為特性調查。國立中興大學昆蟲學研究所碩士論文,台中。36頁。 羅鳳恩。1988。樺斑蝶幼期生物學及食物利用效率之研究。國立台灣大學植物病蟲學研究所碩士論文,台北。56頁。 Alexander, R. D. 1962. Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution 16: 443-467. Alexander, R. D. and D. Otte. 1967. The evolution of genitalia and mating behavior in crickets (Gryllidae) and other Orthoptera. 1-62. Michigan: Mus. Zool., Univ. Mich.. Alexander, R. D. and E. S. Thomas. 1959. Systematic and behavioral studies on the crickets of the Nemobius fasciatus group (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Nemobiinae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 52: 591-605. Beck, S. D. 1980. Insect Photoperiodism. New York: Academic Press,. Bell, P. D. 1979. Rearing the black horned tree cricket, Oecanthus nigricornis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Can. Ent. 111: 709-712. Boake, C. R. B. 1983. Natural history and acoustic behavior of a gregarious cricket. Behaviour 89: 241-250. Bentley, D., and H. Keshishian. 1979. Quantitative staging of embryonic development of the grasshopper, Schistocerca nitens. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 54: 47-74. Chopard, L. 1929. Insects of Samoa and other samoan terrestrial arthropoda.1-58. London: Brit. Mus. Forrest, T. G. 1991. Mate choice in ground crickets (Gryllidae: Nemobiinae). Flo. Entomol. 74(1): 74-80. Fulton, B. B. 1931. A study of the genus Nemobius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 24: 205-237. Furukawa, H. 1970. Two new interesting genera and species of crickets of Japan (Orthoptera). Kontyû 38(1): 59-66. Fedorka, K. M., and T. A. Mousseau. 2002a. Tibial spur feeding in ground crickets: Larger males contribute larger gifts (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Flo. Eotomol. 85(2): 317-323. Fedorka, K. M., and T. A. Mousseau. 2002b. Nuptial gifts and the evolution of male body size. Evolution 56(3): 590-596. Gabbutt, P. D. 1954. Notes on the mating behaviour of Nemobius sylvestris (Bosc.) (Orth., Gryllidae). Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 2(3): 84-88. Hardy, T. N. and K. C. Shaw. 1983. The role of chemoreception in sex recognition by male crickets: Acheta domesticus and Teleogryllus oceanicus. Physiol. Entomol. 8: 151-166. Hudson, W. G., and J. G. Saw. 1987. Spatial distribution of the tawny mole cricket, Scapteriscus vicinus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 45: 99-104. Ivy, T. M., C. B. Weddle, and S. K. Sakaluk. 2005. Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates. Proc. R. Soc. B 272: 2475-2478. Lutz, F. E. 1932. Experiments with Orthoptera, concerning diural rhythm. Amer. Mus. Novit. 550: 1-24. Loher, W. and M. Dambach. 1989. Reproductive Behavior. pp. 43-82. In: F. Huber, T. E. Moore, W. Loher, eds. Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology. Mays, D. L. 1971. Mating behavior of Nemobiinae crickets- Hygronemobius, Nemobius, and Pteronemobius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Flo. Entomol. 54(2): 113-126. Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. 1-428. New York: TATA McGraw-Hill Publishing company. Matheny E. L. JR., R. L. Kepner, and K. M. Portier. 1983. Landing distribution and density of two sound-attracted mole crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 76: 278-281. Nowosielski, J. W., and R. L. Patton. 1963. Studies on circadian rhythm of the house cricket, Gryllus domesticus L. J. Ins. Physiol. 9: 401-410. Nybakken, J. and M., Berthess. 2005. Marine biology-an ecological approach. 6thed. 1-579. Harpercollins College Div. Ôshiro, Y. 1986. A new species of the genus Parapteronemobius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) from Minamidaitô-jima Islnad, Japan. Kontyû 54 (4): 719-722. Ôshiro, Y. 1990a. A new species of the genus Parapteronemobius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) from Akuseki Island in theTokara Islnad, Japan. Jpn. J. Ent. 58(3): 656-660. Ôshiro, Y. 1990b. A new species of the genus Parapteronemobius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) from Takara Island, the Tokaras, Japan. AKITU N. Ser. 177: 1-6. Ôshiro, Y. 1995. Studies on the Gryllidae from the Ryukyu Islands. 鳴き虫会1-131. Ôshiro, Y., and A. Ichikawa. 1997. Description of the genus Taiwanemobius Yang et Chang (Orthoptera, Gryllidae, Nemobiinae) from the Ryukyu Island, Southern Japan. Jpn. J. syst. Ent. 3(2): 277-280. Otte, D., 1994. The crickets of Hawaii: orgin, systematics and evolution. 1-329. Philadelphia: Acad. Nat. Sci. Otte, D., and R. D. Alexander. 1983. The australian crickets (Orthoptera:Gryllidae). 1-477. Philadelphia: Acad. Nat. Sci. Prado, R. A. 2006. Reproductive behavior of Eidmanacris corumbatai Garcia (Orthoptera: Phalangopsidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 35(4): 452-457. Reinhold, K. 1999. Paternal investment in Poecilimon veluchianus bushcrickets: beneficial effects of nuptial feeding on offspring viability. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45: 293-299. Rence, B. and W. Loher. 1977. Contact chemoreceptive sex recognition in the male cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Physiol. Entomol. 2: 225-236. Roe, R. M., C. W. Clifford and J. P. Woodring. 1980. The effect of temperature on feeding, growth, and metabolism during the last larval stadium of the female house cricket, Acheta domesticus. J. Insect Physiol. 26: 639-644. Room, P. M., C. H. Perry, and P. T. Bailey. 1984. A population study of the coconut pest Segestidea uniformis (Willemse) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) on an equatorial island. Bull. Ent. Res. 74: 439-451. Semlitsh, R. D.. 1986. Life history of the northern mole crickets, Neocurtilla hexadactyla (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae), utilizing Carolina-bay habitats. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 79: 256-261. Simmons, L. W. 1990. Nuptial feeding in tettigoniids: male costs and the rates of fecundity increase. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27: 43-47. Stowe, K. 1995. Exploring ocean science. 2ed., 1-426. America: John Wiley & Sons. Sturm, R. 2003. The spermatophore of the black field cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Insecta: Orthoptera: Gryllidae): size, structure and formation. Entomologische Abhandlungen 61(2): 227-232. Szymanski, J. S. 1914. Eine methode zur untersuchung der ruhe- und activitats-perioden bei tieren. Pflug. Arch. Ges. Physiol. 158: 343-385. Sawada, K. and N. Handa. 1998. Variability of the path of the Kuroshio ocean current over the past 25,000 years. Nature 392: 592-595.. Smith, R. L., and W. B. Thomas. 1988. Southwestern distribution and habitat ecology of Gryllodes supplicans. Bul. Entomol. Soc. Am. 34: 186-190. Tomioka, K., and T. Sakamoto. 2006. History dependence of insect circadian rhythms. Formosan Entomol. 26: 87-97. Tregenza, T., and N. Wedell. 1997. Definitive evidence for cuticular pheromones in a cricket. Anim. Behav. 54: 979-984. Ulagaraj, S. M. 1975. Mole crickets: ecology, behavior, and dispersal flight (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae: Scapteriscus). Env. Entomol. 4: 265-273. Ushirokita, M. 1998. Eggs of stick insects drifting in the wake of screw pine’s seed. Insectarium. 4: 108-115(In Japanese). Virant-Doberlet, M and A. Cokl. 2004. Vibrational communication in insects. Neotrop. Entomol. 33: 121-134. Walker, T. J.. 1986. Monitoring the flights of field crickets (Gryllus spp.) and a tachinid fly (Euphasiopteryx ochracea) in north florida. Flo. Ent. 69(4): 678-685. Walton, B. T. 1983. Use of the cricket embryo (Acheta domesticus) as an invertebrate teratology model. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 3: 233-236. Warthen, J. D. and E. C. Uebel. 1980. Comparison of the unsaturated cuticular hydrocarbons of male and female house crickets, Acheta domesticus (L.) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Insect Biochem. 10: 435-439. Yang, J. T., and Y. L. Chang, 1996. A new genus Taiwanemobius (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Gryllidae: Nemobiinae) of ground crickets from Taiwan. J. Orth. Res. 5: 61-64. Yuan, Y., C. T. Liu, P. Ziqin, and S. P. Zheng.1996. Circulations east of Taiwan and in East China Sea and east of Ryukyu Islands during early summer 1985. Acta Oceanologica Sinica 15(4): 423-435. Yuan, Y., A. Kaneko, J. Su, X. Zhu, Y. Liu, N. Gohda and H. Chen. 1998. The Kuroshio East of Taiwan and in the East China Sea and the Currents East of Ryukyu Islands during early Summer of 1996. Journal of Oceanography. 54: 217-226.
摘要: Taiwan beach cricket(Taiwanemobius formosanus Yang et Chang, 1996) was described by Jeng-Tze Yang and Yu-Lin Chang in 1996. The preliminary research indicates that Taiwan beach cricket lives in pebble sandy beach in the eastern coast of Taiwan, including off-shore Lanyu Island. But in the past ten years, no one study again on their basic biology. The whole study began at acquired the references of the biology of beach crickets, such as food habit, life history, distribution, circadian, reproductive behavior and so on. Then the study moved into field investigation and laboratory experiment. Investigating on the information of spatial distribution, habitat, circadian by pit-fall and free-hand collecting. Breeding crickets and recording by video of crickets behavior in laboratory make up the deficiency of biology data from references and field investigation. Crickets were reared in growth chamber (D /L: 12 /12, 25℃, RH 80%). We recorded the behavior of both circadian activity and reproductive behavior by video to analyse the on fixed action pattern. The egg stage was 35.69 ±1.99 days, and the longevity of male and female was 126.00 ±7.22, 127.70 ±8.30 days, respectively. Totally instars of most beach cricket was 8 instars (82.98%), fewer was 9 (17.02%). The first instar was 15.57 ±2.26 days, then reduced in 2~4 instar. Finally it increased accompany by instars. According to the result, we confirmed that T. formosanus lived in pebbled sandy band intensively (4 April: ANOVA, F=2.63, p=0.1049; 21 November: ANOVA, F=4.09, p=0.0382; 20 December: ANOVA, F=4.77, p=0.0250). For the circadian, the active time in the third period was longer than two light periods. The cricket was more active in the dark than in the light period. Male reversed its position and made a distinctive behavior, like vibrating or jerking, and moved with his posterior end directed toward the female's head during courtship. Because of wingless, we presume that it is the same behavior for producing courtship song in the member of Nemobiidae. Because of the similar morphology, the other species T. ryukyuensis distributes over Ryukyu Island is considered that they are the same species. We hypothesize that the egg of beach cricket may disperse by Kuroshio Current from Taiwan east coast to Ryukyu. Results showed that T. formosanus has higher specificity in pebble sandy beach where are easily affected by human activity. We suggest that setting up a natural preservation zone in pebble sandy beach is necessary for protecting this treasuring species.
台灣沙灘蟋蟀(Taiwanemobius formosanus Yang et Chang, 1996)屬地蟋蟀科,本科台灣目前紀錄11種,本種由楊正澤博士與張玉鈴於1996年發表為單模屬。初步研究結果顯示本種分布於台灣東海岸及離島蘭嶼之礫石灘,但過去十年內其基礎生物學之研究資料缺乏。台灣地蟋蟀均分布於陸域,而太平洋岸有10種地蟋蟀分布於海岸各種不同棲地包括紅樹林、珊瑚礁岸、礫石灘等。本研究開始整理回顧海灘蟋蟀類之文獻,希望藉由文獻蒐集進一步了解棲息在海岸的蟋蟀其食性、生活史、分布、日週活動、生殖行為。野外調查則利用徒手採集、掉落式陷阱等方法來了解沙灘蟋蟀在大小尺度之空間分布、棲地類型、日週活動;室內則藉由飼養與行為錄影的方式來補充生活史、日週活動及生殖行為資料之不足。 台灣沙灘蟋蟀在生長箱以相對溼度80%、光照(D /L) 12 /12 hr、恆溫25℃飼養,卵期為35.7 ±2.0天,若蟲共8個齡期(82.98%),少數為9齡(17.02%),總發育天數雄蟲為126.0 ±7.2天,雌蟲為127.7 ±8.3天;各齡期發育天數,一齡15.6 ±2.3天,二至四齡較低,五至八齡則隨齡期而增加。族群結構及分布方面,藉由環島採集之結果,確定沙灘蟋蟀僅分布於台灣本島東部、離島蘭嶼;在海灘中小尺度分布則集中於礫石帶之中(4月4日:ANOVA, F=2.63, p=0.1049,11月21日:ANOVA, F=4.09, p=0.0382,12月20日:ANOVA, F=4.77, p=0.0250),顯示沙灘蟋蟀對於礫石灘棲地具高度專一性;日週活動方面,陷阱調查結果在各時段間不具顯著性差異,而室內錄影實驗中無光照時段(19:00)T. formosanus成蟲移動較為頻繁,且移動時間亦較有光照時間來得長,顯示在無光照時可能為蟋蟀的活動、覓食時間。生殖行為上,分析固定行為模式發現,雄性蟋蟀有出現轉身背對雌蟲、並做出類似震動或抽搐動作。 琉球群島有一種沙灘蟋蟀(T. ryukyuensis),與T. formosanus的外部形態及棲地極相似,因此推測沙灘蟋蟀的卵可能藉由黑潮漂流,散佈至琉球。本研究結果顯示,台灣沙灘蟋蟀只分布於東部礫石灘,且活動及生殖均侷限在同一棲地完成,棲地專一性相當高,然而海岸因人為活動頻繁,棲地容易遭受衝擊,建議未來可以劃設保護區來保護海岸礫石灘環境,如此才能藉由保留完整的海岸生態系特殊地形景觀,同時保留此一珍貴稀有的獨特物種。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/30736
其他識別: U0005-1306200918453700
Appears in Collections:昆蟲學系

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.