Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/33050
標題: 以連續土壤轉換函數預測 van Genuchten 模式參數之研究
A Study of Using Continuous Pedotransfer Functions to Predict Parameters of van Genuchten Model.
作者: 林可薇
Lin, Ke-Wei
關鍵字: 土壤轉換函數
Pedotransfer functions
van Genuchten 模式(vG-Model)
群集分析
複線性迴歸分析
van Genuchten Model(vG-Model)
Cluster analysis
Multiple linear regression
出版社: 水土保持學系所
引用: 中文部分 書籍 1.林俐玲、董小萍,1996,土壤物理學實習手冊,國立中興大學水土保持學系。 2.林傑斌、林川雄、劉明德、飛捷工作室 ,2004,SPSS 12統計建模與應用實務,博碩文化有限公司。 3.萬鑫森譯,1987,基礎土壤物理學,國立編譯館主編,茂昌圖書有限公司。 期刊論文 1.林佳燕,2008,不同土壤質地Arya and Paris模式參數之推估,國立中興大學水土保持學系研究所碩士論文。 2.林明毅,2011,土壤轉換函數應用於水分特性曲線之研究,國立中興大學水土保持學系研究所碩士論文。 3.吳晟哲,2010,土壤水力性質轉換函數─以石門水庫集水區為例,國立中興大學水土保持學系研究所碩士論文。 4.洪靖惠,2008,土壤水分特性曲線參數與物理性質關係之研究,國立中興大學水土保持學系研究所碩士論文。 5.陳信宏,2006,以Arya and Paris Model推估土壤水分特性之研究,國立中興大學水土保持學系研究所碩士論文。 6.張育誠,2006,以基本土壤特性評估土壤水分特徵曲線,國立台北科技大學土木與防災研究所碩士論文。 7.張舒婷,2007,土壤水分特性曲線與不飽合水力傳導度之研究,國立中興大學水土保持學系研究所碩士論文。 8.蔡義誌,2008,不飽和土壤水力傳導度與介質孔隙分布關係之研究,國立中興大學水土保持學系研究所博士論文。 西文部分 1.Ahuja, L. R. and D. Swartzendruber. 1972. An improved form of the soil-water diffusivity function. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36:9-14. 2.Bell, M. A. H. and van Keulen. 1996. Effect of soil disturbance on pedotransfer function development for field capacity. Soil Technology 8:321-329. 3.Burdine, N. T. 1953. Relative permeability calculation from pore size distribution data. Trans. AIME 198:71-77. 4.Chen,T. B., Y. M. Zheng, M. Lei, Z. C. Huang, H. T. Wu, H. Chen, K. K. Fan, K. Yu, X. Wu and Q. Z. Tian. 2005. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface soils of urban parks in Beijing, China. Chemosphere 60: 542–551. 5.Clapp, R. B. and G. M. Hornberger. 1978. Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resour. Res. 14:601-604. 6.Cornelis, W. M., J. Ronsyn, M. van Merivenne and R. Hartmann. 2001. Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for predicting the soil moisture retention curve. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 638-648. 7.Coskun Gulser and Feride Candemir. 2008. Prediction of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Using Some Moisture Constants and Soil Physical Properties. BALWOIS 2008- Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia- 27, 31 May 2008 8.Cuenca, R. H., M. Ek and L. Mahrt. 1996. Impact of soil water property parameterization on atmospheric boundary layer simulation. J. Geophnal. Res. 101:7269-7277. 9.Das, M. and O.P. Verma.2011. Derivation and Validation of Pedotransfer Functions for Point Estimation of Soil Moisture in Sandy to Clayey Soil Texture. Journal of Agricultural Physics Vol. 11, pp. 21-25. 10.Endelman, F. J., G. E. P. Box, J. R. Boyle, R. R. Hughes, D. R. Keeney, M. L. Northrup and P. G. Saffigna. 1974. Themathematical modeling of soil-water-nitrogen phenomena.EDFB-IBP-74-8. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. 11.Espino, A., D. Mallants, M. Vanclooster and J. Feyen. 1995. Cautionary notes on the use of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil hydraulic properties. Agricultural Water Management 29: 235-253. 12.Fereydoon Sarmadian and Ali Keshavarzi. 2010. Developing Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating Some Soil Properties using Artificial Neural Network and Multivariate Regression Approaches. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 72. 13.Gupta, S. C. and W. E. Larson. 1979. Estimation soil water retention characteristic from particle size distribution, organic matter percent and bulk density. Water Resour. Res. 15:1633-1635. 14.Hasan Merdun,, O‥ zer Cınar, Ramazan Meral and Mehmet Apan. 2006. Comparison of artificial neural network and regression pedotransfer functions for prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil & Tillage Research 90 :108–116. 15.Hillel, D. 1980. Fundamentals of Soil Physics, Academic Press, New York. 16.Hodnett, M. G. and J. Tomasella. 2002. Marked differences between van Genuchten soil water-retention parameters for temperate and tropical soils: A new water-retention pedo-transfer functions developed for tropical soils. Geoderma 108:155– 180. 17.King, L. G. 1965. Description of soil characteristics for partially saturated flow. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 29:359-362. 18.Klute, A. and C. Dirksen. 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory methods. p. 687-734. In A. Klute (ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 1: Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph no. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. 19.Ka’lma’n Rajkaia, Sa’ndor Kabos and M. Th. van Genuchten. 2004. Estimating the water retention curve from soil properties: Comparison of linear, nonlinear and concomitant variable methods. Soil & Tillage Research 79 :145–152. 20.Lake Hadi Rahimi, Ali Akbarzadeh and Ruhollah Taghizadeh Mehrjardi.2009. Development of pedo transfer functions (PTFs) to predict soil physico-chemical and hydrological characteristics in southern coastal zones of the Caspian Sea. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment Vol. 1(7), pp. 160-172. 21.Laliberte, G. E. 1969. A mathematical function for describing capillary pressure-desaturation data. Bull. Int. Ass. Sci. Hydrol. 14:131-149. 22.Majou, H. Al., A. Bruand , O. Duval and I. Cousin. 2007. Variation of the water-retention properties of soils: Validity of class-pedotransfer functions. C. R. Geoscience 339:632-639. 23.Matula, S. and K. Špongrova. 2007. Pedotransfer function application for estimation of soil hydrophysical properties using parametric methods. Plant Soil Environ 53:149-157. 24.Merdun, H. 2006. Pedotransfer functions for point and parametric estimations of soil water retention curve. PLANT SOIL ENVIRON., 52, 2006 (7): 321–327. 25.Minasny, B., A. B. Mcbrantney and K. L. Bristow. 1999. Comparison of different approaches to the development of pedotransfer functions for water- retention curves. Geoderma 93:225-253. 26.Mualem, Y. 1976a. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Wafer Resour. Res. 12:513-522. 27.Rawls, W. J. and D. L. Brakensiek. 1982. Estimating soil water retention from soil properties. J. Irrig. Drainage Div. ASCE 108:166-171. 28.Saikia, U. S. and A. K. Singh. 2003. Development and validation of pedotransfer functions for water retention, saturated hydraulic conductivity and aggregate stability of soils of Banha watershed.J. Ind. Soc. Soil Sci. 51, 484-488. 29.Santra, P. and B. S. Das. 2008. Pedotransfer functions for soil hydraulic properties developed from a hilly watershed of Eastern India. Geoderma 146 : 439-448. 30.Saxton, K. E. and W. J. Rawls. 2006. Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70:1569–1578 . 31.Sigh, R., D. K. Das and A. K. Singh. 1992. Prediction of hydrological characteristics from basic properties of alluvial soil. J. Ind. Soc. Soil Sci. 37, 216-222. 32.Strait, S., K. E. Saxton and R. I. Papendick. 1979. Pressure and hydraulic conductivity curves for various soil textures. Internal Report. USDA-ARS, Washington State University, Pullman. 33.Su, C. and R. H. Brooks. 1975. Soil Hydraulic properties from infiltration tests. Watershed Management Proceedings, Irrigation and Drainage Div., ASCE, Logan, Utah, August11-13, pp. 516-542. 34.Teepe, R., H. Dilling and F. Beese. 2002. Estimating water retention curves of forest soils form soil texture and bulk density. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 166 : 111-119 35.van den Berg, M., E. Klamt, L. P. van Reeuwijk and W. G. Sombroek. 1997.Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of moisture retention characteristics of Ferralsols and related soils. Geoderma 78:161-180. 36.van Genuchten, M. Th.. 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J., 44 : 892 -898. 37.van Genuchten, M. Th. and D. R. Nielsen. 1985. On describing and predicting the hydraulic properties of unsaturation soils. Ann. Geophys. 3 : 625 -628. 38.van Genuchten, M. Th., F. J. Leij and S. R. Yates. 1991. The RETC Code for Quantifying the Hydraulic Functions of Unsaturated Soils.p.1-14. U.S. Salinity Laboratory U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 39.Visser, W. C. 1968. An empirical expression for the desorption curve. In P. E. Rijtemaand H. Wassink (eds.). Water in the unsaturated zone, Proc. Wageningen Symposium,IASH/AIHS, Unesco, Paris, Vol I, 329-335. 40.Wosten, J. H. M., P. A. Finke and M. J. W. Jansen. 1995. Comparison of class and continuous pedotransfer functions to generate soil hydraulic characteristics. Geoderma 66:227-237. 41.Wosten, J. H. M., A. Lilly, A. Nemes and C. Le Bas. 1999. Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soil. Geoderma 90 : 169 -185.
摘要: 本研究旨在以土壤質地為基礎,發展van Genuchten 模式(vG-Model)參數之連續土壤轉換函數(Continuous PTFs),台灣土壤型態以壤土為主,故針對中質地土壤進行分析。藉由廣泛蒐集國內外文獻確立模式內使用之變數,運用K-Means法群集分析將土樣依砂粒與黏粒含量做分類,共分成兩組,再利用複線性迴歸分析發展模式,並與未分類土樣發展之模式比較其預測力。由驗證組之均方根誤差(RMSE)與無偏估線點位分布結果顯示依質地分類之Continuous PTFs確實能增進參數α之預測,進而探討模式變數發現重力水與α具有線性關係;參數n之模式則無明顯之效果,觀察其模式發現n值可能受黏粒含量(C)影響。將驗證組土樣依黏粒含量重新分組後再帶入模式,其RMSE與無偏估線點位對於C值大於8%之土樣確實有精進之效果,C值小於8%則無此現象,此與n值之模式發展具有不確定性有關,但黏粒含量對於此參數仍有相當之影響。本研究進一步比較質地發展之PTFs與前人研究依區域發展之PTFs比較,結果顯示質地分類發展之模式於預測參數α與n皆明顯較區域性發展之模式佳,更證實質地分類之必要性。本研究發展之模式如下所示: ln(α)=-3.2110-0.1871∙(BD∙FC)-1423.24∙〖FC〗^(-2) +0.14523∙(BD∙f)-0.1525∙〖OM〗^(-2) ln(n)=-0.0605+407.7189∙f^(-2)+0.0227∙〖OM〗^(-2) +0.00013∙(Sa∙C) ln(α)=-4.3389-0.1572∙(BD∙FC)+0.1259∙(BD∙f) -0.2197∙〖OM〗^(-2) ln⁡(n)=-0.1049+0.0272∙〖OM〗^(-2)+437.1857∙f^(-2) +0.00052∙(C∙FC) ln(α)=-5.6336- 0.0058∙〖FC〗^2+0.0052∙(f∙FC) ln⁡(n-1)=8.6704+5.1255∙〖BD〗^2+850.0738∙〖FC〗^(-2) -16.5089∙BD+0.01316∙(BD∙FC) +0.4315∙(C∙BD)-0.5646∙C
The purpose of this study is developing pedotransfer functions (PTFs) which were based on soil texture to derive parameters of van Genuchten Model(vG-Model). The study focused on loamy soil, because it is the main type of soil in Taiwan. Determining variables in PTFs by collecting literatures widely, then K-Means cluster analysis was used to classify samples according to the content of sand and clay. All samples were derived into two groups, multiple linear regression analysis was used to develop model for each group, and then compared the predictive ability with the model which was developed from all samples. By the calculation of root mean square error and the point distribution of unbiased estimate line which produced from validations showed that PTFs developed according to texture could surely improve the prediction of the parameter α. Further investigation showed that there might be linear relationship between soil gravity water and parameter α. There was no improvement in the prediction of parameter n. However, the result of observing the model showed that the parameter n might be affected by the content of clay. Taking validations to regroup according to the content of clay, and then put them in the model again. The result of root mean square error and the point distribution of unbiased estimate line showed that when the content of clay was greater than 8%, the improvement of the model was obvious, but when the contents of clay were less than 8%, it didn’t have any effect. This phenomenon was related with that the previous studies which pointed out there was uncertainty in developing the model of n, but the effect of clay was undeniable. This study further compared two PTFs which were developed according to texture and region, and the result showed that in prediction of parameter α and n, the former was better than the latter. And the result proved that it was necessary to classify samples by texture. PTFs were as follows: ln(α)=-3.2110-0.1871∙(BD∙FC)-1423.24∙〖FC〗^(-2) +0.14523∙(BD∙f)-0.1525∙〖OM〗^(-2) ln(n)=-0.0605+407.7189∙f^(-2)+0.0227∙〖OM〗^(-2) +0.00013∙(Sa∙C) ln(α)=-4.3389-0.1572∙(BD∙FC)+0.1259∙(BD∙f) -0.2197∙〖OM〗^(-2) ln⁡(n)=-0.1049+0.0272∙〖OM〗^(-2)+437.1857∙f^(-2) +0.00052∙(C∙FC) ln(α)=-5.6336- 0.0058∙〖FC〗^2+0.0052∙(f∙FC) ln⁡(n-1)=8.6704+5.1255∙〖BD〗^2+850.0738∙〖FC〗^(-2) -16.5089∙BD+0.01316∙(BD∙FC) +0.4315∙(C∙BD)-0.5646∙C
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/33050
其他識別: U0005-0708201217302600
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-0708201217302600
Appears in Collections:水土保持學系

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.