Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/34666
標題: 堆砂籬定砂功效之探討
Study on the effect of sand-fixed hedge
作者: 邱盈達
Qiu, Ying-Da
關鍵字: ammount of blown sand
飛砂量
sand-fixed hedge
retain sand efficiency
wind tunnel
堆砂籬
攔砂功效
風洞試驗
出版社: 水土保持學系所
引用: 1. 甘偉航(1988)「海岸竹枝籬堆砂功效評估及植物定砂功能調查」,林業試驗所研究報告季刊,3(4):225~240。 2. 江永哲、張文詔(1978)「海岸飛砂量估算之風洞實驗」,中華水土保持學報,9(2):51~81。 3. 江永哲、游繁結、張炎銘、李遠慶(1978)「攔沙離沉砂功效之試驗」,中華水土保持學報,9(1):91~111。 4. 江永哲、林壯沛(1984)「不同編結形式攔砂構造物防治飛砂功效試驗」,水土保持學報,16、17:109~122。 5. 江永哲、林壯沛(1985)「不同材料攔砂構造物防治風砂功效試驗」,中華水土保持學報,16(1):60~77。 6. 吳昌翰(2006)「台中港飛砂量推估之研究」,國立中興大學水土保持學系研究所碩士論文。 7. 林信輝、江永哲(1979)「砂體含水率與飛砂量之關係試驗」,中華水土保持學報,10(2):173~193。 8. 周恆(1976)「防風定砂」,國立中興大學教務處出版組。 9. 邱創益、黃隆明(1993)「定砂植物對海岸環境影響之研究」,水土保持學報,25(1):39~52。 10. 陳財輝、游漢明、洪富文(2004)「桃園許厝港海岸飛砂之移動及定砂植物之生長」,中華林學季刊,37(4):367~377。 11. 高世民、江永哲(1991)「防風網高度與間距配置之探討」,國立中興大學水土保持學研究所碩士論文。 12. 游繁結(1979)「不同密度堆砂籬之功效探討」,國立中興大學農林學報,28:169~216。 13. 游繁結(1986)「台灣西海岸飛砂量推估之初步研究」,中華水土保持學報,17(1):107~117。 14. 游繁結(1989)「台灣海岸的防風定砂」,「水土保持」專輯。 15. 黃隆明、張書豪(2005)「連續式防風柵之防風功效研究」,國立中興大學農林學報,54(2):113~128。 16. 蔡明華(1972)「崎頂海岸砂丘地土壤物理及化學性測定研究」,沙丘利用,第73期,第三號。 17. 蘇福來(1980)「定砂對策工程」,河海工程,12:11~16。 18. 中島勇喜(1979)飛砂制御に關する基礎的研究,九州大學農學部演習林報告,51:125~183. 19. 河村龍馬(1951),飛砂の研究,束京大學理工研報,5:3~4. 20. 游繁結(1981)「台湾における堆砂垣の間隔について」,砂丘研究, 28(2):51~58。 21. 遠藤治郎、吉沢繁彥、中島勇喜、金內英司、青山清道(1988)「網を用いた伏工による飛砂量の減少」,砂丘研究, 35(2):89~102。 22. 遠藤治郎、小出正明(1992)「砂地飛砂量の高度分布-場所の違いと施工による變化-」,新瀉大學農學部演習林報告,第25號:127~133。 23. 樁東ㄧ郎(1974),「水理學Ⅱ」,森北出版社,日本東京:228~233。 24. Bagnold, R.D.(1954)The physics of blown sand and desert dunes. 25. D.W.(1986)A field dust sampler,Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, March~April:117~119. 26. D. van der Wal(1998)Effects of fetch and surface texture on aeolian sand transport on two nourished beaches. Journal of Arid Environments39:533~547. 27. Dirk Goossens(2000)Wind tunnel and field calibration of five Aeolian sand traps, Geomorphology 35:233~252. 28. Horikawa, K. and H. W. Shen (1960) Sand movement by wind action on the characteristics of sand traps, Beach Erosion Board Crops of Engineers, Technical Memorandum. No. 119. 29. John E.Stout, Ted M.Zobeck(1996)The Wolfforth Fleld Experiment:A Wind Erosion Study,Soil Science 161(9):616~632. 30. Kenneth Pye, Haim Tsoar(1990)Aeolian sand and sand dunes. 31. Van Donk SJ, Skidmore EL(2001)Field experiments of evaluating wind erosion models,Annals of Arid Zone 40(3):281~302. 32. W.M. Cornelis, D. Gabriels (2004)Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control. Journal of Arid Environments 61:315~p.332. 33. Zigg, A.W.(1952)Wind tunnel studies of movement of sedimentary material, 5th. Hyd. Conf., State Univ. of Iowa, Bull. 34:111~135. 34. Zhibao D(2002)The flux profile of a blowing sand cloud:a windtunnel investigation.Geomorphology 49:219~230. 35. Z.Masri(2003)Wind Erosion in a Marginal Mediterranean Dryland Area:A Case Study from the Khanasser Valley,Syria,Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28:1211~1222. 36. Z.S. Li,J.R. Ni(2003)Sampling efficiency of vertical array Aeolian sand traps, Geomorphology 52:243~252. 37. Zhibao D, Guangqiang Qian, Wanyin Luo and Hongtao Wang (2006)Threshold velocity for wind erosion:the effects of porous fences. Environ Geol 51:471~475.
摘要: 堆砂籬於台灣沿海雖已被廣泛使用,然堆砂籬是否需要大面積全面鋪設,才能獲得最顯著功效;主籬與翼籬之間夾角應如何規劃,才能達到最佳化設計,至今尚無具體結果,為能深入探討本研究分為現地及風洞試驗,現地試驗以苑裡沿海為試區,架設BSNE垂直集砂器及多層風速計等進行觀測;風洞試驗則依翼籬長度與角度從事模型吹砂試驗。 由現地試驗結果得知,苑裡試區飛砂之中值粒徑為0.19~0.27 mm,砂粒密度為2.55~2.7 g/cm3,砂面含水率為1.0~5.5 %,經分析結果,其與飛砂量均呈負相關,飛砂量推估式為:(公式略) 堆砂籬於東北季風期間之攔砂量百分比為87.62 %,平均單位面積(m2)之攔砂量為8.71 m3,據此獲得在間距10m,平均單位體積攔砂百分比(即攔砂功效)為87.12 %;又砂丘地形最高點於東北季風過後幾乎沒有變化。再者,砂丘迎風面之攔砂功效高達98.57 %,而背風面之攔砂功效為74.92 %。 由風洞試驗結果發現,翼籬可因應不同風向而增加堆砂效果,至少3倍籬高以上時,定砂量開始增加;又翼籬與主籬之夾角對堆砂功效之高低依序為22.5° > 45° > 90° > 0°。
The sand fixed hedge has been using at Taiwan’s coastally, how is the best desing for different from angle between main hedge and wing hedge, it is still no results. In this study, there are two part of experiment that are field study and wind tunnel. The field study is analysis by BSNE sand sampler and multi-layer anemometer at Yuanli coastally, the wind tunnel experimental that study different length and angle of hedge. The result is show that the distribution of medium diameter from 0.19 to 0.27 mm, the density of sand from 2.55 to 2.7 g/cm3, the water content of sand from 1~5.5%, there is there is negative relationship with amount of Aeolian sand. The function of Aeolian sand is :(公式略) The sand-fixed hedge can fix Aeolian sand for 87.62% during the winter, the average distance by 1 m can fix Aeolian sand for 8.71m3, the top of sand dune is almost not to change by wind blown. In other hand, the sand dune is confer to windward side and leeward side. The effect of fix sand is 98.57% on windward sand dune, and the other is 74.92% on leeward sand dune.The wind tunnel result is show that there is fine result in 3 times sand-fixed hedge height for sand-fixed hedge length, there is different amount of aeolian sand by wing hedge angle with main hedge, in order is 22.5° > 45° > 90° > 0°.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/34666
其他識別: U0005-1808200815102400
Appears in Collections:水土保持學系

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.