Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/34992
標題: 土壤質地對台灣大蟋蟀地道結構之影響
Effects of Soil Texture on Ground Tunnel of Brachytrupes portentosus
作者: 龔楓雅
Kung, Feng-Ya
關鍵字: Brachytrupes portentosus
台灣大蟋蟀
constructural combination of ground tunnel
functional intend
地道功能區結構組合
功能意圖
出版社: 水土保持學系所
引用: 參考文獻 1. 吳翠屏(2011) 「適用國小四年級學童體驗教育之棲地概念」興大 碩士畢業論文。 2. 林明鼎 (2010)「台灣大蟋蟀是低投入草坪管理的好幫手」興大碩 士畢業論文。 3. 洪炳煌(2010)「木賊葉木麻黃森林草坪台灣大蟋蟀棲地成蟲地 道演化之研究」興大碩士畢業論文。 4. 范義彬(1999)「昆蟲在現代林業中之角色與重要性」台灣林業 九十四年八月號:40-46。 5. 梁昇、林明鼎,(2009)「不同海岸防風林台灣大蟋蟀若蟲數量之 比較」農林學報58(2)107-119。 6. 梁昇、洪炳煌,(2009)「臺灣大蟋蟀地道形狀之研究~木賊葉木 麻黃防風林案例」中華水土保持學會年會論文集。 7. 梁昇 (2010)「臺灣大蟋蟀」農業世界雜誌322期:94-96。 8. 梁昇、張明富、邱鈺婷,(2010)「台灣台東森林公園台灣大蟋蟀 棲地特性」中華水土保持學會年會論文集。 9. 梁昇 (2011)「臺灣大蟋蟀成蟲期的特殊行為交配期地道之營造」 農業世界雜誌334期:88-93。 10.梁昇、張明富、邱鈺婷,(2011)「台灣大蟋蟀領域行為應用到農 業遊憩」後ECFA兩岸新局:兩岸農業經貿合作學術研討會。 11.梁昇、劉素娥、張明富、吳翠屏、龔楓雅,(2012) 「台灣大蟋蟀 功能區假說地道之演化」投稿農林學報已接受刊登。 12.梁昇(2012)個人通訊。 13.張明富(2011) 「台灣大蟋蟀台灣東海岸棲地特徵」興大碩士畢業 論文。 14.章加寶,(1990),「台灣大蟋蟀」臺灣葡萄害蟲及其他有害動物 生態與管理技術75頁。 15.楊正澤(1997)「地棲蟋蟀及棲所保育」。台灣省政府農林廳。 16.楊正澤(1989)「臺灣生物資源硏究現況」臺灣生物資源調查及 資訊管理硏習會論文集。 17.楊正澤(1999)。蟋蟀生態簡介。農業世界,193,30-33。 18.楊正澤、詹美鈴、石憲宗,(2004)「德國昆蟲學研究所簡 介。」台灣博物季刊23(4)86-89。 19.楊平世、林芙美(1994)。黑蟋蟀(Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer)之生活史及若、成蟲行為之觀察。國立臺灣大學農學院研究 報告,4(34),411-418。 20.蔡在壽、李明忠、林金值、吳京一(1994)。實驗室內臺灣大蟋 蟀之生活史。師大生物學報,2(29),65-70。 21.蔣慕琰(2005)「台灣農地雜草與生物多樣性維護」台灣植物資 源之多樣性發展研討會專刊:153-170。 22.臺灣特有生物中心,(2009)「地裡的生物--螞蟻與蟋蟀」。 23.行政院農業委員會 http://www.coa.gov.tw/show_index.php 24.台灣大百科http://taiwanpedia.culture.tw/web/index 25.李忻(2009)「蟲蟲與我」中華日報醫藥網 http://reading.cdnnews.com.tw/ 20090222/read/zhfk/SB0010002009021114502499.htm 26.周子軒:蟋蟀生活史 http://www.bud.org.tw/observer/year2003/K/K04.asp 27. Arnold van Huis (2011)http://iphone.terrorism.intlsecu.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1760:2011-01-24-15-47-01&catid=70:2010-12-31-03-47-30&Itemid=98 28. Abdrewatha, H. G., and L. C. Birch (1954) “The distribution and abundances of animals,” University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill. 720pp. 29. Alexander, R. D. (1962) ”The role of behavioral study in Cricket Classification,” Syst. Biol. 11(2)57-72. 30. Alexander, R. D. (1968) “Life Cycle Origins, Speciation, and Related Phenomena in Crickets” The Quarterly Review of Biology 43(1)1- 41. 31. Beattie, A. and P. R. Ehrlich (2004) ”Wild Solutions: How Biodiversity Is Money in the Bank,”, Harvard University Press. 2nd ed. 32. Brown, J. L. (1969)”Territorial Behavior and Population”The Wilson Bulletin, 81(3)293-328. 33. Durst, P. D. V. Johnson, R. Leslie, and K. Shono, (2010) “ Forest Insect as Food: Humans bite back!! Proceedings of a work shop on Asia-Pacificresources and their portential for development, 19-21, Febuary, 2008,Chiang Meu, Thailand. FAO, paper publication 201002. 34. Ghosh, C. C., (2012) “The big brown cricket (Brachytrupes achatinus, Stoll),” Mem. Dept. Agric. India 4:161-182. 35. Hill,Dennis,S. (1983)Agricultural insect pests of the tropics and their control, p673 36. Hill,Dennis,S (2008)Pests of Crops in Warmer Climates and Their Control, p141 37. Hockham, L. R. and K. Vahed, (1997) “The Function of mate guarding in a field cricket(Othoptera: Gryllidae, Teleogryllus natalemis Otte and Cade)” J.Insect Behavior 10(2)247-256. 38. Hölldobler, B. and E. W. Wilson, (1994) ” Journey to the ants: A Story of Scientific Exploration”Amazon.com 39. Huth, N. & H. P. Possingham (2011) “ Basic ecological theory can inform habitat restoration for woodland birds”Journal of Applied Ecology,48,( 2), 293–300 40. Labandeira, C. (2007). "The origin of herbivory on land: Initial patterns of plant tissue consumption by arthropods". Insect Science 14 (4): 259–275. 41. Lee, H. J. and W. Lohar (1995) ”Changes in the Behavior of the Female Short-tailed Cricket, Anurogryllus muticus.(De Grer)(Orthoptera: Gryllidae) following Mating.”J. of Insect Behavior, 8(4)547-562. 42.Lee, H. J., and W. Lohar (1996)”Influence of Age and Environmental Factors on burrow making. A. m. (De Geer; (O. G.)” J. of Insect Behavior, 9(5)819-834. 43. Micheneau, C.. F. J. Warren, B. H. Hugel, S. Gauvin-Bialecki, A. Paillea, and Stresberg, T., (2010) “ Orthopetera, a new order of Pollinator,” Annals of Botany 105(3)355-364. 44.Olff,H.,Brown,V.K.&Drent,R.H.(editors)(1999),“Herbivores between plants and Predatorsm”, Science:639. 45. Otte, D. (1987a) “Africa Crickets(Gryllidae) 9. New Genera and Species of Brachytrupinae and Gryllinae”, Proceeding of the Academy of Natural Sxcience of Philadeplphia, 139,315-374. 46. Otte, D. (1987b) “A new Blind Anurogryllus from the Galapagos Islands Ecuader(Orthotera: Gryllidae Brachtrupinae) J. Orthoptera Research 7, 227-229. 47. Poverda, K. I. Steffan-Dewenter, S. Scheu, and T. Tschartke (2003) ” Effects of Below- and Above-ground Herbivores on Plant Growth, Flower visitation And Seed Set,” Oecologia 135P:601-605. 48.Raksakantong, P. N. M. Kubola and Siriamorrpus, S. (2010)”Fatty Acids and Proximate composition of Eight Thai Edible Tericolorous Insects,” Food Research Internationl 43(1)350-355. 49. Vogel, G.. (2010) “For More Protein, Filet of Cricket,”Science 377(5987) p.811. 50. Walker, T. J., (2010) “ The Taxonomy of the field crickets of the eastern United States (orthoptera: Cryllidae),”Annals of the Entomological Society of America 50:564-602. 51. Weaver, J. E., and R. A. Sommers, (1969) “ Life History and Habitats of the Short-Tailed cricket, Anurogryllus muticus in Central Louisiana,”Annals of the Entomological Society of America 62(2)337-342. 52. West, M. J. and R. D. Alexander, (1963) “ Sub-Social Behavior in a Burrowing-Cricket Anurogryllus Muticus (De Geer)Orthoptera: Gryllidae”, THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE 63(1) 19- 24. 54.Zhenghong,P.(2003),”Inset Pests of Eucalypts in China,”ACIAR Proceeding No.111,183-184
摘要: 最近地道功能區假說,強調地道的結構組合才是生存繁衍的重要依賴,與台灣大蟋蟀過去文獻中一直被描述喜好砂質土壤觀點不同,本研究因此進行檢視砂質土壤的需求純度與功能區結構的純度,何者才是種族繁衍較為重要的因素? 經比較不同土壤試區的台灣大蟋蟀地道水平分布與地道形狀複製樣品,作者發現,不管土壤質地如何,功能區結構均齊備且一致;而雄蟲最後一次建的地道,就是共巢期使用的地道。可見強調結構上功能意圖,對於種族繁衍較為重要。
Constructing a functional zones combination based on Functional Zone Hypothesis is regarded as an essential and new concern to generation propagation of Brachytrupes portentosus, compared to the demand of sandy soil in the traditional literature. This study, therefore, tried to examine the integrity between sandy soil demand and functional zones demand. Two evidences showed that constructural intends are involved in tunnel.Firstly, the cohabiting tunnel is construeted by adult male and secondly,the functional zones are completely prepared through all soil textures. The author, thus, believes that functional zones demand is more sense for generation propagation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/34992
其他識別: U0005-0307201209170600
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-0307201209170600
Appears in Collections:水土保持學系

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.