Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/36896
標題: 利用形態特徵和ISSR分子標誌鑑別臺灣細本葡萄(Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc.)收集品系
Identification of Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc. accessions in Taiwan by morphological traits and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers
作者: 陳似任
Chen, Sz-Ren
關鍵字: Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc.
細本葡萄
variety identity
morphological trait
ISSR marker
品種鑑定
形態特徵
ISSR分子標誌
出版社: 農藝學系所
引用: 牛立新和賀普超。1995。我國葡萄屬野生種形態學特性的研究。葡萄栽培與釀酒 4: 15-17。 王西平、王躍進、周鵬、鄭學勤。2000。中國野生葡萄抗黑痘病基因特有的RAPD標記。中國農業科學 33(6): 13-18。 甘偉松。1975。藥用植物學。pp. 375-377。國立中醫藥研究所。台北。 甘偉松。1980。台灣藥用植物誌(3)。pp. 497-499。國立中醫藥研究所。台北。 行政院農業委員會種苗改良繁殖場。2004。植物品種及種苗法令彙編。pp. 1。行政院農業委員會農糧署。南投。 呂秀英。2006。多變數分析在農業科技之應用。作物、環境與生物資訊 3: 199-216。 何陽修。2004。植物新品種檢定之執行。植物種苗 6(2): 1-11。 祁棟靈、周慶陽、劉三軍。利用葉形結構數值分析葡萄種質親緣關係的研究。2005。中國南方果樹 34(3): 64-66。 李慈慧、吳紹宏、林書妍、陳右人、彭思錦、黃朝窗、廖于瑩、鄭正勇。2007。臺灣具有成為栽培果樹潛力之原生樹種。林業研究專訊 14(4): 17-19。 李興進、姜金龍、劉新裕。1995。本省藥用植物種原之簡介與評估。臺灣地區藥用植物資源之開發與利用學術研討會專刊。臺灣省農業試驗所特刊第號。臺中市。 林義恭。2005。台灣農家要覽-農作篇(二)。pp. 279-282。行政院農農業委員會台灣農家要覽增修訂三版策劃委員會。台北市。 施嘉信。2007。菘藍族群變異之研究。國立中興大學碩士論文。台中。 孫群、佟漢文、吳波、丁自勉、王建華、孫寶啟。2007。不同種源烏拉爾甘草形態和ISSR遺傳多樣性研究。植物遺傳資源學報 8(1): 56-63。 黃玉梅、黃亮白、黃少鵬、蕭吉雄。2006。作物種苗產業現況調查與評估。植物種苗 8(2): 63-74。 許再文。1999。台灣產葡萄科植物的分類研究。國立成功大學碩士論文。台南。 梁振昌。2001。台灣台南白玉米不同地區族群變異之研究。國立中興大學碩士論文。台中。 陳述、陳成、范明仁、鄒箎生。2000。簡化綠豆種原形態結構多樣性之研究。中華農學研究 49(1): 26-34。 陳韋睿。2007。台灣細本葡萄莖葉組織解剖特徵之種內變異性。國立中興大學碩士論文。台中。 陳海初。1994。中藥山葡萄幾種常見品種之辨異。汕頭大學醫學院學報 2: 102-103。 張鴻仁和張明郎。2006。植物品種權相關法規及種苗業管理之介紹。植物種苗 8(4): 63-78。 國家作物種原中心。1997。植物遺傳資源-未來植物生產的 關鍵。農業試驗所特刊(63): 69。台中。 楊家駱。1960。植物名實圖考。世界書局。pp. 745。台北。 路端正、梁紅平。1994。北京葡萄屬植物研究。北京農業學報 1(9): 78-81。 劉三軍和孔慶山。1995。我國野生葡萄分類研究。果樹科學 12(4): 224-227。 劉東和楊峻山。1999。葡萄科植物化學成分研究進展。中國藥學雜誌 34(10):649-652。 劉和義、楊遠波、呂勝由、施炳霖。2000。臺灣維管束植物簡誌(3)。pp. 191-194。行政院農業委員會。台北市。 蔡國良。2004。台灣細本山葡萄(Vitis thumbergii Thunb.)之遺傳多樣性。國立中興大學碩士論文。台中。 顏裕齊。2007。台灣細本葡萄(Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc.)收集系有效成分變異性之研究。國立中興大學農藝學系碩士論文。台中。 羅素藍和賀普超。2001。葡萄抗霜霉病基因RAPD標記的序列分析。海南大學學報自然科學版 19(2): 146-150。 行政院農委會植物品種權公告查詢系統。2008。http://newplant.coa.gov.tw/ Alleweldt, G., and J. V. Possingham. 1988. Progress in grapevine breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 669-673. Alma, M. H., and M. A. Basturk. 2006. Liquefaction of grapevine cane (Vitis vinisera L.) waste and its application to phenol–formaldehyde type adhesive. Ind. Crops Products 24: 171–176. Blair, M. W., O. Panaud and S. R. McCouch. 1999. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification for analysis of microsatellite motif frequency and fingerprinting in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 780-792. Bragdon, S., and D. Downes. 1998. Recent policy trends and developments related to the conservation, use and development of genetic resources. Issues in Genetic Resources No. 7. International Plant Genetic Resource Institute. Rome. Brown, A. H. D. 1989. Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31: 818-824. Charters, Y. M. and M. J. Wilkinson. 2000. The use of self- pollinated progenies as ‘in-groups’ for the genetic characterization of cocoa germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 160-166. Diwan, N., M. S. McIntosh and G. R. Bauchan. 1995. Methods of developing a core collection of annual Medicago species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 755-761. Dou, D. Q., J. REN, M. Cooper, Y. H. He, Y. P. Pei, Y. Takaya. 2003. Polyphenols from Vitis thunbergii Sieb. et Zucc. J. Chinese Pharm. Sci. 12(2): 57-59. Droege, S., and B. Soete. 2001. Trade-related intellectual property rights, north-south trade, and biological diversity. Environ. Resour. Econom. 19: 149-163. Fossati, T., I. Zapelli, S. Bisoffi, A. Micheletti, L. Vietto, F. Sala, and S. Castiglione. 2005. Genetic relationships and clonal identity in a collection of commercially relevant poplar cultivars assessed by AFLP and SSR. Tree Genet. Genomes 1: 11-19. Franke, M. D., and T. B. Brenneman. 1999. Identification of resistance to rhizoctonia limb rot in a core collection of peanut germplasm. Plant dis. 83: 944-948. Galet, P. 1979. A practical ampelography. pp. 24-47. Cornell Univ. Press. Gebhardt, C., C. Blomendahl, U. Schachtschabel, T. Debener, F. Salamini, and E. Ritter. 1989. Identification of 2n breeding lines and 4n varieties of potato (Solanum tuberosum, ssp. tuberosum) with RFLP-fingerprints. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 16-22. Hasan, S. M. Z., A. A. Ngadin, R. M. Shah, and N. Mohamad. 2008. Morphological variability of greater yam (Dioscorea alata L.) in Malaysia. Plant Genet. Resour. 6: 52-61. Holbrook, C. C., and W. F. Anderson. 1995. Evaluation of a core collection to identify resistance to late leafspot in peanut. Crop Sci. 35: 1700-1702. IPGRI, UPOV, OIV. 1997. Descriptors for grapevine (Vitis spp.). International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva, Switzerland/Office International de la Vigne et du Vin, Paris, France/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. Law, J. R., P. Donini, R. M. D. Koebner, J. C. Reeves, and R. J. Cooke. 1998. DNA profiling and plant variety registration. III: The statistical assessment of distinctness in wheat using amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Euphytica 102: 335-342. Lin, L. L., C. Y. Lien, Y. C. Cheng, K. L. Ku. 2007. An effective sample preparation approach for screening the anticancer compound piceatannol using HPLC coupled with UV and fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. B 853: 175-182. Lodhi, M. A., G. N. Ye, N. F. Weeden, and B. I. Reisch. 1994. A simple and efficient method for DNA extraction from grapevine cultivars, Vitis species and Ampelopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 12(1): 6-13. Lu, H. and R. Bernardo. 2001. Molecular marker diversity among current and historical maize inbreds. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 613–617. Maxted, N., L. Guarino, L. Myer, and E. A. Chiwona. 2002 Towards a methodology for on-farm conservation of plant genetic Resources. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 49: 31–16. McGregor, C. E., C. A. Lambert, M. M. Greyling, J. H. Louw and L. Warnich. 2000. A comparative assessment of DNA fingerprinting techniques (RAPD, ISSR, AFLP and SSR) in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Euphytica 113: 135-144. Montagnon, C., and P. Bouharmont. 1996. Multivariate analysis of phenotypic diversity of Coffea Arabica. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 43: 221-227. Moreno, S., J. P. Martin, and J. M. Ortiz. 1998. Intersimple sequence repeats PCR for characterization of closely related grapevine germplasm. Euphytica 101: 117–125. Mugnai, S., C. Pandolfi, E. Azzarello, E. Masi, and S. Mancuso. 2008. Camellia japonica L. genotypes identified by an artificial neural network based on phyllometric and fractal parameters. Pl. Syst. Evol. 270: 95–108. Nagaoko, T. and Y. Ogihara. 1997. Applicability of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in wheat for use as DNA markers in comparison to RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 597-602. Nakagawa, S., S. Horiuchi, H. Matsui, E. Yuda, S. Yamada, Y. Murai, and H. Komatsu. 1991. Distribution and leaf morphology of wild grapes native to Japan. Japan Soc. Hort. Sci. 60(1): 31-39. Natella, F., A. Ghiselli, A. Guidi, F. Ursini, and C. Scaccini. 2001. Red wine mitigates the postprandial increase of LDL susceptibility to oxidation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 30: 1036–1044. Noirot, M., S. Hamon and F. Anthony. 1996. The principal component scoring: a new method of constituting a core collection using quantitative data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 43: 1-6. Oliver, J. L., and J. M. Martinez-Zapater. 1985. A genetic classification of potato cultivars based on allozyme patterns. Theor. Appl. Genet. 69: 305-311. Panaud, O., X. Chen, and S. R. McCouch. 1995. Frequency of microsatellite sequences in rice (Oryza sativa L). Genome 38: 1170-1176. Portis, E., C. Comino1, A. Lenzi, P. Lombardi, R. Tesi, and S. Lanteri. 2004. Amplified fragment length polymorphism for variety identification and genetic diversity assessment in oleander (Nerium oleander L.). Euphytica 136: 125–137. Prevost, A. and M. J. Wilkinson. 1999. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR finngerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 107-112. Rakoczy-trojanowska, M. and H. Bolibok. 2004. Characteristics and a comparison of three classes of microsatellite-based markers and their application in plants. Cel. Mol. Biol. Lett. 9: 221-238. Reid. A., and E. M. Kerr. 2007. A rapid simple sequence repeat (SSR)-based identification method for potato cultivars. Plant Genet. Resour. 5(1): 7-13. Salhi-Hannachi, A., M. Trifi, S. Zehdi, J. Hedfi, M. Mars, A. Rhouma and M. Marrakchi. 2004. Inter-simple sequence repeat fingerprints to access genetic diversity in Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) germplasm. Genet. Res. and Crop. Evol. 51(3): 269-275. Sánchez-Escribano, E., J. M. Ortiz, and J. L. Cenis. 1998. Identification of table grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) by the isoenzymes from the woody stems. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 45: 173-179. Schlötterer, C. 2004. The evolution of molecular markers-just a matter of fashion? Nat. Rev. Genet. 5(1): 63-69. Schut, J. W., X. Qi, and P. Stam. 1997. Association between relationship measures based on AFLP markers, pedigree data and morphological traits in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95 : 1161-1168. Shyur, L. F., J. H. Tsung, J. H. Chen, C. Y. Chiu, and C. P. Lo. 2005. Antioxidant properties of extracts from medicinal plants popularly used in Taiwan. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 3(3): 195-202. Soleas, G. J., E. P. Diamandis, and D. M. Goldberg. 1997. Wine as a biological fluid: history, production, and role in disease prevention. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 11: 287-313. Stanton, M. A., J. McD. Stewart, A. E. Pervical, and J. F. Wendel. 1994. Morphological diversity and relationships in the A-genome cottons, Gossypium arboreum and G. herbaceum. Crop Sci. 34: 519-527. Swanson, T., and T. Göschl. 2000. Property rights issues involving plant genetic resources: implications of ownership for economic efficiency. Ecol. Econ. 32: 75-92. Tanksley, S. D. and S. R. McCouch. 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063-1066. Tessier, C., J. David, P. This, J. M. Boursiquot, and A. Charrier. 1999. Optimization of the choice of molecular markers for varietal identification in Vitis vinifera L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 171-177. Tomažič, I, and Z. Korošec-Koruza. 2003. Validity of phyllometric parameters used to differentiate local Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 50: 773–778. Upadhyaya, H. D. 2005. Variability for drought resistance related traits in the mini core collection of peanut. Crop Sci. 45: 1432–1440. Vos, P. R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Friters, J. Pot, J. Paleman, M. Kuiper and M. Zabeau. 1995. A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl. Acids Res. 23: 4407–4414. Williams, J. G. K., A. R. Kubelik, K. J. Livak, J. A. Rafalski, and S. V. Tingey. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl. Acids Res. 18(22): 6531-6535. Zietkiewics, E., A. Rafalski and D. Labuda. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176-183. UPOV. 2006. European Vitis Database. http://www.genres.de/ eccdb/vitis/
摘要: 本試驗以細本葡萄(Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc.)種原為材料,探討種原之形態性狀及ISSR分子標誌之變異,建立品種鑑定及種原評估之基礎遺傳資訊。細本葡萄之嫩梢、新梢、幼葉及成熟葉等部位之19個形態特徵在收集品系間呈現極大的變異。由主成分分析結果顯示,第一主成分主要可解釋種原葉端裂刻深度之變異;第二主成分則主要可解釋葉面積和葉長寬比之變異;由前二主成分構成之二維散佈圖,發現所有收集品系可分為四個主要集群,以葉端裂刻深度極深、葉面積較大且葉形較長之收集品系數目最少,需加強蒐集以擴大種原變異。由主成分分析結果所選出之9個核心形態特徵,包含嫩梢之頂芽色度,新梢之節間長度,幼葉之上表皮色度,成熟葉之葉形、裂葉數、上裂刻深度、葉面積、葉長寬比及葉端裂刻深度等,可區別87個收集品系。經篩選100條ISSR引子,獲得8條信號較強且表現穩定之ISSR引子,可產生129個多型性之分子標誌;以其中4個解析力最高的引子所擴增的19個核心分子標誌,可建立細本葡萄種原之DNA指紋圖譜。核心分子標誌對於新增的20個收集品系和兩個無性繁殖家系亦有鑑別能力。本研究所建立之品種鑑定方法、性狀調查項目及對照品系之參考圖,可作為今後細本葡萄品種鑑定之依據。
The variations of morphological traits and ISSR markers of Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc. germplasm were investigated and analyzed to establish the basic genetic information for variety identification and evaluation in this thesis. Significant variations of morphological trait in young shoot, shoot, young leaf, and mature leaf were found among collected lines. Principle component analysis showed that the depth of leaf tip sinus, leaf area, and leaf length/width ratio were important traits in germplasm evaluation. The dengrogram of principle component analysis revealed four major groups. According to the principle component analysis, the high depth of leaf tip sinus, longer leaf, and larger leaf area are rare traits in germplasm. To reduce the descriptors of Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc., anthocyanin colouration of young shoot tip, length of shoot internode, color of upper surface of young leaf, mature leaf shape, number of mature leaf lobes, depth of upper lateral sinus, mature leaf area, mature leaf length/width, mature leaf petiole/midrib, and depth of leaf tip sinus were selected traits by principle component analysis, and all the 87 Vitis accessions can be differentiated by cluster analysis. This investigation provides a detailed variety description for Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc. grown in Taiwan. Eight ISSR primers selected from 9 sets of UBC primers were sufficient to distinguish 45 Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc. and one Vitis kelungensis accessions by cluster analysis. Four high resolution primers were screened from eight ISSR primers to obtain 19 core molecular markers to establish the DNA fingerprinting for Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc. germplasm. Twenty new accessions and two clone families were tested and could be identified by using the core markers. In this study, variety identification system, trait investigation and reference pictures have been established for germplasm identification and evaluation in Vitis thunbergii Sieb. & Zucc.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/36896
其他識別: U0005-1608200815491600
文章連結: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-1608200815491600
Appears in Collections:農藝學系

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.