請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/89043
標題: Constructing Bibliographic Relationships of Journal Collections Through FRBR Model
FRBR模式應用於期刊書目關係之建立
作者: 胡麗珠
Li-Chu Hu
關鍵字: 期刊
書目關係
FRBR
MARC21
Serials
Bibliographic relationships
FRBR
MARC21
引用: 一、中文資料 中國圖書館學會分類編目委員會(2005)。中國編目規則(第三版)。臺北市: 中國圖書館學會。 吳慧中(1994)。期刊編目之研究。臺北市:漢美。 柯皓仁(2012)。資源探索服務之功能評估。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,22,1-16。 洪昭蘭(2005)。電子期刊組織整理與使用之研究-以中央研究院為例(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。 胡述兆、王梅玲(2003)。圖書資訊學導論。臺北市:漢美。 徐蕙芬、戴怡正(2007)。書目記錄功能要件最終報告。臺北市:文華圖書管理。 財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心(2013)。資料庫收錄範圍。Retrieved May 31, 2014, from: http://sticnet.stpi.narl.org.tw/sticloc/ttswebill?@0:0:1:illtmp@@0.9430117463203727 國家圖書館(2010)。權威紀錄。【國家圖書館編目園地】。Retrieved December 21, 2014, from: http://catweb.ncl.edu.tw/portal_f2_cnt.php?button_num=f2&folder_id=13 國家圖書館(2013)。RDA工作之推動。【國家圖書館編目園地】。Retrieved December 21, 2014, from: http://catweb.ncl.edu.tw/portal_d7_cnt.php?button_num=d7&folder_id=13。 張慧銖(2003)。圖書館目錄發展研究。臺北市:文華圖書管理。 張慧銖(2011)。圖書館電子資源組織 : 從書架到網路。新北市:Airiti Press。 張慧銖(2014)。圖書館資訊組織新境界。在王振鵠教授九秩榮慶籌備小組編。王振鵠教授九秩榮慶論文集(頁159-170)。台北市:師大書苑。 張慧銖、林時暖 (2004)。書目記錄功能需求之發展。中國圖書館學會會報,73,45-61。 張慧銖、曾昱嫥、李勇德、林瑋琦與闕仲寬(2014)。FRBR相關研究之計量分析。第十二屆海峽兩岸圖書資訊學學術研討會論文集。天津市南開大學,2014年7月6日至8日。 粘芸蓁(2009)。Amazon.com圖書資料檢索結果中所呈現之書目連結關係探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。 郭妮娜(2007)。中國機讀編目格式欄位使用情形之研究。大學圖書館,11(2),166-193。 郭蕙貞(2010)。大學圖書館書目品質研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中興大學,台中市。 陳和琴、陳君屏(2007)。中文電子資源編目。臺北市: 國家圖書館。 陳淑君(1994)。書目品質控制的另一章:相關書目紀錄關係的建立(下)。中央研究院計算中心通訊,10(19),取自:http://www.ascc.sinica.edu.tw/nl/83/1019/04.txt 詹麗萍(2005)。大學圖書館數位化館藏之可及性研究。中華民國圖書館學會會報,74,77-88。 趙慶芬(2006)。電子期刊的資訊組織與取用之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。 鄭玉玲、許令華、林淑芬、牛惠曼 (2012)。資源描述與檢索:RDA與AACR2、MARC 21相關議題初探。國家圖書館館刊,101(2),31-64。 盧秀菊(2000)。圖書館目錄之書目關係。國家圖書館館刊,89(2),123-1 羅羽中、李菡(2014)。解析RDA中的關係描述。數字圖書館,6,55-62。 二、西文資料 AACR.(2006). About AACR2. Retrieved April 3, 2014, from: http://www.aacr2.org/about.html Adams, K., Santamauro, B., & Blythe, K. (2008).Successive entry, latest entry, or none of the above? How the MARC21 format, FRBR and the concept of a work could revitalize serials management. The Serials Librarian, 54(3-4), 193-197. Alan, R. (1993). Linking successive entries based upon the OCLC control number, ISSN, or LCCN. Library Resources & Technical Services, 37(4), 403-413. Allgood, J. E. (2007). Serials and multiple versions, or the inexorable trends toward work-level displays. Library Resources & Technical Services, 51(3), 160-178. American Library Association.(2002).Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd ed., Revision. Ottawa: Canadian Library Association. Anderson, R., & Moore, K. B. (2013).Is the journal dead? Possible futures for serial scholarship, The Serials Librarian, 64(1-4), 67-79.doi: 10.1080/0361526X.2013.759877 Antelman, K. (2004). Identifying the serial work as a bibliographic entity.Library Resources & Technical Services,48(4), 238-255. Antelman, K.,& Davis, S. (2005). Implementing a serial work in an electronic resources management system.Serials Librarian, 48(3-4), 285-288. Antleman, K. (2008). The FRBR frontier: Applying a new bibliographic model to e-resources. The serials Librarian, 53(4), 213-221. Black, S. (2006). Serials in libraries: issues and practices.Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. Bourne, R. (1980). Serials librarianship.London: The Library Association. Bross, V., Hawkins, L., & Nguyen, H. (2013).CONSER serial RDA workflow.Serials Librarian, 64(1-4), 211-215. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2013.760412 Cooperative Online Serials.(2011). Home page of the CONSER program. Retrieve from: http://www.loc.gov/acq/conser/ Copeland, A. (2002). E-Serials cataloging in the 1990s.The Serials Librarian, 41(3-4), 7-29.doi: 10.1300/J123v41n03_02 Creative Research System.(2014). Sample size calculator.Retrieved May 1, 2014, from: http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm Curran, M. (2009). Serials in RDA: A starter''s tour and kit. The Serials Librarian, 57(4), 306-323.Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/57745327?accountid=12716 Curtis, D., Scheschy, V. M., & Tarango, A. R. (2000).Developing and managing electronic journal collections: A How-to-Do-It manual for librarians. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers. Delsy, T. (2003).FRBR and serials. Retrieved Janaurary 18, 2014, from: http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/wgfrbr/papers/delsey.pdf Dunham, B. (2002). Different formats: Linking serial titles for display through bibliographic relationships. Is it possible? Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 26, 3-17. Dunsire, G. (2012). Representing the FR family in the semantic web.Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 724-741. Duranceau, E. F. (1995). Cataloging remote-access electronic serials:Rethinking the role of the OPAC. Serials review, 21(4), 67-77. Espley, J. L., & Pillow, R. (2012).The VTLS implementation of FRBR.Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 369-386. Farrington, J. W. (1997). Serials management in academic libraries: A guide to issues and practices.Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Ford, C. E., &Harter, S. P. (1998). The downside of scholarly electronic publishing: Problems in accessing electronic journals through online directories and catalogs. College and Research Libraries 59(4), 335-346. French, P. (2000). AACR2 and you: Revising AACR2 to accommodate seriality.The Serials Librarian, 38(3/4), 249-256. Goman, M. (1976).The current state of standardization in the cataloging of serials.Library Resources and Technical Services, 19(4), 301-313. Goman, M. (1989).The concise AACR2, 1988 revision. Chicago: American Library Association. Graham, C. (1990). Definition and scope of multiple versions.Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 11(2), 5-32. doi:10.1300/J104v11n02_02 Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y, Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., & Hilf, E. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310-314. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013 Hawkins, L., Nguyen, H., & Tarango, A. R. (2011).CONSER update.Serials Librarian, 60(1-4), 124-134. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2011.556450 Hirons, J. (2002). Displays from multiple versions from MARC 21 and FRBR: A brief review for serials. Paper presented at the CONSER Operations Committee Meeting, Library of Congress. Retrieved Januauary 28, 2014, from: http://www.loc.gov/acq/conser/Possible%20hierarchical%20display.pdf Howarth, L. C. (2012). FRBR and linked data: Connecting FRBR and linked data. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 763-776. IFLA ISBD Review Group. (2011). International Standard Bibliographic Description Consolidated Edition. Retrieved September 02, 2014, from:http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/isbd/isbd-cons_20110321.pdf IFLA Review Group. (2011).Final report of the working group on aggregates. Retrieved November 20, 2013, from: http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbrrg/AggregatesFinalReport.pdf IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. (2009). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final report. Retrieved November 20, 2013, from: http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. (2013).RDA: resource description and access background. Retrieved Januaurary 5 2014, from: http://www.rda-jsc.org/rda.html#background Jones, ED. (2005). The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources.Library Resources & Technical Services,49(4), 227-242. Jones, W. (2000). E-packages.The Serials Librarian, 39(1), 15-18.doi: 10.1300/J123v39n01_02 Krier, L. (2012). Serial, FRBR, and library linked data: A way forward. Journal of Library Metadata, 12(2-3), 177-187. Kuhagen, J. A. (2012). Serials and RDA: An ongoing relationship. TheSerials Librarian, 62, 5-16. Le Boeuf, P.(2012). Foreword. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 355-359. doi: 10.1080/01639374.2012.682001 Leazer, G. H., & Smiraglia, R. P. (1999). Bibliographic families in the library catalog: A qualitative analysis and grounded theory. Library Resources & Technical Service, 43(4), 191-212. Lee, S., & Jacob, E. K. (2011). An integrated approach to metadata interoperability: Construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR. Library Resources & Technical Services, 55(1), 17-32. Library of Congress. (2002).Monograph, serial, or integrating resource:guidelines for the decision (LCRI 1.0).Retrived April 6, 2014, from: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/1-0rev3.pdf Library of Congress.(2006).Functional analysis of the MARC 21 bibliographic and holdings formats. Retrived April 3, 2014, from: http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis/functional-analysis.html Library of Congress.(2012).U.S. RDA implementation updates from the U.S. RDA test coordinating committee. Retrived April 11, 2014, from: http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/RDA_updates_20jun12.pdf Library of Congress.(2013).BIBFRAME implementation testbed. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from: http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/implementation/testbed.html Library of Congress.(2014).Bibliographic Framework Initiative. Retrieved December 20, 2014, from: http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/ Mayernik, M. (2010).The distributions ofMARC fields in bibliographic records.Library Resources & Technical Services, 54(1), 40-54. doi: 10.5860/lrts.54n1.40 Meagher, E. S., & Brown, C. C. (2004).Notes on operations gold rush integrated access to aggregated journal text through the OPAC.Library Resources & Technical Services, 48(1), 69-76. Mitchell, A. M., & Surratt, B. E. (2005).Cataloging and organizing digital resources:A How-To-Do-It manual for librarians. London: Facet. Moen, W. E., & Benardino, P. (2003). Assessing metadata utilization: An analysis of MARC content designation use. In: 2003 Dublin Core Conference: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice – Metadata Research and Application, Seattle Wash. Retreived January 15, 2015, from: http://www.unt.edu/wmoen/publications/MARCPaper-Final2003.pdf Molto, M. B. (2011). Characteristics of serial title changes and recognition of new serial works: Theoretical and practical implications.Serials Review, 37(4), 275-289.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2011.09.011 Morse, T. (2012).Mapping relationships: Examining bibliographic relationships in sheet maps from Tillett to RDA.Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(4), 225-248.doi: 10.1080/01639374.2012.657292 Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of Congress.(2003).Displays for multiple versions from MARC 21 and FRBR. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from: http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis/multiple-versions.html Nicholson, Joseph. (2012). RDA relationships and RDA for serials. Retrieved Auguest 15, 2014, from: https://sites01.lsu.edu/wp/louis/files/2012/04/2011RDARelPresFinal.pdf Niu, J. (2013).Hierarchical relationships in the bibliographic universe. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(5), 473-490. O'Neill, E. (2005). Relational models for aggregates. Retrieved April 22, 2014, from: http://www.oclc.org/research/events/frbr-workshop/presentations/oneill/ONeill-Aggregartes.ppt Oliver, C. (2004). FRBR is everywhere, but what happened to the format variation issue? The Serials Librarian, 45(4), 27–36. doi:10.1300/J123v45n04_02 O''Neill, E. T. (2002). FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Application of the Entity-Relationship model to Humphry Clinker. Library Resources & Technical Service, 46(4), 150-159. Petek, M. (2008).Bibliographic families and relationships among family members in COBIB. OCLC Systems & Services, 24(2), 91-100. doi: 10.1108/10650750810875449 Picc, P., & Repiso, V. O. (2012). The contribution ofFRBR to the identification of bibliographic relationships: The new RDA-based ways of representing relationships in catalogs. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 622-640. RANDOM.ORG. (2014).Random integer generator. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from: https://www.random.org/integers/ RDA Test Coordinating Committee.(2011). Report and recommendations of the U.S. RDA test coordinating committee. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/source/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf RDA Toolkit. (2014). About RDA. Retrieved from: http://access.rdatoolkit.org/ Riva, P. (2004a). Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett''s taxonomy of bibliographic relationships.Library Resources and Technical Services, 48(2), 130-143. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/57574782?accountid=12716 Riva, P. (2004b). Defining the boundaries: FRBR, AACR and the serial.Serials Librarian, 45(3), 15-21. Rosenberg, F., & Hillman, D. (2004).An approach to serials with FRBR in mind.Retrieved from: http://www.lib.unc.edu/cat/mfh/serials_approach_frbr.pdf Shadle, S. (2006).FRBR and serials.The Serials Librarian, 50(1-2), 83-103. Simposn, P., & Seeds, R. (1998). Electronic journals in the online catalog: Selection and bibliographic control. Library Resources & Technical Services, 42(2), 126-132. Sleeman, A., M. (1995).Cataloging remote access electronic materials.Serials Review, 21(4), 72-74. Smiraglia, R. P., & Leazer, G. H. (1999). Derivative bibliographic relationships: The work relationship in a global bibliographic database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(6), 493-504.Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/231396428?accountid=12716 Tillett, B. B. (1987). Bibliographic Relationships: Toward a conceptual structure of bibliographic information used in cataloging(Unpublished doctoral dissertation).University of California, Los Angeles. Tillett, B. B. (1991). A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources and Technical Services, 35(2), 150-158. Tillett, B. B. (2001). Bibliographic relationships.In C. A. Bean, & R. Green (Eds.), Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge (chap.2, pp.19-35). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub. Tillett, B.B. (1992). Bibliographic relationships: An empirical study of the LC machine-readable records. Library Resources and Technical Services, 36(2), 162-188. Tillett, B.B. (2005). FRBR and cataloging for the future.Catalog & Classfication Quality, 39(3/4), 197-205. Vellucci, S. L. (1995). Bibliographic relationships among musical bibliographic entities: A conceptual analysis of music represented in a library catalog with ataxonomy of the relationships discovered(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Columbia, New York. Vellucci, S. L. (1997). Bibliographic relationship. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from the National Library of Canada Electronic Collection websity: http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/300/jsc_aacr/bib_rel/r-bibrel.pdf Williams, J.W. (1997). Serials Cataloging, 1991-1996.The Serials Librarian, 32(1-2), 3-26.doi: 10.1300/J123v32n01_02 Yee, M. M. (2005). FRBRization: A method for turning online public finding lists into online public catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 24(2), 77-95. Young, N. K. (2004). The aggregator-neutral record. TheSerials Librarian, 45(4), 37-42. doi: 10.1300/J123v45n04_03
摘要: 期刊對於學術界知識的創作及資訊的傳遞具有舉足輕重的角色,然而期刊文獻的組織與管理迄今仍是圖書館棘手的問題。本研究擬從期刊書目關係的角度進行探討,分析FRBR模式應用於期刊組織管理的可行性。 本研究主要目的在探討目錄中之期刊書目紀錄所呈現的書目關係,以及應如何著錄MARC 21欄位以呈現期刊的書目關係,最後分析FRBR模式應用於表達期刊書目關係之可行性。在研究方法上,採內容分析法。研究對象為國內六所大學圖書館之期刊書目紀錄。透過二階段的期刊書目紀錄取樣,以Excel軟體計算及人工逐筆分析欄位內容,進而分析期刊之書目關係,計算書目紀錄中,與每種書目關係相關的欄位及分欄的出現比率,以及各類型書目關係的發生頻率,之後再導入FRBR模式並以MARC 21作為書目的著錄格式,分析哪些欄位應予著錄,方能串連期刊的書目關係,建立期刊的書目家族,並且藉此達到階層組織的呈現,以作為國內各大學圖書館未來在組織管理期刊及系統廠商設計系統的參考。 研究結果顯示:(1)圖書館目錄中之期刊書目紀錄的確能呈現書目關係,分別為連續、等同、整體部分、附屬及衍生關係。整體研究樣本中,具一種書目關係以上的期刊樣本,佔60.22%。同時具備二種書目關係以上的期刊樣本,佔5.5%。而不具備任何一種書目關係的期刊樣本,則佔39.78%,亦即約有六成的期刊是至少具備一種書目關係,而有四成的期刊是不具備任何書目關係。在書目關係的呈現比率上,最高者為連續關係,佔58.79%,其次為等同關係,佔21.82%,第三為整體部分關係,佔4.09%,第四為附屬關係,佔3.79%,最少為衍生關係,佔2.58%。(2)透過MARC 21的欄位著錄,足以呈現期刊的五種書目關係,再者,目前對於期刊的著錄方式皆是以整份期刊作為作品進行描述,各種書目關係的連結,亦是以整份期刊為書目關係產生的依據。(3)以MARC 21為著錄格式,不僅能呈現期刊書目關係的欄位,亦能呈現FRBR第一組實體間之關係,就目前期刊著錄的現況,若自動化系統配合MARC 21欄位的著錄,仍舊是連結期刊書目關係及呈現的主要作法。 依據研究結果所提出的建議如下:(1)若要充份呈現期刊的書目關係,應更重視書目紀錄著錄的完整性;(2) 學術圖書館應重新思考書目控制並掌握最新趨勢與發展;(3)因應RDA的實施,圖書館應有階段性的規劃;(4) 大學圖書館應重視權威控制的重要性。
Serials play an important role for the creation of knowledge and transfer of information in the academic circle. However, the organization and management of journal holdings are still a thorny problem. The study intends to analyze the possible applicability of the FRBR model to the organization and management of serials from the perspective of the bibliographic relationships for serials. The purpose of this study was to identify the relationships between bibliographic records for serials shown on library catalog, and to present the bibliographic relationships for serials through MARC 21, and to discovery the possible applicability of the FRBR in represent of the bibliographic relationships for serials.Content analysis served as method of the study with manual inspection as the main approach assisted by Excel calculating. Six Taiwanese university libraries were used as the main research object. The results of the study were that: (1) Bibliographic records for journal holdings in library catalogs are indeed able to exhibiting the bibliographic relationships that are sequential, equivalence, whole-part, accompanying, and derivative relationships. Among the whole study samples, there is one relationship account for about sixty percent, there are two relationships account for about five percent, and there is no relationships account for about four percent. The highest presentation rate of bibliographic relationships is sequential relationships, account for about sixty percent, the second is equivalence relationships, account for about twenty two percent, the third is whole-part relationships, account for about four percent, the fourth is accompanying relationships, account for about four percent, the fifth is derivative relationships, account for about three percent. (2) It's enough to present five kinds of bibliographic relationships through MARC 21. And now the practice of defining the serial work is a whole serial. (3) It represents not only the bibliographic relationships for serials but also the four FRBR Group 1 entities by using MARC 21 for the description.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/89043
其他識別: U0005-2801201514093600
文章公開時間: 2015-01-29
顯示於類別:圖書資訊學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 描述 大小格式 
nchu-104-7100014014-1.pdf1.08 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟


在 DSpace 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。