Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/89618
標題: 農村再生社區居民主觀幸福感之研究-以台中市及苗栗縣地區為例
The Study on Subjective Well-being of the Rural Regeneration Community Resident:A Case of Taichung City and Miaoli County
作者: Ya-Ping Shen
沈雅萍
關鍵字: 農村再生
主觀幸福感
結構方程式
Rural regeneration
Subjective well-being
Structural equation modeling
引用: 中文文獻 方珍玲、陳美芬,2013,「建構台灣農村幸福感及指標之芻議」,農業推廣文彙,57:159-175。 王俊豪,2012,農村幸福競爭力調查與發展模式之研究,國立台灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展學系。 行政院主計處,2012,「社會指標統計年報-國民幸福指數專刊」,台北市:曦望美工設計社。 行政院農委會水保局,2012,農村再生整體發展計畫暨第一期(101 至104 年度)實施計畫,http://www.swcb.gov.tw/content/index.asp?m=1&m1=4&m2=469&gp=18 余民寧、黃馨瑩、劉育如,2011,「台灣憂鬱症量表」心理計量特質分析報告」,測驗學刊,58(1):479-500。 余民寧、鐘珮純、陳柏霖、許嘉家、趙珮晴,2011,「教師健康行為、評價性支持與憂鬱傾向之關係:以主觀幸福感為中介變項」,健康促進與衛生教育學報,35:23-48。 吳明隆、涂金堂,2011,SPSS與統計應用分析,台北市:五南。 吳捷,2008,「老年人社會支持、孤單感與主觀幸福感的關係」,心理科學,31(4):984–986。 呂寶華,2013,「前瞻商業管理與農村發展關係之研究-以農村再生計畫為例」,2013 全方位成功國際學術研討會論文集,1:50-63。 周子敬,2007,統計套裝軟體-精通SPSS,台北市:全華。 林俊昇,2005,「促銷價格及知名度影響休閒農場評價認知與旅遊意願之分析」,農業經濟叢刊,11(1):143-157。 南山人壽、經濟日報,2012,幸福大未來-縣市幸福感大調查http://happy.edn.udn.com/ 張海波,2012,「新生代農民工的社會幸福感-基於江蘇省南京市394位新生代農民工的實證研究」,電子科技大學學報,14(1):21-27。 張翔,2012,提綱挈領學統計,台北市:鼎茂。 莊翰華、賴秋華,2011,「農村再生條例的永續發展向度研究」,農業推廣文彙,56:59-74。 許曉怡,2010,由社區組織推動農村再生計畫之研究-以宜蘭縣冬山鄉大進社區為例,國立政治大學碩博士論文。 陳信雄,2010,「農村再生條例與農業發展」,新世紀智庫論壇,51:95-100。 陳美芬、陳淑雲,2012,「有機村民的社區參與程度及其對幸福感影響之研究」,農業推廣文彙,58:151-162。 陳密桃、陳玲婉,2006,「國小學童母親的人格特質與親職壓力、幸福感之相關研究」,高雄師大學報,20:1-20。 陳順宇,2005,多變量分析,台南市:華泰。 陳榮俊,2011,農村規劃指標對農村在生先期規畫之驗證,國立中興大學碩博士論文。 陳寬裕、王正華,2010,論文統計分析實務:SPSS與AMOS的運用,台北市:五南圖書出版社。 陸洛,1998,「中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討」,國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,8(1):115-137。 曾文志,2007,「大學生對美好生活的常識概念與主觀幸福感之研究」,教育心理學報,38(4):417-441。 曾建薰、 羅紹麟,2006,「遊客滿意度驗證性因素分析及其模式修正之研究-以惠蓀林場森林遊樂區為例」,林業研究季刊,28(4):77-86。 黃建嚴、陳明賢、蔡必焜,2011,「農村社區發展結合農村旅遊之知覺經濟效益分析」,管理實務與理論研究,5(3):34-57。 黃炳文,2014,「農村再生發展指標與幸福感知研究」,102-2410-H-005-047,國立中興大學應用經濟系。 楊國樞,1980,「生活素質的心理學觀」,中學心理學刊,22:11-24。 葉美玲、高美玲,1999,「結構方程式與線性結構之關係」,護理研究,7(5):490-497。 薛宇初、李明聰、 劉修,2010,「太魯閣國家公園遊客旅遊動機、目的地意象之相關研究」,休閒暨觀光產業研究,5(2):28-53。 嚴標濱、鄭雪,2006,「大學生社會支持、自尊和主觀幸福感的關係研究」,心理發展與教育,3:60-64。 英文文獻 Andrew, F. M., & S. B.Withey, 1976,Social indicators of welIbeing,New York: Plenum. Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny, 1986,'The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations,'Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6):1173-1182. Bhutan, 2010, Results of the Nationwide 2010 Survey on Gross National Happiness, http://www.grossnationalhappiness.com/survey-results/index/ Diener E., 2000,'Subjective Well-Bing:The Science of Happiness and a Proposal a National Index,'American Psychologist, l55(1):34-43. Dolan P., T. Peasgood and M.White, 2008,'Do we really know what makes us happy?A review of the economic literature on thefactors associated with subjective well-being,' Journal of Economic Psychology, 29:94–122. Edwards B., M. Goodwin, S. Pemberton and M. Woods,2000,Partnership working in rural regeneration,UK:Great Britain. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., and J. M.Gowdy, 2007,'Environmental degradation and happiness,' Ecological Economics, 60(3):509–516. Gkartzios M. and M Norris.,2011, 'If You Build It, They Will Come': Governing property-led rural regeneration in Ireland,' Land Use Policy, 28:486-494. Graham C., A. Eggers and S. Sukhtankar, 2004,'Does happiness pay?: An exploration based on panel data from Russia,'Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55:319–342. KingdonG. G. & J. Knight, 2007,'Community, comparisons and subjectivewell-being in a divided society,' Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64:69–90. Lelkes O., 2002,'Tasting freedom: Happiness, religion and economic transition,' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 59(2):173–194. OECD, 2012, Beter Lift Index, http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/. Pavot W., E. Diener, C. Randall Colvin and E. Sandvik, 1991,'Further Validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: Evidence for the Cross-Method Convergence of Well-Being Measures,' Journal of Personality Assessment, 57:149–161. Pichler F., 2006,'Subjective Quality of Life of Young Europeans. Feeling Happy but who Knows why?,' Social Indicators Research, 75(3):419–444. Rebecca M. W., D. Rasco, 2014,'Structural equation models for prediction of subjective well-being: Modeling negative affect as a separate outcome?,'The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 2(1):162-176. Sun F.,2007,'Structural Equation Model for Subjective Well-Being,' [J], 29:27-32. Welsch H., 2005,'Environment and happiness: Valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data,' Ecological Economics, 58:801–813. Whittaker1 J. and Hutchcroft I., 2002,'The role of Future Search in rural regeneration: process, context and practice,'Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19:339–345.
摘要: 都市化與工業化的結果使台灣的農村以及農產業面臨許多問題,為解決農村所面臨的困境,故政府於2010年8月頒布農村再生條例,但是其成效是否讓農村再生的居民感受到幸福感? 為評估農村再生居民是否感受到幸福,本研究藉由建構一個具有系統性指標構面衡量農村再生計畫執行後的農村再生居民主觀幸福感受,更進一步探討幸福感指標構面的滿意度與農村再生居民之主觀幸福感之間的關係,除此之外,分析農村再生計畫滿意度是否可藉由影響幸福感指標構面的滿意度進而影響農村再生居民之主觀幸福感。 本研究參考國內外農村再生與幸福感之文獻,研擬出衡量農村再生主觀幸福感之六大構面,包含農村居民與居住條件、農村經濟與產業發展、農村生活與文化、農村社會支持、農村自然與生態、公共服務及居民參與。經由探索性因素分析後,重新建構出六大構面分別為居民居住、社區環境、工作與收入、社會支持、自然生態、公共服務。 經由實證分析顯示整體而言大部分的農村再生居民對於農村的生活感覺幸福,「農村再生滿意度」可以透由中介變數「公共服務」、「自然生態」、「居民居住」對「主觀幸福感」產生影響,故想要藉由農村再生計畫改善農村再生居民之主觀幸福感,可透過改改善「公共服務」、「自然生態」、「居民居住」三個構面的滿意度來達成。
The results of urbanization and industrialization let the rural and agricultural industry in Taiwan face many problems. To solve the dilemma faced by the rural in Taiwan, the government edicted regulations of rural regeneration in August 2010. Could the effectiveness of regulations make the rural residents feel the happiness that is this paper want to know. To assess whether or not the rural residents are feeling happy, this study measures subjective well-being of rural regeneration residents after the implementation of rural regeneration program by constructed a perspectived systematic index. Further, this study discussed the satisfaction of the perspectived happiness index and the relationship of rural regeneration residents' subjective well-being. In addition, this paper analysised whether or not the satisfaction of rural regeneration can be affect by the perspective happiness index and in to affect the subjective well-being of the rural regeneration residents. This study referred the References of rural regeneration at home and abroad, and constructed six perspective subjective well-being of rural regeneration, including rural residents and living conditions, economic and industrial development of rural, life and culture of rural, social support of rural, natural and ecological of rural, public services and residents' participation. After exploratory factor analysis re-constructed new six perspective subjective well-being of rural regeneration, including living of residents, community environment, work and income, social support, ecological, public services. Empirical analysis shows that most the rural regeneration residents feel happy. The of rural regeneration can use the intermediary variable of public services, ecological and living of residents to affect. Therefore, to improve the subjective well-being of by rural regeneration can use the improvement of public services, ecological and living of residents.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/89618
其他識別: U0005-2407201502000400
文章公開時間: 10000-01-01
Appears in Collections:應用經濟學系

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館

Show full item record
 
TAIR Related Article
 
Citations:


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.