Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
標題: The Impact of Floor System on Commercial Layer's Egg Production and Hen's Preference of Nest Location
作者: Lin-Ciao Liao
引用: 王金和、李淵百、吳光和、沈添富、吳憲郎、范揚廣、胡怡浩、許振忠、郭猛德、陳保基、陳晉蒼、黃萬傳、張勝善、葉力子、劉瑞珍、戴謙。2001。畜牧要覽家禽篇(增修版)。中國畜牧學會。台北。行政院農業委員會。2013。雞蛋友善生產系統定義及指南。。 伊沙蛋雞飼養管理手冊。2005。嘉利德生產科技有限公司。雲林。 交通部中央氣象局網站。2013。觀測資料查詢系統。。 交通部中央氣象局網站。2014。觀測資料查詢系統。。 何泰全。2007。臺灣土雞的藾菢行為與產蛋性能。碩士論文。國立嘉義大學。嘉 義。 沈添富。2008。家禽學。華香園出版社。台北。 李淵百。2009。動物福祉。國立中興大學。台中。 沙元安。2013。負壓密閉式雞舍對商業蛋雞與台灣土雞產蛋性能之影響。國立中興大學。台中。 林正鏞。2009。褐色蛋雞之初產性狀、產蛋性狀及雞蛋品質變化。行政院農業委員會。。 胡肇嘉。2004。Rhizopus發酵產物對蛋雞產蛋性能,蛋黃中膽固醇含量及血液性狀之影響。碩士論文。國立屏東科技大學。屏東。 周宜靜。2012。不同地方雞種就巢與產蛋位置之選擇。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 夏良宙。1996。水簾式雞舍基本原理(二)。中國畜牧雜誌28(96):46-50。 陳志峰,李淵百,連日清,1991。土雞、白色肉雞與白色來航雞對雞住血原蟲性白冠病抵抗能力之比較。中畜會誌20(3):305-316。 楊泠泠。1996。臺灣種土雞蛋品質之遺傳研究。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 雷鵬魁。1994。蒸發水牆在籠飼蛋雞舍應用之研究。農林學報43(2):11-20。 鄭智翔、蘇晉輝、黃振芳、林榮新。2013。影響家禽就巢與產蛋行為之因素。中畜會誌42(4):249-262。 賴麗如。1992。平飼和籠飼對土雞藾菢行為與產蛋性狀的影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。台中。 賴麗如,李淵百。1995。平飼和籠飼對臺灣土雞藾菢行為和產蛋性狀的影響。中畜會誌24(4):407-420。 Abrahamsson, P., and R. Tauson. 1998. Performance and egg quality of laying hens in an aviary system. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 7(3): 225-232. Appleby, M. C., and H. E. McRae. 1986. The individual nest box as a super-stimulus for domestic hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 15: 169-176. Appleby, M. C., and S. F. Smith. 1991. Design of nest-boxes for laying cages. Br. Poult. Sci. 32: 667-678. Appleby, M. C., H. E. McRae, I. J. H. Duncan, and A. Bisazza. 1984. Choice of social conditions by laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 37: 215-231. Appleby, M. C., I. J. H. Duncan, and H. E. McRae. 1988. Perching and floor laying by domestic hens: experimental results and their commercial application. Br. Poult. Sci. 29: 351-357. Appleby, M. C., S. N. Maguire, and H. E. McRae. 1986. Nesting and floor laying by domestic hens in a commercial flock. Br. Poult. Sci. 27: 75-82. Brake, J. 1985. Comparison of two nesting materials for broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 64:2263-2266. Brake, J. 1987. Influence of presence of perches during rearing on incidence of floor laying in broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 66: 1587-1589. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1999. Council Directive1999/74/EC of July 19 1999. Laying Down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Laying Hens. CEC. Cooper, J. J., and M. C. Appleby. 1994. Nesting behaviour of hens: Effects of experience on motivation. Appl. Anim. Behav. 42: 283-295. Cooper, J. J., and M. C. Appleby. 1996a. Demand for nest boxes in laying hens. Behav. Proc. 36: 171-182. Cooper, J. J., and M. C. Appleby. 1996b. Individual variation in pre-laying behaviour and the incidence of floor eggs. Br. Poult. Sci. 37: 245-253. Cooper, J. J., and M. C. Appleby. 1997. Motivational aspects of individual variation in response to nestboxes by laying hens. Anim. Behav. 54: 1245-1253. CSES, 2012. Laying hen housing study shows tradeoffs between systems. Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply. Bloomington, MN, USA. Duncan, I. J. H., and V. G. Kite. 1989. Nest site selection and nest-building behavior of the domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. 37: 215-231. Duncan, I. J. H., C. J. Savory, and D. G. M. Wood-Gush. 1978. Observations on the reproductive behaviour of domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 4: 29-42. Dunnington, E. A., and P. B. Siegel. 1985. Long-term selection for 8-week body weight in chickens - direct and correlated responses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 71(2): 305-313. EFSA. 2005. Welfare aspects of various systems for keeping laying hens. Scientific report EFSA-Q-2003-92. Enneking, S. A., H. W. Cheng, K. Y. Jefferson-Moore, M. E. Einstein, D. A. Rubin, and P. Y. Hester. 2012. Early access to perches in caged White Leghorn pullets. Poult. Sci. 91: 2114-2120. Faure, J. M., and R. B. Jones. 1982. Effects of age, access and time of day on perching behavior in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8: 357-364. Guesdon, V., and J. M. Faure. 2004. Laying performance and egg quality in hens kept in standard or furnished cages. Anim. Res. 53: 45-57. Haugh, R. R., 1937. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. U. S. Egg Poultry Mag. 43: 552-555. Hester, P. Y., S. A. Enneking, K. Y. Jefferson-Moore, M. E. Einstein, H. W. Cheng, and D. A. Rubin. 2013. The effect of perches in cages during pullet rearing and egg laying on hen performance, foot health, and plumage. Poult. Sci. 92: 310-320. Huber, H. U., and D. W. Fölsch. 1985. Nesting material preference of domestic hens. Appl. Behav. Sci. 14: 182 (abstract). Huber-Eicher, B. 2004. The effect of early colour preference and of a colour exposing procedure on the choice of nest colours in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 86: 63-76. ISA, 2014. Management guide: Alternative production systems. Jones, F. T., D. V. Rives, and J. B. Carey. 1995. Salmonella contamination in commercial eggs and an egg production facility. Poult. Sci. 74: 753-757. Kite, V. G., Cumming, R. B., and M. Wodzicka-Tomaszewska. 1980. Nesting behaviour of hens in relation to the problems of floor eggs. In: Wodzicka-Tomaszewska, M., Edey, T. N., Lynch, J. J. (Eds.), Armidale. New South Wales, Australia. 93-96. LayWel. 2004. Welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens: Deliverable 6.2 Report on production and egg quality. LayWel. 2006. Welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens: Deliverable 2.3 Description of housing systems for laying hens. Lee, Y. P., Craig, J. V., and A. D. Dayton. 1982. The social rank index as a measure of social-status and its association with egg-production in White Leghorn pullets. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8: 377-390. Lentfer, T. L., S. G. Gebhardt-Henrich, E. K. F. Fröhlich, and E. von Borell. 2013. Nest use is influenced by the positions of nests and drinkers in aviaries. Poult. Sci. Lewis, P. D., and T. R. Morris. 2000. Poultry and coloured light. World's Poult. Sci. J. 56(3): 189-207. Leyendecker, M., H. Hamann, J. Hartung, R. M. Weber, G. Glünder, M. Nogossek, U. Neumann, J. Kamphues, and O. Disti. 2002. Mortality and production traits of laying hens kept in battery cages, furnished cages and an aviary housing system. Proc. 11th European Poultry Conference Bremen. CD-Rom. Meijsser, F. M., and B. O. Hughes. 1989. Comparative analysis of pre-laying behaviour in battery cages and in three alternative systems. Br. Poult. Sci. 30: 747-760. Michel, V., and D. Huonnic. 2003. A comparison of welfare, health and production performance of laying hens reared in cages or aviaries. Br. Poult. Sci. 43: 775-776. Millam, J. R. 1987. Preference of turkey hens for nest-boxes of different levels of interior illumination. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 18: 341-348. Morris, T. R. 2004. Environmental control for layers. World's Poult. Sci. J. 60(2): 163-175. NFU. 2003. UK National Farmers Union Egg Production Bulletin pp. 4-15. Nordskog, A. W., and G. Farnsworth. 1953. The problem of sampling for egg quality in a breeding flock. Poult. Sci. 32(Suppl.): 918 (Abstract). Patherick, J. C., E. Seawright, and D. Waddington. 1993. Influence of quantity of litter on nest box selection and nesting behaviour of domestic hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 34: 857-872. Rietveld-Pieters, B., H. J. Blokhuis, and P. R. Wiepkema. 1985. Egg-laying behavior and nest-site selection of domestic hens kept in small floor-pens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 14: 75-88. Riber, A. B. 2010. Development with age of nest box use and gregarious nesting in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 123: 24-31. Ringgenberg, N., E. K. F. Fröhlich, A. Harlander-Matauschek, H. Würbel, and B. A. Roth. 2014. Does nest size matter to laying hens? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 155: 66-73. Roberts, J. R. 2004. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. J. Poult. Sci. 41(3): 161-177. Rondeel, B. V. 2011. The Rondeel system. Sandilands, V., C. Moinard, and N. H. C. Sparks. 2009. Providing laying hens with perches: fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury? Br. Poult. Sci. 50(4): 395-406. Savory, C. J. 1995. Feather pecking and cannibalism. World's Poult. Sci. J. 51: 215-219. Schmid, I., and B. Wechsler. 1997. Behaviour of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) kept in semi-natural aviaries. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 55: 103-112. Sherwin, C. M., G. J. Richards, and C. J. Nicol. 2010. Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK. Br. Poult. Sci. 51: 488-499. Singh, R., K. M. Cheng, and F. G. Silversides. 2009. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poult. Sci. 88: 256-264. Smith, A., S. P. Rose, R. G. Wells, and V. Pirgozliev. 2000. The effects of changing the excreta moisture of caged laying hens on the excreta and microbial contamination of their shell eggs. Br. Poult. Sci. 41: 168-173. Stämpfli, K., B. A. Roth, T. Buchwalder, and E. K. F. Fröhlich. 2011. Influence of nest-floor slope on the nest choice of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 135: 286-292. Stampfli, K., T. Buchwalder, E. K. F. Fröhlich, and B. A. Roth. 2012. Influence of front curtain design on nest choice by laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 53: 553-560. Struelens, E., F. A. M. Tuyttens, A. Janssen, T. Leroy, L. Audoorn, E. Vranken, K. De Baere, F. Ö dberg, D. Berckmans, J. Zoons, and B. Sonck. 2005. Design of laying nests in furnished cages: influence of nesting material, nest box position and seclusion. Br. Poult. Sci. 46: 9-15. Tactacan, G. B., W. Guenter, N. J. Lewis, J. C. Rodriguez-Lecompte, and J. D. House. 2009. Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages. Poult. Sci. 88: 698-707. Tauson, R. 1998. Health and production in improved cage designs. Poult. Sci. 77: 1820-1827. Tauson, R., A. Wahlström, and P. Abrahamsson. 1999. Effect of two floor housing systems and cages on health, production, and fear response in layers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. (2): 152-159. Tauson, R., and K. E. Holm. 2001. First furnished small group cages for laying hens in evaluation program on commercial farms in Sweden. In Proceedings of the 6th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, Zollikofen, Switzerland. 26-32. Timmons, M. B. 1991. Environmental control system for poultry houses. U.S. Patent No. RE33, 600. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Van den Brand, H., H. K. Parmentier, and B. Kemp. 2004. Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. Br. Poult. Sci. 45: 745-752. Walker, A. W., and B. O. Hughes. 1998. Egg shell colour is affected by laying cage design. Br. Poult. Sci. 39: 696-699. Wood-Gush, D. G. M., and L. B. Murphy. 1970. Some factors affecting the choice of nests by the hen. Br. Poult. Sci. 11: 415-417. Wood-Gush, D. G. M., and A. B. Gilbert. 1973. Some hormones involved in the nesting behavior of hens. Anim. Behav. 21: 98 (abstract). Wood-Gush, D. G. M., and L. J. H. Duncan. 1976. Some behavioural observations on domestic fowl in the wild. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 2: 255-269. Zulovich, J. M., and J. A. DeShazer. 1990. Estimating egg production declines at high environmental temperatures and humidifies. ASAE Paper No. 90-4021. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE. Zupan, M., A. Kruschwitz, T. Buchwalder, and B. Huber-Eicher. 2008. Comparison of the pre-laying behavior of nest layers and litter layers. Poult. Sci. 87: 399-404.
摘要: 消費者訴求蛋雞福祉,以致蛋雞友善飼養系統的發展日益重要。如何在提升蛋雞福祉之時又能兼顧生產效益是國內捨去傳統籠飼而採用替代式生產系統應該解決之重要課題。本研究旨在探討平飼生產系統對於商業蛋雞產蛋性能的影響以及蛋雞對巢箱位置之選擇。試驗使用 385 隻 ISA Brown 蛋雞,平飼育成至 16 週齡分為籠飼與平飼兩組。籠飼為水簾雞舍設置二層層疊籠;平飼為負壓雞舍,設置巢箱與棲架,並有戶外空間。結果顯示,室內溫濕度方面,平飼溫差顯著高於籠飼,6-8 月溫度皆高於籠飼;而相對濕度 6-7 及 9-10 月籠飼較高。平飼體重顯著較高,且平飼蛋雞較早達到 50 %產蛋(164 vs. 180 日齡),50 %產蛋日至 58 週齡的隻日產蛋率較高(85.8 vs. 70.5%),平均隻日蛋產量較多(55.66 vs. 41.90 g)。25週齡的蛋品質兩組差異不大,但 35 及 45 週出現顯著差異。平飼雞蛋的蛋重、蛋殼含量、蛋長、蛋殼彩度、厚度都顯著較高,而且蛋黃顏色較深。籠飼雞蛋則有較高的霍氏單位(87.0 vs. 82.7)。母雞開始產蛋時偏向使用特定方位的巢箱,但在24 週齡後各個方位的差異開始趨於平緩 雖然全期的產蛋大多在下層巢箱。(87.3%),但 48 週齡後母雞在上層產蛋數明顯上升到 20%。全期地面蛋的比例為 1.23%,但是有隨時間而下降的趨勢。19 至 30 週巢外蛋發生的區域較分散,不過隨週齡上升有聚集於特定區域的現象。從巢外蛋的分布情形可知舒適程度以及資源的多寡(飲水器、人員進出口、小門)會影響母雞地面產蛋的偏好。綜上所述,平飼生產系統雖然勞力成本較高,但是除了飼養環境改善之外也保有較佳的產蛋性能,可能值得推廣。
A growing demand by consumers for hen's welfare has led to the important development of 'animal-friendly' layer housing systems. How to maintain production efficiency while promoting hen's welfare is an important task to adopt alternative production system to replace the traditional battery cage system for our egg industry. The research is to investigate the impact of floor system on commercial layer's egg production and the hen's preference of nest location. Three hundreds and eighty-five ISA Brown laying hens were tested in this study. They were raised on floor pen to 16 weeks of age before allocated to cage and floor layer houses. The floor system was a negative pressure house with nests and perches inside and hens can access to outdoor area. Cage system was a water-pad evaporation house with two tiers of single-bird cages. For room temperature and relative humidity, the floor system had larger daily temperature range and higher temperature from June to August. But the cage system had higher relative humidity from June to July and September to October. Hens in floor system had heavier body weight. They reached 50 % laying rate earlier (164 vs. 180 d), and had higher hen-day laying rate to 58 weeks of age (85.8 vs. 70.5%). Besides, average hen-day egg mass was better (55.66 vs. 41.90 g). No difference for egg quality traits was found at 25 weeks of age, but 35 and 45 weeks showed significant difference. Egg weight, shell percent, egg length, shell color and thickness were higher and yolk color was darker in eggs laid by floor hens. However, cage eggs had better Haugh unit (87.0 vs. 82.7). When the hens started to lay, they preferred nest at certain location, but after 24 weeks of age, the preference to lay in nests at special location started to disappear. Although, almost all eggs (87.3%) laid in the entire experiment period were found in the nest of the lower tier, more hens started to use upper tier to lay eggs after 48 weeks of age and the proportion reached 20%. The proportion of eggs laid on the floor was 1.23%, but it decreased with age. At 19-30 weeks of age, the locations of mislaid eggs are separated, but only appeared at some specific locations with age increased. The distribution of mislaid eggs suggested that the level of comfort and the amount of resources influence the preference of hen laying on floor. To sum up, even though the floor system has higher labor cost, but it does improve hen's living and also retain good egg production performance. Floor system may be deserved to be adopted by Taiwan industry.
文章公開時間: 2018-07-16
Appears in Collections:動物科學系



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.