Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/90325
標題: A Survey of Commercial Layers' Daytime and Nighttime Perching Behavior
調查商業蛋雞日夜間棲息行為
作者: Chin-Wei Chuang
莊晉維
關鍵字: 棲架
蛋雞
動物福祉
perch
laying hens
animal welfare
引用: 行政院農業委員會。2014。雞蛋友善生產系統定義及指南。http://animal.coa.gov.tw/html3/index_03_3.html。 甘明宗。1986。公母分飼、合飼及棲木對土雞日間作息行為、鬥爭行為、性行為及經濟性狀之影響。碩士論文。 臺中。 姜中鳳。1994。不同公母比例飼養法、棲架及飼料桶添置與飼糧添加色胺酸,對臺灣土雞日間作息、鬥爭及性行為與重要經濟性狀之影響。碩士論文。臺中。 周易蕾。2006。棲架高度與棲木粗細對於臺灣土雞育成期行為及生長性狀之影響 。碩士論文。國立中興大學。臺中。 周佩璇。2008。性聯遺傳矮小基因與限飼對於臺灣紅羽土雞生長性能與棲息行為之影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。臺中。 林興誠。2002。台灣黑羽土雞在水簾式畜舍棲架雞舍生長與行為觀察之研究。碩士論文。國立屏東科技大學。屏東。 林柔靜。2013。不同地方雞種的社會位序建立。碩士論文。國立中興大學。臺中。 陳亭蓉。1998。北京油雞、絲羽烏骨雞、臺灣地區商用烏骨雞與土雞育成期生長與行為性狀之比較。碩士論文。國立中興大學。臺中。 陳韋如。2008。遺傳與社會環境對臺灣土雞棲息行為的影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。臺中。 葉力子。1990。剪爪、棲架及公母分、合飼對土雞趨近性成熟階段之日間作息行為、鬥爭行為、性行為及經濟性狀之影響。碩士論文。國立中興大學。臺中。 董日鏘。2014。六個地方雞種於公母合飼平飼雞欄之日間作息行為與夜間棲息位置。碩士論文。國立中興大學。臺中。 廖玲喬。2014。平飼生產系統對商業蛋雞產蛋性能之影響以及蛋雞對巢箱位置之選擇。碩士論文。國立中興大學.臺中 謝宇揚。2014。峨嵋雞、北京油雞、絲羽烏骨雞與興大選育土雞於育成期及產蛋期行為表現之比較。碩士論文。國立中興大學。臺中。 蕭薈。2012。不同地方雞種於成長期與產蛋期之日間作息行為與夜間棲息位置。碩士論文。國立中興大學。臺中。 Anna, S. I. O., and L. J. Keeling. 2000. Night-time roosting in laying hens and the effect of thwarting access to perches. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 68:243-253. Appleby, M. C., I. J. H. Duncan, and H. E. Mcrae. 1988. Perching and floor laying by domestic hens-experimental results and their commercial application. Br. Poult. Sci. 29: 351-357. Appleby, M. C., B. O. Hughes, and G. S. Hogarth. 1989. Behavior of laying hens in a deep litter house. Br. Poult. Sci. 30: 545-553. Appleby, M. C., S. F. Smith, and B. O. Hughes. 1992. Individual perching behavior of laying hens and its effects in cages. Br. Poult. Sci. 33: 227-238. Appleby, M. C., S. F. Smith, and B. O. Hughes. 1993. Nesting, dust bathing and perching by laying hens in cages: effect of design on behavior and welfare. Br. Poult. Sci. 39: 186-190. Appleby, M. C. 1995. Perch length in cages for medium hybrid laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 36: 23-31. Appleby, M. C., A. W. Walker, C. J. Nicol, A. C. Lindberg, R. Freire, B. O. Hughes, and H. A. Elson. 2002. Development of furnished cages for laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 43: 489-500. Appleby, M. C., J. A. Mench, and B. O. Hughes. 2004. Poultry Behaviour and Welfare, CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA. Barnett, J. L., P. C.Glatz, E. A. Newman, and G. M. Cronin. 1997. Effects of modifying layer cages with perches on stress physiology, plumage, pecking and bone strength of hens. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 37: 523-529. Bishop, S. C., R. H. Fleming, H. A. Mccormack, D. K. Flock, and C. C. Whitehead. 2000. Inheritance of bone characteristics affecting osteoporosis in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:33-40. Blokhuis, H. J. 1984. Rest in poultry. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 12: 289-303. Brake, J. 1987. Influence of presence of perches during rearing on incidence of floor laying in broiler breeder. Poult. Sci. 66: 1587-1589. Brake, J., T. P. Keeley, and R. B. Jones. 1994. Effect of age and presence of perches during rearing on tonic immobility fear reactions of broiler breeder pullets. Poult. Sci. 73: 1470-1474. Cordiner, L. S., and C. J. Savory. 2001. Use of perches and nestboxes by laying hens in relation to social status, based on examination of consistency of ranking orders and frequency of interaction. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71: 305-317. Deighton, T., and J. C. D. Hutchinson. 1940. Studies on the metabolism of fowls: II The effect of activity on metabolism. J. Agr. Sci. 30: 141-157. Enneking, S. A., H. W. Cheng, K. Y. Jefferson-Moore, M. E. Einstein, D. A. Rubin, and P. Y. Hester. 2012. Early access to perches in caged White Leghorn pullets. Poult. Sci. 91: 2114-2120. Faure, J. M., and R. B. Jones. 1982a. Effect of sex, strain and type of perch on perching behavior in the domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8: 281-293. Faure, J. M., and R. B. Jones. 1982b. Effect of age, access and time of day on perching behavior in the domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8: 357-364. Fleming, R. H., C. C. Whiteheand, D. Alvey, N. G. Gregory, and L. J. Wilkins. 1994. Bone structure and breaking strength in laying hens housed in different husbandry system. Br. Poult. Sci. 35: 651-662. Gregory, N. G., and L. J. Wilkins. 1989. Broken bones in domestic fowl: handling and processing damage in end-of-lay battery hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 30: 555-562. Gregory, N. G., and L. J. Wilkins. 1990. Broken bones in chickens : effect of stunning and processing in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 31: 53-58. Guhl, A. M. 1953. Social behavior of domestic fowl. Kans. Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 73. Gunnarsson, S., L. J. Keeling, and J. Svedberg. 1999. Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose house laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 40:12-18. Hester, P. Y., S. A. Enneking, K. Y. Jefferson-Moore, M. E. Einstein, H. W. Cheng, and D. A. Rubin. 2013a. The effect of perches in cages during pullet rearing and egg laying on hen performance, foot health, and plumage. Poult. Sci. 92: 310-320. Hester, P. Y., S. A. Enneking, K. Y. Jefferson-Moore, M. E. Einstein, H. W. Cheng, and D. A. Rubin. 2013b. The effect of perch availability during pullet rearing and egg laying on musculoskeletal health of caged White Leghorn hens. Poult. Sci. 92: 1972-1980. Hester, P. Y., J. P. Garner, S. A. Enneking, H. W. Cheng, and M. E. Einstein. 2014. The effect of perch availability during pullet rearing and egg laying on the behavior of caged White Leghorn hens. Poult. Sci. 93: 2423-2431. Hughes, B. O., and H. A. Elson. 1977. Use of perches by broilers in floor pens. Br. Poult. Sci. 18: 715-722. Hughes, B. O., and M. C. Appleby. 1989. Increase in bone strength of spent laying hens housed in modified cages with perches. Vet. Rec. 124: 483-484. Keeling, L. J. 1997. A comparison of two basic characteristics of a perch for laying hens. Proceeding of the 31st International Congress of the ISAE, Research Institute of animal Production, Prague, CZ. p:83. Kjaer, J. B., and J. A. Mench 2003. Chapter 5 : Behaviour problems associated with selection for increased production. Pages 67-82 in Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology. W. M. Muir and S. E. Aggrey, New York. Knowles, T. G. and D. M. Broom. 1993. Effect of catching method on the concentration of plasma corticosterone in end-of-day hens. Vet. Rec. 133: 527-528. Kopka, M. H., H. W. Cheng, and P. Y. Hester. 2003. Bone mineral density of laying hens housed in enriched versus conventional cages. Poult. Sci. 82(Supp1. 1):29.(Abstr.) LeVan, N. F., I. Estevez, and W. R. Stricklin. 2000. Use of horizontal and angled perches by broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65: 349-365. Mankovich, N. J., and E. M. Banks. 1982. An analysis of social orientation and the use of space in a flock of domestic-fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 9: 177-193. Martrenchar, A., D. Huonnic, J. P. Cotte, E. Boilletot, and J. P. Morrisse. 2000. Influence of stocking density, artificial dusk and group size on the perching behavior of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 41: 125-130. Mashaly. M.M., M. L. Webb, S. L. Youtz, W. B. Roush, and H. B. Graves. 1984. Changes in serum corticosterone concentration of laying hens as response to increased population-density. Poult. Sci. 63: 2271-2274. Newberry, R. C. 1995. Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. 44: 229-243. Newberry, R. C., I. Estevez, and L. J. Keeling. 2001. Group size and perching behavior in young domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73:117-129. Nielsen, B. L. 2004. Breast blisters in groups of slow-growing broilers in relation to strain and the availability and use of perches. Br. Poult. Sci. 45: 306-315. Olsson, I. A. S., and L. J. Keeling. 2002. The push-door for measuring motivation inhens : Laying hens are motivated to perch at night. Anim. Welfare.11: 11-19. Pettit-Riley, R., and I. Estevez. 2001. Effects of density on perching behavior of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71: 127-140. Pickel, T., B. Scholz, and L. Schrader. 2010. Perch material and diameter affects particular perching behaviours in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 127: 37-42 Pickel, T., B. Scholz, and L. Schrader. 2011a. Roosting behavior in laying hens on perches of different temperatures: Trade-offs between thermoregulation, energy budget, vigilance and resting. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 134: 164-169. Pickel, T., B. Scholz, and B. Scholz. 2011b. Pressure load on keel bone and foot pads in perching laying hens in relation to perch design. Poult. Sci. 90: 715-724. Quin, T. H., and J. J. Baumel. 1990. The digital tendon locking mechanism of the avian foot (aves). Zoomorphology 109:281-293. Rodriguez-Aurrekoetxea, A., E. H. Leone and I. Estevez. 2014. Environmental complexity and use of space in slow growing free range chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 161:86-94 Sandiliands, V., C. Moinard, and N. H. C. Sparks. 2009. Providing laying hens with perches : fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury? Br. Poult. Sci. 50: 395-406. Savory, C. J., D. Percival, and I. Yuill. 2002. Influence of perch space allowance on perching behavior of laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:S22-S23. Schrader, L., and B. Muller. 2009. Night-time roosting in the domestic fowl : The height matters. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 121: 179-183. Struelens, E., F. A. M. Tuyttens, L. Duchateau, T. Leroy, M. Cox, E. Vranken, J. Buyse, J. Zoons, D. Berckmans, F. Odberg, and B. Sonck. 2008. Perching behaviour and perch height preference of laying hens in furnished cages varying in height . Br. Poult. Sci. 49: 381-389. Tauson, R. 1998. Health and production in improved cage designs Poult. Sci. 77:1820-1827. Taylor, P. E., G. B. Scott, and P. Rose. 2003. The ability of domestic hens to jump between horizontal perches: effects of light intensity and perch colour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 83: 99-108. Vits, A. D., Weitzenburger, H. Hammann, and O. Dist. 2005. Production, egg quality, bone strength, claw length, and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed furnished cages with different group size. Poult. Sci. 84:1511-1519. Webster, A. B., and J. F. Hurnik. 1990. Behavior, production, and well-being of the laying hens. 1. Effect of movable roosts, relationship of cage mates, and genetic stock. Poult. Sci. 69: 2118-2127. Wood-Gush, D. G. M., and I. J. H. Duncan. 1976. Some behavioral observations on domestic fowl in the wild. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 2: 255-260. Wood-Gush, D. G. M., I. J. H. Duncan, and C. J. Savory. 1978. Observations on social-behavior of domestic –fowl in wild. Biol. Behav. 3: 193-205.
摘要: 隨著動保意識的提升,傳統巴達利籠飼漸不被接受,用平飼及替代式飼養系統飼養蛋雞日漸普遍。2014年行政院農業委員會頒布雞蛋友善生產系統指南與定義,規定平飼及放牧系統須放置棲架並給予每隻雞15cm以上的棲架空間。本調查之目的旨在研究平飼系統蛋雞日夜間之棲息行為以了解母雞對棲架之需求性及夜間所需棲息空間。觀察之雞舍中間為巢箱,兩面靠牆各放置兩座A型棲架,每座棲架分為上中下三層。調查結果顯示在日間06:00至18:00七個時間點之觀察,以早上08:00及下午14:00過後有較多的母雞(11%)會使用棲架,若開放使用戶外空間,雞隻於上午10:00至下午16:00使用棲架的頻率會顯著較低(P < 0.01)。在夜間棲息方面,雖然提供了足夠的棲息空間(每隻雞15cm),但是僅有43%的雞隻會使用棲架,雞隻會在熄燈前就開始選擇棲息位置,並於熄燈後10分鐘趨於穩定。母雞夜間使用中上層棲架(81%)顯著多於下層棲架(P < 0.01)。夜間休息採取站姿的雞隻比例會從熄燈後開始慢慢減少,並在午夜過後又開始逐漸增加。由於上層棲架的雞隻數目多而擁擠,使得採取站姿休息的比例也高於其他兩層棲架,尤其以中層棲架的母雞較少採取站姿休息。使用走道側棲架的雞隻顯著較多會面對內側(P < 0.01),而使用上層及靠牆側棲架的雞隻則顯著較多會面對外側(P < 0.01)。綜合上述,棲架的擺放位置與設計會影響到棲架的使用程度,提供一個舒適與安全的棲架能提升雞隻使用的意願。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/90325
文章公開時間: 2017-08-18
Appears in Collections:動物科學系

文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.