Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/98605
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheng-Yu Linen_US
dc.contributor.authorYuan-Jung Chenen_US
dc.contributor.authorChao-Yuan Linen_US
dc.contributor.author林政侑zh_TW
dc.contributor.author陳垣榮zh_TW
dc.contributor.author林昭遠zh_TW
dc.date2016-12zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-16T01:23:51Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-16T01:23:51Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11455/98605-
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies on the collapses indicated that the weak geology condition and extreme rainfall are the main reasons of landslide. However, it was unable to explain the neighboring non-failure site, which the similar geological condition. Frequency of landslide event is always inversely proportional to the landslide scale, and therefore return period and scale should be distinguished. In addition, landslides in the watershed could be categorized by the occurrence locations i.e. near-riverbank and off-riverbank landslide, which are not only caused different mechanism but also different landslide scale. Near-riverbank landslides are mainly affected by a stream, whereas off-riverbank landslides are usually influenced by rainfall intensity. Thus, the relationship between the collapse location characteristics and different rainfall return periods is relatively important to explore. Chen-You-Lan watershed was selected as the study area due to numerous landslides. The events of Typhoon Herb, Toraji and Morakot, which caused more serious disasters, were selected to estimate rainfall return period and extract the each newly collapses. According to the terrain and land use of landslide sites, the collapse sites can be classified as headstream, river, road and cultivation categories. In addition, the spatial distribution and trend relationships for the collapse site and the correspondent scale were also well discussed under the different return periods. The results showed that rainfall return period of the selected events is quite different although the rainfall intensity is similar. Typhoon Herb has the highest return period (100-yr) and caused the largest amount of collapse area and volume, which implies the noticeable factor for the collapse scale is rainfall return period. Over 60% of landslide sites, trigged by three typhoon events, were categorized as river landslide. Over 80% of the re-collapse area located at near-riverbank which was vulnerability to erode by stream and resulting in slope toe failure. In contrary, the headstream collapses are invulnerability to recurrence landslide since the deposited sediment could stabilized the slope toe.en_US
dc.description.abstract過去研究對崩塌現象之發生,常歸咎於極端降雨及地質條件,卻未能解釋鄰近相似條件 之區位未發生災害之現象。崩塌發生頻率常與規模成反比,因此邊坡發生崩塌之機率及其規模 宜有區隔,集水區邊坡崩塌除立地條件不同外,主要可歸納為近岸及離岸崩塌,近岸崩塌主要 受逕流;離岸崩塌則受降雨強度所影響,不同區位不僅誘發的機制不同,規模大小也有所差異, 故集水區降雨重現期距與崩塌特性關係亟待探討。本研究以陳有蘭溪集水區為樣區,選取受災 較為嚴重之賀伯、桃芝及莫拉克等三場颱風事件,推估其降雨事件之重現期距及萃取新增崩塌 區位,另以地形及土地利用將崩塌發生區位分為源頭、河道、道路及農墾地等四類,針對集水 區於不同降雨重現期距下,探究崩塌區位與規模之空間分布及趨勢關係。結果顯示三場事件雖 單日降雨強度相近,重現期距卻以賀伯颱風之 100 年為最大,且崩塌面積及量體亦最大,可見 崩塌規模主要影響因子為降雨重現期距。三場事件中河道崩塌所佔比例最大,皆 60%以上,而 重複崩塌區位亦以近岸崩塌為主,重複崩塌面積達 80%,主因為河道邊坡本為水流易攻擊之區 位,一旦基腳被攻穿常造成淺層崩塌,而源頭區位則因崩落之土砂恰可穩定基腳,因此再次發 生崩塌機率不高。zh_TW
dc.language.isozh_TWzh_TW
dc.relation水土保持學報, Volume 48, Issue 4, Page(s) 1863-1876.zh_TW
dc.subjectReturn perioden_US
dc.subjectCollapse scaleen_US
dc.subjectSpatial distribution of landslidesen_US
dc.subjectNear-riverbanken_US
dc.subjectOff-riverbanken_US
dc.subject重現期距zh_TW
dc.subject崩塌規模zh_TW
dc.subject崩塌區位zh_TW
dc.subject近岸崩塌zh_TW
dc.subject離岸崩塌zh_TW
dc.titleA study of relationship between the rainfall return period and the landslide site in a watersheden_US
dc.title降雨重現期距與集水區崩塌區位關係之研究zh_TW
dc.typeJournal Articlezh_TW
Appears in Collections:第48卷 第04期
文件中的檔案:

取得全文請前往華藝線上圖書館



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.