Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
標題: 加勁擋土構造與混凝土擋土牆互制行為之探討
The Study on Mechanical Behavior of Interaction between Reinforced and Concrete Retaining Walls
作者: 林啟弘
Lin, Chi-Hung
關鍵字: 混凝土擋土牆;Concrete retaining walls;加勁擋土結構;邊坡穩定;reinforced retaining structures;slope stability
出版社: 土木工程學系所
引用: 參考文獻 1.內政部營建署(2001),“建築物基礎構造設計規範”。 2.內政部營建署(2008),“加勁擋土牆設計及施工規範之訂定成果報告”。 3.內政部建築研究所(2005),“坡地社區生態防災工法暫行技術手冊暨解說擋土設施及坡面保護工編”。 4.行政院公共工程委員會(2002)“基層公共工程基本圖彙編”。 5.行政院農業委員會水土保持局(2005)“水土保持手冊”。 6.行政院農業委員會林務局(2004)“工程標準斷面圖”。 7.交通部(2001)“公路橋梁設計規範”。 8.周銘瑋(2009)“以有限元素程式PLAXIS分析加勁擋土結構之力學行為(含潛變效應)”,國立宜蘭大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 9.陳建吾(2004)“加勁擋土牆動態行為之模擬”,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 10.張程翔(2007)“加勁擋土牆之土壓力分析研究”,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 11.廖瑞堂(2008),“坡地災害防治對策及案例”,科技圖書股份有限公司。 12.廖瑞堂(2001),“山坡地護坡工程設計”,科技圖書股份有限公司。 13.Mononobe, N. (1929), “Earthquake-Proof Construction of Masonry Dams,” Proceedings, World Engineering Conference 9, 274-280. 14.Okabe, S. (1926), “General Theory of Earth Pressure,” Journal of the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, 12(1). 15.PLAXIS bv (2010), PLAXIS 2D Reference Manual, P.O.Box 572, 2600 An Delft, Netherlands.

The mountain slope in Taiwan area is susceptible to unsteady condition and easily caused to disaster due to the particular characteristics of the topography, geology, coupled with the impact of earthquake, typhoon or storm. Therefore, various engineering facilities in the selection to stabilize slope should consider the potentially disruptive factors. The general slope stability should be designed in accordance with its functional requirements, behavioral mechanism, the topography, geological and environmental conditions, and fully review the overall stability and the structure safety in order to bring into greatest efficiency.
This study aims at the engineering behavior of slope stability for flexible reinforced retaining structures incorporated with rigid concrete retaining wall by using PLAXIS computer analysis program. Some different types of combination between reinforced and concrete retaining walls of in-situ cases are selected for numerical analysis. From the analyzed results, it is indicated that : (1). Due to the limitation of stiffness in the lower outside concrete retaining wall, the overall structural stability is still inadequate, even the upper reinforced retaining structure yields back moderately. (2). The outward deformation in the upper reinforced retaining structure can be significantly reduced and the stability is reached through the proper stiffness provided by the lower outside concrete retaining wall if the lower part reinforced retaining structure is directly extended and placed on the top of concrete retaining wall. (3). If possible, properly reducing the size of the reinforced retaining structure and leaving some space between the reinforecd and concrete retaining walls, the best stability in the design of overall retaining structure can be obtained.
其他識別: U0005-1708201214374400
Appears in Collections:土木工程學系所

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.