Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/10245
標題: 含液態黏滯性阻尼器建築之耐震評估
Seismic Evaluation of Building with Fluid Viscous Dampers
作者: 黃靖夫
Huang, Jing-Fu
關鍵字: 液態黏滯性阻尼器;Fluid Viscous Dampers;非線性側推分析;阻尼係數分配;耐震評估方法;Unliner Pushover Analysis;Distribution of Damping Coefficient;Seismic Evaluation Rule
出版社: 土木工程學系所
引用: 1.Yao, J.T.P., “Concept of Structural Control”, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol.98, No.ST7, pp.1567-1574, 1972. 2.Soong,T.T. and Dargush, G.F., “Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering”, John Wiley&Sons, 1997. 3.內政部,「建築物耐震設計規範及解說」,台北,2011 年。 4.Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation for the seismic rehabilitation of building-FEMA 356, Federal Emergency Managency Agency, Washington, D.C, November 2000. 5.Constantinou, M.C., Tsopelas, P., and Hammel, W., Testing and Modeling of an Improved Damper Configuration for Stiff Structural Systems, Center for Industrial Effectiveness, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY., 1997. 6.Freeman,S.A. , Nicoletti ,J.P. ,and Tyrell, J.V., ”Evaluations of Existiong Buildings for Seismic Risk -A Case Study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington”, National Earthquake Conference,pp.113-122,1975. 7.內政部營建署,「結構混凝土設計規範」,1992年。 8.Applied Technology Council (ATC), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings,Vol.1, ATC-40,Redwood City,CA,1996. 9.Mayhaney,J.A., Freeman, S.A., Paret, T.F., and Kehoe,B.E.,”The Capacity Spectrum Method of Evaluating Structural Response During the Loma Prieta Earthquake”,National Earthquake Conference,Memphis,pp.501-510,1993. 10.FEMA-273 and 274, NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic Rehailitation for Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., 1997. 11.Sezen, H. and Moehle, J.P.,”Shear strength model for lightly reinforced concrete columns”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.130, No.11, 1692-1703, 2004. 12.國家地震中心,「雲林縣口湖國小校舍現地試驗之材料取樣檢測與結構配筋圖重建」,國立雲林科技大學營建材料檢測中心,報告編號:E05-00362,2005年。 13.葉勇凱、蕭輔沛、林金祿,「耐震詳評之ETABS推垮分析」,校舍之耐震評估與補強講習會,台北,2005年。 14.葉勇凱、蕭輔沛,「建築結構耐震能力詳細評估法-以消防廳舍為例」,鋼筋混凝土建築耐震能力評估研討會論文集,台北,2006年。 15.蕭輔沛、葉勇凱、林金祿,「校舍建築之耐震能力詳細評估與試驗驗證」,中華民國第八屆結構工程研討會論文集,南投,2006年。 16.蕭輔沛、葉勇凱、曾至堅,「建築物耐震詳細評估發法之研究(一)」,國家地震工程研究中心報告,編號NCREE-07-049,台北,2007年。 17.Taylor, D. P., “ Fluid Dampers for Application of Seismic Energy Dissipation and Seismic Isolation”, Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, No.798,1996 . 18.Constantionu, M. C. and Symans, M.D., “ Experimental and analytical Investigation of seismic of structures with supplemental fluid viscous dampers.” Report No.NCEER-92-0032, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, SUNY at Buffalo, New York.1992. 19.Reinhorn, A. M., Li,C. and Constantinou, M. C., “Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Seismic Retrofit of structure with Supplemental Damping, Part 1-Fluid Viscous Damping Devices”, Published as Report NCEER-95-0001, by the National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo,1995. 20.黃震興、黃尹男,“使用線性黏性阻尼器建築結構之耐震試驗與分析”,國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-01-022,2001。 21.黃震興、黃尹男、洪雅惠,“含非線性黏性阻尼器結構之減震試驗與分析”,國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-02-020,2002。 22.陳泰仰,「結構物加裝線性黏滯性液流阻尼器之設計」,國立成功大學土木研究所碩士論文,徐德修教授指導,2002。 23.黃震興、黃尹男、李昭逸,“含黏性阻尼器減震結構之非線性地震反應試驗與分析”,國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-03-011,2003。 24.黃震興、易序良,“使用黏性阻尼器減震結構設計公式修正(I)”,國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-03-012,2003。 25.黃震興、何松晏,“使用黏性阻尼器減震結構設計公式修正(II)”,國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-04-009,2004。 26.黃柏智,「黏性阻尼器銜接斜撐勁度對結構減震效益之影響」,國立台灣科技大學營建工程研究所碩士論文,黃震興教授指導,2005。 27.吳念娟,「房屋結構之黏性阻尼器阻尼係數分配法比較」,國立台灣科技大學營建工程研究所碩士論文,黃震興教授指導,2009。 28.FEMA-440,Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures,Federal Emergency Management Agency,Washington, D.C.,2004. 29.Elwood, K. J., and Moehle, J. P., “Axial capacity model for shear damaged columns,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 102, No. 4, 578-587, 2005. 30.Elwood, K. J., and Moehle, J. P., “Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 21,No. 1, 71-89, 2005. 31.ACI Committee 318, Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI318-05) and commentary (ACI 318R-05). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005. 32.ASCE 41-06, Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings by American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 2006. 33.NEHRP Recommended Previous for Seismic Regulation for New Buildings and Other Structure, Part 1: Previous (FEMA368), Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.2000. 34.NEHRP Recommended Previous for Seismic Regulation for New Buildings and Other Structure, Part 2: Previous (FEMA369), Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.2000. 35.Raggett, J. D., “Estimating Damping of Real Structure,” Journal of the structural division, Sept., 1975. 36.Chopra, Anil K., Dynamic of Structures, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey,1995. 37.台灣邁達斯股份有限公司,「校舍耐震能力詳細評估之NCREE for MIDAS Gen操作應用範例」,台北,2009年。 38.國家地震中心,「MIDAS Gen 耐震詳細評估輔助分析程式使用說明」,台北,2009年。 39.葉勇凱、蕭輔沛、沈文成、楊耀昇、黃世建,“鋼筋混凝土建築物耐震能力詳細評估分析方法(推垮分析)”國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-09-015,2009。 40.“校舍結構耐震評估與補強技術手冊第二版”, 國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-09-023,2009。 41.黃書澤,「樓版變形特性對校舍耐震能力評估值的影響」,國立中興大學土木研究所碩士論文,翁駿民教授指導,2011。 42.梁博舜,「立面勁度不規則對校舍耐震能力評估值的影響」,國立中興大學土木研究所碩士論文,翁駿民教授指導,2011。
摘要: 
依據現行規範設計下,房屋結構物裝設線性黏滯性阻尼器作為消能減震設備時,黏滯性阻尼器常與斜撐串聯銜接成系統,如同Maxwell Model阻尼,普遍認知對於黏滯阻尼的優點就是不具儲存勁度,若斜撐的勁度不足時,此認知假設會與事實不符。本研究利用不含黏滯性阻尼之架構為比較的基準,運用等值線性化的方式推導出等效勁度公式、阻尼迴圈面積公式,並由耐震曲線求得性能點(Vmax、到達層間相對側向位移角為0.5%的第一個位置)與相對應的性能地表加速度,根據柱斷面的變化、阻尼係數不同的配置方式,配合斜撐勁度變化來突顯減震的效應,並提出迭代分析的運算結果與之比較。
在數值分析的範例中,本研究以MIDAS Gen軟體進行側推分析數據模擬,對象為一棟十五層樓長向六跨、短向三跨之三維構架,本文由分析結果得知,阻尼器阻尼係數不應該採均勻分配,斜撐勁度的模擬數值範圍,以及黏滯性阻尼器發揮最大作用的時機,並且用耐震能力評估值來顯示出最佳的設計方式。

According to the existing standard design, the building structure installation of linear fluid viscous dampers as energy dissipation devices. It is usually associated with bracing systems converge into a series such like Maxwell Model. The advantages of fluid viscous dampers are not have the storage stiffness. If the braces stiffness are not enough then this advantages will not the facts.
Use the Empty framework to be the basis for comparison. And take the equivalent linear way to derive the effective stiffness and damping loop area. By the pushover curve to obtain performance point like Vmax or SDR= 0.5% of the first position. And also obtain the performance ground acceleration. Form the different of the column section or the damper constant with different configurations, and with the braces stiffness change to performance the damping effect. Also comment with the results of the iterative analysis comparison.
Use the software Midas Gen to do pushover analysis for data simulation.And then by the results of the analysis that the damping coefficient of the damper should not adopt the uniform distribution. Also know the simulation range of values to braces stiffness, and as well as the greatest opportunity to play in fluid viscous dampers. Final according to seismic capacity evaluation of the value shows the best design method.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/10245
其他識別: U0005-0808201200060000
Appears in Collections:土木工程學系所

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-101-7099062025-1.pdf1.98 MBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network    Request a copy
Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.