Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
標題: The Analysis of Mechanical Behavior for Retaining Wall with Limited Backfill Area
作者: 廖勝弘
Laiw, Shen-Hung
關鍵字: backfill;背填土;retaining wall;safety factor;擋土牆;安全係數
出版社: 土木工程學系所
引用: 1.林志陽(2008),“現有公路擋土牆力學行為之研究”,國立中興大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 2.廖敏坤(1996),“傾斜式擋土牆力學行為之研究”,國立中興大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 3.施國欽(2004),“大地工程學(二)基礎工程篇”,文笙書局。 4.林佳蓁(2007),“兩階式擋土牆力學行為之研究”,國立中興大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 5.王家祥(2004),“重力式擋土牆邊坡安全性影響因子之研究”,國立中興大學水土保持研究所碩士論文。 6.歐章煜(2002),“深開挖工程-分析設計理論與實務”,科技圖書公司。 7.鄭柏威(2008),“應用PLAXIS 程式分析SMW擋土壁特性與開挖變形之關係”, 國立台灣科技大學營建工程系研究所碩士論文。 8.交通部公路總局(2005),“道路工程參考圖”。 9.廖瑞堂(2003),“邊坡穩定及保護之設計準則研訂與解說”,交通部台灣區國道新建工程局。 10.B.M.Das(2004), “Principle of Geotechnical Engineering 5E”,PWS Publishing Company,Boston. 11.Mononobe, N.(1929),“Earthquake-Proof Construction of Masonry Dams,” Proceedings, World Engineering Conference 9, 176-182. 12.Okabe, S. (1926), “General Theory of Earth Pressure,” Journal of the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, 12(1). 13.PLAXIS bv (2010), PLAXIS 2D Reference Manual, P. O. Box 572, 2600 An Delft, Netherlands.
The upper slopes of the mountainous roads in Taiwan are often so steep and furthermore the road width is too narrow. As a result, the road construction should be carried out in the lower slopes with retaining walls under the condition of limited backfill area. Besides, the leaned-back retaining walls are usually adopted in the road construction. However, there is not much analysis and research related to leaned-back retaining walls. Therefore, this thesis aims to conduct a research of mechanical behavior for leaned-back cantilever retaining walls under different limited backfill area. It is expected that the findings of this study can be used as references for the construction organizations concerned.
This study carries out the stability analysis and discussion for some examples of leaned-back retaining walls, and probes into the mechanical behavior of the same examples using computer program PLAXIS. From the analyzed results, it can be summarized as follows: Firstly, with the increase of the width of limited backfill, the safety factors of leaned-back retaining walls in different heights against the overturning, slide, and bearing capacity of the retaining wall base tend to decrease. Secondly, the results from the analysis of PLAXIS program show that in terms of the entire deformation and the horizontal movement, there is apparently greater subsidence at the top of the backfill if it takes the equivalent soil weight of 60 cm height. On the other hand, with the increase of the width of limited backfill, the deformed area will become larger and tend to go downwards and backwards. Thirdly, regardless of the width of limited backfill, for the upper part, the horizontal stress behind the wall tends to increase with the increase of the depth of backfill area; for the lower part, especially close to the base of the wall, there is a nearly even distribution. Fourthly, leaned-back retaining walls, regardless of their heights and different widths of limited backfill area, bring about greater vertical stress at the wall heel, which is supposed to be related to the geometry of leaned-back retaining walls.

其他識別: U0005-1608201110290500
Appears in Collections:土木工程學系所

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.