Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/17842
標題: 泰國師資培育制度與教師素質管理機制之研究
A Study on the Teacher Education System and the Teacher Quality Management Mechanism in Thailand
作者: 高南香
Gao, Nan-Xiang
關鍵字: 泰國;Thailand;師資培育制度;教師素質管理機制;國際比較教育;Teacher Education System;Teacher Quality Management Mechanism;International and Comparative Education
出版社: 教師專業發展研究所
引用: 一、中文部分 中央社(2010年1月4日)。泰國師資短缺 政府重金栽培新鮮 人。【新聞群組】。 取自http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-20393 王凱平(2005,6月)。中德師資培育制度之比較。學校體育,15,113-126。 2013年5月31日,取自http://140.122.72.62/jfile/88-18.pdf 白亦方(2010,3月)。美國優質師資培育的底蘊分析。教育研究與發展期刊, 6, 21-38。 吳欣怡(2012)。高職餐飲管理科專業教師素質之研究。國立高雄餐旅大學餐旅教 育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。 沈靜濤、張素貞、羅天豪(2011,3月)。專業發展學校理念與實踐:以師資培 用為例。中等教育季刊,62,92-109。 李奉儒(2008,3月)。中央集權與教育市場:英國師資培育制度變革之探究。 教育研究與發展期刊,4,55-82。 李奉儒(2011)。英國師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉主編,各國 師資培育制度與教師素質現況。台北市:教育部。 李俊湖(2009)。少子化趨勢下台灣師資培育之困境與省思。取自: http://www.naer.edu.tw/mediafile/fdownload/369/627/2007-8-24-16-5-45-627.pdf 李詠絮(2011)。芬蘭師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉主編,各國 師資培育制度與教師素質現況。台北市:教育部。 林子斌(2011)。新加坡師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉主編,各 國師資培育制度與教師素質現況。台北市:教育部。 林進材(2000)。 師資培育制度,。載於國立編譯館(主編),教育大辭書(849-850 頁)。台北市:文景。 林開忠、鍾宜興(2011)。東南亞教育發展、現況與省思。台北市:巨流。 林靜宜(2009)。台灣光復後師資培育制度之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與 行政學系碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。 林清江(1991)。比較教育。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。 周祝瑛(2009,9月)。台灣地區師資培育政策之檢討與展望。中等教育季刊, 60,8-20。 施宜煌(2003,9月)。回顧與前瞻:從歷史脈絡省察知識經濟時代台灣的師資培 育。國教學報 ,15, 231-252。 姜文閔、韓宗禮(1994)。教師素質量。載於審委員會(主編),教育百科辭典。 台北市:五南。 柯昕儀(2003)。建構我國中小學教師素質管理機制之研究。國立中山大學教育研 究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。 候禎塘、李俊賢(2010)。 泰國特殊教育與師資培育。特殊教育輔助科技,5,21-26。 高敏嘉(2009)。現代日本師資制度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,台 北市。 師資培育法(2005年12 月 28 日修正)。 郭生玉(1988)。心理與教育研究法。台北市:精華書局。 郭淑芳、陳盛賢、楊思偉、連啟瑞、黃坤龍(2008)。師資培育政策回顧與展望研 究報告。家教育研究院籌備處(編碼:NAER-97-08-C-1-01-07-2-07)。台北市:國家教育研究院籌備處。 連寶靜(2004)。美國、日本與中國大陸幼兒保育與教育師資培育與資格之比較。 2013年5月31日,取自his.ctust.edu.tw/lien/txt/art/art%20019.doc‎ 張新仁、方德隆、丘愛鈴、李芊慧(2007)。師資培育機構評鑑:美國師資培育 認可委員會的評鑑制度及其啟示。高雄師大學報,22,1-20。 張鈿富、吳慧子、吳舒靜(2010,6月)。問題建構分析台灣師資培育政策之規 劃。教育研究與發展期刊,6,207-230。 張繼寧(2009)。英國教師培訓政策。臺灣師資培育電子報,3。2013年5月31 日,取自https://tted.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/?p=242 陳龍城(2012年9月3日)。泰國國會議員團拜會 促進台泰經貿交流。【新聞群組】。 取自http://www.tainan.gov.tw/tainan/news.asp?id=%7BE2B284CA- AD9B-4A91- 9634-85BFA5C943E2%7D 陳喜月(2011)。芬蘭師資培育制度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。慈濟大學。台 北市 梁忠銘(2008,3月)。日本師資培育改革過程國家角色運作之探討。教育研究 與發展期刊,4,1-26。 梁忠銘(2011,3月)。日本師資培育機構認證制度之研究。教育研究與發展期 刊,7,83-110。 梁忠銘(2011)。日本師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉主編,各國 師資培育制度與教師素質現況。台北市:教育部。 梁福鎮(2010,6月)。當前德國師資培育政策與改革方案研究。教育科學期刊,9, 105-123。 梁福鎮(2010,12月)。德國中小學教師培育制度研究 。教育科學期刊,9, 101-122。 梁福鎮(2012)。比較教育學:起源、內涵與問題的探究。台中市:悅翔。 游自達(2010,3月)。【各國師資培育制度介紹】 新加坡教師教育制度與改革趨 勢。師資培育專業通訊,17,11-17。 翁福元(2000,2月)。九零年代初期台灣師資培育制度改革檢討:社會─政治 的觀點。教育政策論壇,3,156-198。 教師法(2013年01 月 23 日修正)。 黃宇仲(2011年4月15日)。以後現代觀點探討台灣現行師資培育機構之評鑑方 式。E-SOC JOURNAL,94。2013年6月28日,取自http://society.nhu.edu.tw/e- j/94/a46.htm 黃桂英(2006)。短期華語師資培訓之探究 ─ 泰國華語教師師資儲訓班。國立臺 灣師範大學華語文教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。 黃源河(2012 年 04 月 15 日),〈各國教師教育制度--美國〉。《臺中教育大學教師教育電子報》,2012 年 04 月 15 日,取自http://home.ntcu.edu.tw/~TEC/e_paper/e_paper_c.php?SID=38 黃詣翔(2011)。我國國民中學教師素質現況之調查研究─偏遠與一般地區之比 較。國立台灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。 黃瑞琴(1994)。質的教育研究方法。台北市:心理出版社。 黃嘉莉(2011)。各國師資培育制度與教師素質之理論分析。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉 主編,各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況。台北市:教育部。 張鈿富、吳慧子、吳舒靜(2010)。問題建構分析台灣師資培育政策之規劃。教育 研究與發展,6,207-230。 葉惠芬(2009)。國小優良教師素質指標建構與實證之研究。台北市立教育大學教 育學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。 葉蕙芬(2009)。國小優良教師素質指表建構與實證之研究。台北市立教育大學教 育學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。 溫明麗(2009年3月16日)。台灣師資培育制度的省思時間【PPT】。取自 http://doc88.uquwu.com/content/201206/01/962d087c380f1f6fc6bb932e7f1c7795.html 楊深坑(2006,3月)。國家管理、市場機制與德國近年來師資培育之改革。教 育研究與發展期刊,2,119-144。 楊深坑(2007,3月)。德國師資培育中心歷史發展與組織結構。教育研究與發 展期刊,3,35-56。 楊深坑、黃嘉莉(2011)。各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況之比較分析。各國師 資培育制度與教師素質現況。台北市:教育部。 楊智穎(2012)。多元師資培育制度下品格教育課程改革之研究。課程與教學季刊, 15,71-86。 楊思偉(2010,12月)。【各國師資培育制度介紹】日 本 師 資 培 育 制 度。師 資培育專業通訊,20,6-11。 潘淑滿(2010)。質性研究理論與應用。台北市:心理出版社。 鄭景澤(2010,3月)。英國和挪威師資培育政策目標的比較研究。臺灣師資培 育電子報,6。2013年5月31日,取自https://tted.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/?p=265 鄭勝耀(2011)。美國師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉主編,各國 師資培育制度與教師素質現況。台北市:教育部。 賴怡真(2007)。師資培育制度之變遷過程:一個歷史制度的觀點。南華大學教育 社會學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。 謝斐敦(2011)。德國師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉主編,各國 師資培育制度與教師素質現況。台北市:教育部。 顏佩如、歐于菁、王蘊涵(2012,6月)。芬蘭中小學師資培育碩士化制度與最 新師資培育政策發展之研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,26,31-54。 顏伶娟(2009年10月29日)。日本中小學教師評鑑方案之分析【線上知識分享平 台】。取自http://eshare.stust.edu.tw/EshareFile/2009_10/2009_10_66501627.pdf 二、西文部分 Anamnart, W. (2010). Training of NFE Teachers in Thailand. Regional Seminar on Teacher Policies in Asia-Pacific, Bangkok: Sirindhorn Institute for Continuing Education and Development (SICED). Retrieved from http://www.unescobkk.org/education/teacher education-and-training/teacher- policies-workshop-2010/ Boon-aree, S., Kraisonsawat, S., Piromjitpong, S., Sookud, W. (2007). Research and development of Teacher Education’s quality management for 5 years curriculum of teacher education in Udon Thani Rajabhat University. Retrieved from http://202.28.199.11/tdc/browse.php?option=show&browse_type=title&titleid=866 8&query=%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%9C%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B9&s_mode=any&d_field=&d_field=&d_start=0000-00-00&d_end=2556-04-04&limit_lang=&limited_lang_code=&order=&order_by=&order_type=&result_id=2&maxid=32 Boonyananta, S. & Siribanpitak, P. (2007). The qualifications of the teaching force in Thailand. In M. I. Richard (Ed), A comparative study of teacher preparation and qualifications in six nations (pp. 85-93). Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Chanbanchong, C. (2010). Towards further reform of teacher education in Thailand. The 2nd East Asian International Conference on Teacher Education Research, Teacher Education for the Future-International Perspectives. The Hong Kong Institute of Education: Hong Kong. Chumjit, Y. (2010). Self actualization for teachers. Bangkok, Thailand: Odean Store. Chutiboot, M. (2010, March). Developing Quality Teacher by Empowered Approach. Retrieved from http://spbkk1.sesao1.go.th/kmresearch/datareserch/mon/empowered.pdf Council of Rajabhat University Presidents of Thailand (2004). Rajabhat University Act, B.E. 2547 (2004). Retrieved from http://www.rajabhatnetwork.com/Default.aspx?pageid=8 Department of Asean Affairs (2012, June). Preparation of Thailand in the ASEAN community. Retreived from http://www.mfa.go.th/asean/contents/files/other-20121203-163316- 599601.pdf Department of Basic Education (2010). Officers'' Handbooks. Retrieved from http://www.krucenter.net/UserFiles/File/sob/s94.pdf Dhiravegin, L. (2009, October 14). The history of The Education System in Thailand [Online news]. Manager. Retrieved on June 6, 2013, from http://www.manager.co.th/Daily/ViewNews.aspx?NewsID=9520000122025 Dolprasit, S. (2000, July). Analysis and proposals of evaluation system for teachers and educational personnel [Online articles]. Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Education. Retrieved on July 23, 2013, from http://www.moe.go.th/main2/article/article-somsak/article-somsak05.htm Education Reform Operation Center (1999). Educational reforms of the Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.moe.go.th/main2/edu-reform/edu- reform.htm Faculty of Education Maha Sarakham University (2012). Rajabhat University Act, 2004. Retrieved July 26, 2012, from http://www.edurmu.org/law.html Faikhamta, C., Jantarakantee, E. and Roadrangka, V. (2011). The Current Situation of Field Experience in a Five-Year Science Teacher Education Program in Thailand. Retrieved from CEPS database. Fuller, S. C. & Ladd, H. F. (2012). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED532767) Ingersoll, R.M. (2007). A comparative Study of Teacher Preparation and Qualifications in Six Nations. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED498318) Kajohnsin, B., Khemtong, P., Muengkoe, S., Leesatayakun, M., Keowmookdar, N., Dejamonchai, S., Lehmongkol, P., Jeerapattanatom, P. & Vajragupta, Y. (2006). Developing 5- Year Teacher Education Programs for Basic Education: Year one of Implementation, Kasetsart University. Retrieved July 26, 2012, from http://anchan.lib.ku.ac.th/kukr/handle/003/18735 Khakhenchon, C. (2009). The result of education reform in the first decade (1997-2007) to carry on the work of educational reform in two decades. Retreived September 25, 2012, from http://www.sahavicha.com/?name=article&file=readarticle&id=1883 Khurusapha explain National Education Act section 44 for Professional license (2012, March 22). Siamrath. pp. 17. Kijtorntham, W., Andhivarothai, P., Kiewkor, S. & Yamtim, V. (2012). National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT). Retrieved from http://www.nrct.go.th/th/NewsSection.aspx?ArticleType=ArticleView&ArticleID=215#.UaYWrtJSg Kitratporn, P. (2011). The Second Round of Education Reform: Teacher education and Teacher development in Basic Education. Retrieved on June 5, 2013, from http://wwww.mua.go.th/users/bhes/front_home/Ohec_bhes2554/Doc_54/p8_10.45-12.00/8_01.pdf. Lampang Rajabhat University (2011). The History of Lampang Rajabhat University. Retrieved from http://www.lpru.ac.th/about54/about.html Law office of the Ministry of Education (2012). Compulsory Education Act.2545 (2002). Retrieved from http://www.ed-law.moe.go.th/law_1.php Law office of the Ministry of Education (2012). National Education Act B.E.2542 (1999). Retrieved from http://www.ed-law.moe.go.th/law_1.php Law office of the Ministry of Education (2012). Third National Education Act. B.E. 2553 (2010). Retrieved from http://www.ed-law.moe.go.th/law_1.php Lin, R.L., Xie, J.C., Jeng, Y.C. & Huang, S.H. (2010). The Relationship between Teacher Quality and Teaching Effectiveness Perceived by Students from Industrial Vocational High Schools. Asian Journal of Arts and Sciences, 1(2), 167-187. Retrieved from http://www.asia.edu.tw/journal/ajas/ajas/no2/2.pdf Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan) (2012, May 21).Re: The 2012 Taiwan-Thailand Higher Education.【Online forum】.Retrieved fromhttp://english.moe.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=12737&ctNode=516&mp=1 Nakarin, N. (2009, July 22). Khurusapha can’t to resolve the ploblem of Teacher don’t understand research [Web article]. Retrieved on May 30, 2013, from http://www.sahavicha.com/?name=blog&file=readblog&id=1547 National Statistical Office (2013). Re: Thai population. Retrieved from (http://service.nso.go.th/nso/thailand/thailand.jsp#)。 Nattawat (2012, December 12). Shock!! The Evaluation level of Thailand’s student is worse [Online news]. MThai. Retrieved on May 31, 2013, from http://news.mthai.com/general-news/207233.html Nopparak, S. (2011, March 25). A six-year teacher education in my mind. Retrieved from http://www.edu.nu.ac.th/tedc/ Office of Basic Education summarized that Thailand Educational Service Areas are 261 [Online news] (2012, January 24). Dailynews. Retreived from http://www.dailynews.co.th/education/9146 Office of the Education Council (2006). Research Report of A comparative study of educational reform in the ASEAN. Retreived September 25, 2012, from http://e-learning.vec.go.th/elearning/elearning/Doc/research/AseanDev.pdf Office of the Education Council. (2011). Main Policy for the power of education reform in the second decade (2011-2018). Retrieved from http://www.onec.go.th/onec_main/page.php Office of the Higher Education Commission (2010, May). “One Province: One University” To provide higher education for a Wonderful Thailand creation. Booklet of Higher Education, 36(383). Retrieved from http://www.mua.go.th/pr_web/udom_mua/data/394.pdf Office of the Higher Education Commission (2011, February). 2011 Year for Developing teacher quality. Booklet of Higher Education, 37(392). Retrieved from http://www.mua.go.th/pr_web/udom_mua/data/392.pdf Office of the Higher Education Commission supporting new generation teacher be smart and Master''s degree (2013). Retrieved from http://www.unigang.com/Article/5576 Office of The Teacher Civil Service And Educational Personnel Commission (2008). Criteria and methods to evaluate the efficiency of officers and educational personnel’s performance . Retrieved on April 19, 2013, from www.brm1.obec.go.th/mydoc/babpaku.com Office of The Teacher Civil Service And Educational Personnel Commission (2013). Announce ment of the regulation and procedures for the recruitment and appointment of persons to serve as teachers and educational personnel: Teacher assistant positions. Retrieved on April 19, 2013, from http://www.kroobannok.com/57839 Phanakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University (2012). History of Phanakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University. Retrieved July 26, 2012, from http://www.aru.ac.th/Anni100Years/History.html Phanphruk, S. (2003). Producing 5-Year Teacher Education Programs for Basic Education: Professional Teacher. Journal of Educational Administration, KKU, 27(2),4-10. Phruttikul, S. (2011, June-September). Professional development of early childhood teachers. Journal of Education Studies, Burapha University, 22 (3), 1-14. Pimpa, N. (2005). Teacher Performance Appraisal in Thailand: Poison or Panacea? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 4(2-3), 115-127. doi: 10.1007/s10671-005-1547-6 Promote the Graduate Diploma need to study for 3 semesters (2011, May 20). Thairath. Retrieved October 1, 2012, from http://www.moe.go.th/moe/th/news/detail.php?NewsID=23675&Key=hotnews Ratananukul, P. (2012, May 18). Re: Teacher quality and standards to ASEAN. Retreived from www.npu.ac.th/gms/pdf/Drpinit.pdf‎ Romchat, C. (2005). The Scenario of Teacher Professional Curriculum in The Next Decade (B.E.2550-2559.) (Doctoral dissertation, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok). Retrieved from thesis.swu.ac.th/swudis/Cur_Re_Dev/Chompunut_R.pdf Rukspollamuang, C., Madiloggovit, C., Hongwitayakorn, U.& Yamabhai, J., (2004). Shortage of Teachers at Basic Education Level. Retrieved February 26, 2013, from http://www.edu.chula.ac.th/resch/new%20research1/2549.4.htm Secretariat Office of The Teacher Council of Thailand. (2011). Standards of Teacher Profession. Retrieved April 26, 2012, from http://www.ksp.or.th/ksp2009/th/news/detail.php?NewsID=2417&Key=news5 Sinlarat, P. (2006). Creative and Productive Teacher Education A Case of Teacher Education Reform in Thailand. Journal of Educational Administration Khon Kaen University ,29(1), 5-1. Sirirattanajitt, A. (2013, May 22). The Corruption case of teacher assistant [Online forum comment]. Manager. Retrieved on June 1, 2013, from http://www.manager.co.th/Daily/ViewNews.aspx?NewsID=9560000061439 Sompongtam, C., Anannavee, P. & Khonchalad, K. (2011, Oct). A Study on the Trend of Characteristics of Thai Teachers in the Next Decade (B.C. 2019). Proceeding Teacher Development in the 21st Century. pp. 1-5. Retrieved from http://www.edu.buu.ac.th/newweb/report/Proceeding%20EDUCA2011%20final.pdf Student’s Dance clips because teacher neglected children [Online news] (2011, December 29). Dailynews. Retrieved on May 30, 2013, from http://www.dailynews.co.th/education/5213 Tangchitsomkit, W. (2011). Self actualization for teachers. Bangkok, Thailand: Odean Store. Tannirat, T. (2008). A Comparative of 4-year and 5-year Teacher Education Programs: A Multi–Research Method Study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. Tansiri, W. (1999). The Explanation of National Education Act B.E.2542 (1999). Retrieved from http://www.moe.go.th/hp-vichai/ex-prb00.htm Teacher License need to according to the law (2012, March 22). Thairath, pp.15. Thailand''s children learn to 1,200 hours per year, but have a little knowledge [Online news] (2013, March 10). Dailynews. Retrieved on May 31, 2013, from http://www.dailynews.co.th/education/189693 Thanyaporn (2009, November 5). Re: Origin of Five-year Teacher Program [Web blog]. Retreived from http://thanyaporn01.blogspot.tw/2009/11/5.html The Bureau of International Cooperation (2012). Re: Thailand Education System Education [Online Article]. Retrieved from http://www.bic.moe.go.th/th/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=661&catid=61&Itemid=193 The New Generation Teacher for Teacher Education Curriculum Reform in the 21st century (Online article) (2013, May 6). Retrieved from http://educ105.wordpress.com/%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A1-%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%93%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A9%E0%B8%93%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B8%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%99/ The teachers’ Council of Thailand (2003). Teacher and Educational Personnel Act B.E. 2546 (2003). Retrieved April 15, 2012, from http://www.ksp.or.th/Khurusapha/En/ 2012, from http://www.sahavicha.com/?name=article&file=readarticle&id=1883 The Teachers’ Council of Thailand (2011). Standards of Teacher Profession. Retrieved from http://www.ksp.or.th/ksp2009/th/home/ Thongkeaw, T. (2007). Research and evaluation projects of Teacher Education for Basic education in undergraduate (5 years course). The Academic Journal of the Suan Dusit Graduate School, 3(2), 1-5. Toncharoen, R. (2010). The development and trends of bachelor degree program concerning teacher educationcurriculum for early childhood education in Thailand (Doctoral Thesis, Education Degree in Early Childhood Education, Bangkok, Thailand). Retreived from thesis.swu.ac.th/swudis/Ear_Chi_Ed/Rassamee_T.pdf Unable to 6 years New generation Teacher [Online news] (2011, April 28). Thaipost. Retrieved on May 20, 2013, from http://www.thaipost.net/category/1/7?page=88 Unemployed Teacher impact on the teacher oversupply estimated two hundred thousand a year (2012, December 11). Thaipost . Retrieved February 26, 2013, from http://www.thaipost.net/news/111212/66397 Wattananarong, K. (2011, February 7). Teacher training and professional development courses.【Online News】.Thairath. Retrieved from www.thairath.co.th/content/edu/147028 Wolhuter, C. (2011, November). Globalization and Teacher Education. Journal of Comparative Education, 71, 55-82. doi: 10.3966/16095758201111071003
摘要: 
由於全球化發展趨勢,國際互動更為緊密與頻繁,訊息與知識交流亦變得更為容易,彼此不但能更清楚掌握自己國家狀況,也能更深入瞭解他國狀況。就泰國而言,除了與台灣同屬亞洲國家,兩國之間更有良好的關係。相較於大量歐美思想引介與應用文獻,台灣對於泰國教育的相關研究卻極其有限。本研究之目的即在於探究泰國師資培育制度與教師素質管理機制,期以提供台灣對於泰國的師資培育制度與教師素質管理機制有更深入的瞭解。為達上述目的,本研究採取多元研究方法,包括歷史研究法、文件分析法、比較教育法與半結構深度訪談法等,據此分析泰國的師資培育制度與教師素質管理機制之起源背景、主要內涵、問題以及未來趨勢。
本研究重要發現與結論如下:首先、就泰國的師資培育制度與教師素質管理機制之起源背景而言,泰國的師資培育制度深受西方的影響,而教師素質機制於《1997年泰國憲法》與《1999年國民教育法》始具有規劃。其次、泰國的師資培育管道具有「大學學位」、「學士後教育文憑」以及「認證教師知識標準」等不同方式。就泰國教師身份而言,係具有公務人員身份,故需要通過國家考試資格。第三、泰國的師資培育制度存在著教師數額不足、教師對於個人薪水待遇問題之關注,普遍高於對學生學習成效的重視程度,而教師更亟需提升教學能力以提升學生學習興趣。第四、為因應「東協加3」及21世紀未來發展需求,泰國的師資培育制度與教師素質管理機著手規劃了6年期的教師課程制度。第五、從教師專業發展的國際比較來看,泰國與各國的師資培育制度與教師素質管理機制同時具有共同點與差異性。
根據前述五項研究結論,茲提出以下幾項建議:一、策略應該持續地實施,不應時常更換。二、為了解決教師重視研究而忽略學生的問題,評鑑可減少為一年一次,但評鑑內容需更嚴謹。三、泰國應該採取類似師資供需管制或計畫性培育機制來調控全國的教師供需。四、對於未來研究而言,一方面應藉由擴大研究訪談對象之層級或區域代表性,期以更完整掌握泰國整體師資培育對象之觀點與可能問題;另一方面也應增加入量化研究以增加研究資料蒐集之一般性或普遍性的觀點。

The trend of globalization is closely associated with frequent international relations. Information and knowledge sharing has become easier and helps us get a clear understanding of the situation of our own countries as well as other countries in the world. Thailand and Taiwan, for instance, are not only located in Asia; the two countries also enjoy good relationships with one another. Compared to the large number of European and American thoughts and literature, research in Taiwan about Thailand’s education is very limited. This research aims to provide directions of teacher education system and teacher quality management mechanism in Thailand. For that purpose, several research methods are conducted in this research, including historical research, documentary analysis, comparative education, and semi-structured and in-depth interview. Analysis of this research is concerned with the background, main contents, problems and future trends in the teacher education system and the teacher quality management mechanism in Thailand.
The main results obtained from this research are summarized as follows: First, in terms of the background of teacher education system and the teacher quality management mechanism in Thailand, the influence of Western teacher education system on that of Thailand and the planning of Thailand teacher’s quality began from amendment of the Constitution Act of 1997 and the National Education Act of 1999. Second, there are many different ways of carrying out teacher education in Thailand: Bachelor of Education, Graduate Diploma and Certification of Teacher’s knowledge Standards. For Thai teachers to become government officers, they need to pass the national examination. Third, teacher supply doesn’t meet the social demand that Thailand is facing. A lot of teachers are more concerned about getting higher salaries rather than paying attention to their students’ learning. Teachers need to enhance their teaching ability and enhance students’ interest in learning. Fourth, in order to comply with the "ASEAN" and the future development needs of the 21st century, Thailand’s teacher education system and teacher quality management mechanism began to plan a six-year curriculum. Finally, from a comparison of teacher professional development programs worldwide, Thailand’s teacher education and teacher quality management system have similarities as well as differences with other countries around the world.
Based on the above-mentioned five results of this study, the following suggestions are made: (1) Strategy should continue to be implemented and should not be changed often. (2) To resolve the problem of teachers not paying enough attention to their students’ learning, it is important to have a serious evaluation mechanism.
(3) Thailand should adopt a program of teacher supply and demand control or well-planned training mechanisms to control the quantity of teachers in the country. (4) For future researches, participants should be studied with an expansion of the level or regional representation for an overall understanding of the teacher education issue. Also, quantitative research techniques could be included for a more global and inclusive data collection.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/17842
其他識別: U0005-0808201301105600
Appears in Collections:教師專業發展研究所

Show full item record
 
TAIR Related Article

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.