Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/18833
標題: 技術併購對創新績效之影響-以台灣電子業為例
The Impact of Technological Acquisitions on Innovation Performance: An Empirical Examination on Taiwan Electronics Industry
作者: 黃淑瑩
Huang, Shu-Ying
關鍵字: technological acquisitions;技術併購;innovation performance;patent growth rate;R&D productivity;創新績效;專利成長數;研發生產力
出版社: 會計學研究所
引用: 中文參考文獻 魏啟林,1993,掌握企業購併的最適策略,遠流出版社。 楊玉澤,1999,高科技產業併購之租稅規劃,全國智慧財產權研討會論文集,35-47頁。 伍忠賢,2002,企業併購理論與實務-全球投資觀點,新陸書局。 曾真真、何雍慶,2005,以資源基礎觀點及動態能力觀點檢視併購決策及併購績效—以金融整合為例,管理評論,第24卷第3期,頁95-116。 謝幸達,2007,技術收購與公司創新績效-台專高科技產業之實證研究,淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士論文。   英文參考文獻 Ahuja, G., and R. Katila. 2001. Technological Acquisitions And The Innovation Performance Of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study. Strategic Management Journal 22: 197-220. Brouthers, K. D., P. V. Hastenburg, and J. V. D. Ven. 1998. If most mergers fail why are they so popular? Long Range Planning 31: 347-353. Branch, B. and T. Yang. 2006. A test of risk arbitrage profitability. International Review of Financial analysis. 15: 39-56. Cassimana, B., M. G. Colomboc, P. Garronec, and R. Veugelersb. 2005. The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological- and market-relatedness. Research Policy. 34: 195-220. Cloodt M., J. Hagedoorn, and H. V. Kranenburg. 2006. Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Research Policy. 35: 642-654. Cohen, W., and D. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35: 128-152. Eisenhardt , K. M. and C. B. Schoonhoven. 1996. Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science. 7: 136-150. Ernst, H., and J. Vitt. 2000. The influence of corporate acquisitions on the behaviour of key inventors. R&D Management. 30: 105–120. Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search. Management Science. 47: 117-132. Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature. 18: 1661-1707. Gugler, K., D. C. Mueller, B. B. Yurtoglu and C. Zulehner. 2003. The effects of mergers: an international comparison. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 21: 625-653. Gammelgaard, J. 2004. Access of competence: an emerging acquisition motive. European Business Forum. 17: 44-47. Ghosh, A. 2001. Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions? Journal of Corporate Finance. 7: 151-178. Graebner, M. E. 2004. Momentum and serendipity: how acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strategic Management Journal. 25: 751–778. Grant, R. M. 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science. 7: 375-387. Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson, R. A. Johnson, and D. D. Moesel. 1996. The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal. 39: 1084-1119. Higgins, M. J., D. Rodriguez. 2006. The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Financial Economics. 80 351–383. Healya, P. M., K. G. Palepub and R. S. Rubackb. 1992. Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics. 31: 135-175. Hagedoorn, J., and G. Duysters. 2002. External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies. 39: 167–188. Henderson, R., and I. Cockburn. 1996. Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery. The RAND Journal of Economics. 27: 32-59. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3: 305-360. Krishnan, H. A., and D. Park. 2002. The impact of work force reduction on subsequent performance in major mergers and acquisitions-An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research. 55: 285-292. Kogut, B., and U. Zander. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science. 3: 383-397. Linn, S. C., and J. A. Switzer. Are cash acquisitions associated with better postcombination operating performance than stock acquisitions? Journal of Banking & Finance. 25: 1113-1138. Mueller, D. C. 1985. Mergers and Market Share. Review of Economics and Statistics. 67: 259–267. Mitchell, M. and T. Pulvino. 2001. Characteristics of risk in risk arbitrage. Journal of Finance. 56: 2135-2176. Makri, M., M. A. Hitt, and P. J. Lane. 2010. Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal. 31: 602–628. Puranam, P., and K. Srikanth. 2007. What They Know Vs. What They Do: How Acquirers Leverage Technology Acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal. 28: 805-825. Paruchuri, S., A. Nerkar, and D. C. Hambrick. 2006. Acquisition Integration and Productivity Losses in the Technical Core: Disruption of Inventors in Acquired Companies. Organization Science. 17: 545-562. Park, C. 2002. The effects of prior performance on the choice between related unrelated acquisitions: implications for the performance consequences of diversification strategy. The Journal of Management Studies. 39: 1003-1011. Thornhill, S. 2006. Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing. 21: 687-703. Puranam, P., H. Singh, and M. Zollo. 2006. Organizing For Innovation: Managing The Coordination-Autonomy Dilemma In Technology Acquisitions. The Academy of Management Journal Archive. 49: 263-280. Puranam, P., and K. Srikanth. 2007. What they know vs. What They Do: How Acquirers Leverage Technology Acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal. 28: 805–825. Quintana-García, C., and C. A. Benavides-Velasco. 2008. Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy.37: 492-507. Ramaswamy, K. P., and J. F. Waegelein. 2003. Firm Financial Performance Following Mergers. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 20: 115-126. Rege, U. P. 1984. Accounting Ratios to Locate Take-Over Targets. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 11: 301–311. Ranft, A. L., and M. D. Lord. 2002. Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation. Organization Science. 13: 420-441. Ransbotham, S., and S. Mitra. 2010. Target Age and the Acquisition of Innovation in High Technology Industries. Management Science. Schmidt, D. R., and Fowler. 1990. Post-acquisition financial performance and executive compensation. Strategic Management Journal. 11: 559-569. Seth, A., K. Song and R. R. Pettit. 2002. Value creation and destruction in cross-border acquisitions: an empirical analysis of foreign acquisitions of U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal. 23: 921-940. Trautwein, F. 1990. Merger motives and merger prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal. 11: 283-295. Vester, J. 2002. Lessons Learned about Integrating Acquisitions. Research Technology Management. 45: 33-41. Zhao, X. 2009. Technological Innovation and Acquisitions. Management Science. 55: 1170-1183.
摘要: 
本研究探討台灣電子工業技術併購對創新績效的影響,並進一步探討併購雙方的整合程度、技術相關性與規模對創新績效的影響。依先前研究採用專利成長數、研發生產力衡量創新績效,並以民國89年至97年進行技術併購的國內上市櫃電子業公司為樣本比較創新績效的差異。實證結果顯示,技術併購後創新績效反而降低;但進一步探討發現整合程度愈低,讓目標公司保有原來的制度或研發程序的自主性對創新績效有顯著的正向影響;併購雙方知識相關性高,併購公司有能力利用目標公司技術,可降低技術整合風險進而提升創新績效;知識相對規模愈大,亦即併購雙方知識絕對規模差異愈小,需耗費更多資源整合雙方技術,反而會降低創新績效。

This paper examines the impact of technological acquisitions on innovation performance in Taiwan electronics industry. We further explore how the integration policy and the characteristic between bilateral firms' knowledge bases affect the innovation output. According to prior literature, this paper use patents growth rate and R&D productivity to measure innovation performance. The sample of our research includes all technological acquiring firms listed in Twain Stock Exchange from 1999 to 2008. We find the innovation performance decrease after technological acquisitions. The preservation of autonomous for target firm is positively associated with innovation output and the relatedness of acquired and acquiring knowledge bases enhances innovation performance, while relative size of the acquired knowledge base reduces innovation output.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/18833
其他識別: U0005-1407201116191000
Appears in Collections:會計學系所

Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.