Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/18859
標題: 社會網絡與創新之關係及其影響因素之探討
The relationship between social network and firm innovation and its determinants
作者: 張武鈞
Chang, Wu-Chun
關鍵字: Social network;社會網絡;Innovation;Absorptive Capacity;Market power;創新;吸納能力;市場力量
出版社: 會計學研究所
引用: 中文部分 劉軍,2007,社會網絡分析法(Social Network Analysis: A Handbook),重慶:重慶大學出版社。 英文部分 Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, Structural holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(3): 425-455. Atkins, K. 2009. Locational market power in network constrained markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 70(2): 416–430. Argote, L. 1999. Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Norwell, MA: Kluwer. Barnes, J. A. 1954. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations 7(1): 39-58. Baum, J. C., T. Calabrese, and B. S. Silverman, 2000. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 267–294. BarNir, A. 2002. Interfirm Alliances in the Small Business:The Role of Social Networks Journal of Small Business Management 40(3): 219–232. Baldridge, J. W, R. A. Burnham. 1975. Organizational innovation: individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly 20(2): 165–76. Beamish, P. W. 1987. Joint Ventures in LDCs: Partner Selection and Performance. Management International Review 27(1): 23 -37. Beamish, P. W., and A. Kachra. 2004. Number of partners and JV performance . Journal of World Business 39 (2): 107–120. Boumgarden, P. 2008. Is the effect of network diversity diverse? The impact of strategic focus on learning in decision-making organizations. Network Diversity and Org. Learning. Brass, D. J. 1995. A social network perspective on human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management 13: 39-79. Brown, B., and J. E. Butler. 1995. Competitors as allies: a study of entrepreneurial networks in the U.S. wine industry. Journal of Small Business Management 33 (3):57–66. Brewer, T. L. 1993. Government Policies, Market Imperfections, and Foreign Direct Investment . Journal of International Business Studies 24(1): 101-120. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes. Harvard University Press: Boston. Burt, R. S. 1983. Corporate Profits and Cooptation. Alliance, NewYork. Burt, R. S. 2000. The network structure of social capital. Research in organizational behaviour 22 : 345-423. Butts, C. T. 2008. Social network analysis: A methodological introduction .Asian Journal of Social Psychology 11(1) :13–41. Carpenter, M., and J. Westphal. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 639–660. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94(supplement): S95–S120. Cohen, W. M., and, D. A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128– 152. Cockburn, I. M., and R. M. Henderson. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics 46(2): 157−182. Chesbrough, H.W. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Sch Chen, Y. S., M. J. Lin, and C. H. Chang. 2009. The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management 38(2): 152–158. Cheng, E. W., and W. L. Eddie. 2000. Establishment of Critical Success Factors for Construction Partnering. Journal of Management in Engineering 16 (2): 84-92. Daghfous, A. 2004. Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal 69(2): 21−27. Deng, X., W. J. Doll, and M. Cao. 2008. Exploring the absorptive capacity to innovation/productivity link for individual engineers engaged in IT enabled work. Information and Management 45 (2): 75–87. Dyer, J. H. 1997. Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 535–556. Dyer, J. H., and K. Nobeoka. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal 21(3):345–367. Freeman, C. 1991. Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy 20(5) : 499–514. Fabrizio, K. R. 2009. Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy 38(2 : 255–267 Faems, D., L. B. Van, and K. Debackere. 2005. Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 (3):238–250. Faust, K. 1997. Centrality in Affiliation Networks. Social Networks 19(1) : 157-191. Fleming, L., and O. Sorenson. 2001. Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy 30(7): 1019–1039. Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science 47(1): 117–132. Fukugawa, N. 2006. Determining factors in innovation of small firm networks: a case of cros industry groups in Japan. Small Business Economics 27 (2):181–193. Garcia-Vega, M. 2006. Does technological diversification promote innovation? Research Policy 35(2): 230–24. Ghoshal, S., and C. A. Bartlett. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review 15(4): 603–625. Goerzen, A., and P. W. Beamish. 2005. The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 26 (4): 333–354. Greve, H. R. 2007. Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 16(5): 945–975. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilitieson alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 20(5): 397–420. Gulati, R., N. Nohria, and A. Zaheer. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 203–215. Haeussler, C., and M. Higgins. 2009. Control right and the performance of strategic alliances.Electronic copy available at;http;//ssrn.com/abstract=1424073. Hagan, S. B., and M. B. Green. 2004. Corporate knowledge transfer via interlocking directorates:a network analysis approach. Geoforum 35 (1) 127–139 Hambrick D, T. Cho, and M. J. Chen. 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(4): 659–684. Haunschild, P. R., and C. M. Beckman. 1998. When do interlocks matter?: Alternative sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 815–844. Huang, Y., and C. Chen. 2010. The impact of technological diversity and organizational slack on innovation. Technovation 30(7): 420–428 Inkpen, A. C., and W. K. Tsang. 2005. Social capital, networks, and Knowledge transfer. Academy of management review 30(1): 146–165. Jansen, J. J. P., F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2006. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science 52(11): 1661–1674. Kauser, S.; and V. Shaw. 2004. The influence of behavioral and organisational characteristics on the success of international strategic alliances. International Marketing Review 21(1): 17-52. Kim, L. 1998. Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organizafion Science 9(4): 506-521. Knoke, D., and J. H. Kuklinski. 1982. Network analysis, Newbury park. Calif: Sage. Knudsen, M. P. 2007. The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24 (2):117–138. Kumar, B. N. 1995. Partner-Selection-Criteria and Success of Technology Transfer: A Model Based on Learning Theory Applied to the Case of Indo-German Technical Collaborations. Management International Review 35(Special Issue): 65-78. Liao et al. 2010. Relationships between knowledge acquisition, absorptive capacity and innovation capability: an empirical study on Taiwan’s financial and manufacturing industries. Journal of Information Science 36 (1):19–35. Liu, X. 1997. The relative contributions of foreign technology and domestic inputs to innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries. Technovation 17(3) :119-125. Lichtenthaler, U. 2009. Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journa 52(4):822–846. Luo, Y. 1997. Partner Selection and Venturing Success:The Case of Joint Ventures with Firms in the People''s Republic of China. Organization Sciencea 8(6): 648-662. Lane, P. J., and M. Lubatkin. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 19(5): 461–477. Laumann, E. O. 1978. Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual Review of Sociology 4(1): 455-84. Marin, A., and B. Wellman. 2009. Social Network Analysis: An Introduction . Forthcoming in Handbook of Social Network Analysis. Edited by Peter Carrington and John Scott. Mitchell, J. C. 1969. Social Network in Urban Situations: Analysis of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns. Manchester: Manchester University press. Miller, C., L. Burke, and W. Glick. 1998. Cognitive diversity among upper echelon executives: implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal 19(1): 39–58. Mohr, J., and P. Spekman. 1994. Characteristics of partnership success :partnership attributes , communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic management journal 15(2):135-152. Montgomery, C. A. 1985. Product-market diversification and market power. Academy of Managemeni 28(4): 789-798. Mottner, S., and S. Smith. 2009. Wal-Mart: Supplier performance and market power. Journal of Business Research 62(7) : 535–541. Mowery, D. C, and J. C. Oxley. 1995. Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1): 67-93 Mowery, D. C. 1983. The relationship between in-trafirm and contractual fomis of industrial research in America manufacturirtg, 1900-1940. Explorations in Economic History 20: 351-374. Murovec, N., and I. Prodan. 2009. Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation 29 :859–872. Muthusamy, S. K., and M. A. White. 2006. Does power sharing matter? The role of power and influence in alliance performance.Journal of Business Research 59(7) :811-819. Naisbitt, J. 1984. Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: HarperCollins. Nohria, N. and C. Garcia-Pont. 1991. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. StrategicManagement Journal 12(2): 105–124. Padgett, J. F., and A. Christopher. 1993. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology 98(6): 1259-1319. Pereira, P. 2001. Market power, cost reduction and consumer search. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19:1457–1473. Podolny, J. M., and K. L. Page. 1998. Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 57–76. Pothukuchi, Damanpouret, Choi, Chenal, and Park. 2002. National and Organizational Culture Differences and International Joint Venture Performance. Journal of international business studies 33(2): 243–265. Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in organizational behavior 12: 295–336. Phelps, C. C. 2010. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal 53(4): 890–913. Raubb, W., and J. Weesie. 1990. Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. American Journal of Sociology 96(3): 626–654. Raider, H. J. 1998. Market Structure and Innovation, Social science research 27(1): 1-21. Sampson, R. C. 2007. R&D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and Alliance organization on innovation. Academy of management journal 50(2): 364–386. Scherer, F. M., and D. Ross. 1990. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd ed., Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. Schilling, M. A. 2007. Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation. Management Science 53(7): 1113–1126 . Schilling, M. A. 1998. Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Academy of Management Review 23(2) : 267−284. Scott, J. 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, London, UK: Sage. Shepherd, W. G. 1970. Market power and economic welfare. New York: Random House. Smith-Doerr, L., and Powell, W. W. 2005. Network and economic life. In N. Smelser and R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (2nd ed.): 379–402. Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation/Princeton University Press. Soh, P. H. 2010. Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation. Strategic Management Journal Strat. 31: 438–461. Sonquist, J. A., and T. Koenig. 1975. Interlocking directorships in the top US corporations: A graph theory. Insurgent Sociologist 5(3): 196–230. Spergel, I. 1976. Interaction between community structure, delinquency, and social policy in the inner city. In The Juvenile Justice System, ed. M. Klein : 55-100. Beverly Hills: Sage. Stirling, A. 2007. A general framework for analysing diversityin science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 4: 707–719. Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (NSI): 27–43. Talke, K., and S. Salomo, et al. 2010. How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy 39(7): 907–918. Tang, F., J. Mu, D. L. MacLachlan. 2008. Implication of network size and structure on organizations’ knowledge transfer. Expert Systems with Applications 35(1) : 1109–1114. Teece, D. 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18(1): 1–25. Thorgren, S. 2009. Designing interorganizational networks for innovation: An empirical examination of network configuration, formation and governance J. Engineering and Technology Management 26(3) :148–166. Tsai, Y. C. 2006. Effect of Social Capital and Absorptive Capability on Innovation in Internet Marketing. International Journal of Management 23(1): 157-166. Tichy, N. M., M. L. Tushman, and C. Fombrun. 1979. Social Network Analysis for Organizations. Academy of Management Review 4(4): 507-519. Turk, H. 1977. Organizations in Modern Life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Tuten, T. L., and D. J. Urban. 2001 .An Expanded Model of Business-to-Business Partnership Formation and Success. Industrial Marketing Management 30(2): 149-164. Van de Ven, A. H. 1976. On the nature, formation, and maintenance of relations among organizations. Academy of Management Review 1: 24–36. Wang, H. 2010. Is firm-specific innovation associated with greater value appropriation? The rolesof environmental dynamism and technological diversity. Research Policy 39: 141-154. Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press; 1 edition . Wincent, J., and S. Anokhin. 2010. Does network board capital matter? A study of innovative performance in strategic SME networks. Journal of Business Research 63(3): 265–275. Wong, J. K. 1995. Technology transfer in thailand: Descriptive validation of a technology transfer model. International Journal of Technology Management 10(7/8): 788-796. Zahra, S. A., and G. George. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, Reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 17(2): 185-203.
摘要: 
近年來創新對於企業的重要性日益的提升,企業為了發展創新可藉由相互合作來達成目標,如策略聯盟、合資投資、互相持股等,因此造成企業間社會網絡之形成,社會網絡可以提供企業所需的資源和知識,對於企業的創新有很大之幫助,故探討社會網絡對企業創新有何影響是一個重要之議題。本研究以電子產業為研究對象,並以連鎖董事來劃分社會網絡邊界,將網絡分為多樣性、規模和密度等結構特性,分析其對創新之影響,接者再試圖探討企業之吸納能力與市場力量的強弱對網絡與創新有何影響,實證結果顯示網絡多樣性、網絡密度與創新呈顯著的倒U型關係,網絡規模與創新則呈不顯著之關係,而吸納能力與市場力量較弱之企業,其建立社會網絡對其創新績效提升具有較高之邊際效益,並額外發現本身創新能力較弱之企業,其建立社會網絡對其創新績效提升也具有較高之邊際效益。

In recent years, the importance of innovation for firms is on the rise. To develop innovation, firms usually cooperate with each other, in the form of strategic alliances, joint investments, or mutual shareholding, which produces social networks among firms. Social networks provide firms with resources and knowledge they need, and thus are of great help. Therefore, it is an important issue to explore the impact of social networks on innovation. Using date from electronics industry, this study analyzes the relationship between social network and firm innovation and its determinants. The results show that the relationship between network diversity and firm innovation is inverted U-shaped and so does the relationship between network density and firm innovation. However, this study does not find a significant relation between network size and firm innovation. Besides, for firms with lower absorptive capacity and market power, the marginal benefit of social network is larger.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/18859
其他識別: U0005-3006201116020900
Appears in Collections:會計學系所

Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.