Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorNai-Hui Suen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Shih-Yanen_US
dc.identifier.citation中文部分 朱祥霖,2012,公司治理是否影響避稅活動之進行,東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 余安婷,2011,公司治理特性、經營策略對企業租稅規避程度之影響,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 林世銘與楊朝旭,1994,上市公司營利事業所得稅負擔之研究,財稅研究,第26卷第6期,頁34-52。 林嬌能,2007,帳面-課稅所得差異與盈餘管理之相關性,國立成功大學會計研究所博士論文。 林嬌能與許彩蓮,2011,家族企業與租稅規劃之關聯性,會計學報,第4卷第1期,頁23-49。 林寶人,2010,台灣上市櫃家族企業與公司績效,會計學報,第3卷第1期,頁53-82。 洪榮華、陳香如與林慧珍,2007,公司治理機制對創新、多角化策略及公司績效之影響-研發密集產業之實證,中山管理評論,第15卷第1期:37-60。 陳明進,2002,營利事業有效稅率決定因素之實證研究,會計評論,第34期,頁57-75。 陳明進,2003,我國租稅優惠對營利事業租稅負擔之影響,管理評論,第22卷第1期,頁127-151。 陳振遠、王朝壁、林靖傑與徐銘志,2006,台灣上市公司董事會穩定性與長期績效之實證研究,經營管理論叢,第2期第2卷,頁85-103。 許彩蓮,2010,家族企業與租稅規劃之相關性,逢甲大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 張敏蕾、廖四郎與林修平,2009,財稅差異與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,管理學報,第26期第4卷,頁391-415。 黃美祝,2010,財稅差異金額大小對國稅局選案查核之影響,會計評論,第50期,頁23-55。 黃美祝與李映茹,2009,最低稅負制對企業租稅負擔影響之研究-高科技產業與傳統產業之比較,當代會計,第10期第2卷,頁189-224。 黃舒綺,1999,海外直接投資企業與國際性租稅規劃,國立中興大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。 湯麗芬,2010,家族企業特質與盈餘品質之關聯性,當代會計,第11卷,頁371-410。 廖益興、楊清溪與廖秀梅,2007,公司治理機制與財務報表品質之關聯性研究,財務金融學刊,第15期,頁67-112。 廖秀梅,2004,董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-探討台灣家族控制企業因素的影響,國立臺北大學會計學研究所博士論文。 廖秀梅、李建然與吳祥華,2006,董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響,東吳經濟商學學報,第54期,頁117-160。 葉銀華,1999,家族控股集團、核心企業與報酬互動之研究-台灣與香港證券市場之比較,管理評論,第18卷第2期,頁57-90。 葉銀華與李存修,2003,「台灣之獨立董監制度的改革-政策性建議」,會計研究月刊,第213期:頁66-85。 葉銀華、蘇裕惠、柯承恩與李德冠,2004,公司治理機制對於關係人交易的影響,證券市場發展季刊,第15卷第4期,頁69-106。 蘇淑慧、呂倩如與金成隆,2009,家族公司與盈餘品質關係之研究:所有權、管理權與控制權,台大管理論叢,第19卷第2期,頁35-70。 楊朝旭與吳幸蓁,2009,資產減損之決定因素與盈餘資訊性後果:論公司治理之角色,會計評論,第48期,頁67-114。 西文部分 Ahmed, K., M. Hossain, and M. B. Adams. 2006. The Effects of Board Composition and Board Size on the Informativeness of Annual Accountiong Earnings. Corporate Governance:An International Review 14:418-431. Ahmed, A. S, and S. Duellman. 2007. Accounting Conservatism and Board of Director Characteristics:An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43:411-437. Ahmed, K. and D. Henry. 2012. Accounting Conservatism and Voluntary Corporate Governance Mechanisms by Australian firms. Accounting and Finance 52:631-662. Ali, A., T. Y. Chen, and S. Radhakrishnan. 2007. Corporate Disclosures by Family Firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44:238-286 Anderson, R. C. and D. M. Reeb. 2003. Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance:Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance 58 (3):1301-1328. Anderson, R., S. Mansi, and D. Reeb. 2004 Board Characteristics, Accounting Report Integrity and the Cost of Debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37(3):315-342. Badertscher, B. A, J. D. Phillips, M. Pincus, and S. O. Rego. 2009. Earnings Management Strategies and the Trade-Off between Tax Benefits and Detection Risk:To Conform or Not to Conform?. The Accounting Review 84 (1):63-97. Barontini, R. and L. Caprio. 2006. The Effect of Family Control on Firm Value and Performance:Evidence from Continental Europe. European Financial Management 12 (5):689-723. Beasley, M. 1996. An Empirical Analysis Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review 71:443-466. Beekes, W., P. Pope, and S. Young. 2004. The Link between Earnings Timeliness, Earnings Conservatism and Board Composition:Evidence from the UK. Corporate Governance. An International Review 12:47-59. Block, S. 1999. The Role of Nonaffiliated outside Directors in Monitoring the Firm and the Effect on Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions 12:1-8. Booth, J., M. Cornett, and H, Tehranian. 2002. Boards of Directors, Ownership, and Regulation. Jounal of Banking and Finance 26:1973-1996. Boyd, B. K. 1995. CEO Duality and Firm Performance:A Contingency Model. Strategic Management Journal 16(4):301-312. Boyd, B. 2006. Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of The Resource Dependence Model. Strategic Management Journal 11:419-430. Bruton, G., D. Ahlstrom, and J. Wan. 2003. Turnaround in East Asian Firms:Evidence from Ethnic Overseas Chinese Communities. Strategic Management Journal 24:519-540. Byrd, J. W. and K. A. Hickman. 1992. Do outside Directors Monitor Managers?Evidence from Tender offer Bids. Journal of Financial Economics 32:195-221. Cheng, S. 2008. Board Size and The Variability of Corporate Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 87:157-176. Chen, S., X. Chen., Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin. 2010. Are family Firms More Tax Aggressive than Non-Family Firms? Journal of Financial Economics 95:41-61. Cheng, Q. and T. D. Warfield. 2005. Equity Incentives and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review 80 (2):441-476. Chiang, H. T., and C. Feng. 2005. An Empirical Study of Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance. Journal of American Academy of Business 6(1):95-101 Chrisman, J. J., J. H. Chua, and P. Sharma. 2005. Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family Firm. Theory and Practice:1042-2587. Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The Separation of Owership and Control in Easr Asia Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1-2):81-112. Claessens, S., S. Djankov., J. P. H. Fan., and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57 (6):2741-2771. Cloyd, B. 1995. The Effects of Financial Accounting Conformity on Recommendations of Tax Preparers. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 17 (2):50-70. Cloyd, B., J. Pratt, and T. Stock. 1996. The Use of Financial Accounting Conformity on Recommendations of Tax Preparers. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 17 (3):50-70. Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (3):371-406. Davis, P. 1983. Realizing the Potential of Family Business. Organizational Dynamics 12:47-56 Dayton, K. 1984. Corporate hovernance:The Other Side of the Coin. Harvard Business Review 62:34-37. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation:An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Cintemporary Accounting Research 13:1-36. Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn. 1985. The Structure of Corporate Ownership:Causes and Consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93 (6):1155-1177. Desai, M. A. and D. Dharmapala. 2006. Corporate Tax Avoidance and High-Powered Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics 79:145-179. Desai, M. A., A. Dyck, and L. Zingales. 2007. Theft and Taxes. Journal of Financial Economics 84:591-623. Desai, M. A. and D. Dharmapala. 2009. Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value. The Review of Economic and Statistics 91 (3):537-546. Denis, D. J., D. K. Denis, and A. Sarin. 1997. Agency Problems, Equity Ownership, and Corporate Diversification. The Journal of Finance 52 (1):135-159 Dimitropoulos, P. E. and D. Asterious. 2010. The Effect of Board Composition on the Informativeness and Quality of Annual Earnings:Empirical Evidence from Greece. Research in International Business and Finance 24:190-205. Donaldson, L., and J. H. Davis. 1991. Stewarship Theory or Agency:CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management 16(1):49-64. Eisenberg, T., S. Sundgren, and M. T. Wells. 1998. Large Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms. Journal of Financial Economics 48:35-54. Faccio, M., L. H. P. Lang, and L. Young. 2001. Dividend and Expropriation. American Economic Review 91(1):54-78. Faccio, M. and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 65:365-395. Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency Problems and The Theory of The Firm. Journal of political Economy 88 (2):288-307. Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law & Economics 26:301-325. Fan, J. P. H. and T. J. Wong. 2002. Corporate Ownership Structure and The Informativeness of Accounting Warnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (3):401-425. Firth, M., P. M. Y. Fung, and O. M. Rui. 2006. Ownership, Board Structure, and The Informativeness of Earnings: Evidence From an Emerging Market. Working paper, Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Frank, M. M., L. J. Lynch, and S. O. Rego. 2009. Tax Reporting Aggressiveness and Its Relation to Aggressive Financial Reporting. The Accounting Review 84 (2):467-496. Garcia Lara, J. M., B. Garcia Osma, and F. Penalva. 2007. Board of Director’s Characteristics and Conditional Accounting Conservatism:Spanish Evidence. European Accounting Review 16 (4):727-755. Garcia Lara, J. M., B. Garcia Osma, and F. Penalva. 2009. Accounting Conservatism and Corporate Governance. Review of Accounting Studies 14:161-201. Gleason, C. A., and L. F. Mills. 2002. Materiality and Contingent Tax Liability Reporting. The Accounting Review 77(April):317-342. Graham, J. R. and A. L. Tucker. 2006. Tax Shelters and Corporate Debt Policy. Journal of Financial Econmics 81:563-594. Green, R. C. 1984. Investment Incentive, Debt, and Warrants. Journal of Financial Econmics 13:115-136. Guenther, D., E. Maydew, and S. Nutter. 1997. Financial Reporting, Tax Costs, and Book-Tax Conformity. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23 (November):225-248. Gupta, S. and K. Newberry. 1997. Determinants of The Variability in Corporate Effective Tax Rates:Evidence From Longitudinal Data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16:1-40. Hanlon M. 2005. The Persistence and Pricing of Earnings, Accruals, and Cash Flows When Firms Have Large Book-Tax Differences. The Accounting Review 80 (1):137-166. Hanlon, M., E. L. Maydew., and T. Shevlin. 2008. An Unintended Consequence of Book-Tax Conformity:A loss of Earnings Informativeness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 46:294-311. Hanlon, M. and J. Slemrod. 2009. What does Tax Aggressiveness Signal?Evidence From Stock Price Reactions to News about Tax Shelter Involvement. Journal of Public Economics 93:126-141. Hanlon, M. and S. Heitzman. 2010. A review of Tax Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50:127-178. Handler, W. C. 1989. Methodological Issues and Considerations in Studying Family Business. Family Business Review 2 (3):257-276. Hermalin, B. E. and M. S. Weisbach. 2001. Boards of Directors as An Endogenously Determined Institution:a survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review 9:7-26. Hillman, A. J., G. D. Klein, and R. A. Luce. 2001. Board Composition and Stakeholder Performance:Do Stakeholder Directors Make a Difference? Business and Society 40:295-314. James, C. 1999. Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops:1999. ISAAA Briefs 12:Preview. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications. Ithaca. New York. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of The Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4):305-360. Jensen, M. C. and R. Ruback. 1983. The Market for Corporate Control:The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11:5-50. Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeover. American Economic Review 76:323-329. Jensen, M. C. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and The Failure of Internal Control System. Journal of Finance 148:831-880. Kiel, G. C., and G. J. Nicholson. 2003. Board Composition and Corporate Performance:How the Australian Experience Informs Contrasting Theories of Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance:An International Review 11(3):189-205. Klassen, K. J. 1997. The Impact of Inside Ownership Concentration on the Trade-off Between Financial and Tax Reporting. The Accounting Review 72(3):455-474. Klein, A. 2002. Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33:375-400. LaPorta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate Ownership Around the World. The Journal of Finance 54(2):471-518. LaPorta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 2002. Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation. The Journal of Finance 58:3-27. Leuz, C., D. Nanda, and P. Wysocki. 2003. Earnings Management and Institutional Factors: An International Comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69 (3):505-527. Manzon, G. J. and G. Plesko. 2002. The Relation between Financial and Tax Reporting Measures of Income. Tax Law Review 55:175-214. Maury, B. 2006. Family Ownership and Firm Performance:Empirical Evidence from Western European Corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance 12(2):321-341. Minnick, K. and T. Noga. 2010. Do Corporate Governance Characteristics Influence Tax Management?. Journal of Corporate Finance 16:703-718. Miller, D., and I. Le Breton-Miller. 2006. Family Governance and Firm Performance:Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities. Family Business Review 19(1):73-87. Mills, L., M. M. Erickson, and E. L. Maydew. 1998. Investments in Tax Planning. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 20:1-20 Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management Ownership and Market Valuation:An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1-2):293-315. Patton, A., and J. C. Baker. 1987. Why Won’t Directors Rock The Board? Harvard Business Review 65(6):10-18. Pearce, J. A. and S. A. Zahra. 1989. Board of Director and Corporate Financial Performance:A Review and Integrative Model. Journal of Management 15 (2):291-334. Phillips, J., M. Pincus, and S. Rego. 2003. Earnings Management:New Evidence Based on Deferred Tax Expense. The Accounting Review 78(2):491-521. Saito, T. 2008. Family Firms and Firm Performance:Evidence from Japan. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22:620-646. Scholes, M. S., M. A. Wolfson, M. M. Erickson, E. L. Maydew, and T. J. Shevlin. 2009. Taxes and Business Strategy: A Planning Approach. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Setia-Atmaja, L. and J. Haman. 2011. The Role of Board Independence in Mitigating Agency Problem II in Australian Family Firms. The British Accounting Review 43:230-246. Shevlin, T. and S. Porter. 1992. The Corporate Tax Comeback in 1987 Some Further Evidence. Journal of the American Taxation Association 14:58-79. Shleifer , A. and R. W. Vishny. 1997. A survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance 52 (2):737-783. Singh, M., and W. III. N Davidson. 2003. Agency Costs, Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance Mechanisms. Journal of Banking & Finance 27(5):793-816. Sridharan, U. V., and A. Marsinko. 1997. CEO Duality in The Paper and Forest Products Industry. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions 10:59-65. Stickney, C. P. and V. E. McGee. 1982. Effective Corporate Tax Rates The Effect of Size, Capital Intensity, Leverage, and Other Factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1:125-152. Sraer, D. and D. Thesmar. 2007. Performance and Behavior of Family Firms: Evidence from The French Stock Market. Journal of the European Economic Association 5:709-751. Strong, J. S. and J. R. Meyer. 1990. Sustaining Investment, Discretionary Investment, and Valuation:A Residual Funds Study of the Paper Industry. Asymmetric Information, Corporate Finance, and Investment. Chicago. 127-148. Vafeas, N. 2000. Board Structure and The Informativeness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19:139-160. Vafeas, N. 2005. Audit committees, Boards and The Quality of Reported Earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research 22 (1):1093-1122. Van den Berghe and S. Carchon. 2002. Corporate Gorvernance Practices in Flemish Family Businesses. Corporate Governance:An International Review 10(3):225-245. Veliyath, R. 1999. Top Management Compensation and Shareholder Returns:Unravelling Different Models of The Relationship. Journal of Management Studies 36:123-143. Watts, R. 2003a. Conservatism in Accounting Part I:Explanations and Implications. Accounting Horizons 17 (3):207-221. Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review 53 (1):112-134. Weir, C. and D. Liang. 2001. Governance Structures, Director Independence and Corporate Performance in the UK. European Business Review 13(2):86-95. Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outsider Directors and CEO Turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20:431-460. Wen, Y., K. Rwegasira, and J. Bilderbeek. 2002. Corporate Governance and Capital Structure Decision of Chinese Listed Firms. Corporate Governance:An International Review 10(2):75-83. Wilson, R. 2009. An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants. The accounting Review 84:969-999. Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings Management and Corporate Govermant :The Role of The Board and The Audit Committee. Journal of Corporatr Finance 9:295-316. Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. Family Control and Corporate Governance:Evidence from Taiwan. Internal Review of Finance 2:21-48. Yermack, D. 1996. Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics (40):185-211. Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce II. 1989. Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance:A Review and Integrated Model. Journal of Management 15 (2):291-334.en_US
dc.description.abstract企業的租稅負擔一直是企業重要成本與費用,不僅會影響管理階層營運績效的好壞,更會影響企業未來資金的運用,例如投資或分配給股東。企業在進行任何的商業決策或投資活動時都會與租稅負擔有所牽扯。本研究針對台灣上市公司家族企業與租稅規避行為之關係,分別利用有效稅率與財稅差異探討,並進一步研究董事會特性,包含董事會規模、董事會獨立性及董事長兼任總經理等特性,探討其對家族企業之租稅規避行為之影響。本研究以有效稅率及財稅差異之衡量方法作為租稅規避之代理變數。 本研究以2005年至2008年台灣上市公司做為樣本,排除了證券、金融與保險業以測試家族企業、董事會結構與租稅規避之間的關係。實證結果顯示,家族企業與現金有效稅率呈顯著正相關且與財稅差異呈顯著負相關,顯示家族企業較不會進行租稅規避方面的行為,表示家族企業因擁有企業較大之所有權,因此會以較長遠的投資視野進行決策,且家族企業有世代傳承情況,為保全企業在市場上的聲譽以永久經營,將更關注自身企業在市場上之聲譽。家族董事會規模與(現金)有效稅率呈顯著正相關,表示家族企業的董事會規模愈大,家族企業之董事會較不會受管理階層所操控,能達到監督的效果,愈不會進行租稅規避之行為。此外,家族董事長兼任總經理與有效稅率呈顯著負相關且與財稅差異呈顯著正相關,顯示家族企業的董事長兼任總經理時,即家族企業之董事長涉入公司經營業務而兼具總經理之雙重身分時,將使得董事會獨立性與監督功能受到損害,使得經理人愈容易為了自身利益而進行租稅規避。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe tax burden is one of important operating costs and expenses for business. Tax cost not only affects the firms’ operational performance, but also affects the funds that firms can use in investments or distribution of dividends. This study investigates the relationship between the family firms and tax agressiveness by using a sample of Taiwaness listed firms. The study uses the effective tax rate and book-tax difference to measure tax agressiveness. With regard to board characteristics, this study uses the board size, the board independence and CEO duality as proxies. Using a sample of listed companies in Taiwan during 2005 to 2008, excluding financial and insurance industries, the empirical results show that the relationship between the family firms and cash effective tax rate is significantly positive, and the relationship between the family firms and book-tax difference is significantly negative. That means that family firms are less tax aggressive. Family firms have larger corporate ownership and they are more concerned about firm’s reputation in order to operate permanently. The relationship between family board size and effective tax rate is significantly positive. As a larger board, family members do not control or affect board’s decisions easily, limiting family firms use tax aggressive activities to make self-interests. In addition, the relationship between the family CEO duality and the effective tax rate is negative and the relationship between the family CEO duality and the book-tax difference is significantly positive. When the chairman and CEO are the same person, the board independence and oversight function are weaker, therefore, it is more easy for management to do tax aggressive activities.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents目次 第一章 緒論............................................1 第一節 研究動機與背景............................1 第二節 研究目的與貢獻............................3 第三節 研究架構及流程圖..........................5 第二章 文獻探討....................................7 第一節 租稅規避的成本與效益......................7 第二節 家族企業及非家族企業的代理問題............8 第三節 家族企業租稅規避行為之探討................11 第四節 董事會特性與財務報導品質、租稅規避的關係..12 第三章 研究方法....................................17 第一節 研究假說..................................17 第二節 變數定義..................................19 第三節 實證模型..................................22 第四章 實證結果....................................28 第一節 樣本選取與資料來源........................28 第二節 實證結果..................................30 第五章 結論與建議..................................61 第一節 研究結論..................................61 第二節 研究限制及建議............................61 參考文獻................................................63 中文部分............................................63 西文部分............................................64zh_TW
dc.subjectFamily Firmen_US
dc.subjectTax Aggressiveen_US
dc.subjectBoard Characteristicen_US
dc.subjectthe effective tax rateen_US
dc.subjectBook-tax differenceen_US
dc.titleFamily Firms, Board of Director Characteristics and Tax Aggressivenessen_US
dc.typeThesis and Dissertationzh_TW
item.openairetypeThesis and Dissertation-
item.fulltextno fulltext-
Appears in Collections:會計學系所
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.