Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
標題: 可信賴的網路教師評鑑系統平台建構之研究
A Trusty Web-based System Platform for Teaching Evaluation
作者: 林美玉 
Lin, Mei-Yu 
關鍵字: e-voting;電子投票;anonymous;teacher evaluation;匿名性;教師評鑑
出版社: 資訊科學系所
引用: 參考文獻 1.林育生,王志逸,"資訊安全應用系統開發實務",碁峰資訊股份有限公司,ISBN: 986-421-437-3。 2.黃明祥,林詠章,"資訊與網路安全概論 : 建構安全的電子商務系統",麥格羅.希爾出版集團台灣分公司,ISBN: 986-157-166-3。 3.賴溪松,韓亮,張真誠, “近代密碼學及其應用”,松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司,ISBN: 9572219537。 4.毛郁雯,大學實施「學生評鑑教師教學」之研究- 以國立台北師範學院為例,國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所,碩士論文,2000。 5.李青峰,黃景彰,王丕承,應用密碼技術於可驗證之無記名投票,國立交通大學資訊管理研究所,碩士論文,1993。 6.林敏惠,黃景彰,網際網路祕密投票之研究,交通大學資訊管理研究期刊第三卷第一期,2001。 7.張德勝,台灣地區大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」制度之研究,師大學報:教育類第50期第2卷,2005,203-225頁。 8.教育部全球資訊網,大專院校概況表(87~94 學年度),2006,, Access time 2006/06/30。 9.A. Fujioka, T. Okamoto and K. Ohta, “A practical secret voting scheme for large scale elections”, Advances in Cryptology: Proceedings of AusCrypt’92, LNCS 718, Springer-Verlag, 1992, pp. 244-251. 10.Abrami, P. & Mizener, D., Student / Instructor Attitude Similarity, Student Ratings and Course Performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 1985, pp. 693-702. 11.Beerens, D. R., Evaluating teachers for professional growth. Thousand Berkeley, CA: Mc Cutchan, 2000. 12.Cashin, W. E., “Student ratings of teaching: recommendations for use idea paper”, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 339731, No.22., 1990. 13.Coutinho, S. C., “The Mathematics of Ciphers: Number Theory and RSA Cryptography,” A K Peters, Ltd., 1999. 14.D. Chaum, “Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses and Digital Pseudonyms”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1981, pp. 84-88. 15.Greene, J. E., School personnel administration. Radnor, Pennsylvania: Chilton Book Company, 1971. 16.H. Nurmi, A. Salomaa and L. Santean, “Secret Ballot Elections in Computer Networks,” Computers & Security, 10 ,1991, pp. 553-560. 17.Iwanicki, E. F., Teacher evaluation for school improvement. In J. Millman & Darling-Hammond, L.(Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers, Newbury Park, California:Sage Publications, 1990 , pp. 158-174. 18.Kerlinger, F., Student evaluation of university professors. School and Society, 48, 1971, pp. 353-356. 19.Kulik, J. A. & Mckeachie, W. J., The evaluation of teacher in higher education. Review of Research in Education, 1985, pp. 210-237. 20.Martin, C., & Nagao, D. H., Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 1989, pp. 523-533. 21.Millman, J., Handbook of teacher evaluation. London, Sage, 1981. 22.Peterson, K. D., Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc, 1995. 23.P. H. Slessenger, “Socially Secure Cryptographic Election Scheme,” Electronic Letters, 27 (11) ,May 1991, pp. 955-957. 24.R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. Adleman, “A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 21, 1978, pp. 120-126. 25.R. Rivest, The MD5 Message Digest Algorithm, Network Working Group RFC 1321 , Apr, 1992. 26.Smith, M., & Leigh, B., Virtual subjects: Using the internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29(4), 1997, pp. 496-505. 27.Spears, R., & Lea, M., Panacea or Panoption? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 1994, pp. 427-459. 28.Stufflebeam, D., & Shinkfield , A.J., Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1995. 29.Theall,M.&Franklin,J., Student Ratings in the context of evaluation Systems.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, fall 1990 , pp.17-34. 30.Tollefson, N., Chen J. S., & Kleinsasser, A., The relationship of students’ attitudes about effective teaching to students’ rating of effective teaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1989, pp. 529-536.


Teacher evaluation is an important method to promote teaching and student learning. The junior college and the university use either anonymous evaluating on the paper form or registered evaluating on the on-line system. It quite wastes manpower, time and paper to anonymous evaluate on the paper form. And registered evaluating on the on-line system may lead students to answer dishonest ideas. This paper proposed a trusty Web-based system platform for teaching evaluation. The main goals of the proposed system are to enhance the security such as anonymous, privacy and so on.
Based on cryptography techniques, a trusty Web-based system platform for teaching evaluation is proposed in this thesis. The requirements for this system architecture include: 1.Students who only have this course can do the evaluating, 2.It must be evaluated anonymously evaluation, 3.Each student of every course can only evaluate once, 4.It can not let the other person know the results of the teaching evaluation besides teacher and system administrator, 5.The results of teaching evaluation will not be modified and stole. We let the students use our system to make the evaluation in term with the questionnaire.
Participants included 533 undergraduates in National Chung Hsing University, and 248 sample size collected. They were from 18 courses of four different departments. The results of the questionnaire are: (1)75% of the students agree that our system can offer the privacy of the contents, (2)72.18% of the students agree that our system can offer the privacy of the identity, and (3)75.81% of the students prefer that the school to use our system. We can verify that our scheme will be trusted from the experimental results.

Keyword: e-voting, anonymous, teacher evaluation
其他識別: U0005-2607200616321000
Appears in Collections:資訊科學與工程學系所

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.