Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/21290
標題: The related analysis of intellectual capital and intellectual property rights in the law and economy-using mixed research methods for example
智慧資本及智慧財產權於法律與經濟間關聯性分析-以結合質性及量化研究之混合方法為例
作者: 賴毓晃
Lai, Yu-Huang
關鍵字: 智慧資本;intellectual capital;智慧財產權;法律與經濟;混合方法;法實證研究;intellectual property rights;law and economy;mixed research method;empirical legal research
出版社: 科技法律研究所
引用: 一、中文 (一)圖書 1.林大容譯(2001),Leif Edvinsson and Michael S. Malone著,智慧資本:如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值(Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Roots),台北:麥田出版股份有限公司,原書於1999年出版。 2.王海南、李太正、法治斌、陳連順、顏厥安合著(1997),法學入門,台北:元照出版,第三版。 3.參胡幼慧,質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例,台北:巨流圖書公司,1996年,第一版,頁9。 4.徐宗國譯(2005),Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin著,質性研究概論(Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Tehory Procedures and Techniques),台北:巨流,初版7刷,原書於1990年出版。 5.唐海華譯(2001),Tashakkori, A. and Teddie, C.著,混合方法論︰定性方法和定量方法的結合(Mixed Methodology Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches),大陸:重慶大學出版社,原書於1998年出版。 6.楊仁壽(1989),法學方法論,台北市:著者。 7.鄧穎懋、王承守、劉仲平、李建德合著(2005),智慧財產權管理,第一版,台北:元勝出版有限公司。 8.謝志偉、王慧玉譯(2010),J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark著,混合方法研究導論(Design and Conducting Mixed Method Research),台北:心理出版社,初版一刷,原書於2007年出版。 9.謝銘洋(2001),智慧財產權之基礎理論-智慧財產權法系列(一),第三版,台北:謝銘洋發生。 (二)期刊論文 1.司法院(2002),智慧財產案件審理法新制問答彙編,頁8。 2.沈冠伶(2009),智慧財產民事訴訟事件與行政爭訟事件之統合處理,法學新論,第8期,頁2-3。 3.陳彥鈞(2008),我國IC 設計產業減少申請積體電路布局原因之探討,雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士論文,頁57-59。 4.謝銘洋(2010),智慧財產權法-我國智慧財產權法近年來之發展與司法實踐,臺大法學論叢,39卷2期,頁201-203。 (三)網路資源 1.智慧財產法院網站,http://ipc.judicial.gov.tw。 2.司法院網站,http://www.judicial.gov.tw/juds/。 3.立法院法律系統,http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lglaw。 4.維基百科中文網站,http://zh.wikipedia.org。 5.智慧財產局網站,http://www.tipo.gov.tw。 6.濟部國際貿易局網站,http://cweb.trade.gov.tw。 7.中華民國統計資訊網,http://www.stat.gov.tw。 8.Google文件網站,http://doc.google.com。 二、西文部分 (一)Books 1.Benjamin F. Crabtree and William L. Miller,(1999),Doing Qualitative Research(2nd ed.),United Kingdom London:Sage.9. 2.Cuba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994), ”Competing paradigms in qualitative research”, In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research,105-117, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. 3.Lincoln,Y.S., and Guba, E. G. (1985),Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, 290-295,CA: Sage Publications. 4.Patton,M. Q. (1990),Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.).Newbury Park, CA: Sage. (二)Journal Articles 1.Aino Kianto, Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen and Paavo Ritala(2009), “Intellectual capital in service- and product-oriented companies.” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(3),305-325. 2.Andreas N. Andreou, Annie Green, Michael Stankosky(2007), "A framework of intangible valuation areas and antecedents", Journal of Intellectual Capital,8(1),52-75. 3.Andrew Kok(2007),” Intellectual Capital Management as Part of Knowledge Management Initiatives at Institutions of Higher Learning” Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management,5(2),181-192. 4.Camilo Augusto Sequeira, Eloi Ferna´ndez y Ferna´ndez and Ma´rcia Christina Borges(2009), “The best returns come from intangible resources:an integrated approach.” VINE: The journal of information and knowledge management systems, 39(1), 7-19. 5.C’eline Lagrost, Donald Martin, Cyrille Dubois and Serge Quazzotti(2010), “Intellectual property valuation: how to approach the selection of an appropriate valuation method.” Journal of Intellectual Capital,11(4),481-503. 6.Chung-Chu Liu(2010),” Prioritizing Enterprise Environment Management Indicators by Intellectual Capital Perspective”The Journal of International Management Studies,5(2),110-117. 7.Datta, L. (1994),” Paradigm wars: A basis for peaceful coexistence and beyond”,In Reichardt, C.S. & Rallis, S.F. (Eds), The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives,53-70,San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 8.Howe, K. (1988), “Against the Quantitative-qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas die Hard.” Educational Researcher, 17(8):10-16. 9.Jamal A. Nazari, Irene M. Herremans, Robert G. Isaac, Armond Manassian and Theresa J. Kline (2009),”Organizational characteristics fostering intellectual capital in Canada and the Middle East”, Journal of Intellectual Capital,10(1),135-148. 10.James Guthrie, Richard Petty and Federica Ricceri.” The voluntary reporting of intellectual capital” Journal of Intellectual Capital,7(2),254-271. 11.Kwee Keong Choong(2008),” Intellectual capital: definitions, categorization and reporting models.” Journal of Intellectual Capital,9(4),609-638. 12.Markus Arpa et al.(2006), ”Intellectual Capital Report 2006”, Oesterreichische Nationalbank,1-28. 13.MC Chen, SJ Cheng and Yuhchang Hwang(2005),” An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms'' market value and financial performance.” Journal of Intellectual Capital,6(2),159-176. 14.Mohan Subramainiam and MARK A. YOUNDT(2005),” The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities.” Academy of Management Journal,48(3),450-463. 15.Reichardt, C. S. and Rallis, S. F. (1994), “Qualitative and quantitative inquires are not incompatible: A call for a new partnership”, In Reichardt, C.S. and Rallis, S.F. (Eds),The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives,San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,85-92. 16.Shari S.C. Shang and Shu-fang Lin(2010), “A model of intellectual capital management capability in the dynamic business environment.”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 8, 15-23. 17.Siana Halim(2010), “Statistical analysis on the intellectual capital statement.” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(1), 61-73. 18.Weihrich H., (1982)” The TOWS Matrix-A Tools for situational Analysis.”,Long Range Planning,15(2),54-66. (三)Electronic Resources Wikipedia website,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innovation_system.
摘要: 
The current national economic development has gone through the "factor-driven", "efficiency-driven" and "performance-driven" stages toward the "knowledge-driven", "innovation-driven" and "value-driven" new generation.
The critical resources expand to intangible assets, and even the intellectual assets and valued assets, including those assets to create , manage, use, diffuse and produce, also actually showing off its innovative processes, products and services to contribute intellectual capital into products or services, even industries.
In this study, in view of existing research lack of common dialogue between law and economy, firstly tries in the projection in the legal system and legal reality, and applies the qualitative and quantitative research methods such as mixed research methods incarnating the recycle of theory criticism and theory construction.
Reviewing the difference of the formal theory and substantive theory of the law responds the legitimacy, relevance and harmony to shape the more dialogue channels and the more research topics, also to create new research methods.
For legislators, this research could acquire the value chain of the intellectual property law as the reference to formulate and amend. For authorities, it could react to the Legitimacy, relevance and harmony of the law making the legal system operate effectively. For the judiciary, it could adjust the judicial systems adjudicate the dispute. For the enterprises, it could outline the arrangement of the intellectual assets and the intellectual property rights creating the competitiveness and value. Finally for the researchers, it could shape the novel research methods for the cross domain issues.

現今各國經濟發展已歷經「要素驅動」、「效率驅動」、「效能驅動」階段,邁往「知識驅動」、「創新驅動」、「價值驅動」之新世代,驅動關鍵性資源亦由實體資產擴延至無形資產,甚而智慧資本及智慧財產權,其含納智慧資本及智慧財產權之創造、管理、運用、擴散與產價階段,並實際展露於創新之流程、產品及服務而產生價值 ,促成智慧資本及智慧財產權成為產品或服務,甚為產業。
本研究鑑於現行智慧資本及智慧財產權於法律與經濟之對話數據不足且缺乏共通渠道,試先投射於上位之法體系及法現實,並試由質性研究方法與量化研究方法即謂混合研究方法之運用及對話,體現理論批判與理論建立之競合及互賴之循環運作模式,檢視法形式理論與實質理論之差異,反饋法體系及法現實之正當、適切及調和,並期廣納各方領域論述,激起研究之辯論,形塑對話通路,開創更多研究議題,期可創獲新穎之跨域研究方法,並增補現行智慧資本及智慧財產權於法律與經濟之對話數據且共通渠道之不足。
本研究期為法體系有效維運之利害關係人開造實益,對立法者,期由體現理論批判與理論建立之競合及互賴之循環運作模式,創獲智慧財產權法價值鏈,作為立法、修法之參據。對業務主管機關,期開創法律與經濟之對話數據且共通渠道,檢視及反饋法體系與法現實之正當、適切,調和法規範執行策略,使法體系有效維運。對司法機關,期藉由司法審理與經濟成長之對話數據,動態調整司法審理制度及模式,有效裁決多元競爭領域紛爭,形成公平、正義、互信之司法秩序。對企業,提供法律與經濟之對話數據,整合智慧財產盤點及投資策略,勾勒出企業智慧財產之佈局及競爭圖像,創造競爭力及價值。對研究者,期激起跨域研究辯論,形塑跨域研究對話通路,開創更多跨域研究議題及創獲新穎之跨域研究方法。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/21290
其他識別: U0005-2508201111411500
Appears in Collections:法律學系

Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.