1. NCHU Institution Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 科技管理研究所
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/22544
標題: 科技自律、任務價值、認知行為控制以及任務-科技配適度如何影響學生對電子教科書的使用意圖
How technology self-regulation, task value, perceived behavior control and task-technology fit affect students' intention to use e-textbook
作者: 許芳瑜
Hsu, Fang-Yu
關鍵字: e-textbook;電子教科書;task-technology fit (TTF);technology self-regulation;task value;perceived behavior control;intention to use;performance;任務-科技配適度;科技自律;任務價值;認知行為控制;使用意圖;績效
出版社: 科技管理研究所
引用: Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992), “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication”, MIS Quarterly, 227-247. Ajzen, I. (2002b), “Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683. Ajzen, I. (1991), “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. Armstrong, C.J. and Lonsdale, R. (2003), “The e-book mapping exercise: Draft report on phase 1”, JISC E-books Working Group, London, available at: www.jisc.ac.uk//uploaded_documents/eBook_mapping_exercise_FinalReport_0403.pdf. Atkinson, J. W. (1957), “Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior”, Psychological Review, 64, 359-372. Baltes, P. B. (1997), “On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of development theory”, American Psychologist, 52, 366-380. Bandura, A. (1997), “Self-efficacy: The exercise of control”, New York: W.H., Freeman and Company. Bandura, A. (1986), “Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory”, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996), “Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning”, Child Development, 67, 1206-1222. Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009), “Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments”, Internet and Higher Education, 12, 1-6. Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2002), “Intuition, affect, and personality: Unconscious coherence judgements and self-regulation of negative affect”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1213-1223. Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996), “Self-regulation failure: An overview”, Psychology Inquiry, 7, 1-15. Benbasat, I., Dexter, A. S., & Todd, P. (1986), “An experimental program investigation presentation: An integration of the findings”, Communications of the ACM (29:11), 1094-1105. Brandtstadter, J., & Greve, W. (1994), “The aging self: Stabilizing and protective processes”, Developmental Review, 14, 52-80. Bolt, M. A., Killough, L. N., & Koh, H. C. (2001), “Testing the interaction effects of task complexity in computer training using the social cognitive model”, Decision Sciences, 32(1), 1-20. Chang, H. H., & Wang, I. C. (2008), “An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments”, Computers in Human Behavior, 24, (5), 2336-2356. Chang, H. H. (2009), “Author'sAcceptedManuscript”, Task-technology fit and user acceptance of online auction, Int. J.Human-ComputerStudies, doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.010. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998), “On the self-regulation of behavior”, New York: Cambridge University Press. Chang, M. M. (2007), “Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring”, Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 23, 187−196. Cheon, J. W. (2009), “Causal relationships between background characteristics, service utilization, satisfaction, and service outcomes (school performance): A path analysis”, Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 957-962. Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., & Newsted, P.R. (2003), “A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail emotion/adoption study”, Information Systems Research, 14 (2), 189-217. Chiu, C. M., &Wang, Eric T. G. (2008), “Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value”, Information & Management, 45, 194-201. Cole, J. S., Bergin, D. A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2008), “Predicting student achievement for low stakes tests with effort and task value”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 609-624. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995), “Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills”, Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143. Corno, L. (1994), “The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition in educational research”, Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22. Coutinho, S. (2008), “Self-efficacy, metacognition, and performance”, North American Journal of Psychology, 10, 165-172. Ctandall, V. C. (1969), “Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement”, In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement related motives in children (pp. 11-45), New York: Russell Sage. Davis, F. D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly (13:3), 319-342. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985), “Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior”, New York: Plenum. Dickson, G. W., DeSanctis, G., & McBride, D. J. (1986), “Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: A cumulative experimental approach”, Communications of the ACM (29:1), 40-47. Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999), “Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs”, Information & Management, 36, 9-21. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F.,with the assistance of, Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983), “Expectancies, values and academic behaviors”, In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146), San Francisco: W.H. Freemen. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002), “Motivational beliefs, values and goals”, Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998), “Motivation to succeed”, In W. Damon (Series Ed.) and N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. III, pp. 1017-1095), New York: Wiley. Efron, B.(1979), “Bootstrap methods: Another look at the Jackknife”, Annals of Statistics 7, 1-26. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistic”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. (2005), “A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16 (5), 91-109. Goodhue, D., & Tompson, R. L. (1995), “Task-technology fit and individual performance”, MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236. Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994), “Explaining the role of user participation in information system use”, Management Science (40:4), 440-465. Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997), “Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide web”, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 45, 37-64. House, J. D. (2000), “Academic background and self-beliefs as predictors of student grade performance in science”, engineering and mathematics, International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(2), 207-220. Hsieh, J.J.P.-A., Rai, A., and Keil, M. (2008), “Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged”, MIS Quarterly, 32 (1), 97-126. Jackson, J. W. (2002), “Enhancing self-efficacy and learning performance”, Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 243-254. Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000), “Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction”, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17. Junglas, I., Abraham, C., & Ives, B. (2009), “Mobile technology at the frontlines of patient care: Understanding fit and human drives in utilization decisions and performance”, Decision Support Systems, 46, 634-647. Junglas, I., Abraham, C., & Watson, R. T. (2008), “Task-technology fit for mobile locatable information systems”, Decision Support Systems, 45, 1046-1057. Karoly, P. (1993), “Mechanisms of self-regulation: A system view”, Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23-52. Kistantas, A. (2000), “The role of self-regulation strategies and self-efficacy perceptions in successful weight loss maintenance”, Psychology & Health, 15, 811-820. Kuhl, J. (1992), “A theory of self-regulation: Action versus state orientation, self-discrimination and some applications”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 97-129. Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (Eds.) (1994), “Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation”, Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe. Kuhl, J., & Fuhrmann, A. (1998), “Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The Volitional Components Inventory”, In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span, 15-49, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Kuhl, J., & Kraska, K. (1989), “Self-regulation and metamotivation: Computational mechanisms, development and assessment”, In R. Kanfer, P. Ackerman, & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Abilities, motivation, and methodology, 343-375, New York: Erlbaum. Landoni, M. (1997), “The Visual Book system: A study of the use of visual rhetoric in the design of electronic books”, PhD thesis, Department of Information Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. Lee, C. C., Cheng, H. K., & Cheng, H. H. (2007), “An empirical study of mobile commerce in insurance industry: Task-technology fit and individual differences”, Decision Support Systems, 43, 95- 110. Lee, H. K., Suh, K. S., & Benbasat I. (2001), “Effects of task-modality fit on user performance”, Decision Support Systems 32, 27-40. Lee, M. C. (2009), “Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8, 130-141. Lee, M. C. (2009), “Understanding the behavioural intention to play online games: An extension of the theory of planned behaviour”, Online Information Review, 33(5), 849-872. Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982), “Effects of text illustrations: A review of research”, Educational Communication and Technology, A Journal of Theory, Research and Development, 30(4), 195-232. Lin, T. C., & Huang, C. C. (2008), “Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit”, Information & Management, 45, 410-417. McGill, T. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2009), “A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact”, Computers & Education, 52, 496-508. Mikk, J. (2000), “Textbook: research and writing”, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien: Peter Lang. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1992), “An empirical examination of a model of the factors affecting utilization of information technology by end users”, working paper, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C. Multon, K. D., & Brown, S. D. (1991), “Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38. Najjar, L. J. (2001), “Principles of educational multimedia user interface design”, In R. W. Swezey & D. H. Andrews (Eds.), Reading in training and simulation: A 30-year perspective, 146-158, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Nunnally, J. (1978), “Psychometric Theory”, New York: McGraw-Hill. Pajares, F. (1997), “Current directions in self-efficacy research”, In M. E. Maeher & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, 1-49, Greenwhich, CT: JAI Press. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996), “Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications”, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002), “Motivation in education: Theory research and applications (2nd ed.)”, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993), “Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ)”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801−813. Rickman, J. T., Holzen, R. V., Klute, P. G., & Tobin, T. (2009), “A campus-wide e-textbook initiative”, EDUCAUSE Quarterly Magazine, 32, available at: http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/ACampusWideETextbookInitiative/174581 Schwarzer, R., (2001), “Social-cognitive factors in changing health-related behavior”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 47-51. Smith, C. D., & Mentzer, J. T. (2009), “Forecasting task-technology fit: The influence of individuals, systems and procedures on forecast performance”, International Journal of Forecasting, doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.05.014. Tenenhaus, M., et al. (2005), “PLS path modeling”, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205. Tice, D. M., & Bratslavsky, E. (2000), “Giving in to feel good: The place of emotion regulation in the context of general self-control”, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 149-159. Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003), “Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of internet self-efficacy”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43-50. Vessey, I. (1991), “Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs vs. tables literature”, Decision Sciences (22:2), 219-240. Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002), “Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class”, Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 151-163. Wiener J. B. (2004), “The regulation of technology, and the technology of regulation”, Technology in Society, 26, 483-500. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000), “Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. Wu, I. L., & Chen, J. L. (2005), “An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study”, Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 62, 784-808. Yates-Hendrix, E. (1991), “Collaboration and co-development: A formula for effective educational software”, International Journal of Instructional Media, 18(1), 43-53. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995), “Attaining reciprocality between learning and development through self-regulation”, Human Development, 38, 367-372. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995), “Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective”, Educational Psychologist, 30, 217-221.
摘要: 
學習教材推層出新，電子教科書的出現，亦對傳統的書面教材帶來衝擊。目前雖尚未有專屬的電子教科書，但在相關產品研發方面，已有一定的技術與成就。電子教科書不僅保留紙本教材原有的特色及優點，例如標注重點以及輸入筆記，亦提供更多相關的學習功能，如搜尋關鍵字及查詢單字等功能，以增加學習效率，而電子教科書也提供學生更多元化的學習方式，如紙本教材所沒有的語音導讀功能等等。
然而，除了電子教科書此項科技與學生學習任務配適以外，學生本身的能力亦是相當重要的因素。因此，本研究同時以任務-科技配適度，以及科技自律、任務價值以及認知行為控制，探討學生對於電子教科書的使用意圖，進而瞭解學生使用電子教科書的績效為何。經由問卷設計、情境模擬測驗以及統計，驗證了各項因素對於電子教科書使用意圖的影響。
經本研究發現，電子教科書（科技）可配適於學生學習任務，進而對於電子教科書的使用意圖有顯著的影響；而科技自律、任務價值以及認知行為控制，對於電子教科書的使用意圖亦有顯著的影響；電子教科書的使用意圖亦會影響績效。是故，基於本研究結果與發現，除了可有效探討電子教科書使用意圖的影響因素外，亦可作為將來電子教科書發展設計、或推行使用的參考。

Innovative learning materials are continuously being developed, and the emergence of electronic books has strongly affected traditional paper-based materials. Although, currently, there is no dedication that electronic textbooks (e-textbooks) are used for school materials, there are related technologies and achievements in terms of relevant product research and development. E-textbooks retain the original characteristics and functions of paper-based materials, such as the abilities of point highlighting and notes taking. E-textbooks also provide additional learning features, such as the use of keywords and vocabulary searches, which help to increase learning efficiency. E-textbooks provide students with variety of learning methods, such as the voice guidance function that is not available in paper-based materials.
Aside from the fitness of e-textbooks and students' task learning, students' abilities is the most important. Therefore, this study applied task-technology fit (TTF), technological self-regulation, task value, and perceived behavioral control to investigate students' intention to use e-textbooks. It also identifies the performance impact of students' usage of e-textbooks. Questionnaires, scenario simulations, and statistical tests were utilized to verify the influence of various factors on the intention to use e-textbooks. The results of the study showed that e-textbooks (technology) could be adapted to students' learning tasks to significantly influence their intention to use e-textbooks. Technological self-regulation, task value, and perceived behavioral control significantly affected students' intention to use e-textbooks. The intention to use e-textbooks also influences performance. The results of this study explored the factors influencing students' intention to use e-textbooks; this information can be as a reference for future developments, designs, and promotions of electronic materials.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/22544
其他識別: U0005-2607201023541800
Appears in Collections:科技管理研究所

Show full item record
 
TAIR Related Article

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.