DSpace CRIS
DSpace-CRIS consists of a data model describing objects of interest to Research and Development and a set of tools to manage the data. Standard DSpace is used to deal with publications and data sets, whereas DSpace-CRIS involves other CRIS entities: Researcher Pages, Projects, Organization Units and Second Level Dynamic Objects (single entities specialized by a profile, such as Journal, Prize, Event etc; because any profile can define its own set of properties and nested objects)
Learn More
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11455/22666| 標題: | 使用FAHP瞭解夥伴選擇因素—以「縮減產業數位落差計畫」為例 Using FAHP to Determine the Factors of Partner Selection-A Case on the "Bridging the Digital Divide of SME Project" |
作者: | 陳建瑋 Chen, Chien-Wei |
關鍵字: | Partner selection;夥伴選擇;e-business adoption;SMEs;FAHP;企業電子化;中小企業;模糊層級程序分析法 | 出版社: | 電子商務研究所 | 引用: | Al-Khalifa, A. K., & Peterson, S. E. (1999). The partner selection process in international joint ventures. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12), 1064-1081. Al-Qirim, N. (2007). The adoption of ecommerce communications and applications technologies in small business in New Zealand. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6, 462-473. Auster, E. R. (1994). Macro and strategic perspectives on interorganizational linkages: A comparative analysis and review with suggestions for reorientation. Advances in Strategic Management, 10, 3-40. Ayag, Z., & Ozdemir, R. G. (2006). A fuzzy AHP approch to evaluating machine tool alternatives. J Intell Manuf, 17, 179-190. BarNir, A., & Smith, K. A. (2002). Interfirm alliances in the small business: The role of social networks. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), 219-232. Belton, V., & Gear, T. (1983). On a shortcoming of Satty''s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega, 11, 228-230. Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2004). Strategic decision making: Applying the analytic hierarchy process decision engineering. London: New York Spinger-Verlag New York. Boender, C. G. E., de Grann, J. G., & Lootsma, F. A. (1989). Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 29, 133-143. Bouyssou, N., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Perny, P., Tsoukias, A., & Vincke, P. (2000). Evaluation models: A critical perspective. Boston: Kluwer. Bozbura, T. F., & Beskese, A. (2007). Prioritization of organizational capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 44, 124-147. Bozbura, T. F., Beskese, A., & Kahraman, C. (2007). Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 1100-1112. Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Wilkinson, T. J. (1995). Strategic alliances: Choose your partners. Long Range Planning, 28(3), 18-25. Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233-247. Buyukozkan, G., Kahraman, C., & Ruan, D. (2004). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection. International Journal of General Systems, 33(2-3), 259-280. Chan, F. T. S., Chan, M. H., & Tang, N. K. H. (2000). Evaluation methodologies for technology selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 107, 330-337. Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP -based approach. Omega, 35, 417-431. Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655. Chen, J.-K., & Chen, I.-S. (2007). Constructing Taiwanese small-enterprise innovative capital indices by using fuzzy AHP. The Business Review, Cambridge, 8(2), 159-164. Chen, S. H., Lin, H. T., & Lee, H. T. (2004). Enterprise partner selection for vocational education: Analytical network process approach. International Journal of Manpower, 25(7), 643-655. Cheng, C. H. (1997). Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research, 96, 343-350. Cheng, C. H. (1999). Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 107, 25-35. Cheng, E. W. L., & Li, H. (2001). Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Information Management & Computer Security, 9(2), 61-70. Chung, S., Singh, H., & Lee, K. (2000). Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategi Managemetn Journal, 21, 1-22. Dacin, M. T., Hitt, M. A., & Levitas, E. (1997). Selecting partners for successful international alliances: examination of U.S. and Korean firms. Journal of World Business, 32(1), 3-16. Dagdeviren, M., & Yuksel, I. (2008). Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Information Sciences, 178, 1717-1733. Daniel, R. D. (1961). Management information crisis. Harvard Business Review, September,111-121. Das, T. K., & He, I. Y. (2006). Entrepreneurial firms in search of established partners: Review and recommendations. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 12(3), 114-143. Deitel, H. M., Deitel, P. J., & Steinbuhler, K. (2001). E-business and e-commerce for managers. N.J.: Prentice Hall. Deng, H. (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21, 215-231. Deng, Z.-Y., & Tseng, K.-H. (1989). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of content characteristic and application (part 1). Chinese Statistical Report, 27(6), 5-22. Dong, L., & Glaister, K. W. (2006). Motives and partner selection criteria in international strategic alliances: Perspectives of Chinese firms. International Business Review, 15(6), 577-600. Drukcer, P. F. (1974). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Row. Dubelaar, C., Sohal, A., & Savic, V. (2005). Benefits, impediments and critical success factor in b2c e-business adoption. Technovation, 25, 1251-1262. Duran, O., & Aguilo, J. (2008). Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy- AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 1787-1794. Dyer, J. S. (1990). Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 36, 249-258. Eid, R., Trueman, M., & Ahmed, A. M. (2002). A cross-industry review of b2b critical success factors. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 12(2), 110-123. Eikebrokk, T., R., & Olsen, D. H. (2007). An empirical investigation of competency factors affecting e-business success in European SMEs. Information & Management, 44, 364-383. Feindt, S., Jeffcoate, J., & Chappell, C. (2002). Identifying success factors for rapid growth in SME e-commerce. Small Business Economics, 19, 51-62. Fink, D. (1998). Guidelines for the successful adoption of information technology in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Information Management, 18(4), 243-253. Fu, H.-P., Ho, Y.-C., Chen, R. C. Y., Chang, T.-H., & Chien, P.-H. (2006). Factors affecting the adoption of electronic marketplaces. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(12), 1301-1324. Geringer, J. M. (1999). Strategic determinants of partner selection criteria in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), 41-62. Glaister, K. W., & Buckley, P. J. (1997). Task-related and partner-related selection criteria in UK international joint ventures. British Journal of Management, 8, 199-222. Glaister, K. W., & Wang, Y. (1993). UK joint ventures in china: Motivation and partner selection. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 11(2), 9-15. Grandon, E. E., & Pearson, J. M. (2004). Electronic commerce adoption: An empirical study of small and medium us business. Information & Management, 42, 197-216. Haq, A. N., & Kannan, G. (2006). Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 29, 826-835. Harrigan, K. R. (1988). Strategies for joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 141-158. He, Z.-X., & Wang, W. (1988). Decision science--from great to satisfaction (1st ed.). Szechwan Province: Chongqing publisher. Hitt, M. A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L. (2004). The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organization Science, 15(2), 173-185. Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J.-L., & Borza, A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449-467. Hoffmann, W. H., & Schlosser, R. (2001). Success factors of strategic alliance in small and medium-sized enterprises--an empirical survey. Long Range Planning, 34, 357-381. Hsiung, H.-H., Yu, J. C.-M., & Seetoo, D.-H. (2004). Confidence building in partners of strategic alliance: An empirical study of Taiwanese firms in the information technology industry. Journal of Management, 21(4), 477-497. Hu, C.-Y. (2006). To determine the key factors that influence consumers to join the group purchasing online. National Chung Hsing University. Huang, L. (2006). Building up a b2b e-commerce strategic alliance model under an uncertain environment for Taiwan''s travel agencies. Tourism Management, 27, 1308-1320. Industry, commerce and service census in 2001. (2001). In A. Directorate-General of Budget, and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Ed.). Jian, Z.-F. (2005). Decision analysis and management: A unison framework for total decision quality enhancement. Taipei: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87, 171-184. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382-394. Kang, H.-Y., & Lee, A. H. I. (2007). Priority mix planning for semiconductor fabrication by fuzzy AHP ranking. Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 560=570. Karsak, E. E., & Tolga, E. (2001). Fuzzy multicriteria decision making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system in investments. International Journal of Production economics, 69(2001), 49-64. Kosko, B. (1992). Neural networks and fuzzy systems: Prentice-Hall. Kumar, N. V., & Ganesh, L. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the use of the analytic hierarchy process for estimating membership values in a fuzzy set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 82, 1-16. Kuo, R. J., Chi, S. C., & Kao, S. S. (2002). A decision support system for selecting convenience store location through integration of fuzzy AHP and artificial neural network. Computers in Industry, 47, 199-214. Kwong, C. K., & Bai, H. (2002). A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13, 367-377. Lai, S.-Q. (2004). The industrial competitiveness of SMEs on e-business. Yan Kao Shuang Yue Kan, 28(1), 54-68. Lee, A. H. I., Chen, W.-C., & Chang, C.-J. (2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of it department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 96-107. Lee, M., Pham, H., & Zhang, X. (1999). A methodology for priority setting with application to software development process. European Journal of Operational Research, 118, 375-389. Lee, W. B., Lau, H., Liu, Z., & Tam, S. (2001). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in modular product design. Expert Systems, 18(1), 32-42. Leung, L. C., & Cao, D. (2000). On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 124, 102-113. Li, S. X., & Rowley, T. J. (2002). Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among U.S. Investment banks. Academy of management journal, 25(6), 1104-1119. Liu, Z.-M. (2006). A large-scale survey on smes'' e-business adoption. Retrieved 12/24, 2007, from http://www.ithome.com.tw/itadm/article.php?c=39644 Lorange, P., & Roos, J. (1992). Strategic alliances. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Luo, Y. (1998). Joint venture success in china: How should we select a good partner. Journal of World Business, 33(2), 145-166. MacGregor, R. C., & Lejla, V. (2006). E-commerce adoption barriers in small business and the differential effects of gender. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 4(2), 1-24. Millet, I., & Harker, P. T. (1990). Globally effective questioning in the analytic hierarchy process. European J. Oper. Res., 48, 88-97. Muralidhar, K., Santhnam, R., & Wilson, R. L. (1990). Using the analytic hierarchy process for information system project selection. Information and Management, February, 87-95. Murtaza, M. B. (2003). Fuzzy- European J. Oper. Res. application to country risk assessment. American Business Review, 21(2), 109116. Narasimhan, R. (1983). An analytical approach to supplier selection. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 19(4), 27-32. Nielsen, B. B. (2003). An empirical investigation of the drivers of international strategic alliance formation. European Management Journal, 21(3), 301-322. Parthasarathy, S., & Anbazhagan, N. (2007). Evaluating ERP implementation choices using AHP. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 3(3), 52-65. Phan, D. D. (2001). E-business management strategies: A business-to-business case study. Information Systems Management, fall. Phan, D. D., & Stata, N. M. (2002). E-business success at Intel: An organization ecology and resource dependence perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(4), 211-217. Pidduck, A. B. (2006). Issues in supplier partner selection. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(3), 262-276. Ramanathan, R., & Ganesh, L. S. (1994). Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members'' weights. European J. Oper. Res., 79, 249-265. Salo, A. A. (1996). On fuzzy ratio comparisons in hierarchical decision models. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 84, 21-32. Satty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281. Satty, T. L. (1980). Analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill. Satty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7), 841-855. Satty, T. L. (1987). Rank generation, preservation, and reversal in the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Sciences, 18, 157-177. Satty, T. L. (1990). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. Pittsburgh, Pa, RWS. Satty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1984). The legitimacy of rank reversal. OMEGA, 12(5), 513-516. Sheu, J.-B. (2004). A hybrid fuzzy-based approach for identifying global logistics strategies. Transportation Research Part E, 40, 39-61. Simpson, M., & Docherty, A. F. (2004). E-commerce adoption support and advice for UK SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(3), 315-328. Stam, A., Minghe, S., & Haines, M. (1996). Artificial neural network representations for hierarchical preference structures. Computers and Operations Research, 23, 1191-1201. Stockdale, R., & Standing, C. (2004). Benefits and barriers of electronic marketplace participation: An SME perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17(4), 301-311. Stone, M. (2003). Sme e-business and supplier-customer relations. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(3), 345-353. Sun, H.-Y. (2007). Taiwanese depend more and more on the internet, the business opportunity for internet service can be expected. Retrieved 12/24, 2007, from http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=170 Talor III, F. A., Ketcham, A. F., & Hoffman, D. (1998). Personnel evaluation with AHP. Management Decision, 36(10), 679-685. Tatoglu, E. (2000). Western joint ventures in turkey: Strategic motives and partner selection criteria. European Business Review, 12(3), 137-147. Taylor, M. J., Mcwilliam, J., England, D., & Akomode, J. (2003). Skills required in developing electronic commerce for small and medium enterprises: Case based generalization approach. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 3, 253-265. Tesfamariam, S., & Sadiq, R. (2006). Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP). Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 21, 35-50. Tsao, H.-Y., Lin, K. H.-C., & Lin, C. (2004). An investigation of critical success factors in the adoption of B2BEC by Taiwanese companies. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 5(1/2), 198-202. Tsaur, S. H., Chang, T. Y., & Yen, C. H. (2002). The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management, 23, 107-115. Tsaur, S. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Wang, K. C. (1997). Evaluating tourist risks from fuzzy perspectives. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 796-812. Tuysuz, F., & Kahraman, C. (2006). Project risk evaluation using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: An application to information technology projects. International journal of Intelligent systems, 21(559-584). Tzeng, G.-H., Chiang, C.-H., & Li, C. W. (2006). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and dematel. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044. Ulas, D. (2005). Motives and partner selection criteria for formulation of ijvs in high-technology industries in turkey. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 3, 10-21. van Laarhoeven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty''s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229-241. Wang, J., & Lin, Y.-I. (2003). A fuzzy multicriteria group decision making approach to select configuration items for software development. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134, 343-363. Wang, L., Chu, J., & Wu, J. (2007). Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production economics, 107, 151-163. Wang, P., Wee, C. H., & Koh, P. H. (1999). Establishing a successful Sino-foreign equity joint venture: The Singapore experience. Journal of World Business, 34(3), 287-305. Wang, Y.-M., Luo, Y., & Hua, Z. (2008). On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and is applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 735-747. Weiss, E. N., & Rao, V. R. (1986). AHP design issues for large scale systems. Decision Sciences, 18, 43-61. Wong, J.-Y., & Chou, Y.-C. (2006). Decision analysis: Methods and applications. Taipei: Hwa Tai Publishing. Wu, C.-Y. (2005). The research of critical success factors for the implementing electronic commerce on small and medium business. Ming Chuan University. Wu, H.-L. (2007). Small and medium enterprise white book (1st ed.). Taipei City: Small and Medium Enterprise Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs. Wu, S., Lee, A., Tah, J. H. M., & Aouad, G. (2007). The use of a multi-attribute tool for evaluating accessibility in buildings: The AHP approach. Facilities, 25(9), 375-389. Xion, Y.-X. (2003). The survey of SMEs'' e-business adoption in 2003. Techvantage, 35, 110-132. Ye, T.-J. (2007). Regular internet users q3 2007. Retrieved 12/24, 2007, from http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=185 Yeung, J. H. Y., Shim, J. P., & Lai, A. Y. K. (2003). Current progress of e-commerce adoption: Small and medium enterprises in Hong Kong. Communications of the ACM, 46(9), 226-232. Yu, C. S. (2002). A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP problems. Computers and Operations Research, 29, 1969-2001. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353. Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process-a survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 16, 96-108. Zhang, P.-Y. (2007). Institute for information industry estimate the growth rate of internet shopping in 2008 will achieve 36%. Retrieved 12/24, 2007, from http://www.ectimes.org.tw/shownews.aspx?id=9875 Zhang, X. (2000). Motivations, objectives, locations and partner selections of foreign invested enterprises in china. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 5(3), 190-203. Zheng, J., Caldwell, N., Harland, C., Powell, P., Woerndl, M., & Xu, S. (2004). Small firms and e-business: Cautiousness, contingency and cost-benefit. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 10, 27-39. Zheng, R.-F. (2004). Business online in Taiwan 2004. Retrieved 12/24, 2007, from http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=92 | 摘要: | In Taiwan, the segregation exist between the large enterprises who can afford the Internet Technology and the SMEs who cannot forms the “digital divide” between these two groups of enterprises. To help the SMEs to bridge the difficulty in the adoption of IT, government in Taiwan implements a series of e-business project. “Bridging the Digital Divide of the SME Project” is one of them, which is implemented by the 12 e-business sub-contractor agencies and over 1,000 ISPs. In this research, we focus on the partner selection criteria of the 12 e-business sub-contractor agencies and ISPs in the “Bridging the Digital Divide of the SME Project”. Through literature review and interview with the experts who join this e-business project in practice, we develop two models to deal with our two research questions: 1) what the selection criteria for the 12 e-business sub-contractor agencies finding the cooperation partners (ISPs) in the “Bridging the Digital Divide of the SME Project” (for model 1); 2) what the selection factors that drive ISPs to find the capable SMEs implementing e-business (for model 2). FAHP is adopted to analyze the research data in two models. The results of the analysis in model 1 show that “ISP's top management support to the alliance (x11)”, “both sides have similar motivation and objective to the alliance (x15)”, “manger's communicating, operating, and managing capability (x23)”, “professional technique, capability to serve their customer, and the number of spots of ISP's store (x24)”, and “ISP's goodwill (x22)” are considered as important criteria for the e-business sub-contractor agencies to select the ISPs as their cooperative partners. On the other side, the analysis results in model 2 tell us that “trust between SME and ISP (y14)”, “support for cooperation from the internal of SME (y11)”, “SME's ability to integrate company strategy and Internet functions (y13)”, “SME's ability to manage and operate the business (y24)”, and “both sides have similar motivation and objective for cooperation (y15)” are determined as important factors for the ISPs to find capable SMEs for implementing e-business. Based on the results above, we provide suggestions to the government who want to implement e-business projects, the ISPs who want to join e-business projects, and the SMEs who want to join the e-business projects supported by the government. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11455/22666 | 其他識別: | U0005-0608200802300600 |
| Appears in Collections: | 科技管理研究所 |
Show full item record
TAIR Related Article
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.