DSpace CRIS
DSpace-CRIS consists of a data model describing objects of interest to Research and Development and a set of tools to manage the data. Standard DSpace is used to deal with publications and data sets, whereas DSpace-CRIS involves other CRIS entities: Researcher Pages, Projects, Organization Units and Second Level Dynamic Objects (single entities specialized by a profile, such as Journal, Prize, Event etc; because any profile can define its own set of properties and nested objects)
Learn More
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11455/22862| 標題: | 探討服務便利性如何影響資訊系統成功之研究 How Service Convenience Influences Information System Success |
作者: | 張鴻亮 Wibowo, Sony |
關鍵字: | 服務便利性;Service Convenience;資訊系統;資訊系統的成功;學生資訊系統;資訊系統服務便利性;Information System;Information System success;Student Information System;IS SERVCON | 出版社: | 科技管理研究所 | 引用: | Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. 1992. Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2): 227-247. Ahituv, N. 1980. A Systematic Approach Toward Assessing the Value of an Information System. MIS Quarterly, 4(4): 61-75. Anderson Jr, W. T. 1972. Convenience Orientation and Consumption Behavior. Journal of Retailing, 48(3): 49. Avizienis, A., Laprie, J. C., Randell, B., & Landwehr, C. 2004. Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. Dependable and Secure Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 1(1): 11-33. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. 1988. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16: 74-94. Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. 1983. DEVELOPMENT OF A TOOL FOR MEASURING AND ANALYZING COMPUTER USER SATISFACTION. Management Science, 29(5): 530-545. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. 1980. Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3): 588-606. Berry, L. L. 1979. The Time-Buying Consumer. Journal of Retailing, 55(4): 58. Berry, L. L., Seiders, K., & Grewal, D. 2002. Understanding Service Convenience. Journal of Marketing, 66(3): 1-17. Bollen, K. A. 1989. Introduction to Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Brand, W. s. 1948. REPORT OF THE DEFINITIONS COMMITTEE. Brown, L. G. 1990. Convenience in Services Marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, 4(1): 53-59. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. 1992. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21: 230-258. Bucklin, L. P. 1963. Retail Strategy and the Classification of Consumer Goods. Journal of Marketing, 27(1): 50-55. 38 Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix. Psychological Buletin, 56(2): 81-105. Cardozo, R. N. 1965. An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 2(3): 244-249. Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. 1995. On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2): 237-246. Copeland, M. T. 1923. RELATION OF CONSUMERS'' BUYING HABITS TO MARKETING METHODS. Harvard Business Review, 1(3): 282-289. Dai, H., & Salam, A. F. 2010. An Integrative Framework of Service Convenience, Service Consumption Experience, and Relational Exchange in Electronic Mediated Environment (EME). Paper presented at the ICIS 2010 Proceedings. Dai, H., Salam, A. F., & King, R. 2008. Service Convenience and Relational Exchange in Electronic Mediated Environment: An Empirical Investigation. Paper presented at the ICIS 2010 Proceedings. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319-340. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. 1992. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1): 60-95. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. 2003. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4): 9. Devaraj, S., Ming, F., & Kohli, R. 2002. Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics. Information Systems Research, 13(3): 316-333. Dillon, W., & Goldstein, M. 1984. Multivariate Analysis: Method and applications New York, USA: John Wiely & Sons. Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. 1988. The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2): 259-274. Ein-Dor, P., & Segev, E. 1978. ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT AND THE SUCCESS OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Management Science, 24(10): 1064-1077. 39 Etgar, M. 1978. The Household as a Production Unit. Research in marketing, 1(JA Press: Greenwich, CT): 79-98. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 18(1): 39-50. Gallagher, D., Ting, L., & Palmer, A. 2008. A journey into the unknown; taking the fear out of structural equation modeling with AMOS for the first-time user. Marketing Review, 8(3): 255-275. Gross, B. L., & Sheth, J. N. 1989. Time-Oriented Advertising: A Content Analysis of United States Magazine Advertising, 1890-1988. Journal of Marketing, 53(4): 76-83. Hackbarth, G., & Kettinger, W. J. 2000. BUILDING AN E-BUSINESS STRATEGY. Information Systems Management, 17(3): 78. Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. L., Tatham, W. C., & Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis (5 ed.). Upper Saddle River: NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. C., & Anderson, R. E. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition), Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition): Pearson Prentice Hall. Hamilton, S., & Chervany, N. L. 1981. Evaluating Information System Effectiveness -- Part I: Comparing Evaluation Approaches. MIS Quarterly, 5(3): 55-69. Holbrook, M. B., & Lehmann, D. R. 1981. Allocating Discretionary Time: Complementarity Among Activities. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(4): 395-406. Holton, R. H. 1958. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN CONVENIENCE GOODS, SHOPPING GOODS, AND SPECIALTY GOODS. Journal of Marketing, 23(1): 53-56. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cut-Off Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1): 1-55. Jones, S., Wilikens, M., Morris, P., & Masera, M. 2000. Trust Requirements in E-Business. Communications of the ACM, 43(12): 80-87. 40 Kelley, E. J. 1958. THE IMPORTANCE OF CONVENIENCE IN CONSUMER PURCHASING. Journal of Marketing, 23(1): 32-38. Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. 1971. Social Marketing: An Approach to Planned Social Change. Journal of Marketing, 35(3): 3-12. Kumar, P., Kalwani, M. U., & Dada, M. 1997. The impact of waiting time guarantees on customer''s waiting experiences. Marketing Science, 16(4): 295. Lai, J.-Y., Ulhas, K., & Lin, J.-D. 2012. Assessing and managing e-commerce service convenience. Information Systems Frontiers: 1-17. Lai, J.-Y., & Yang, C.-C. 2009. Effects of employees'' perceived dependability on success of enterprise applications in e-business. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(3): 263-274. Li, E. Y. 1997. Perceived Importance of Information System Success Factors: A Meta Analysis of Group DIfferences. Information and Management, 32: 13. Mason, R. O. 1978. Measuring information output: A communication systems approach. Information & Management, 1(4): 219-234. Molla, A., & Licker, P. S. 2001. E-Commerce System Success: An Attemp to Extend and Respecify The Delone and McLean Model of IS Success. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2(4): 131-141. Motet, G., & Geffroy, J.-C. 2003. Dependable computing: an overview. Theor. Comput. Sci., 290(2): 1115-1126. Murphy, P. E., & Enis, B. M. 1986. Classifying Products Strategically. Journal of Marketing, 50(3): 24-42. Nickols, S. Y., & Fox, K. D. 1983. Buying Time and Saving Time: Strategies for Managing Household Production. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2): 197-208. Palvia, P. C. 1996. A model and instrument for measuring small business user satisfaction with information technology. Information & Management, 31(3): 151-163. Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. 2002. Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1): 50-69. 41 Robey, D. 1979. User Attitudes and Management Information System Use. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3): 527-538. Rush, R. T., & Miu, C. 2006. What Academic Research Tells us About Service. Communications of the ACM, 49(7): 49-54. Seddon, P. B. 1997. A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research, 8(3): 240. Seiders, K., Berry, L. L., & Gresham, L. G. 2000. Attention, Retailers! How Convenient Is Your Convenience Strategy? Sloan Management Review, 41(3): 79-89. Seiders, K., Voss, G. B., Godfrey, A. L., & Grewal, D. 2007. SERVCON: development and validation of a multidimensional service convenience scale. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1): 144-156. Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. Yale, L., & Venkatesh, A. 1986. TOWARD THE CONSTRUCT CONVENIENCE IN CONSUMER RESEARCH. Advances in Consumer Research, 13(1): 403-408. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. 1996. The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2): 31-46. | 摘要: | 研究目的- 此篇研究的目的是為了檢驗服務便利性(SERVCON)對於資訊系統成功模型的影響，此研究將服務便利性(SERVCON)概念化，並透過六個構面: 決策、取得、搜尋、交易、受益、後利益來描繪資訊系統使用者在使用服務時所意識到的時間與付出。科技的進步和普遍導致服務便利性在資訊系統成功模型中被視為一個淺在的影響因素，此研究採用可靠性與有用性來衡量使用者所意識到的價值並測量資訊系統使用者的滿意度。 研究設計/方法- 這篇研究分析了290位來自中台灣的國立大學學生，並於近期使用過學生資訊系統(SIS)，其中包括大學、碩士與博士生。 研究發現- 研究結果強烈的支持服務便利性(SERVCON)是影響資訊系統成功的一個重要因子。除此之外，在使用者使用服務時，服務便利性的各構面能夠幫助服務提供者在決策、取得、搜尋、交易、受益、後利益等階段降低使用者所花費的時間與付出。 Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine effect of service convenience (SERVCON) construct towards Information System (IS) success model. This study conceptualizes SERVCON as dependent variable, six-dimensional construct (decision, access, search, transaction, benefit, and post-benefit) that represent IS user’s perceived time and effort when in interaction with the service. Technological advances and generalization of the IS users have led SERVCON to be considered as a potential influence of IS success model. This study purposes dependability and usefulness as user’s perceived value to measure IS user satisfaction. Design / methodology –This study conduct an analysis of survey data from 290 students from public university in central Taiwan, consisting of undergraduate, master, and doctoral students, about recent use of Student Information System (SIS). Findings – Results of this paper strongly supported that SERVCON is one of important factor for IS success. In addition, SERVCON construct can assist IS service providers reduce users’ time and effort to decide, access, search transact, benefit, and post-benefit when they consume the services |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11455/22862 | 其他識別: | U0005-2607201215095200 |
| Appears in Collections: | 科技管理研究所 |
Show full item record
TAIR Related Article
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.