Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/23222
標題: Re-examining the Investment Performance of F_SCORE : Evidence during the Financial Crisis
F_SCORE 投資效能之再檢驗-以金融海嘯期間為例
作者: 林紋瑤
Lin, Wen-Yao
關鍵字: Financial information;財務資訊;Value investing;Book-to-market ration;Financial Crisis;價值投資;淨值市價比;金融海嘯
出版社: 財務金融系所
引用: 參考書籍與資料 班哲明.葛拉漢(Benjamin Graham),「智慧型股票投資人」(The Intelligent Investor: A Book of Practical Counsel) Robert G. Hagstr (2006) , 「巴菲特核心投資法」(The Warren Buffett Portfolio Mastering The power of The Focus Investment Strategy), 參考文獻 國內文獻 [1]王錦清(民79),〈台灣地區股票上市公司之財務比率與股價關係之研究〉,文化大學企管系未出版碩士論文。 [2]方智張、姚明康 (1998),〈台灣上市公司的淨值市價比現象〉,《管理學報》, 15卷,第3期,第367-391頁。 [3]李建然、廖秀梅、廖益與(2003),〈股權結構、董事獨立性與企業經營績效之研究,《會計理論與實務研討會》。 [4]呂珮怡 (2010),〈券商推薦利益衝突度於金融海嘯前後的變化〉,國立中興大學財務金融所碩士論文。 [5]吳繼先 (2007),〈以財務報表資訊建構投資組合-台灣與中國大陸股市之應用〉,國立中興大學財務金融學系碩士論文。 [6]周建新、陳振宇、陳姿妤 (2009) ,〈以PEG、PERG 與PERDG 指標 建構投資組合與績效評估〉,會計與公司治理,第六卷 第一期,第57-78 頁。 [7]林尚志(2003),〈我國公司治理評等指標建立之研究〉,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。 [8]林美花(民81),〈財務報表資訊與股票投資報酬率關係之研究〉,《行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告》。 [9]洪榮華、雷雅淇 (2002),〈公司規模、股價、益本比、淨值市價比與股票報酬關係之實證研究〉,《管理評論》,21卷,第3期,第25-48頁。 [10]施純玉(民86),〈淨值市價比效果之探討〉,國立台灣大學財金系未出版碩士論文。 [11]苗建華(2009),〈價值投資:財務與公開資訊的應用〉,國立中興大學財務金融學系碩士論文。 [12]張明峰(1991),〈股權結構對公司績效影響之研究〉,國立台灣大學財金系未出版碩士論文。 [13]陳世章(1996),〈基本分析與股價報酬之關聯性〉,國立台灣大學會計系未出版碩士論文。 [14]陳美菊 (2009),〈全球金融危機之起因、影響及因應〉,《經濟研究》,第9期,第261~296頁。 [15]陳莞渝(2009),〈會計變數與股票報酬間之關聯性:以台灣上市櫃公司為例〉,成功大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。 [16]劉德明(1995),〈企業評價模型有效性之實證〉 [17]謝淑娟(1993),〈觀點探討股權結構與公司經營績效之關係-以台灣上市公司為實證〉,交通大學管科系未出版碩士論文。 [18]鄭凱元 (2009),〈金融危機下全球股票市場連動性與投資組合:使用因素分析法〉,國立台灣大學經濟學系碩士論文。 國外文獻 [1]Abarbanell, J., Buhee, B., (1997), “Fundamental analysis, future earnings, and stock prices.”, Journal of Accounting Research 35, 1-24. [2]Ali, A., Hwang, L., Trombley, M., (2003), “Arbitrage risk and the book-to-market anomaly.”, Journal of Financial Economics 69, 355-373. [3]Ball, R., Brown, P., (1968), “An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers.”, Journal of Accounting Research 6, 159-177. [4]Beaver, w., Clarke, R., Wright, F., (2979), “The association between unsystematic security returns and the magnitude of earnings forecast errors.”, Journal of Accounting Research 17, 316-340. [5]Chan, Louis k. C., Yasushi Hamao, and Lakonishok J., (1991), “Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan.”, Journal of Finance 46, 1739-1764. [6]Claessens, s. Djankov, s., Fan, J.P.H., Lang, L.H.P., (1998), “Corporate Diversification in East Asia:the Role of Ultimate Ownership and Group Affiliation.”, World Bank. [7]Datar, S.M., Feltham, G.A., Hughes, J.H., (1991), “The role of audits and audit quality in valuing new issues.”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 14 (March), 3-49. [8]Dechow, P., Sloan, R., (1997), “Returns to contrarian investment strategies: tests of naïve expectations hypotheses.” Journal of Financial Economics 43, 3-27. [9]Edward I. Altman (1968), “Financial Ratio,Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy”, Journal of Finance. [10]Fama, E., K. French,(1992), “The cross-section of expected stock returns.”, Journal of Finance 47 (June),427-65. [11]Fama, E., K. French,(1993), “Common risk factors in returns on stock and bonds.” Journal of Finance Economics 33 (February), 3-56. [12]Fama, E., K. French,(1995), “Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns.” Journal of Finance 50, 131-55. [13]Gadhoum, Y., Ayadi M.A., (2003), “Ownership structure and risk: a Candian empirical analysis.”, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 42 (Winter), 19-39. [14]Houlthausen R., Larcker, D., (1992), “The prediction of stock returns using financial statement information.”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 15, 373-411. [15]Joseph D. Piotroski. (2000), “Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers.”Journal of Accounting Research 38,1-41. [16]Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., (1994), “Contrarian investment, extrapolation and risk.” Journal of Finance 49(December), 1541-1578. [17]LaPorta, R., (1996), “Expectations and the cross section of stock returns.”, Journal of Finance 51, 1715-1742. [18]Lev, B., Thiagarajan, R., (1993), “Fundamental information analysis.”, Journal of Accounting Research 31, 190-215. [19]Lipe, R., (1986), “The information contained in the components of earnings.”, Journal of Accounting Research 24, 37-64. [20]Ou, J., Penman, S., (1989), “Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock returns.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, 295-329. [21]Rosenberg,B., Reid, K., Lanstein, R., (1985), “Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency.”, Journal of Portfolio Management 11, 9-17. [22]Sloan, R., (1996), “Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings.”, The Accounting Review 71, 289-316. [23]Stickel, s., (1998), “Analyst incentives and the financial characteristics of wall street darlings and dogs.” Woking paper, LaSalle University.
摘要: 
本研究目的在於檢驗在金融海嘯期間,Piotroski(2000)提出的F_SCORE在台灣股市的實用性。由於過去文獻對於F_SCORE的實證都是在穩定的經濟環境中,然而在金融海嘯震盪下,所謂的優良股是否仍能獲得較高之超額報酬或者較少之損失?
有別於Piotroski每年重算F_SCORE挑出好的公司,在下一年投資且不斷輪迴,本研究利用金融海嘯前三年期間之財務報表資訊,每年挑選出前25%高淨值市價比(BM)公司,並運用F_SCORE評分,將三年中至少有二年落在高分群之公司歸類為優良股,反之,三年中至少有二年落在低分群之公司歸類為不良股,再進行優良股與不良股之投資組合的績效比較。
實證結果獲致以下主要結果:在金融海嘯期間,(1)優良股之投資組合持有一年時,其絕對報酬顯著優於不良股投資組合。(2)優良股投資組合與持有同期間大盤報酬相比之超額報酬亦顯著為正。(3)優良股投資組合風險顯著低於不良股投資組合風險。(4)將金融海嘯前三年與金融海嘯後二年皆納入觀察,投資組合持有期間延長至五年,優良股投資組合績效仍顯著優於不良股投資組合與大盤報酬,但風險卻高於不良股投資組合。(5)利用本研究方法挑選出的優良股公司有規模小、內部董監事持股率高、財務透明度高三項特徵。
本研究結果除了驗證F_SCORE在正常經濟環境下為有效外,在如金融海嘯般的動盪環境下,也是有效的選股方法。此一發現可供投資者選股時的重要參考。

The purpose of this study is to examine the practicality of F_SCORE proposed by Pitroski (2000) in Taiwan during the financial crisis (2008). In the past, several researches which explore the investment performance of F_SCORE suppose that the economic condition is stable. However, whether F_SCORE can prove investors' investment performance efficiency in the financial crisis is still an open question. Therefore, in contrast to the investment strategy used by Piotroski (2000), we define the stocks, which the values of F_SCORE are higher than 8 and appear twice during the period from 2005 to 2007, as the winner, and otherwise. Furthermore, we select the winners to construct a winner portfolio for exploring the efficiency of F_SCORE during the financial crisis. The findings of this study are as follows. First, the 1-year raw return of winners is higher than of losers. Second, the adjusted-market abnormal return of winners is significantly positive. Third, the risk of winners is significantly lower than that of losers. Fourth, when we extend the holding period from 1-year to 5-year, the evidence shows that the performance of winners is still better than of losers and market portfolio but the risk of winners is higher than of losers. Finally, we find that the characteristics of winners are small firms, higher holdings of inside directors and higher degree of financial transparency. According to these findings, we conclude that investors can improve their investment performance by using F_SCORE in both stable and volatile economic conditions.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/23222
其他識別: U0005-1306201119224400
Appears in Collections:財務金融學系所

Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.