Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
標題: 高低速二段式冷卻水塔與變頻式冷卻水塔運轉成本之分析比較-以12吋半導體廠為例
Operating Cost Comparison of High/Low Two-Speed Cooling Tower and Variable-Frequency Drives Cooling Tower -In a 12-inch Semiconductor Factory
作者: 王森樺
Wang, Sen-Hua
關鍵字: high/low two-speed cooling tower;高低速二段式冷卻水塔;VFD cooling tower;operating costs;energy saving;變頻式冷卻水塔;運轉成本;節能
出版社: 機械工程學系所
引用: [1] Operating Manual, “Adjustable Frequency AC Drive User Manual”, Allen-Bradley Co., Ltd., 2005. [2] Operating Manual, “Operating Instructions User Documentation- SIEMENS MICROMASTER 440”, SIEMENS Co., Ltd., 2003.10. [3] Doug Smith, “Variable Frequency Drives & Cooling Towers”, [4] Timothy Keister, “Cooling Water Management Basic Principles and Technology”, 2005. [5] Chi-Yi Wang, “Cooling tower for automatically adjusting flow rates of cooling water and cooling air with variations of a load”, United States Patent, 2002.09. [6] 林助訓,“變壓變頻電源饋入感應馬達之冷凍空調系統最佳節能控制”,修平學報,第十一期,2005年9月。 [7] 財團法人台灣綠色生產力基金會,“變頻器應用Q&A節能技術手冊”。 [8] 林建儒,“變頻器教育訓練手冊”,2006年1月。 [9] 謝博丞,“冷卻水塔之節水策略”,碩士論文,成功大學,2004年5月。 [10] 陳清良,“半導體廠冰水主機與冷卻水塔最佳化運轉”,碩士論文,台北科技大學,2004年。 [11] 吳志榮,“冷凍空調冷卻水路系統的熱性能分析”,碩士論文,中山大學,2006年6月。 [12] 姚庭光,“冷卻水塔教育訓練手冊”,2008年4月。 [13] 許家榮,“降載下冷卻水塔之節水分析”,碩士論文,成功大學,2008年7月。 [14] 黃錦文,“冷卻水塔槪說與如何節能”,能源資訊網,節能專家園地。 [15] 林進煌,“變頻冷卻水塔之節能研究”,碩士論文,台北科技大學,2006年。 [16] 陳國珍,“冷卻塔撰鑑”,良機國際集團,2003年3月。 [17] 張懿中,“化學水質處理系統介紹”,2008年5月。 [18] 游博文,“大型海洋生物博物館儲冷式空調系統能源效益改善分析”,碩士論文,中山大學,2005年6月。 [19] 王文博,“冷凍工程,下冊”,大中華圖書公司,1972年。 [20] 羅金枝,“冷卻水塔熱性能之數據計算分析與實驗驗證”,碩士論文,中原大學,2006年1月。

Semiconductor is a highly energy-consuming industry. In order to reduce production cost, energy saving issues should be highly addressed. In semiconductor facilities, VFD (Variable-Frequency Drives) is widely used as a technique for energy-saving. In this work, detailed operating -cost items for two sets of cooling towers with two different control modes in the cooling system of a 12-inch semiconductor factory were analyzed. One of the two control modes is high/low two-speed, the other is VFD. The operating costs include power of fan motor, make-up water in cooling towers, processing fees for waste water drainage disposal and water treatment dosing. Time period for the measurement is one year. The average operating costs per RT (ton of refrigeration) per month were recorded from January 2008 to December 2008. The result shows that, in terms of energy saving, the VFD cooling tower is more effective in winter than in summer. Comparing the cooling towers operating at the VFD mode with those operating at the high/low two-speed mode, the average saving of the operating cost for the former is about 13.5% per month. This analysis recommends to substitute the high/low two-speed controller with the VFD controller. The payback time for this substitution is 5.5 years.
其他識別: U0005-2605200922293700
Appears in Collections:機械工程學系所

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.