Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/24317
標題: M型社會發展趨勢下,多品牌經營策略的探討-以W餐飲業為例
A Study of the Multi-Brand Strategy under the Trends of M-social -an example of W Group
作者: 彭志鴻
Peng, Chih-Hung
關鍵字: http://etds.lib.nchu.edu.tw/etdservice/view_metadata?etdun=U0005-0407200714411400;多品牌策略;品牌策略;M型社會趨勢
出版社: 高階經理人碩士在職專班
引用: 中文部分: 1.李怡寬(1994),影響品牌延伸領域及消費者對品牌延伸評估因素之研究,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 2.李貞德(1996),品牌延伸與消費者購買決策關係之研究 - 以手錶品牌為例,交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 3.李秀真(1998),消費者對品牌延伸評估因素之研究 - 以三C品牌延伸至通訊相關產品為例,交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 4.杜盈盈(1998),品牌延伸形式與消費者知覺風險對品牌延伸效果之影響,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 5.林育卉(2000),企業形象、顧客滿意與品牌權益之關係研究 - 以連鎖便利商店為例,銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 6.邱纓琇(1999),國際品牌授權稀釋效果之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 7.洪秀蓉(1992),影響品牌延伸評估效果因素之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 8.胡同來(1996),『品牌延伸的理論發展與評析』,中國工商學報,第十八期,頁 415-429。 9.徐子明(1999),品牌延伸之自我蠶食效果以口香糖市場為例,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。 10.袁志強(1998),產品涉入對品牌延伸效果影響之研究,淡江大學國際貿易學研究所碩士論文。 11.郭榮芳(1985),連鎖便利商店印象與購買行為之關係研究 - 台北市統一與味全連鎖體系之實證研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 12.黃俊英與賴文彬(1990),『涉入理論及其對消費者行為的影響』,管理新思潮,中華民國管理科學學會,頁17-39。 13.郭崑謨與池進通(1987),『塑造行銷形象重要構面之探討 - 貿易商服務形象之例』,中華民國市場拓展協會七十五年年會論文集,中華民國市場拓展協會。 14.陳雯怡(1998),品牌概念延伸與產品技術延伸對品牌延伸效果的影響,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 15.陳振燧與洪順慶(1999),『消費品品牌權益衡量量表之建構 - 顧客基礎觀點』,中山管理評論,第七卷第四期頁1175-1199。 16.陳振燧(2000),『產品概念策略、品牌命名策略和來源國效果影響品牌權益建立之研究』,管理評論,第十九卷第二期頁35-56。 17.許三源(1999),公司競爭策略、顧客品牌權益認知及品牌態度關聯性之研究-以台灣地區行動電話為例,成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 18.趙琪(1996),交易成本觀點下品牌延伸決策之研究,台灣大學商學系博士論文。 19.廖榮文(1999),品牌概念形象與廣告訴求對廣告效果之影響,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 20.蔡宗倫(1995),消費者對品牌延伸的知覺因素評估 - 以重複購買之替代性產品為例,臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 21.鄭漢彬(1995),中美日汽車品牌權益決定因素之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 22.鄭英輝(1998),品牌人格與產品類別對品牌延伸評價的影響,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,。 23.鄭秀倫(2000),品牌傘的企業背書效果,政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 英文部分: 1.Aaker D.A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity : Capitalizing onthe Value of a Brand Name, New York : The Free Press. 2.Aaker D. A. & K. L. Keller (1990),“Consumer Evaluations ofBrand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.54 No1, January, pp.27-41. 3.Aaker D.A. (1990), “Brand Extensions : The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, ” Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp.47-56. 4.Aaker D.A. (1992),“The Value of Brand Equity,”Journal of Business Strategy, Vol.13 No.4, pp.27-32. 5.Aaker, D.A. (1996), Building Strong Brand, New York : The Free Press. 6.Aaker J. L. (1997),“Dimensions of Brand Personality,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.34, August, pp.347-356. 7.Alba J.W. & J.W. Hutchinson (1985), A Framework for Understanding Consumer Knowledge Comparison and Inference Processing, working paper, University of Florida, Center for Consumer Research. 8.Alba J.W. & J.W. Hutchinson (1987),“Dimension of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.13, March, pp.411-454. 9.Barwise P. (1993), “Introduction to The Special Issue on Brand Equity”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.10 No3. 10.Barwise P. (1993), “Brand Equity: Snark or Boojum?” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.10,pp.93-104. 11.Bettmam J.R., & C.W. Park (1980), “Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience on Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Processes : A Protocol Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.7, pp.234-248. 12.Bettmam J.R. & M. Sujan (1987), “Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparative and Non-Comparative Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumer,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14, pp.141-154. 13.Blackett T. (1991), “The Valuation of Brands,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 9 No.1, pp.27-35. 14.Bloch P. H. & M. L. Richins (1983), “A theoretical Model for the Study of Product Importance Perceptions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.47, Summer, pp.3-11. 15.Boush D.M. & B. Loken (1991),“A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.28, February, pp.16-28. 16.Broniarczyk S. M. & J. W. Alba (1994),“The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.31 No5,pp.214-228. 17.Brucks M. (1985), “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, June, pp.1-15. 18.Celsi R.L. & J.C. Olson (1988), “The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15, September, pp.210-224. 19.Chakravarti D., D. J. MacInnis, & K. Nakamoto (1990), “Product Category Perceptions, Elaborative Processing and Brand Name Extension Strategies,” Advance in Consumer Research, Vol.17, pp.910-926. 20.Chernatony L.D. & G. McWilliam (1989), “Branding Terminology The Real Debate,” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, July/August, pp.29-32. 21.Christopher M. & B. Pitts (1969), “It’s Who You Sell,” Business Management, November, pp.26-31. 22.Cobb-Walgren C., R. A. Cynthia & D. Naveen (1995), “Brand Equity, Brand Preference, and Purchase Intent,” Journal of Advertising, Vol.24 No3, pp.25-40. 23.Crimmins J.C. (1992), “Better Measurement and Management of Brand Value,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 32, No.6, pp.11-19. 24.Crissy E.W.J. (1971), “Image : What is it,” MSU Business Topics, Winter, pp.77-80. 25.Dornblaser L. (1992), New Product Totals for 1991 Soar Past 16,000 Level, New Product News, Gorman Publishing Co.. 26.Dowling G. R. (1988), “Measuring Corporate Images : A Review of Alternative Approaches,” Journal of Bussiess Research, Vol.17, August, p.28. 27.Doyle P. (1990),“Building Successful Brands: The Strategic Options,”Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.7 No2, Spring, pp.5-20. 28.Elinor S. & J. Selame (1975), Developing a Corporate Identity, Chain Store publishing Co., pp.1. 29.Farquhar P. H. (1989), “Managing Brand Equity,” Marketing Research, Vol 1, September, pp.24-33. 30.Farquhar P.H. (1990), “Managing Brand Equity,” Journal of Advertising Research, August/September, pp.RC7-RC12. 31.Farquhar P.H. (1990), Managing Brand Equity, AMA conference Chicago, IL, June. 32.Frankenberger K.D. & R. Liu (1994), “Does Consumer Knowledge Affect Consumer Responses to Advertised Reference Price Claims?,” Rsychology & Marketing, Vol.11, May/June, pp.235-249. 33.Fry J. N. (1967),“Family Branding and Consumer Brand Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.4, August, pp.237-247. 34.Gamble T.R. (1967), Brand Extension in Plotting Marketing Strategy, ed. Lee Adler., pp.167-178. 35.Glenn W. C. (1974), Consumer Behavior : Theory and Practice, Richard D. Irwin Inc., pp.369. 36.Gray E. R. & J. M. T. Balmer (1998),“Managing Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation,”Long Range Planning, Vol.31 No5, October, pp.695-702. 37.Greg B. P. & R. Nelson (1985), Product attributes and perceived quality : Foods In : J.Jacoby and J.C.Olson(eds), Perceived quality. Lexington, MA : Lexington Books. 38.Gunther E. E. (1959), Evaluating Corporate Image Measurements : A Review of Techniques, New York : Proceedings of the Advertising Research Foundation, pp.61-66. 39.Hartman C. L., L. L. Price & C. P. Duncan (1990), “Consumer Evaluation of Franchise Extension Products: A Categorization Processing Perspective,” Advanced in Consumer Research, Vol.17, pp.120-127. 40.Houston M. J. & M. L. Rothschild (1978),“Conceptual and Methodological Perspectives in Involvement,” Research Frontiers in Marketing: Diagues and Directions, ed. S. Jain, Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp.184-187. 41.Jacfvelyn P. (1980), Public Relations in Business, New York, Harper & Row Publish Inc., pp.108. 42.Kamakura W.A. and G.J.Russell (1990), A Scanner-based measure of brand equity, working paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. 43.Keller K. L. & D. A. Aaker (1992),“The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.29 No2,pp.35-50. 44.Keller K. L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.57, January, pp.1-22. 45.Keller K. L. (1998), Strategic Brand Management, 1st edition, New Jersey : Prentice Hall. 46.Kesler L. (1987),“Extensions Leave Brand in New Area, ” Advertising Age, June, pp.1. 47.Kim P. (1990),“A Perspective on Brands,”Journal of Consumer Marketing, Fall, pp.20-30. 48.Kim K. (1991), Consumer evaluation of brand extension : An analogical reasoning perspective, Doctoral dissertation,Marketing Department, The Wharton School, Philadelphia, PA. 49.Kirkpatrick C.A. (1964), Advertising : Communication is Marketing, 2nd ed., Boston, Mass : Houghton Mifflin Co., pp.8-9. 50.Kotler P. (1997), Marketing Management : Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th edition, Prentice Hall. 51.Lane V. & R. Jacobson (1995),“Stock Market Reactions to Brand Extension Announcements: The Effects of Brand Attitude and Familiarity,”Journal of Marketing, Vol.59, January, pp.63-77. 52.Laurent G. & J. N. Kapferer (1985),“Measure consumer involvement profiles,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.22, pp.41- 53. 53.Lassar W., B. Mittal & A. Sharnma (1995),“Measuring Customer-Based Brand Equity,”Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.12 No4, pp.11-19. 54.Loken B. & D. R. John (1993),“Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact?”Journal of Marketing, Vol.57 No3, pp.71-84. 55.Martin G.S. & T. J. Brown (1990),“In Search of Brand Equity : the Conceptualization and Measurement of the Brand Impression Construct,”In : Childers, M. L., et al., eds, Marketing Theory and Applications, 2, Chicago,IL. : American Marketing Association, pp.431-438.
摘要: 
品牌是企業在顧客心目中的形象、承諾與經驗的組合,它代表一家公司對一個特定產品的承諾。「品牌」是行銷之根,沒有品牌的行銷就是「無根的行銷」。但在M型社會趨勢下,原市場的消費主力中產階級逐漸消失後,企業必須擬定品牌策略,改變商品結構與行銷方式,因為在未來只有兩種客戶:一種是上層階級客戶,他們越來越有錢,也越來越奢華,對他們來說,價錢不是問題,要求的是徹底奢華路線,價值、樂趣與商品的獨特性,對他們來說,那才是購買的關鍵。相對的,另一種也是佔據最大市場區塊的,則是中低階層的客戶,他們的人數逐年暴增,面孔卻和過去的窮人截然不同,他們期望以較低的價格,得到最高品質與最貼心服務的產品,這就是所謂的「新奢華主義」。
在這樣的新市場趨勢下,對以多品牌為經營主軸的企業集團而言,應該如何調整集團品牌的經營策略,本研究目的主要探討多品牌策略下,經由消費者是否知道不同品牌是出自於同一集團,來探討消費者品牌知覺之ㄧ致性,同時探討不同品牌價格差異化和消費者可支配所得高低之市場競爭效果。本研究以品牌知覺、互補效果及掠奪效果為應變數,以消費者是否知道不同品牌是出自於同一集團、可支配所得高低及品牌間的價格差異為自變數,利用SPSS10.0套裝軟體做迴歸分析。
經由這樣一個研究、調查與分析,探討出未來品牌拓展的方向,應是做向下延伸,且品牌向下延伸的過程,品牌應以母品牌的副品牌,尋求消費大眾的認同。

The brand is the enterprises in the so-called“mind shelves”of the customer with the associations of the image, commitment and experience, it represents a kind of commitments to the customers. For now on, the M- social trend, after the main middle class of consumption is fading on the former market, enterprises have to plan the new strategics of brands , to restructure the products and vision of the marketing. There are two kinds of customer only in the future: One is upper- class customer, of who are richer and richer, to live in more and more luxurious. The price is not a problem to them, but the needs in luxurious completely. Such of the products with the uniqueness of value, enjoyment are the key issues for them to purchase on an impulse. Comparatively the level of middle-low stratum, the left side of the M-social, is occuping the largest market share. And to increase suddenly year by year, in which of the members have a totally different appearance and demands with the ones in the past, oppositly, to expect the products with the high quality but the lower price and high-standard service, and this is so-called ”New luxury doctrine“.
Such a trend of new market under the M-social, the enterprise group with the marketing strategy of multi-brand, they have to revise it in order to follow up. The purpose of this research, to probes into the strategics of the multi-brands mainly: Observing the consciousness of brand through whether consumers know that different brands come from the same group, and meantime, the effect of the market competition caused by differentiation in price among the different brands and the level of consumer disposable income. This research regards the brand consciousness, complementary result and robbing result as dependent variables, and regards whether consumers know with different brands come from the same group , the differentiation in price among different brands, and the level of consumer disposable income as independent variables. And to make the regression analysis with SPSS10.0 .
After our research and investigation in this thesis, we verify the direction of the multi-brand expanding in the future, which have to extend downwards, and the course of the brand extends downwards should seek for the consciousness of consumer to know about the brand-subordinate with the mother''s brand.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/24317
其他識別: U0005-0407200714411400
Appears in Collections:高階經理人碩士在職專班

Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.