Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11455/24961
標題: | 企業經營策略與電子商務作法適配之探討與研究 The Study of Matching between Cooperative Strategy and EC Approaches |
作者: | 李佳霙 Lee, Chia-Ying |
關鍵字: | 電子商務;Balanced Scorecard;企業經營策略;平衡計分卡;灰關聯分析法;electronic commerce | 出版社: | 高階經理人碩士在職專班 | 引用: | 中文部分 王岷濤 (1992). 實用專家系統概論, 台北:科技圖書公司出版. 王昱傑 (2006). "利用灰關聯分析進行台灣地區貨櫃船公司財務績效代表性指標之擷取." 航運季刊 15(1): 1-17. 天下雜誌 (2012). 「最佳聲望標竿企業」調查揭曉. 天下雜誌社. 台北. 司徒達賢, (1999). 策略管理. 台北, 遠流出版公司. 司徒達賢 (2001). 策略管理新論. 台北, 智勝文化. 施能仁、劉定焜 (1998). "台灣股價指數之避險操作 - 灰色滾動模式預測." 灰色系統學刊. 柯承恩、陳依蘋 (2000). "平衡計分卡之理論與應用." 會計研究月刊: 29-31. 許士軍, (2004).企業策略. 台北, 普林斯頓國. 陳文華 (2000).運用資料倉儲技術於顧客關係管理. 能力雜誌. 台北, 能力雜誌. 陳瑜芬、莫懷恩 (2000). "企業全球運籌管理的物流策略規劃." 經建會研究專論. 晋宗義, et al. (2009). 糧食安全問題研究-以安徽省為例. 全國大學生統計建模大賽參賽論文三等獎. 邵強 and 王恆久 (1999). "灰關聯分析在新產品開發決策中的應用." 科學管理研究17(1): 1-5. 曾保彰 (2013)."服務導向架構(Service-Oriented Architecture,SOA) 簡介." 臺灣大學計算機及資訊網路中心電子報. from http://www.cc.ntu.edu.tw/chinese/epaper/20070620_1008.htm. 鄧聚龍, Ed. (2000). 灰色系統理論與應用, 高立圖書有限公司. 鄭華清 (2001).24小時的品牌經理人: 十倍速時代的行銷新戰略. 台北, 麥格羅.希爾出版社. 賴士葆、王秉鈞、黃佑安 (1997). 創新能力與新產品研發過程關析之研究. 科技管理研討會論文集: 90-99. 賴金田 (2004).台灣企業應用軟體(Business Application)產業現況及其創新活動與構面之研究, 國立台灣大學. 商學研究所. 行政院研究發展考核委員會 (1990). 行政機關生產力衡量模式之研究, 行政院研究發展考核委員會. 洪震宇 (2002). 企業標竿如何突破景氣僵局. 天下雜誌社. 260: 176-190. 英文部分 CCE (2007). Foundation of democracy: Authority, Privacy, responsibility, justice training manual (primary grade 1). Calabasas, CA:Center for Civic Education: 41-42. Chan, J. and T. Tong (2007). "Multi-criteria Material Selections and End-of-life Product Strategy: Grey Relational Analysis Approach.” Materials and Design 28(5): 1539-1546. Christopher, M., et al. (2012). Relationship Marketing, Taylor & Francis. Clark, K. B. and F. T. (1990). “The Power of Product Integrity.” Harvard Business Review. Novermber – December. Clausewitz, V. (1827). “On WarNew and Revised Edition with an Introduction and Notes by Colonel F.N. Maude C.B. (Late R.E.).” First Published: after Clausewitz’s death in 1831;Translated: from the German by Colonel J.J. Graham ;Transcription/Markup: by Charles Keller for Project Gutenberg/Brian Baggins, Andy Blunden ;Copyleft: Clausewitz Reference Archive (marxists.org) 2003. Permission is granted to copy and/or distribute this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. Dave Ulrich (2005). “The HR Value Proposition.” Harvard Business Press. Dess, G. G. and P. S. Davis (1984). “Porter’s (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance.” The Academy of Management Journal 27(3): 467-488. Dignan, L. (2011). “Cloud Computing Market: $241 Billion in 2020. ZDNet.”. from http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/cloud-computing-market-241-billion-in-2020/47702. Drucker, P. F. (1999). Innovation and Entrepreneurship, HarperCollins. Elaine Lawrence, et al. (2001). 網際網路商業, 臺北市 臺灣西書. Ertell, K. (2010). “The key to driving retail success with social media: focus on Facebook.” Retrieved from ForeSe Results. Etringer, B., Hillerbrand,E and C. D. Claiborn (1995). “The transition from novice to expert counselor.” Counselor Education and Supervision 35. Forrester (2010-2013) top 10 trends for mobile. Forrester Research (2013). Forrester’s top 10 trends for mobile in 2013. J. Koetsier. Forrester Research,.http://venturebeat.com/2013/02/14/forresters-top-10-trends-for-mobile-in-2013/#Eqw38MbPvLoc0uyj.99 Gartner (2010-2013). Digital Technologies Are Top Priorities. Gartner, Inc. Gartner Group (2013). Digital Technologies Are Top Priorities in 2013. STAMFORD. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2304615 Grant, R. M. (1996). “Toward a Knowledge – based Theory of the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal(Winter Special Issue): 109-122. IDC Taiwan (2013). IDC(國際數據資訊)公佈2013年台灣ICT市場十大趨勢預測. 台北.http://www.idc.com.tw/about/411.html IDC中國 (2013). 中國政府行業IT市場2013年10大預測. 孫溪海. IDC中國. http://www.idc.com.cn/prodserv/detail.jsp?id=NTEz IDC (2013). IDC Predictions 2013. IDC http://www.idc.com/research/Predictions13/downloadable/238044.pdf IBM (2013). “IBM 的服務導向架構:Smart SOA.” from http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tw/solutions/soa/. IDC (2010-2013)Top 10 Predictions. INVESTOPEDIA.COM (2013). “Market Share.” 2013, from http://www.investopedia.com. Jackson, S. E. a. S., R. S. (2000). Managing Human Resources-A Partnership Perspective, South-Western College Publishing. Kalakota, R. (1996). Frontiers of electronic commerce / Ravi Kalakota, Andrew B. Whinston. Kalakota, R. and A. B. Whinston (1996). Electronic Commerce: A Manager’s Guide, Addison-Wesley Professional. Kaplan and Norton (2013). "Balanced Scorecard Basics." Retrieved 04/20, 2013, from http://www.balancedscorecard.org/BSCResources/AbouttheBalancedScorecard/ tabid/55/Default.aspx. Kluyver, C. A. D. and J. A. Pearce, Eds. (2004). Strategy: A View From The Top (4th Edition), Pearson Education, Inc.,. Wiki.mbalib.com (2013). from wiki.mbalib.com Noe, R., et al. (2013). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management, McGraw-Hill Education. Paridon, T. J. (2004). “Retail opinion sharing: Conceptualization and measurement.” Journal Retailing and Consumer Services 11(1): 87-93. Porter, M. E. (1998). “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. .” New York: Free Press Republished with a new introduction, 1998. Power, D. J. (2006). “Free Decision Support Systems Glossary.” from http://DSSResources.COM/glossary/. Robbins, S. P. and T. A. Judge (2010). Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall. Robbins, S. P. and M. Coulter (2011). 管理學, 華泰文化. Singh, A. (Jan, 2004). “An Introduction to Virtualization.” from http://kernelthread.com/publications/virtualization/. STANLEY, M. (2000). “The B2B Internet Report Collaborative Commerce.” Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Internet Research. Staten, J. (2008). “Is Cloud Computing Ready for the Enterprise? .” . “Strategic and Business Planning Practices of Fast Growth Family Firms.” Journal of Small Business Management 39(1): 60-72. Van den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W.,de Boer, M. (1999). “Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities.” Organization Science(10(5),551-568). White, C. J. (2000). “The IBM Business Intelligence Software Solution,.” DataBase Associates, Inc., Version 4,. | 摘要: | 電子商務已與現今商務行為有著不可分割的關係,由以前的實體商務活動延伸至網路活動中,使得原本的商務活動變得更快、更省時間與成本的完成;而不論哪種商務活動,都承認電子商務是幫助企業實現策略目標的手段之一,只是電子商務業者對於實現企業具體策略目標的想法與企業經營者對策略目標的完成所應依靠的工具或作法間一直存在無形的隔閡,原因在於企業經營者關注的重心往往是實體面的商務行為及產生的效益,而電子商務專家較偏重在運用網路科技所帶來的刺激,兩者間的溝通少了一個媒介。 基於以上的動機,本研究將以企業之觀點,探討企業現階段所面臨到的網路世界,面對產品、服務及資訊交換等不同功能的企業交易,該選擇哪些電子商務技術來落實企業所重視的經營策略?Kalakota (1996)認為「電子商務的應用受企業採納後,可能帶來的效益仍是個未知數」,所以在探討這些電子商務技術時,若純粹只以電子商務的角度及建置成本來進行公司決策的擬訂,可能產生企業的經營風險。 故本研究乃針對企業經營策略與電子商務作法適配之探討做為研究目標。為了達成上述研究目的,主要為四個步驟,首先是探討公司重要經營策略,先以A公司之「企業經營策略」為基礎,再擷取天下雜誌票選年度「1000大調查」所用的「競爭力指標」,以及訪談企業經營者以增加「企業經營策略」項目,經過平衡計分卡整理後,把重覆或類似的項目加以合併,與電子商務無關的策略項目剔除後得到17項「企業經營策略」;第二個步驟是以設計「企業所重視的經營策略之探討」之問卷並透過問卷的回收,經過灰關聯分析法之資料分析,由統計值中萃取出6項「企業所重視的經營策略」,分別為「顧客關係策略」、「整合能力策略」、「差異化策略」、「創新能力策略」、「利潤率策略」及「人力資源策略」;第三步驟是探討電子商務技術與趨勢,本研究在尋找電子商務作法時,不只以internet之網路為電子商務作法之界限,而以企業對內與外的各項資訊、訊息及溝通的連結之間的作法為企業電子商務技術的探討;故本研究採取全球具有科技指標意義的IDC、Forrester Research及Gartner Research三家市調公司在2010至2013年內所做的「2010-2013年IDC台灣ICT市場十大趨勢預測」、「2010-2013年IDC全球ICT市場十大趨勢預測」、「2010-2013年IDC中國ICT市場十大趨勢預測」、「2010-2013年Forrester行動產業之十大預測趨勢」、「Gartner 2010-2013年度十大技術優先事項」資料,做為本研究分析電子商務技術項次之用,經以電子商務技術的角度整理三家市調公司之ICT相關報告後得到「行動技術與運用」、「雲端運算」、「企業應用軟體」、「服務導向應用與架構(SOA)」、「技術基礎建設」、「資安」、「分析與商業智慧(BI)」、「巨量資料(Big Data)」、「社交商務」、「虛擬化」、「端對端(End-to-End)」、「協同技術(工作流程)」、「IT管理」、「列印管理」、「顧客關係管理」、「舊系統更新」等之「電子商務技術或電子商務趨勢項目」共16項;最後的步驟是也是本研究最重要的產出結果,乃是將第二步驟所得到的6項「企業所重視的經營策略」與第三步驟「電子商務技術或電子商務趨勢項目」探討所得16項技術,透過「不同企業經營策略下的電子商務技術之運用」之問卷,找出第二步驟所得到的6項策略可用哪些「電子商務技術或電子商務趨勢項目」達成策略目標,透過電子商務專家針對現有之16項電子商務技術項目之問卷回收後進行比較與及分析後得到不同策略之最適配電子商務作法之結果為:(1)符合「顧客關係策略」經營策略時可運用的電子商務技術之適配作法為:「顧客關係管理」及「服務導向應用與架構(SOA) 」、(2)符合「整合能力策略」經營策略時可運用的電子商務技術之適配作法:「企業應用軟體」及「雲端運算」、(3)符合「差異化策略」經營策略時可運用的電子商務技術之適配作法:「分析與商業智慧(BI) 」及「行動技術與運用」、(4)符合「創新能力策略」經營策略時可運用的電子商務技術之適配作法:「行動技術與運用」及「分析與商業智慧(BI) 」、(5)符合「利潤率策略」經營策略時可運用的電子商務技術之適配作法:「分析與商業智慧(BI) 」及「企業應用軟體」、(6)符合「人力資源策略」經營策略時可運用的電子商務技術之適配作法:「企業應用軟體」及「協同技術(工作流程)」。經由此項研究程序得知在現今商業環境下,企業經營策略是公司願景的目標,故策略要達成,運用設計問卷之設計、發放與回收結果分析,可找到合適的電子商務技術,以幫助企業在達成該策略時所應執行的方案與資源之運用方式。 最後依據上述研究之結果提出本研究之結論與建議,以提供給期望能引導經營者與電子商務執行單位間的一個可行模式作為發展公司經營策略決策之參考,創造出更高附加價值及更強的競爭優勢之參考建議。 E-commerce is inseparable from today’s’ life. It has extended the traditional 9 to 5 business activities to 24 hours a day internet business. It has made the business activities become faster, quicker and cheaper. Regardless of the kind of business activities, one has to admit that e-commerce is one of the best ways to help companies achieve strategic objectives, but there has always been an invisible wall between the idea of utilizing e-commerce to achieve a specific strategic objective and the business owners’ original idea of success. It is because business owners only pay attention to the normal business activities and their profit, while the e-commerce experts focus on exercising e-commerce to generate even more business deals, their misunderstanding is caused by lack of a common ground. Due to the above motivation, this study will be based on the point of view of a business enterprise to discuss, when facing the fast-changing technology, what should the company do to make the company more competitive in products, services and the exchange of the information. Kalakota (1996) thinks "After the company accepts e-commerce, the potential benefit is still unknown." It could bring great risk to the company if it only focuses on the cost of building an e-commerce and the benefit of the technology products as the base of the company’s decision-making. This research is focused on discussing the best way to combine an enterprise business strategy and e-commerce platform as one successful business. In order to reach the above subject, it has been divided to four steps: First step, discuss the importance of an enterprise business strategy. A company for example, it uses CommonWealth magazine’s 1000 survey "competitiveness index" from the "Choice of the Year" as first index, and interviews with business owners to increase the "business strategy" as second index, after finishing the balanced scorecard, merge repeat or similar projects, after leaving the irrelevant issues out, what we have left are 17 different "business strategies". Second step: Through the questionnaire “A discussion over the company’s valued business strategy”, after grey relational analysis of the data, extracted by the statistical value of the six “companies’ valued business strategy". Third step: Discuss the e-commerce technology and the trends. During the research, the writer is not only exploring the internet as the e-commerce limitation, but also the inter- and outer –communication, the message and the ways of communication from the enterprise as a base to develop the research. This research adopts three market research companies’ 10 top technologies, 10 mobile industries and etc.. from 2010 to 2013 as the base to analyze e-commerce, we get 16 e-commerce technologies or trends as a results. The final step is also the most import output of this research: We combine the second step and the third step’s discussion, which generate 16 technologies and through the “different business strategy, the use of e-commerce technology” questionnaire, using suitability, then defined by the twenty-eight law, we got 2 issues which are the most successful items in each business e-commerce technology or e-commerce trends. Finally, according to the research’s conclusion and suggestion, the writer would like to provide a reference for the company as a new model for the cooperation between the company owner and the company executive unit, hoping to provide a more value-added service and other more competitive advantages. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11455/24961 | 其他識別: | U0005-1706201311510400 |
Appears in Collections: | 高階經理人碩士在職專班 |
Show full item record
TAIR Related Article
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.