Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/25171
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor蘇迺惠zh_TW
dc.contributor.author陳語涵zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yu-Hanen_US
dc.contributor.other高階經理人碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.date2013en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-06T07:24:29Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-06T07:24:29Z-
dc.identifierU0005-1708201310345500en_US
dc.identifier.citation中文部分 吳佩蓁,2013,財務報表穩健與公司獲利能力之關係,中興大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 姜家訓、葉鴻銘,2007,債權人監督、公司治理、會計師公費依賴度與盈餘穩健性之關係,中華會計學刊,第6卷,第2期,頁173-208。 高蘭芬、陳怡凱與陳美蓮,2011,代理問題與盈餘穩健性,會計評論,第52期,頁103-136。 陳美惠與金成隆,高等財務會計研究-理論與實證,滄海書局,頁311-318。 黃劭彥,鍾宇軒與歐建民,2009,股權結構、背書保證、會計師核閱與自願性財務預測精準度之關聯性研究,第10卷,第1期,頁29-62。 楊清溪、高惠松,公司治理機制對會計盈餘穩健性之影響——以台灣資本市場為例,中華管理評論國際學報,2009 年8 月第十二卷第三期,Vol. 12, No. 3, Aug 2009。 楊朝旭,會計盈餘及時性對公司治理結構之影響-以台灣上市公司為例,當代會計第四卷第一期民國九十二年五月,Journal of Contemporary Accounting Volume 4 Number 1, May 2003 PP. 1-28。 楊朝旭與吳幸蓁,2009,資產減損之決定因素與盈餘資訊性後果:論公司治理之角色,會計評論,第48期,頁67-114。 廖益興與楊清溪,2007,公司治理機制與財務報表品質之關聯性研究,財務金融學刊,第15卷第3期,頁67-112。 西文部分 Ahmed, A. S. and S. Duellman, 2007. Accounting Conservatism and Board of Director Characteristics: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43(2-3): 411-437 Ahmed, A., B. Billings, R. Morton, and M. Standford-Harris. 2002. The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt cost. The Accounting Review 77(4): 867-890 Ahmed, A. S. and S. Duellman. 2011. Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in monitoring managers’ investment decisions. Accounting and Finance 51: 609-633 Bushman, R. M., and J. D. Piotroski. 2006. Financial Reporting Incentives for Conservative Accounting: The Influence of Legal and Political Institutions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42(1-2): 107-148. Ball, R. 2001. Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public financial reporting and disclosure. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services: 127-169. Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(1): 3-37. Ball, R. and L. Shivakumar, 2005. Earnings Quality in U.K. Private Firm: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(1): 83-128 Beaver, W.H. and S.G. Ryan. 2000. Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research 38 (1): 127-148. Beaver, W.H. and S.G. Ryan. 2005. Conditional and unconditional conservatism: concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies 10 (2-3): 269-309. Beekes, W., P. Pope, and S. Young. 2004. The link between earnings timeliness, earnings conservatism and board composition: Evidence from the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12 (1): 47-59 Bliss, J.H. 1924. Management through Accounts. New York, NY: The Ronald Press Company. Bushman, R., and A. Smith. 2001. Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31(1-3):237-333. Bushman, R., J. Piotroski, and A. Smith. 2007. Capital allocation and timely accounting recognition of economic loss. Working paper, University of Chicago. Chen, F., O. Hope, Q. Li and X. Wang. 2011. Financial reporting quality and investment efficiency of private firms in emerging markets. The Accounting Review 86(4): 1255-1288. Chi, W., and C. Wang. 2010. Accounting conservatism in a setting of information asymmetry between majority and minority shareholders. The International Journal of Accounting 45(4): 465-489. Field, L., M. Lowry, and S. Shu. 2005. Does disclosure trigger litigation? Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(3): 487-507. Francis, J. and X. Martin. 2010. Acquisition profitability and timely loss recognition. Journal of Accounting and Economics 49(1-2):161-178. Garcia Lara, J., B. Garcia Osma, and F. Penalva. 2010. Conditional conservatism and firm investment efficiency. Working Paper, Universidad Carlos III de Marid. Garcia Lara, J. M., B. Garcia Osma, and F. Penalva. 2009. Accounting conservatism and corporate governance. Review of Accounting Studies 14(1): 161-201. Givoly, D. and C. Hayn. 2000. The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics 29(3): 278-320. Givoly, D., C. Hayn, and A. Natarajan. 2007. Measuring reporting conservatism. The Accounting Review 82(1): 65-106. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305-360. Klein, A. 2002. Audit Committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(3): 375-400. Khan, M., and R. Watts. 2009. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48(2-3):132-150. Kothari, S. P., T. Lys, C. W. Smith, and R. L.Watts. 1988. Auditor Liability and Information Disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 3(4): 307- 339. LaFond, R., and R. Watts. 2008. The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review 83(2): 447-478. MA, T. 2010. Accounting Conservatism and Corporate Investment. Working Paper,Washington University in St. Louis. Peasnell, K. V., P. F. Pope, and S. Young. 2005. Board monitoring and earnings management:Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 32(7-8):1311-1346 Qingyuan, L., and Tielin W. 2010. Financial reporting quality and corporate investment efficiency: Chinese experience. Nankai Business Review International 1(2): 197-213. Shackelford, D. A. and T. Shevlin. 2001. Empirical Tax Research in Accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31(1-3): 321-387. Smith, C., and R. Watts. 1992. The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies. Journal of Financial economics 32(3): 263-292. Suijs, J. 2008. On the value relevance of asymmetric financial reporting policies. Journal of Accounting Research 46(5): 1297-1321. Verrecchia, R. 2001. Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32(1-3): 91-180. Watts, R. 2003a. Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and Implications. Accounting Horizons 17(3): 207-221. Watts, R. 2003b. Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and reach opportunities. Accounting Horizons 17(4): 287-301. Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1978. Toward a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53(January): 112-134.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11455/25171-
dc.description.abstract盈餘時效性不對稱之條件穩健為傳統的會計慣例,及時認列損失的條件穩健會計可以減少資訊不對稱,避免經理人從事淨現值為負的投資計劃,有助於公司取得低成本的外部資金,增加投資機會。投資活動是公司獲利成長的必備條件之一,及時認列損失的條件穩健會計可以提高公司的投資效率,進而公司改善財務績效。考量公司投資效率的改善並不容易具體衡量,本研究擬探討盈餘時效性不對稱性與公司投資後續年度獲利能力之關係,以間接檢測條件穩健對公司投資效率之影響。 本研究係以2005年至2008年臺灣上市公司為研究樣本,採用Basu (1997)盈餘時效性不對稱之模型來探討條件穩健與公司獲利能力之關係,有關獲利能力之衡量係採用毛利率及營業活動現金流量兩項績效指標。 本研究實證結果發現,盈餘時效性不對稱之條件穩健與公司投資後續三年度之毛利率與營業活動現金流量呈正相關,表示公司及時認列損失可以改善公司投資後續年度之獲利能力。本研究認為盈餘時效性不對稱之條件穩健可以改善公司投資效率,進而促使投資後續年度獲利能力提高。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAsymmetric timeliness of earnings, conditional conservatism, is a traditional accounting policy. Timely loss recognition can reduce information asymmetry, avoid managers from undertaking negative net present value projects, help firms obtain external funds at lower costs and increase investment opportunities. Conditional accounting conservatism can improve investment efficiency therefore improve firm’s future profitability. Because investment efficiency is not directly observable, this study examines the relation between timely loss recognition and future profitability to draw inferences about the impact of conditional conservatism on investment efficiency. Using a sample of firms listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange over the 2005 to 2008 period, this study uses Basu’s (1997) asymmetric timeliness of earnings model to measure conditional conservatism. This study uses two proxies, profit margin and cash flows from operation, to measure firms’ profitability. The empirical results show that asymmetric timeliness of earnings is positive association with profit margin and cash flows from operation subsequent to investment decisions. This study suggests that timely loss recognition can improve firms future profitability, which indirectly exhibits that conditional conservatism can improve investment efficiency.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究目的與貢獻 2 第三節 研究架構與流程圖 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 穩健會計之概述 5 第二節 穩健會計四大經濟應用 6 第三節 公司治理與財務報告品質之關係 8 第四節 盈餘時效性不對稱與公司獲利能力之關係 10 第三章 研究方法 11 第一節 研究假說 11 第二節 變數定義 12 第三節 實證模型之建立 15 第四章 實證結果 17 第一節 樣本選取與資料來源 17 第二節 實證結果 20 第五章 結果與建議 28 第一節 研究結果 28 第二節 研究限制與建議 29 參考文獻 30 中文部分 30 西文部分 31zh_TW
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.publisher高階經理人碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.relation.urihttp://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0005-1708201310345500en_US
dc.subject盈餘時效性不對稱zh_TW
dc.subjectAsymmetric timeliness of earningsen_US
dc.subject條件穩健zh_TW
dc.subject獲利能力zh_TW
dc.subject毛利率zh_TW
dc.subject營業活動現金流量zh_TW
dc.subjectconditional conservatismen_US
dc.subjectprofitabilityen_US
dc.subjectprofit marginen_US
dc.subjectcash flows from operationen_US
dc.title盈餘時效性不對稱與公司獲利能力關係之探討zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effect of Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings On Firm Profitabilityen_US
dc.typeThesis and Dissertationzh_TW
item.languageiso639-1zh_TW-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeThesis and Dissertation-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextno fulltext-
Appears in Collections:高階經理人碩士在職專班
Show simple item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.