Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/27321
標題: 菲律賓相關產業的利害關係人看待生質能源永續發展之觀點
Relevant Stakeholders’ Perception on Sustainable Development in the Biofuel Production of the Philippines
作者: 賈欣棠
關鍵字: 生質燃料;biofuel production;利害關係人認知;菲律賓;stakeholders’ perception;Philippines
出版社: 國際農學研究所
引用: Acosta-Michlik, L., Lucht, W., Bondeau, A. and Beringer, T. 2011. Integrated Assessment of Sustainability Trade-offs and Pathways for Global Bioenergy Production: Framing a Novel Hybrid Approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15:2791-2809. Agrawal, A. 1995. Dismantling the Divide between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge. Development and Change 24:413-439. Aquino, M. U. 2010. ACAP ensures support to DA programs. BAR Chronicle 8: 2. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC), 2006. APERC Energy Supply and Demand Outlook. 2006. Volumes 1&2. Asia Pacific Energy Research Center (APERC). Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC), 2010. APERC Energy Overview 2010. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC). Bulan, C.A. 2001. Biodiesel as an alternative fuel leading to cleaner environment. Industrial Technology Development Institute: Manila, Philippines. Bureau of Agricultural Statistics (BAS) 2010A. Cassava: Area Harvested 2010. www.bas.gov.ph. Bureau of Agricultural Statistics (BAS) 2010B. Cassava: Volume of Production 2010. www.bas.gov.ph. Chakrabortty, A. 2008. Secret report: biofuel caused food crisis. Internal World Bank study delivers blow to plant energy drive. The Guardian. Clancy, J. S. 2008. Are Biofuels Pro-Poor? Assessing the Evidence. European Jouranal of Development Research. 20:416-431. Department of Energy, (DOE). 2012A. Coal. http://doe.gov.ph/ER/Coal.htm. DOE. Fort Bonifacio, Philippines. Date Accessed: January 13, 2012. Department of Energy, (DOE). 2012B. Renewable Energy. http://www.doe.gov.ph/ER /Renenergy.htm. DOE. Fort Bonifacio, Philippines. Date Accessed: January 13, 2012. Department of Energy, (DOE). 2012C. Alternative Fuels. http://www.doe.gov.ph/AF/ Biofuels.htm. DOE. Fort Bonifacio, Philippines. Date Accessed: January 13, 2012. Department of Energy, (DOE). 2012D. Bioethanol. http://www.doe.gov.ph/AF/ Bioethanol.htm. DOE. Fort Bonifacio, Philippines. Date Accessed: January 13, 2012. Department of Energy, (DOE). 2012E. Biodiesel. http://www.doe.gov.ph/AF/ Biodiesel.htm. DOE. Fort Bonifacio, Philippines. Date Accessed: January 13, 2012. Doornsbosch, R. and Steenblik, R. 2007. Biofuels: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease? Paris: OECD http://www.cfr.org/publication/14293/oecd.html. Dumlao, T. A. 2010. Fulfilling the Promise of Growth in Mindanao. Philippine Daily Inquirer. www.inquirer.net. Eickhout, B. et al. 2008. Local and Global Consequences of the EU Renewable Directive for Biofuels: Testing the Sustainability Criteria. pp. 70 in MNP Report, vol. 50143001. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Ewing, M. and Msangi, S. 2009. Biofuels Production in Developing Countries: Assessing Trade-offs in Welfare and Food Security. Environmental Science and Policy 12:520-528. Ewing, R. 2008. Brazil environment agency seizes Amazon soy, corn. Reuters UK. Grunwald, M. 2008. The Clean Energy Scam. Time Magazine. Hazell, P. and Pachauri, R. K. 2006. Overview. IN: Bioenergy and Agriculture: Promises and Challenges. pp.3-4 Focus. Washington: IFPRI. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/focus14.pdf. Hughes, E. 2000. Biomass Cofiring: Economics, Policy and Opportunities. Biomass and Bioenergy 19:457-465. Jumbe, C. B. L., Msiska F. B. M. and Madjera, M. 2009. Biofuels Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Are the policies conducive?. Energy Policy: 37: 4980-4986. Lee, D. R. 2005. Agricultural Sustainability and Technology Adoption: Issues and Policies for Developing Countries. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 87 (Number 5, 2005): 1325–1334. Li, J. F. and Hu, R. Q. 2003. Sustainable Biomass Production in China. Biomass and Bioenergy 25: 483-499. Lichtfouse, E., Navarette M., et al. 2009. Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Sustainable Agriculture, Vol. 1. Springer, EDP Sciences. Londo, M. and Deurwaarder, E. 2007. Developments in EU biofuels policy related to sustainability issues: overview and outlook. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1: 292–302. Maruyama, A., A.P. Aquino, X.B. Dimaranan and S. Kai. 2009. Potential of biofuel crop production in the Philippines: A preliminary analysis. Hort Research 63: 67-76. McCormick, K. and Kaberger, T. 2007. Key Barriers for Bioenergy in Europe: Economic Conditions, Know-How and Institutional Capacity and supply Chain Co-ordination. Biomass and Bioenergy 31: 443-452. Mendoza, T. C. 2008. Agronomic features, ethanol yields and resource use of four feedstocks for ethanol production in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Crop Science 33(1): 21-36. Monbiot, G. 2007. If we want to save the planet, we need a five-year freeze on biofuels. The Guardian. Ravindranath, N. H. and Balachandra, P. 2009. Sustainable Bioenergy for India: Technical, Economic and Policy Analysis. Energy 34: 1003-1013. REN21. 2009. Renewable Global Status Report 2009 Update. Paris: Renewable Energy policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21). Republic Act No. 9367. 2006. S. No. 2226. 13th Cong. 3rd Sess. The Royal Society of London. 2008. Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges. (No. RS Policy document 01/08). London: The Royal Society. Thornley, P. and Cooper, D. 2008. The Effectiveness of Policy Instruments in Promoting Bioenergy. Biomass and Bioenergy 32: 903-913. USAID. 2007. Philippines Country Report. International Resources Group. Rural Development Mission for Asia. Bangkok, Thailand. Walsh, B. 2008, The Trouble with Biofuels. Time Magazine. Worldwatch Institute. 2007. Biofuels for Transport: Global Potential and Implications for Energy and Agriculture. London: Earthscan.
摘要: 
本研究探討了十個利害關係人,對於菲律賓國內在生產生質燃料上永續發展的認知。結果顯示生質燃料被視為達到永續發展的手段,但若聚焦於「經濟」永續發展的層面上,這些利害關係人則有更多的考量。本研究的結果也找出了菲律賓生質燃料尚未完全被經營運作的最主要因素,而這也是生產面上的經濟問題。
生質燃料生產被認為是一項市場上的突破性發展,利用農作物產出乾淨且可再生的能源。但當前生質燃料生產力不足,一般認為是由於在農業生產中,缺少能夠生產生質燃料的設施來應付日益增加的生質能源需求。雖然已有淺層的生質燃料資訊網絡,受訪的農業生產者基於對永續發展的關懷,也有意願從事生質燃料生產,但設施的缺乏讓他們無法實行。
對於提升菲律賓境內生質燃料的認識和採行,一個健全的生質燃料市場以及足夠的生質燃料設施,相信可成為一個有力的因素。

This study explores the perception of the ten relevant stakeholders about sustainable development using biofuel production in the Philippines as the test case. The results presented in this study imply that the biofuel production is perceived as a method towards the achievement of sustainable development. However, there are various considerations amongst stakeholders that focus within a dimension of sustainable development that is on economic development. This study also answers the priority concerns that keeps the full operation of biofuel production in the country, as well as it’s the economic issues on the production aspects.
Biofuel production is seen to be a breakthrough in the market as an agricultural product for the production of clean and renewable energy. However, the inadequate biofuel supply is perceived to be rooted in the lack of the production facilities that could produce enough biofuel given its constantly increasing demand. Though there is a shallow information network on biofuels, the interviewed agricultural producers concern towards sustainable development provides them the willingness to produce biofuels; however the absence of production facilities hinders them from doing so.
A well-established market and adequate production facilities of the biofuel, is believed to be a strong factor that will promote awareness and adoption of the biofuel production in the Philippines.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/27321
其他識別: U0005-2808201213113500
Appears in Collections:國際農學研究所

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-101-7099030755-1.pdf1.37 MBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network    Request a copy
Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.