Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11455/27898
標題: | 家庭娛樂消遣及教育文化支出之影響因素分析-家庭生命週期理論之應用 A Study on the Factors Affecting Family Recreation and Education Expenditure-An Application of Family Life Cycle Theory |
作者: | 陳勇實 Chen, Yung-Shih |
關鍵字: | Recreation Expenditure;娛樂消遣支出;Education Expenditure;Family Life Cycle;教育文化支出;家庭生命週期 | 出版社: | 應用經濟學系所 | 引用: | 參考文獻 中文部分: 1.台灣地區家庭收支調查報告,2004,行政院主計處。 2.李庸三,1976,人口因素對台灣家庭消費型態之影響-民國 53年台灣家庭收支調查報告之計量分析,博士論文。 3.林怡珍,2003,台灣家計單位休閒需求之研究,碩士論文。 4.林建煌,2000,行銷管理,台北:智勝文化。 5.林榮斌,1991,以家庭生命週期為基礎分析家庭醫療費用的 特性,碩士論文。 6.周麗芳,1996,不同社會階層、生命週期、區位之家庭消費 型態研究,台灣大學農業推廣學研究所碩士論文。 7.周秀華,2002,深度休閒者學習經驗之研究,高雄師範大學 成人教育研究所碩士論文。 8.高淑貴,1991,家庭社會學,台北:黎明文化。 9.孫智嫻,1991,農家婦女勞動使用研究-生命週期理論之應 用,中興大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文。 10.許嘉棟及郭曼瑾,1987,台灣地區的消費體系、成員人數與社 會福利分配,經濟論文叢刊,第十五輯第二期。 11.梁愛玲,1995,台北市雙薪家庭休閒與生命週期關係之探討, 台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 12.唐祖湘,2001,家庭服裝消費空間選擇之研究-以永和市婦女 代理消費者為例,東吳大學社會學系碩士論文。 13.黃千珊,1999,家庭生命週期與家庭休閒活動決策歷程之研究- 以基隆市核心家庭為例,高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士 論文。 14.葉日武(譯),2002,Hawkins, Best & Coney 著,消費者行 為,台北:前程文化。 15.劉鶯釧,1981,家庭生命循環對所得分配之影響-台灣之實證分 析,台灣大學經濟研究所博士論文。 16.劉鶯釧,1982,台灣地區家庭所配因素分析,中央研究院三民主 義研究所,第三次社會指標會議。 17.賴景昌,2004,總體經濟學,台北:雙葉書廊。 18.羅安琍,1999,不同家庭生命週期與社經背景婦女之服裝消費研 究,台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。 19.羅紀瓊,1984,台灣地區家庭部門的消費型態-線性對數支出體 系與多項式對數函之比較,經濟論文,中央研究院經濟研究 所,第十二卷第二期。 20.嚴世傑,1987,SPSS/PC 使用手冊,台北:儒林圖書。 21.蘇淑真,1979,台灣農業消費支出之變動及其影響因素之分 析,中興大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文。 西文部分: 1.Ando, A. and F. Modigliani, 1963, The Life-Cycle Hypothesis of Saving : Aggregate Implications and Tests, American Economic Review 53:55-84. 2.Becker, Gary S., 1964, Human Capital, Columbia University Press for N.B.E.R. 3.Becker, Gary S., 1974, A Theory of Marriage, in Economics of the Family, ed. T. W. Schultz, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.299-344. 4.Bigelow, H. F. , 1942, Marriage and the Family, Boston : Heath. 5.Bloom, D. E. , 1984, Putting Off Children, American Demographics, 6(September), pp.30-33, p.45. 6.Bloom, D. E. and N. G. Bennett, 1986, Childless Couples, American Demographics, 8 (August), pp.23-25, pp.54-55. 7.Burr, Wesley R. , 1979, Symbolic Interaction and the Family. In Contemporary Theories about the Family, Vol.1, New York Free Press, pp.42-111. 8.Danko, W. D. and C. M. Schaninger, 1990a, Attitudinal and Leisure Activity Differences across Modernized Household Life Cycle Categories. In Advances in consumer Research, Vol. 17, Prove, UT : Association for Consumer Research, pp.886-894. 9.Danko, W. D. and C. M. Schaninger, 1990b, An Empirical Evaluation of the Gilly and Enis Updated Household Life Cycle Model, Joirma; pf Bisomess Research, 21(August), pp.39-57. 10.Danko, W. D. and C. M. Schaninger, 1993, A conceptual and empirical comparison of alternative household life cycle models. Journal of Consumer Research. 19(March), pp.580-593. 11.Duvall, E. M. , 1971, Family Development, Philadelphia: Lippincott. 12.Duvall and B. Miller, 1985, Marriage Family Development. New York: Harper & Row. 13.Friedman, M. ,1957, A Theory of the Consumption. New Jersey : Princeton University Press. 14.Gilly, M. C. and B. M. Enis, 1982, Recycling the Family Life Cycle: a Proposal for Redefinition. Advances in Consumer Research, p.9, pp.271-276. 15.Hill, Reuben L. and Roy H. Rodgers, 1964, The developmental Approach, in Handbook of Marriage and the Family, ed. Horold T. Christensen, Chicago : Rand McNally, pp.171-211. 16.Mincer, J. , 1958, Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution, Journal of Political Economy, August, pp.281-302. 17.Murphy and W. Staples, 1979, A Modernized Family Life Cycle, Journal of Consumer Research, 6(June), pp.12-22. 18.Nye, F. L. , 1979, Choice, Exchange, and the Family, in Contemporary Theories about the Family, Vol. 2, ed. Wesley R. Burr et al. New York: Free Press, pp.1-41 19.Scanzoni, John H. , 1975, Sex Roles, Lifestyle, and Childbearing: Changing Pattems in Marriage and Family, New York: Free Press. 20.Scanzoni, John H. , 1979, Social Processes and Power in Families, in Contemporary Theories about the Family, New York: Free Press, pp.295-316. 21.Scanzoni, John H. , 1982, Sexual Bargaining-Power Politics in the American Marriage, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 22.Wagner, J. and S. Hanna, 1983, The Effectiveness of Family Life Cycle Variables in Consumer Expenditure Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 10(September), pp.281-291. 23.Wells, w. and G. Gubar, 1966, Life cycle concept in marketing research. Marketing Research, 3(November), pp.355-363. 24.Wilkes, R. E. , 1995, Household Life-Cycle Stages, Transitions, and Product Expenditures, Journal of Consumer Research, pp.22-42. 25.Witt, P. A. and T. L. Goodale, 1981, The relationship between barriers to leisure enjoyment and family stages. Leisure Sciences, 4(1), pp.29-34. 26.Yankelovich, Daniel, 1981, New Rule in American Life: Searching for Self-Fulfillment in a World Turned Upside Down, New York: Random House. | 摘要: | 本文主題為家庭娛樂消遣及教育文化支出之影響因素分析,主要探討家庭在不同生命週期階段與家庭娛樂消遣及教育文化支出情形與影響因素。因此本研究之目的如下: ㄧ、分析家庭娛樂消遣支出在不同家庭生命週期階段之差異情形及影響因素。 二、分析家庭教育文化支出在不同家庭生命週期階段之差異情形及影響因素。 三、提出具體建議,供有關決策單位參考。 本研究係以我國行政院主計處的「台灣地區家庭收支訪問調查」資料庫作為實證分析的資料來源,此項調查抽樣方法採用分層二段隨機抽樣法,以全台灣地區村里為第一抽樣單位,村里內之戶為第二抽樣單位,本研究選取民國93年家庭收支訪問調查資料,作為分析的基礎。在研究方法上,以Ando and Modigliani所提出生命週期理論來說明家庭娛樂消遣支出及教育文化支出在不同家庭生命週期階段之消費行為,並採用Witt and Goodale(1981)的分法,以最小子女的年齡將家庭生命週期劃分為五個階段,以迴歸分析探討差異情形及影響因素。 依本文之研究,扼要地將結論,臚列如下: 一、在不同家庭生命週期階段,家庭娛樂消遣及教育文化支出差異具顯著性,且家庭娛樂消遣支出平均金額差異較小,家庭教育文化支出平均金額差異較大。 二、在不同家庭生命週期階段之家庭娛樂消遣支出,在「戶長個人社 經條件」變數類別方面之影響因素差異大,且影響方向非一致性 ;惟在「家庭概況」變數類別方面之影響因素並無差異,且影響方向具一致性。 三、在不同家庭生命週期階段,家庭娛樂消遣支出之影響因素,大致以「教育程度3」及「家庭可支配所得」對於家庭娛樂消遣支出最具重要影響力並具有顯著性。 四、在不同家庭生命週期階段之家庭教育文化支出,在「戶長個人社經條件」及「家庭概況」變數類別方面之影響因素差異甚大,且 影響方向非一致性。 五、在不同家庭生命週期階段,家庭教育文化支出之影響因素,大致以「年齡」、「教育程度3」及「戶內人口數」對於家庭教育文化支出最具重要影響力並具有顯著性。 關鍵字:娛樂消遣支出、教育文化支出、家庭生命週期 The topic of this paper is to analyze the influential factors of family recreation and education expenditure at different stages of the family life cycle. The objectives of this research are as follow: 1.Analyze the differential condition and influential factors of family expenditure at different stages of family life cycle. 2.Analyze the differential condition and influential factors of family education at different stages of family life cycle. 3.Propose specific recommendation as references for related authority. This research is to use the database of the “Family Income and Expenditure Interview Investigation in Taiwan” of Directorate - General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, as the source of data for the empirical analyses. This sample method is to use stratified random sampling method, the villages in Taiwan as the first sampling unit and the residents of the villages as the second sampling unit, the analysis is base on the data of the family expenditure interview investigation collected in Year 2004. On the research method, use the life cycle theory proposed by Ando and Modigliani to explain the consumption behavior of family recreation and education expenditure at different stages of the family life cycle, as well as using Witt and Goodale's (1981) method, according to the age of the youngest child, separate the household life-cycle into five stages and use regression-analysis to examine differences and influential factors. According to this research, the following are the highlights of the conclusion: 1.At different stages of the family life cycle, there is significant difference in family recreation and education expenditure. The average amount of family recreation as smaller difference and the average amount of family education expenditure has larger significant difference. 2.For the family recreation expenditure at different stages of life cycle, the variable category,“ head of residence's personal social condition” has major differences in the influential factors, and the direction of influence is non-consistent; for the “household's general situation” variable category, the influential factors have no differences and the direction of influence is consistent. 3.At different stages of family life cycle, the “level of education”and“household disposable income” has significant influence on family recreation expenditure. 4.For the family education expenditure, the influential factors of the variable categories, “head of residence's personal social condition” and “household's general situation” have big difference, and the direction of influence is non-consistent. 5.At different stages of family life cycle, the effecting factors of family education expenditure are mainly “age”, “level of education” and “Number of population per residence”, all these factors have significant influence on family education. Keywords : Recreation Expenditure, Education Expenditure, Family Life Cycle |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11455/27898 | 其他識別: | U0005-2007200713345600 |
Appears in Collections: | 應用經濟學系 |
Show full item record
TAIR Related Article
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.