Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/30703
標題: Biosystematics of the galling midge Daphnephila (Diptera:Cecidomyiidae) on Machilus spp. (Lauraceae) in Taiwan
台灣樟科楨楠屬植物造癭癭蚋Daphnephila(雙翅目:癭蚋科)之生物系統分類
作者: Chiang, Tung-Chyuan
江東權
關鍵字: host specificity;寄主專一性;Daphnephila spp.;Machilus spp.;gall morphospecies;morphology;reproductive behavior;Daphnephila;楨楠屬;蟲癭形態種;分生;形態;生殖行為
出版社: 昆蟲學系所
引用: 呂勝由。2008。台灣樟科楨楠屬植物系統分類之研究。國立中山大學生物科學系博士論文。181頁。 周韋汝。2008。探究造癭昆蟲基因分子演化關係及蟲癭組織蛋白質體組成-以樟科楨楠屬植物及癭蚋科昆蟲為例。國立交通大學生化工程研究所碩士論文。136頁。 邱瑞珍 。1958。臺灣昆蟲學文獻索引(1684-1957)。臺灣省農業試驗所特刊第一號 1: 21。 洪士程,何坤耀,陳建忠。2008。嘉義地區新發現荔枝癭蚋(Litchiomyia chinensis) (雙翅目:癭蚋科)為害初報。台灣昆蟲 28: 315-320。 唐昌迪。2008。青剛櫟葉片梭狀癭-造癭癭蚋之生物學與分類。國立中興大學昆蟲學系碩士論文。58頁 翁瑜鞠。2003。台灣中部楨楠屬植物上常見的五種癭蚋蟲癭之比較。國立中興大學生命科學院碩士論文。105頁。 高橋良一。1935。台灣產蟲癭に就こ。科學の台灣 3: 3-8。 梁立明,楊淑燕,楊正澤,陳明義。1999。關刀溪森林生態系變葉新木薑子與長葉木薑子蟲癭之發育。林業研究季刊 21: 75-89。 楊曼妙。1999。蟲癭生物學與進化。昆蟲分類及進化研討會專刊 113-126頁。國立台灣大學昆蟲系及台灣省立博物館出版。 楊曼妙。2007。蟲癭: 昆蟲與植物共舞。科學發展月刊 409: 28-33。 楊淑燕。2001。癭蚋蟲癭應用於台灣楨楠屬植物系統分類之言研究。國立中興大學生命科學院碩士論文。109頁。 楊淑燕。陳明義。楊正澤。2000。台灣的植物癭。行政院農業委員會及中華民國環境綠化協會出版。127頁。 楊遠波,劉和義,呂勝由。1999。台灣維管束植物簡誌第貳卷。行政院農業委員會。352頁。 董景生。2006。由寄主植物、氣候與微環境探討癭蚋科Daphnephila屬昆蟲在台灣樟科楨楠屬植物之分布。國立台灣大學昆蟲學研究所博士論文。162頁。 董景生。2007。香楠抽芽物候期對癭蚋科蟲癭生活史的影響。林業研究專訊14: 5。 趙若凡。香楠葉部的四種癭蚋蟲癭之形態比較。國立成功大學生命科學研究所。62頁。 廖日京。1995。台灣樟科植物之學名訂正(再版)。國立台灣大學農學院森林學系。203頁。 劉業經,呂福原,歐辰雄。1994。台灣樹木誌。國立中興大學農學院出版委員會。925頁。 Abrahamson, W. G., G. Melika, R. Scrafford, and G. Cs&oacute;ka. 1998. Gall-inducing insects provide insights into plant systematic relationships. Am. J. Bot. 85: 1159-1165. Bequaert, J. 1924. Galls that secrete honeydew. A contribution to the problem as to whether galls are altruistic adaptations. Bull. Brooklyn Entomol. Soc. 19: 101-124. Bloch, R. 1965. Abnormal development in plnats: a survey. Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie 15: 145-183. Buhr, H. 1965. Bestimmungstabellen der Gallen (Zoo- und Phytocecidien) an Pflanzen Mittel- und Nordeuropas. Band II. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena. Pp. 763-1572 & 25 pls. with unnumberered facing pages bearing figure legends. Carneiro, M. A. A., C. S. A. Branco, C. E. D. Braga, E. D. Almada, M. B. M. Costa, V. C. Maia, and G. W. Fernandes. 2009. Are gall midge species (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) host-plant specialists?. Revista Brasileira de Entomo. 53: 365-378 Cergo, C. L., A. E. Weis, N. O. Polans, and C. K. Bretz. 1990. Sympatric sibling species from three phenotypically distinct Asteromyia (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) galls on the same host plant species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83: 149-154. Cockerel1, T. D. A. 1890. The evolution ofinsect galls. Entomologist 23: 73-76. Cook, L. G., and P. J. Gullan. 2008. Insect, not plant, determines gall morphology in the Apiomorpha pharetrata species-group (Hemiptera: Cocdea). Aus. J. Entomol. 47: 51-57. Cs&oacute;ka, G. 1997. Plant Galls. Forest Research Institute. Budapest, Hungary. 160 pp. Dawkins, R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection. Oxford Univ. Press. 307pp. Dreger-Jauffret, F., and J. D. Shorthouse. 1992. Diversity of gall-inducing insects and their galls pp. 8-33. In: J. D. Shorthouse, and O. Rohfritsch, eds. Biology of Insect-induced Galls. Oxford Univ. Press. Esp&iacute;rito-Santo, M. M., and G. W. Fernandes. 2007. How many species of gall-inducing insects are there on Earth, and where are they? Entomol. Soc. Am. 100: 95-99. Felt, E. P. 1940. Plant gal1s and gal1 makers. Comstock. Ithaca. 364pp. Felt, E. P. 1965. Plant galls and gall makers. Hafner Publishing Company, Inc., New York. 365pp. Funk, D.J., D.J. Futuyma, G. Orti, and A. Meyer . 1995. Mitochondrial DNA sequences and multiple data sets: a phylogenetic study of phytophagous beetles (Chrysomelidae: Opharaella). Molecular Biology and Evolution 12, 627-640. Gagn&eacute;, R. J. 1994. The gall midges of the Neotropical Region. Cornell Univ. Press. Ithaca. 352pp. Gagn&eacute;, R. J. 2004. A catalog of the Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) of the world. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 408pp. Gagn&eacute;, R. J. 2010. Update for a catalog of the Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) of the world. Digital version 1. Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA. Retrieved from: http:// www.ars.usda.gov/ SP2UserFiles/ Place/ 12 754100/Gagne_2010_World_Catalog_Cecidomyiidae.pdf Harris, M. O., S. P. Foster, K. Agee, and S. Dhana. 1996. Sex pheromone communication in the apple leafcurling midge (Dasineura mali). New Zealand Plant Protection Society (Inc.). 52-58. Inbar, M., M. Wink, and D. Wool. 2004. The evolution of host plant manipulation by insects: molecular and ecological evidence from gall-forming aphids on Pistacia. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 32: 504-511. Inbar, M., I. Izhaki, A. Koplovich, I. Lupo, N. Silanikove, T. Glasser, Y. Gerchman, A. Perevolotsky, and S. Lev-Yadun. 2009. Why do many galls have conspicuous colors? A new hypothesis. Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 4: 1-6. Isidoro, N., I. H. Williams, M. Solinas, and A. Martin. 1992. Mating behaviour and identification of the female sex pheromone gland in the brassica pod midge (Dasineura brassicae Winn.: Cecidomyidae, Diptera). Boll. Ist. Ent. <G. Grandi> Univ. Bologna (47): 27-48 Jaschof, M. 2000. Catotrichinae subfam. n.: a re-examination of higher classification in gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Entomol. Sci. 3: 639-652. Kane, N. A., C. S. Jones, and T. Vuorisalo. 1997. Development of galls on leaves of Alnus glutinosa and Alnus incana (Betulaceae) caused by the Eriophyes laevis (Nalepa). Int. J. Plant Sci. 158: 13-23. Kieffer, J. J. 1905. &Eacute;tude sur de nouveaux insectes et phytoptides gallicoles du Bengale. Annales de la Soci&eacute;t&eacute; Scientifique de Bruxelles. 29: 143-200. Kraus, J. E., R. M. D. S. Isaias, C. Vecchi, and G. W. Fernandes. 2003. Structure of insect galls on two sympatric subspecies of Chrysothamnus nauseosus (Pall. Expursh) Britton (Asteraceae). Bol. Bot. Univ. S&atilde;o Paulo. 21: 251-263. K&uuml;ster, E. 1911. Die Gallen der Pflanzen. Leipzig, S. Hirzel. 437pp. Maia, V. C., G. W. Fernandes, and L. A. Oliveira. 2010. A new species of Bruggmanniella (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Asphondyliini) associated with Doliocarpus dentatus (Dilleniaceae) in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 54: 225-228. Mamaev, B. M., and. N. P. Krivosheina. 1993. The larvae of the gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae). A. A. Balkema Publishers. 293pp. Mani, M. S., 1953. On a collection of plant galls and gall midges from India. Agra Univ. J. Res. 2: 247-266. Mani, M. S., 1964. Ecology of plant galls. Dr. W. Junk Publisher, the Hague, Netherlands. 434pp. McAlpine, J. F. 1981. Morphology and terminology-adults, pp. 9-63. In: J. F. McAlpine, B. V. Peterson, G. E. Shewell, H. J. Teskey, J. R. Vockeroth, and D. M. Wood. eds., Manual of Nearctic Diptera, vol 1. Can. Government Publishing Centre. Hull. Agriculture Canada Monograph No. 27. Meyer, J. 1987. Plant galls and gall inducers. Gebr&uuml;der Borntraeger. Berlin. 291pp. M&ouml;hn, E. 1955. Beitr&auml;ge zur Systematik der Larven der Itonididae (= Cecidomyiidae, Diptera). 1. Teil: Porricondyliinae und Itonidinae Mitteleuropas. Zool. Sci. 105: 1-247. M&ouml;hn, E. 1961. Gallm&uuml;cken (Diptera, Itonididae) aus El Salvador. 4. Zur Phylogenie der Asphondyliidi der neotropischen und holarktischen Regionen. Senck. Biol. 42: 131-330. Moura, M. Z. D., G. L. G. Soares, and R. M. D. Santos lsaias. 2008. Species-specific changes in tissue morphogensis induced by two arthropod leaf gallers in Lantana camara L. (Verbenaceae). Aust. J. Bot. 56: 153-160. Nyman, T., A. Widmer, and H. Roininen. 2000. Evolution of gall morphology and host-plant relationships in wikkow-feeding sawflies (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Evol. 54: 526-533. Nyman, T., F. Bokma, and J. P. Kopelke . 2007. Reciprocal diversification in a complex plant-herbivore-parasitoid food web. BMC Biology. 5: 49-57. Paik, J. C., J. Yukawa, N. Uechi, and S. Sato. 2004. Gall-inducing species of the family Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) recorded from the Korean Peninsula and surrounding islands, in comparison with the gall-midge fauna of Japan. Esakia 44: 57-66. Panelius, S. 1965. A revision of the European gall midges of the subfamily Porricondylinae. Acta Zool. Fen. 113pp. Price, P. W., G. L. Waring, and G. W. Fernandes. 1986. Hypotheses on the adaptive nature of galls. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 88: 361-363. Price, P. W., G. W. Fernandes, and G. L. Waring. 1987. Adaptive nature of insect galls. Environ. Entomol. 16: 15-24. Rohfritsch, O. 1992 Patterns in gall development. pp. 60-87. In: J. D. Shorthouse, and O. Rohfritsch, eds. Biology of Insect-induced Galls. Oxford Univ. Press. Rohfritsch, O., and J. D. Shorthouse. 1982. Insect galls. pp. 131-152. In: G&uuml;nter and J. S. Schell, eds. Molecular Biology of Plant Tumors. Academic Press. Roskam, J. C. 2005. Phylogeny of gall midges (Cecidomyiidae). pp. 305-319. In: A. Rmnan,C. W. Schaefer, and T. M.Withers. Biology, Ecology, and Evilution of Gall-inducing Arthropods. Roskam, J. C. 1992. Evolution of the gall inducing guild. pp. 34-49. In: J. D. Shorthouse, and O. Rohfritsch, eds. Biology of insect-induced galls. Oxford Univ. Press. Sato, S. and J. Yukawa. 2004. Redescription of Hartigiola faggalli (Monzen) comb. n. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) inducing leaf galls on Fagus crenata (Fagaceae) in Japan. Esakia 44: 13-26. Shannon, R. E. and J. W. Brewer. 1980. Starch and sugar levels in three coniferous insect gal1s. Z. Angew. Entomol. 89: 526-533. Shorthouse, J. D., J. J. Leggo, M. D. Sliva, and R. G. Lalonde. 2005. Has egg location influenced the radiation of Diplolepis (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) gall wasps on wild roses? Bas. Appl. Ecol. 6: 423-434. Shorthouse, J. D., D. Wool, and A. Raman. 2005. Gall-induging insects-nature''s most sophisticated herbivores. Bas. Appl. Ecol. 6: 407-411. Skuhrav&aacute;, M., V. Skuhrav&yacute;, and J. W. Brewer. 1984. Biology of gall midges. pp. 169-222. In: T. N. Ananthakrishnan, eds. Biology of gall insects. Oxford and IBH Pub. Co., New Delhi, India. Skuhrav&aacute;, M. 1986. Family Cecidomyiidae, pp. 72-297. In: A. So&oacute;s. Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera. 4. Sciaridae-Anisopodidae. Akademiae Kiado, Budapest. Stern, D. L. 1995. Phylogenetic evidence that aphids, rather than plants, determine gall morphology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 260: 85-89 Stone, G. N., and K. Sch&ouml;nrogge. 2003. The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 512-522. Stone, G. N., and J. M. Cook. 1998. The structure of cynipid oak galls: patterns in the evolution of an extended phenotype. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265: 979-988. Tokuda, M. 2004. Illiciomyia Tokuda, a new genus for Illiciomyia yukawai sp. n. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae: Asphondyliini) inducing leaf galls on Illicium anisatum (Illiciaceae) in Japan. Esakia 44: 1-11. Tokuda, M., K. Tabuchi, J. Yukawa, and H. Amano. 2004b. Inter- and intraspecific comparisons between Asteralobia gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) causing axillary bud galls on Ilex species (Aquifoliaceae): species identification, host range, and mode of speciation. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 957-970. Tokuda, M., and J. Yukawa. 2007. Biogeography and evolution of gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) inhabiting broad-leaved evergreen forests in oriental and eastern palearctic regions. Orient Insects 41: 121-139. Tokuda, M., J. Yukawa, and K. G&ocirc;ukon. 2007. Life history traits of Pseudasphondylia rokuharensis (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) affecting emergence of adults and synchronization with host plant phenology. Environ. Entomol. 36: 518-523. Tokuda, M., J. Yukawa, and W. Suasa-Ard. 2008a. Dimocarpomyia, a new oriental genus of the Tribe Asphondyliini (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Inducing leaf galls on longan (Sapindaceae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 101: 301-306. Tokuda, M., M. M. Yang, and J. Yukawa. 2008b. Taxonomy and Molecular Phylogeny of Daphnephila Gall Midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Inducing Complex Leaf Galls on Lauraceae, with Descriptions of Five New Species Associated with Machilus thunbergii in Taiwan. Zool. Sci. 25: 533-545. Westphal, E.1980. Responses of some Solanaceae to attack by the gall mite Eriophyes cladophthirus. Plant Dis. 64: 406-409. Wood, D. M., and A. Borkent. 1989. Phylogeny and classification of the Nematocera pp. 1333-1370 In: J. F. McAlpine, and D. M. Wood. 1989. Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 3. Can. Goverment Publisging Center. Quebec. Canda. Yang, S. Y., M. Y. Chen, and J. T. Yang. 2002. Application of Cecidomyiid galls to the systematics of the genus Machilus (Lauraceae) in Taiwan. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 43: 31-35. Yukawa, J. 1971. A revision of the the Japanese gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Mem. Fac. Agr. Kagoshima Univ. 8: 1-203. Yukawa, J. 1974. Descriptions of new Japanese gall midges (Diptera. Cecidomyiidae, Asphondyliidi) causing leaf galls on Lauraceae. Kontyu 42: 293-304. Yukawa, J. 1981. Collecting record of the Machilus leaf gall midge, Daphnephila machilicola Yukawa (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) from Formosa. Mem. Kagoshima Univ. Res. Center S. Pac. 2: 49-50. Yukawa, J. 1987. Life history stratigies of univoltine gall making Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) in Japan. Phytophaga 1: 121-139. Yukawa, J . 2000. Synchronization of gallers with host plant phenology. Pop. Ecol. 42: 105-113. Yukawa, J., and N. Ohsaki. 1998. Separation of the Aucuba fruit midge, Asphondylia aucubae sp. nov. from the Ampelopsis friit midge, Asphondylia baca Monzen (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae). Konty&uacute; 56: 365-376. Yukawa, J., and O. Rohfritsch. 2005. Biology and ecology of gall-inducing Cecidomyiidae (Diptera). pp. 273-304 In: A. Raman, C. W. Schaefer, and T. M. Withers eds. Biology, ecology, and evolution of gall-inducing arthropods. Enfield, New Hampshire: Science Publishers. Yukawa, J., N. Uechi, M. Tokuda, and S. Sato. 2005. Radiation of gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in Japan. Bas. Appl. Ecol. 6: 453-461.
摘要: 
造癭昆蟲多為單食性或寡食性,具有寄主及寄生器官專一性,因此蟲癭形狀被視為造癭昆蟲表型的延伸,代表造癭昆蟲種類。本研究以寄生於台灣樟科楨楠屬植物上的雙翅目癭蚋科Daphnephila屬造癭癭蚋為材料,從蟲癭形態、造癭昆蟲分子及形態特徵,以及寄主植物等資訊,探討其分類與親緣關係,並且觀察葉部癭蚋之生殖行為,建立基礎生物學資訊。本研究檢視台灣楨楠屬的所有物種,採集其上發生的蟲癭,依據蟲癭形態、發生位置以及寄主植物物種等資訊,可分為38個形態種,再依其相似性,可歸納為8個蟲癭系列(鼠狀、棒狀、鳥頭狀、壺狀、倒卵狀、小壺狀、梭狀以及針狀),系列間蟲癭形狀有明顯差異,而系列內差異較小。以粒線體基因分析,結果顯示相似蟲癭形態種之造癭癭蚋大都為單系群,且各單系群間彼此有明確分化現象,分化程度界於1.3%~14.3%之間,其中僅有極少數在2%以下,且都集中在棒狀系列中;形態研究顯示寄生於枝條與葉部的癭蚋,兩者在幼蟲胸骨形狀及成蟲外生殖器有明顯差異,但是在枝條蟲癭內或葉部蟲癭之內的各形態種的癭蚋差異較不明顯,但仍有可區辨的微細差異。綜合各項結果,Daphnephila屬癭蚋目前至少可區分出9種(包含已命名之5種)。枝條癭有4種,除了原已命名之D. truncicola,另有3未命名種。葉片癭部分較為複雜,鼠狀系列為一複合種,已命名者有D. taiwanensis,但在分生方面顯現仍有分化中之待釐清的隱藏種;葉片棒狀系列、壺狀系列與鳥頭狀系列蟲癭之造癭者整體呈現複合種的關係,除已描述的棒狀造癭者D. stenocolia以及鳥頭狀造癭者D. ornithocephala,尚包含多個分化中的類群,其中壺狀明顯自成一支,應可確認已獨立分化為新種,其他各型則仍待釐清;而小壺狀系列則應與倒卵狀系列之造癭者D. sueyenae為同一物種。本研究針對標本較為齊全之2新種進行描述,即香楠及霧社楨楠枝條梭狀I型D. sp.1及葉片壺狀D. sp.2。針對葉部癭蚋生殖行為觀察結果,顯示成蟲生殖契合寄主植物物候,雌蟲於初展開的嫩葉產卵,可能藉由費洛蒙吸引雄蟲前來交配,而蟲癭的著生模式決定於雌蟲的產卵行為。整體而言,Daphnephila的各蟲癭系列(除了小壺狀系列以外)可對應各不同癭蚋物種,但系列內的癭形態種則不一定能直接判定為不同癭蚋物種,須從多方面的證據掌握其整體變異,才能綜合釐清分類情形。

Most of gall-inducers are monophagus or oligophagus, which utilize a narrow spectrum of host plants and organs. Diversity of gall inducers and the specific relationship between galling insects and host plants are considered as a consequence of adaptive radiation. Galls could be considered as extension of phenotypes of the gall indusers. This study focused on the relationship between Daphnephila spp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and Machilus (Lauraceae) in Taiwan based on morphological characters of insect and galls, molecular, and biological data in order to clarify the galler taxonomy and the phylogenetic relationship. After examining all the plant species of Machilus in Taiwan, the acquired galls were sorted into 38 morphological species based on their gall shape, galling position, and host plant information. Galls with similar shaped could be further groups into 8 series, i.e., spindle-shaped, needle-like, urn-shaped, little urn-shaped, obovate, club-shaped, bird-head-shaped and ovoid gall serieses. There are significant differences among gall seires but smaller variation within each gall series. Molecular analansis based on gene revealed that most of gall midges with similar shapes (gall morphospecies) are monophyletic group. Clear differentiation ranging from 1.3% to 14.3% exists between each group and only a few less than 2% which is mainly belong to club-shaped series. Morphological differences were found between midges from stem and leaf galls, espcieally on larval spatula and adult genitalia. Only trievial differences could be found for the midges within stem or leaf galling groups. The overall evdiences suggest that there are at least 9 species in Daphnephila, including 5 named species (Daphnephila sueyenae, D. ornithocephaia, D. stenocalia, D. taiwanensis, D. truncicola), and 4 new species. The stem gall midges inculed 1 named species (D. truncicola) and 3 unnamed species. The taxonomy of leaf gall midges are more complicated. The mouse-like gall series is a species complex, which contain D. taiwanensis and a cryptic species. The club-shaped, bird-head-like, and the urned-shaped series formed another species complex, including two named species (D. stenocalia and D. ornithocephala) and a new species (urned-shaped gall inducer). The midges of little urn-shaped gall series are the same species of midges belonging to obovate gall series (D. sueyenae). Field observation on midges indicates the clear synchronization between reproduction of adults and phenology of host plants. Females may secrete pheromone to mate with males and the galling position and patter are determined by females. To sum up, the gall shape series (except for little urn-shaped gall series) reflect the taxonomic status at species category of Daphnephila gall midges, whetheras the variability with gall shape series may not always reflect the species status. It is necessary to obtain eveidences from differet aspects and to integrate the overall variation for making correct taxonomic determination for the gall midges.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/30703
其他識別: U0005-2308201115512500
Appears in Collections:昆蟲學系

Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.