Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/32997
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, S.L.en_US
dc.contributor.author鄭豐邦zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorShiu, W.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, P.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCheng, F.P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Y.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, W.S.en_US
dc.date2009zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-06T07:44:39Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-06T07:44:39Z-
dc.identifier.issn0916-7250zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11455/32997-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this article was to investigate the effects of sedatives and general anesthetics, such as tiletamine-zolazepam, medetomidine, and isoflurane oil the short ERG protocol. Six healthy mongrel dogs were assessed by a convenient short ERG protocol with the owners' consent. The amplitudes of a-wave and b-wave, as well as the implicit time of ERG under different anesthesia statuses, were recorded and analyzed. The amplitudes of ERG waves were not significantly different between tiletamine-zolazepam and medetomidine groups, except in b-wave after 5 min dark adaptation (140 +/- 42 mu V in tiletamine-zolazepam and 101 +/- 32 mu V in medetomidine, p<0.01). The amplitude of ERG recorded in isoflurane (5 +/- 3 mu Vof a-wave and 12 +/- 6 mu V of b-wave under light adaptation; 41 +/- 19 mu V of b-wave after 1 min dark adaptation; 28 +/- 15 of a-wave and 58 +/- 32 /N of b-wave after 5 min dark adaptation) were significantly different from tiletarnine-zolazepain (8 +/- 2 mu V of a-wave and 24 +/- 9 mu V of b-wave under light adaptation; 117 +/- 44 mu V of b-wave after I min dark adaptation; 59 18 IN of a-wave and 140 42 IN of b-wave after 5 min dark adaptation), except in a-wave after I min dark adaptation (39 +/- 13 mu V in tiletamine-zolazepam and 34 +/- 17 mu V in isoflurane). Comment-General anesthesia had significantly lower amplitudes in the dark-adapted group compared with the sedation group. Therefore, tiletamine-zolazepam is a desirable choice for the short ERG protocol in dogs.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USzh_TW
dc.relationJournal of Veterinary Medical Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Veterinary Medical Science, Volume 71, Issue 6, Page(s) 763-768.en_US
dc.subjectelectroretinogramen_US
dc.subjectisofluraneen_US
dc.subjectmedetomidineen_US
dc.subjecttiletamine-zolazepamen_US
dc.subjectmedetomidineen_US
dc.subjecttelazolen_US
dc.subjectretinaen_US
dc.titleThe Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Short Electroretinography Protocol in Dogsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articlezh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextno fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:獸醫學系所
Show simple item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.