Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/34158
標題: 台灣樂活生活型態之測量—台中地區之檢證分析
LOHAS Measurement in Taiwan- A validation in Taichung Area
作者: 黃雅芝
Huang, Ya-Chih
關鍵字: LOHAS;樂活;lifestyle;measurement scale;生活型態;量表
出版社: 生物產業推廣暨經營學系所
引用: 李永展、陳錦賜(2001)。永續發展之反思。建築與規劃學報,2(1),43-57。 邱魏頌正、李梅菲(2002)。行動電話購買行為研究—方法-目的鏈之運用。傳播與管理研究,1(2),213-237。 相元翰(2007)。綠色行銷下消費者之綠色消費行為分析。國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文,新竹市。 梁馨方(2007)。生活型態對綠色消費之影響—量販店消費者之分析。中興大學生物產業推廣暨經營學系碩士論文,台中市。 鄭健雄、劉孟奇(2003)。台灣本土化渡假生活型態量表之建構—以多樣本為基礎之信效度分析。管理學報,20(6),1221-1246。 戴耶芳(2008)。從浪漫主義觀點探討社會行銷取向之初探性研究—以7-11樂活LOHAS行銷為例。世新大學公共關係暨廣告學研究所碩士論文,台北市。 盧妍巧(2007)。樂活(LOHAS)理念行銷之初探。逢甲大學經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,台中市。 外文文獻 Anderson, W. Thomas., & Golden, Linda L. (1984). Lifestyle and psychographics: a critical review and recommendation. Advances in Consumer Research,11(1), 405-411. Ansbacher, Heinz L.(1967). Life style: a historical and systematic review. Journal of Individual Psychology, 23(2), 191-212. Baker, Daniel., Hamshaw, Kelly., & Kolodinsky, Jane. (2009). Journal of Extension, 47(6). Berenson, Mark L., Levine, David M., & Krehbiel, Timothy C. (2009). Basic Business Statistics (11nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Berger, Ida E., & Corbin, Ruth M. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of public Policy and Marketing, 11(2), 79-100. Bloch, Peter H. (1984). The wellness movement: imperatives for health care marketers. Journal of Health Care Marketing,4, 9-16. Brunso, Karen., & Grunert, Klaus G. (1998). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in shopping for food. Journal of Business Research, 42, 145-150. Brunso, Karen., Scholderer, Joachim., & Grunert, Klaus G. (2004). Testing relationship between values and food-related lifestyle: results from two European countries. Appetite, 43, 195-205. Chen, Huei Ju., Hwang, Shiuh Nan., & Lee, Chuan. (2006). Visitors’ characteristics of guided interpretation tours. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1167-1181. Cooper, Donald R., & Schindler, Pamela S. (2008). Business research methods (13nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education. Dunlap, Riley E., Van Liere, Kent D., Mertig, Angela G & Jones, Robert Emmet. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 425-442. Dunlap, Riley E. (2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: from marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 3-18. Field, Andy. (2009). Discovery statistics using SPSS (3nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc. Fraj, Elena., & Martinez, Eva. (2006). Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: an empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(3), 133-144. Fransson, Niklas., & GARrling, Tommy. (1999). Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369-382. Gilg, Andrew., Barr, Stewart., & Ford, Nicholas. (2005). Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Futures, 37, 481-504. Green, Ken., & Vergragt, Philip. (2002). Towards sustainable household: a methodology for developing sustainable technological and social innovations. Futures, 34(5), 381-400. Hair, Joseph F., Black, William C., Babin, Barry J., & Anderson, Rolph E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Herath, Deepananda., Cranfield, John., & Henson, Spencer. (2007). Who consumes functional foods and nutraceuticals in Canada? Results of cluster analysis of the 2006 survey of Canadians’ demand for food products supporting health and wellness. Appetite, 51, 256-265. Hinrichs, C. Clare., & Lyson, Tomas A. (2008). Remaking the North American food system- strategies for sustainability. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Kahle, Lynn R., Beatty, Sharon E., & Homer, Pamela. (1986). Alternative measurement approached to consumer values: the List of Values(LOV) and Values and Life Style(VALS). Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 405-409. Kraft, Frederic B., & Goodell, Phillips W. (1993). Identifying the health conscious consumer. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 13(3), 18-26. Everage, Laura. (2002). Understanding the LOHAS lifestyle. Gourmet Retailer, 23(10), 82-86. Lyson, Thomas A. (2004). Civic agriculture: reconnecting farm, food, and community. MA: Tufts University Press. Lyson, Thomas A., & Guptill, Amy. (2004). Commodity agriculture, civic agriculture and the future of U.S. farming. Rural Sociology, 69(3), 370-385. Lyson, Thomas A. (2005). Civic agriculture and community problem solving. Culture and Agriculture, 27(2), 92-98. Mostafa, Mohamed M. (2006). Antecedents of Egyptian consumers’ green purchase intentions: a hierarchical multivariate regression model. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 19(2), 97-126. Okoli, Chitu., & Pawlowski, Suzanne D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42, 15-29. Plummer, Joseph T. (1974). The concept and application of life style segmentation. Journal of Marketing, 38(1), 33-37. Ray, Paul H., & Anderson, Sherry Ruth. (2000). The culture creatives: how 50 million people are changing the world (pp.35-37). New York: Three Rivers Press. Roberts, James A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36, 217-231. Rowe, Gene., & Wright, George. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 353-375. Scholderer, Joachim., Brunso, Karen., Bredahl, Lone., & Grunert, Klaus G. (2004). Cross-culture validity of the food-related lifestyle instrument (FRL) within Western Europe. Appetite, 42, 197-211. Seyfang, Gill. (2006). Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: examining local organic food networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 383-395. Smithers, John., Lamarche, Jeremy., & Joseph, Alun E. (2008). Unpacking the terms of engagement with local food at the farmers’ market: insights from Ontario. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 337-350. Stagl, Sigrid. (2002). Local organic food market: potentials and limitations for contributing to sustainable development. Empirica, 29, 145-162. Stern, Paul C. (1992). Psychological dimension of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269-302. Thogersen, John., & Olander, Folk. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: a panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 605-630. Van Liere, Kent D., & Dunlap, Riley E. (2008). The ''new environmental paradigm''. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 19-28. Weigel, Russell., & Weigel, Joan. (1978). Environmental concern: the development of a measure. Environment and Behavior, 10(1), 3-15. Wilkins, Jennifer Lynn. (2005). Eating right here: moving from consumer to food citizen. Agriculture and Human Values, 22, 269-273. 網路資料 Brundtland Report. (n. d.) Encyclopedia of the Atmospheric Environment. Retrieved November 7, 2008, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ace.mmu.ac.uk/eae/Sustainability/Older/Brundtland_Report.html Do lifestyle changes improve health? (2009, January 9). World Health Organization. Retrieved March 14, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/multimedia/podcasts/2009/lifestyle-interventions-20090109/en/ The VALSTM Segments. (n. d.) SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. Retrieved June 14, 2010, from the World Wide Web: http://www.strategicbusinessinsights.com/vals/
摘要: 
LOHAS has been a prevalent slogan in Taiwan since in recent years. However, the strict definition of LOHAS is unclear so far. In order to comprehend LOHAS deeply, the purpose of this research has twofold. The first one is to construct a Taiwanese LOHAS measurement scale, and the second is to apply this scale to consumers for validation. Since food-related lifestyle is most familiar to us, this study cross-validated consumers separately from food-related consumption modes of commodity and civic agriculture. By comparing their differences of LOHAS measures, the researcher can go further in validating LOHAS measurement scale.
Delphi method in this research contained 2 steps, and it was used to develop and design dimensions of LOHAS lifestyle measurement scale. Those dimensions established at the first step consequently contributed to scale building. After constructing the scale, an expert analysis and survey was performed to confirm the reliability and validity of the scale. A combination of systematic and quota-sampling was executed to pick out and recruit consumers for data collection.
Several statistical methods were employed to validate the reliability and validation of LOHAS scale, such as factor analysis, cluster analysis, ANOVA, and cross-tabulation analysis. Factor analysis was performed to extract LOHAS items into 16 factors, and then these factors were used by cluster analysis to classify consumers into 5 groups. According to the results, the reliability and validity of LOHAS scale were proven to be acceptable.

近十年來,樂活的概念在媒體與企業的推波助瀾下已在台灣蔚為風潮。然而至今台灣多數與樂活相關的研究仍著重於商機評估和消費者人數預測,對於樂活的定義仍不明確,學術研究也付之闕如。為深入探究台灣樂活生活型態,本研究嘗試建構台灣本土的樂活生活型態量表,為了確立量表的適切性,同時蒐集實際樣本檢證之。本研究假設商品型農業和市民農業消費者存在樂活程度上的差異,因此欲運用量表來衡量此兩型態消費者的樂活程度以確立量表效度。簡言之,本研究目的有二,一為建構台灣本土樂活生活型態量表;二則為實際運用此量表以探究其適切性。
量表構面的建構先是透過兩回合的德菲法匯集專家意見而成,隨後根據各構面蒐集相關題項以完成量表建構。量表題項共計59題,透過攔截式的訪問共蒐集453筆觀察值。
資料分析則先以探索性因素分析將樂活變項簡化為16個因素,接續又進行集群分析將研究對象區分成5個集群,依其樂活特質分別命名為:充實生活族、自律儉樸族、平淡生活族、務實求是族和寄情工作族;後續則再透過交叉檢證來確立因素分析與集群分析的準確性。在效度的部分則以農產品消費型態與樂活集群的關聯性分析和農產品消費型態之因素分析結果比較來檢證效標關聯效度之同時效度。結果顯示,樂活生活型態量表的信、效度皆在可接受的範圍內。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/34158
其他識別: U0005-0107201022394800
Appears in Collections:生物產業管理學系

Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.