Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/34785
標題: 滯洪及沉砂池設計常見問題
The Review for the Design of the Detention and Deposit Pond
作者: 吳日凱
Wu, Jih-Kai
關鍵字: 水土保持計畫;soil and water conservation plan;滯洪沉砂池;水土保持計畫審查意見;detention and deposit ponds;reviews of soil and water conservation plan
出版社: 水土保持學系所
引用: 行政院農業委員會水土保持局(2006),水土保持相關法規彙編。 王宗敦(2003),滯洪池水文設計之研究,國立台灣大學碩士論文。 江金鴻(2001),滯洪池洪峰削減率影響因子之研究,國立屏東科技大學碩士論文。 吳輝龍(2004),水土保持法制之研析,中華水土保持學報,第35卷,第4期,287-294。 吳嘉俊(2005),水土保持計畫與技術規範之實務分析,行政院農業委員會編號SWCB-94-117。 林昭南、黃宏斌(2004), 水土保持計畫審核與監督實務,中華水土保持學報,第35卷,第4期,331-338。 林昭遠(2006),山坡地管理作業參考手冊,,行政院農業委員會編號SWCB-95-052。 林俐婷(2007),水土保持計畫審查意見爭議之探討,國立中興大學碩士論文。 許桂端(2006),水土保持計畫審查之研究,國立中興大學碩士論文。 曾志銓(2001),滯洪池系統最佳化之研究,國立中央大學碩士論文。 黃宏斌(2006) ,研編水土保持計畫施工監督檢查標準作業流程,行政院農業委員會編號SWCB-95-057。 楊宏敏(2006),水土保持計畫施工檢查表格之研究,國立中興大學碩士論文。 陳重光(2006),水土保持治理與管理介面之初步探討,坡地防災學報,第5卷,第1期。 陳重光(2006),從『水土保持管理』談簡易水土保持申報書之效果、責任與誤用,水土保持法律學術研討會p65-p136。 陳立晃(2007),水土保持計畫施工檢查之研究,國立中興大學碩士論文。
摘要: 
對於開發所導致過量地表逕流及泥砂的處理,須根據「水土保持技術規範」規定設置適當之滯洪沉砂設施,以降低因開發而增加下游地區洪峰流量及泥砂之衝擊。因此滯洪沉砂設施便成為水土流失控制成敗之關鍵;完善之水土保持相關法規、技術規範及設計和專業技師在水土保持業務上所擔負之責任與角色就益顯重要。
本研究重心為藉彙整水土保持計畫審查意見有關於滯洪沉砂設施的部分,予以分類、統整、整理分析常見審查意見討論並提出建議,提供水保技師與相關人員參考。根據本研究整理結果發現五大常見問題:各部分入流及出流的銜接與高程不當、滯洪量或泥沙生產量估算錯誤、排放口公式使用錯誤、滯洪量體或沉砂量體計算錯誤、攔汙柵型式不當,由此可知設計者在此部份之設計較易發生疏忽,因此,未來從事設計或審查時應加強考量此部份,藉此提高滯洪沉砂設施設計品質、降低犯錯之可能、縮短審查流程,以促進提高整體水土保持工作之品質與效率。

To cope with excess surface runoff and sediments elicited by land development and reduce the consequent increase of peak flows and sediments downstream, proper detention and deposit facilities should be constructed based on Soil and Water Conservation Technical Guide. In other words, detention and deposit ponds are the key preventers of water loss and soil erosion. Besides, applicable laws and regulations of soil and water conservation, proper designs and engineers' professionalism are also crucial in this matter.
This research paper is targeted at the collection and analyses of all detention and deposit pond related issues covered in investigators' reviews of soil and water conservation plans. Most frequent problems and reviews would be analyzed, and potential solutions and advice discussed as reference for all soil and water conservation professionals. The research findings reveal the following five most frequently encountered problems—elevation differences between outfalls and infalls, miscalculation of detention volume or sediment yield, misuse of formulas for outfalls, miscalculation of regulated detention volume or regulated sediment yield (safety coefficients included), and inappropriate forms of trash racks. Facility designers and investigators should pay more attention to these most frequently overlooked details so as to increase the quality of detention and deposit facilities, reduce potential mistakes, shorten the time invested in all investigations and promote better quality and efficiency of works in soil and water conservation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/34785
其他識別: U0005-1808200911400200
Appears in Collections:水土保持學系

Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.